What went wrong /pol/?
>>73005111
[citation needed]
>>73005207
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/05/04/upshot/electoral-map-trump-clinton.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0
>>73005111
Nothing, from the looks of it.
Explain this/pol
WE
>>73005170
WUZ
a very simple way to know why Jesus wasn't a nigger or a sandnigger
>Ephesians 4:28
>He who steals must steal no longer; but rather he must labor, performing with his own hands what is good, so that he will have something to share with one who has need.
Scientifically speaking, why is homosexuality abnormal, even if there are some cases of homosexuality in other species?
they dont reproduce so it wouldnt be good for a species to have too many homosexuals
>>73004964
"sexual attraction" as identity is a human invention , and one that came about roughly 40 years ago.
Animals perform homosexual acts but eventually get around to breeding. Faggots never do this.
>>73004964
There is cannibalism, war, rape, murder, pedophilia, incest, etc., in animals too, should we accept these?
Daily reminder that only us Whites are allowed to have Asian women.
>asian men can't compete with our 'real' cock
>nogs and spics can't compete with our 'real' brain
Fuck off race mixing loser
Waito piggu go home!
>>73004886
>Going full on"muh dick muhfugguh"
Alright buddy, let's just become niggers.
OH BOY
forgot source http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/05/us/islamic-state-war-powers-lawsuit-obama.html?_r=0
OY VEY IM BEING SLID
>>73005084
Here's a bump it's been happening to my all day bro
>Why aren’t you guys quoting Nate Silver anymore? Because he’s a crock.
>He hasn’t been ‘mistakenly’ wrong. He has been wrong again, and again, and again. Check it out.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/03/the-man-behind-the-hilarious-conservative-pundit-parody-account-speaks-out/
>>73004491
>Everyone is going to be looking at the Trump vs. Clinton general election from the prism of 2000 battleground. “First, let us give these states to Clinton, those states to Trump, and focus on the one or few battleground states.” 2000 was close because both candidates sucked. Gore? Bush Jr.? 2004 was also close because both candidates sucked. Bush Jr.? Kerry? 2008 was completely misread by people since 2006 was misread by people. Democrats won control of the House in 2006 due to conservative districts punishing Republican GW Bush Administration by voting for the Democrat. After all, Obama campaigned on lower taxes, stronger military, etc. Carville hilariously wrote a book saying that there would be 40 more years of Democratic control. 2012, you have Obama vs Romney, a terribel candidate.
>Here is why 2016 won’t be ‘close’ in the perspective of 2000 type ‘battleground’ scenarios and ‘ground game’ crap.
>>73004560
>First, I think we are in a Re-Alignment. I know this is said every election, but we are due for one. Liberal and Conservative alignment is dead. What is happening is a Globalist vs Nationalist alignment. Republicans would be very smart to have Trump help undergo the alignment of Republicans into Nationalists. The Democrats, especially with their super-delegate bullshit, are delaying their inevitable re-alignment into a Globalist Party. They will get there, but it may be a shellacking for a general election or two in order to get it.
Second, most people reading this site have never seen a true landslide election. The strangest general election ever was Carter’s. Reagan and Nixon won 49 states in two of their elections. The point is that the 2000-ish ‘this is going to be CLOSE and battleground states OMG’ type thinking may not apply here. It could very well be a blowout. Trump, like Reagan and Nixon, will get Democrat votes. Laffer, from the infamous Laffer’s Curve, predicts Republican candidate to win 47 states. He predicts this because he has seen Nixon and Reagan elections because in those cases the Democratic Party put up a ‘machine candidate’ who just royally sucked. Hillary Clinton royally sucks. I think she is the worst (electoral wise) candidate the Democrats could have chosen. They could have put in anyone else.
>>73004700
>Third, Hillary Clinton will be the first time we have ever had a female Presidential candidate. How will people respond? I do not think they will respond well. So many women do not want a female president. We have had two instances of female VP picks. Mondale in 1984 (lost 49 states) and McCain in 2008 (big loss). Cruz had Fiorina as a VP pick before Indiana primary and Cruz got blown out. Inside the beltway thinking says it is good to put up female VP candidates, but the public doesn’t seem to agree. Based on this, a main female presidential candidate will likely be blown out.
>Fourth, Hillary Clinton has the most baggage I’ve ever seen a political candidate have. It goes beyond the emails and money cheating. I am talking Monica Lewinsky and all the other bimbo eruptions. Many young people did not live through that. They will be shocked that Hillary Clinton stuck by and allowed Bill Clinton to humiliate her again and again. I expect young feminists to vote against Hillary Clinton because of that.
Dearest /pol/, house of Trump, I fear you have a false image of what a liberal is. Today, on my college campus, I had a discussion with some of my other faggoty ilk. You imagine this living human thumb to be representative of us, it is not. We were discussing that abomination, and the concept of safe spaces and trigger words. Ultimately, and unanimously, we came to the same conclusion; this behavior is unacceptable and completely at odds with the theory of inclusion we operate on.
