Isn't the irony wonderful? How leftist women change their appearance like this to be 'rebellious' or 'unique', but all end up looking alike? Why has the septum piercing, died hair, tumblr aesthetic gained so much popularity lately?
They are called special snowflakes for a reason.
The clean-cut conservative look is the new 'rebellious' look for men. Housewife attire and demeanor for women.
Not sure what the fuck happened either.
>>71389903
The same reason why morons think that using the term "corporate" as an epithet is rebellious. Or why man-bunned beard fags will post 15+ statuses of their super-fucking-awesome tattoos and then say "I don't give a fuck what people think."
Long story short: People want to be non-conformists, but only if it's socially acceptable. Sound retarded? Nobody ever said millennials were intelligent. Or anyone who did was probably as stupid as they are.
What is most reliable major media and why is it BBC?
I actually have been watching CNN but recently I found that BBC is much better to know global news. I also like TYT to know american politics.
Tell me your story. bro
>>71389710
British people are generally gay so don't use BBC
>>71389710
BBC radio just outright lies.
>BBC
>TYT
>reliable
I thought Japs were supposed to be smart.
>11 million germans surrender in WWII
>2/3 of entire Wehrmacht/SS
>More than every other European combatant COMBINED
>No meaningful resistance post-occupation, something even Albania and Ethiopia managed
Why were Nazi's such cowards, /pol/?
The last few months were a brutal fight. The Germans had to resort to sending children and old men to fight. I wouldn't say they were cowards, they gave it all they had. Their spirits were completely broken in the end.
Also if this post ends in doubles Germany rises up and sends all Muslims to concentration camp.
They pissed of the entire western world and they were going to get ass blasted if they surrendered. They basically did, anyway, but surrender would have drastically lowered the loss of life.
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-how-to-hack-an-election/
>Money was no problem. At one point, Sepúlveda spent $50,000 on high-end Russian software that made quick work of tapping Apple, BlackBerry, and Android phones. He also splurged on the very best fake Twitter profiles; they’d been maintained for at least a year, giving them a patina of believability.
>Sepúlveda managed thousands of such fake profiles and used the accounts to shape discussion around topics such as Peña Nieto’s plan to end drug...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
The amount of Trump shills says you might have a point.
I don't think we're important enough for such things, though I guess it could happen. I think most of the people crying "SHILL!" just don't have a good response so that is what they have to fall back on.
Its not hard to spot the ones pushing an agenda and the ones just here to shitpost.
After all, 4chan is satire and not to be taken seriously.
So why would thousands of people come here each day expecting to be treated seriously?
You fucking faggot.
@RALLY NOW https://youtube.com/watch?v=pPsliR232oc
>Previous Thread: >>71943139
VOTER REGISTRATION DEADLINES:
CT- 4/25 in-person (12 a.m. EST) http://www.sots.ct.gov/sots/cwp/view.asp?a=3179&q=489908
WA- 4/25 online & 5/16 in-person
OREGON- 4/26
NEW MEXICO- 5/10
NJ- 5/17
CALIFORNIA, S. DAKOTA- 5/23
*URGENT* PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS:
>You will be voting for 3 DELEGATES on the 26th
>Your...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
/MELANIAGEN/
It's time for a woman to stand her ground.
One that all our young ladies will be proud to look up to.
She will be an idol for all young girls across the United States, and perhaps, even the world.
A star that will reign supreme: there she is! Miss Melania Trump — First Lady to our President of the United States, Donald J. Trump!
>Ms. Melania: She Votes NY! A Day in the Life... Stride in Heels!
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/melania-trump-votes-ny-primary-38518181
>Ms....
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
MOVEMENT
>>71946558
>RALLY NOW
https://youtube.com/watch?v=OpPdNcO_P0E ENG
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Qzn_d6GHSv4 DTS
https://youtube.com/watch?v=AkBBGlFS3KY NU
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Twt-G_NjTlA LB
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkBBGlFS3KY NU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpPdNcO_P0E ENG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrjGb6otxUg PP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twt-G_NjTlA LB2016
https://youtube.com/watch?v=pPsliR232oc RSB
Chick was hot as hell in high school. Marxism got ahold of her life and destroyed it. 4 years after graduation I message her what I've thought for years
>>71389139
>something worth dying for
please tell me this is fake
>>71389207
It's obviously fake
Lol she probably thinks you are a weird fuck
You're thoughts on the latest Trump MAGA Train?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aj_IsiMA4G4
>>71389044
Your... Fuck I'm a cuck...
>>71389044
>MUH 7/11
>Appeal to emotion
lol
Trump is getting desperate
It was a reference to a fire station numbered 711.
