Whats the difference between these? Is the red writing version better?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 120 dpi Vertical Resolution 120 dpi Image Created 2016:05:17 18:35:56 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1201 Image Height 588
>>2841398
Whats the gear thread? Is using google better?
>>2841398
Both shit anyway.
Beroflex 28mm f2.8, or japan-made Pentacon.
>>2841398
none of them is good, as both are old pentacon
if you're going to be this finicky, at least get enough money to buy a reknowed good lens before
there's no such thing as good old ussr/gdr obscure lenses, that's a meme: the quality control in general was very poor; so 90% of the time they're shitty lenses (especially after 40 years of use)
>>2841398
One has electric contacts (not digital) the other doesn't. Both are shit lenses even for crop. I have one, considering trashing it.
Pentagon with text MC is multicoated lens. In some situations they are great lenses!
>>2841439
>there's no such thing as good old ussr/gdr obscure lenses, that's a meme
how about the zenitar.
>>2842471
>how about the zenitar.
>the quality control in general was very poor; so 90% of the time they're shitty lenses
the only real benefit of zenitars are exquisite focal lengths and lens designs at very low price
if one could flip through a batch of zenitars, surely one would find a good lens; but there's no such thing as they're traded on ebay etc, really a hit-or-miss