Liberalism is at its core a laissez-faire philosophy. According to Sidney Fine, "Just as liberals supported freedom of thought in the intellectual sphere, so were they equally prepared to champion the principles of free trade and free competition in the sphere of economics." My interpretation, and the interpretation of my fellow lefty-fags, suggests that through inclusion and open mindedness the inherently superior ideologies, philosophies, and cultural motifs will naturally rise to the top. Safe spaces are anathema to this idea. So you fucking nazi shits, truce?
Nobody gives a shit.
>>73004122
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Nowadays, "liberals" are more akin to Stalinists in the making. While people will shit on you, many share your point of view; the libertarian /pol/ is big.
You're not a liberal anymore; the movement betrayed you.
Also, don't come to someone's house to insult them and then expect respect, you fucking wormbrain waste of aminoacids.
Europeans please move to the USA. Your countries are cucked. There is no hope for many European countries such as Sweden, Germnay, France, Denmark, UK (unless BREXIT), and many others.
Here in America we will play soccer with you, drink with you, and welcome you with open arms. The USA needs more white people. Get out before the brown hordes overwhelm you
>>73066960
>UK (unless BREXIT)
They're fucked anyway. Islam is more rampant in the UK than anywhere else in Europe.
>>73066960
>no alps
>no cheese
>no charcuterie
>no alizée
>no rafales
yeah no thanks
>>73066960
I'm planning to senpai, but it ain't as easy as hopping a fence
It seems like renting is better than owning a home.
>Renting gives you more options (i.e. getting a cheaper/more expensive apartment)
>Moving is much easier
>Repairs, landscaping, and upkeep falls on the landlord
>Thanks to expenses like the property tax, you never stop paying for your house even after the mortgage is payed.
>>73004095
In general, property prices go up, though. If you rent for 10 years, you're out all that money. If you own for 10 years, you have the value you paid off plus whatever the property appreciated for. You're right on those other points, though. It is easier to move and some of the upkeep is a pain in the ass.
We bought our first house in Chicagoland in 1999 for $270K. In late 2007 we sold it for $410K. Same year we bought a house in Columbus OH for $379K. It's now worth $350K. We have 3 acres and the nearest neighbor is 1000ft away.
We owe $78K on it. Sooo... we've done OK. I particularly enjoy walking on the back deck in my underwear and a cup of coffee, cranking up the speakers whenever I want, and not ever having to deal with HOAs.
Our next house it going to be cash deal with money in escrow for property taxes.
>>73004299
Is there any benefit to having your home's value increase if you don't intend to sell it though? Say you've raised your children in the same home for those ten years; you don't want to sell your home (which has risen in value). Are you just paying more in property taxes since your home's value increased?
It is literally time to mother FUCK the government. We are FREE MEN.
FUCK THE GOVERNMENT.
WE ARE FREE MEN. FUCK YOU
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/05/05/feds-expected-announce-final-e-cigarette-rule-could-nearly-ban-them/83951786/
>>73065439
Get ready for plenty of fedora tipping posts from /pol/'s resident statists.
>>73065439
I still can't believe how utterly SAD+MAD the tobacco industry got because of vaping
Payed online canadians on /pol/ shilling cigarettes soon.
>>73065439
Get a boat and go out to sea, that's the closest place without a government.
Time to start a white colony in Siberia, lads!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3573199/Russia-offers-person-FREE-land-long-frozen-wastelands-country-s-Far-East.html
olde threade >>72984549
>>73003926
there is a reason people didn;t settle there and passed the land bridge to america thousands of years ago.
just leave that land I dont understand why he wants to develop it
Leave it as wilderness
Ancient forests and things that should just remain untouched in my opinion
conditions arent the best to live in either
>>73004203
sounds like a challenge
>>73004203
>there is a reason people didn;t settle there and passed the land bridge to america thousands of years ago.
because its fucking cold and in the middle of nowhere
we know how to build superinsulated structures and grow food in cold climates.
Do you hear that giant sucking sound?
It's /pol/ getting ready to apologize to the original Donald Trump.
We didn't recognize sir. You were a generation too early. You could have stopped it.
>>73003866
He was right about everything he said.
Too bad he quit the race, and got back in. He was leading in some national polls. Because of him we got Clinton. And now we have to deal with Cunt-on.
>>73003866
This.
Who is he?
I believe that is the hacker known as "4chan"
>>73003841
Max hardcore?
>>73004051
guess again
Holy fuck is there a man more delusional than Al "WE WUZ KINGS N SHEET" Sharpton?
WE
WE
WUZ
kek, is Bernie actually going to take this to the end?
But the superdelegates are all going to switch to Sanders.
>>73003708
Guccifer
>>73003761
Because...