You faggots are grasping for straws. Build the wall
who here can't wait for sanders to lose tomorrow?
The asspain will be delicious.
i know im no americano, but even shillary is thousand times better than this commie and thats something
>>71389034
who /newyork/ here?
can't wait for tomorrow
AI has taken over. Censoring written word and image/video is trivial now. It's not just a matter of site operators 'deleting' content. Negative feedback can be generated in huge volume in a believable way with AI in order to turn people off to certain ideas.
People have the instinct to try to fit in. Their opinions in the moment can be and very often are influenced by simple expressions of opinion like a one-sentence comment, especially if there are many such comments all agreeing.
This is the cutting edge of the media. Instead of just presenting ideas and implying their popularity, the ideas can be presented and the appearance of their popularity can not just be implied, but asserted with fabricated evidence. The fact that people emotionally identify with expressions as simple as snippets of text is being exploited to gain a great amount of leverage in influencing their minds.
It's as simple as this: people see that they can post anything they want online, they see their expression appear in the public setting, they see people they know respond, and can respond in turn.
This builds the very deep expectation that anything they see in the same place or in a similar place was made by a person more or less like them.
But it's not necessarily true in every case.
The implications of AI in society are complex. Basically, anyone who has enough computing resources can influence public opinion through the internet in an extremely powerful way that exceeds any other technique in history by far.
How can you deny that this is at very least a possibility? The technology and resources have existed for a long time and such practices would be extremely profitable. There is no possible argument against these facts.
Basically the internet has turned into and is becoming more so a thought feedback machine that puts down "unpopular" ideas and shoves them to places with no audience.
Let me just summarily counter some obvious objections:
1 The straw-man examples that microsoft has been advertising and posting all over the internet (especially on 4chan) of the "nazi chatbot" and "pretty awful image interpreter" will be cited. "THE CUTTING EDGE IS NOT THAT SHARP" they will say. These examples are not the cutting edge. These are toy versions of the real thing that are allotted a trivial amount of computing power and opened up to the public to guide their perceptions of the state of the art.
The examples brought forth by...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
2) CAPTCHA etc. are easily solved with computing power that is not expensive for large companies OR governments. CAPTCHA etc. serve only to prevent people with less computing power from doing the same thing as people with more computing power. Such controls are generated algorithmically and can be partially cracked algorithmically and then the results in specific cases can be analyzed with AI to come up with an approximate solution that is likely to be correct.
3) The most obvious path to refutation (what the shills would say first) would be "people think for themselves...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I guess pol is too stupid to have this discussion
Explain /pol/
BUY THE MEN'S PRODUCT THEN YOU DUMBFUCK
We wuz kingz ?
>>71388932
There is nothing stopping you buying the cheaper razor and using it.
You choose to pay more for something that appeals to you.
/pol/ all i want to do is get drunk all day everyday
how do i stop this degeneracy?
>>71388843
start exercising. The two are incongruous and your body will make you want to quit drinking.
>>71388843
I fell for the STEM meme
Do you believe that black people in America today deserve reparations?
>>71388784
Yes, the black people in America today should pay reparations to all their victims.
>>71388859
FPBP
>>71388784
>affirmative action, gov't programs, free education, diversity hirings, and financial aid aren't reparations already
they already got it, now they just got to fucking earn it
Political Compass Thread: Crowd Chart Edition
Do the test here: https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
Post your results afterwards with the following:
A Name to put on the crowd chart
The Chart that you got at the end of the test
The Numbers that you got
Basically, just do the same thing that I do (first post)
After the first 30 valid posts, the chart will be created.
I'll just be called OP, naturally.
Quick Bump
>>71943646
trunks
1.13
3.13
these tests are dumb as fuck tho, measure 20 different opposing metrics and then stick a dot on a graph
What a fuckin idiot why did he do this?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=aj_IsiMA4G4
https://youtube.com/watch?v=aj_IsiMA4G4
https://youtube.com/watch?v=aj_IsiMA4G4
Right before the NY primary too
You just KNOW he's a Hillary plant at this point
7/11 was a part time job
Trump did 7/11. Don't you get it? It was all staged.
>>71388753
>it's very close to my heart
Cherry/Coca-Cola mix is the best Slurpee senpai
So who *realistically* has a chance of winning the election?
Trump, cause you cant stump him
>>71388651
Hillary is going to win, but she's going to be a one term President. Trump has been flailing around a lot and it's going to be difficult to convince people that he is seriously ready to be Presiddent of the United States of America.
Hillary is a piece of shit and will be a single term President.
Hillary will win