What kind of edit is that /p/?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 96 dpi Vertical Resolution 96 dpi Image Created 2016:01:01 18:20:07 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 720 Image Height 1080
>>2842974
Raised black point and lowered white point on a photo of dark subjects lit by flash.
>>2842977
this?
>>2842980
Raised black point and poorly applied high contrast on a dark scene lit by soft light. Probably either an overcast sky, or a clear sky with the sun blocked by the building they're leaning against.
>>2842982
So all of these edits are done by messing with levels/curves on photoshop right?
>>2842983
every edit is
>>2842985
Yes but they messed JUST with that right?
>>2842993
With just a cursory glance at the images, and no forensic style evaluation, yeah, that's how you'd duplicate the looks. No telling specifically how they did it for those images, but if you had a normal file of the same scene, you could replicate the look with a curves adjustment layer.
Id bang em
>>2843028
I'd mess with their curves if you know what I mean
:^)
>>2843076
Kek
>>2842974
Holy shit is that Matt Granders black daughter?
>>2842974
and this is why I hate the current generation...
I hate these images because I cannot discern their actual skin color and thus it is ambiguous if would or would not bang
>>2843286
GRANGER
>>2843374
you know it very well she's a mud, and you'd fuck her all the same anon. There you go, being honest is not all that difficult.
>>2843374
>2000 + 16
>predicating bangability on skin tone and not appreciating all colors of the rainbow.
Ishygddt diggity doo
>>2842974
i'd totally lick ketchup off that white girls belly
as for the right one, i'm /pol/ so yeah... no ;^)
>>2843693
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
