>Please Please Me: 1/2
>With the Beatles: 1/2
>AHDN: 1/2
>Beatles for Sale: 1/2
>Help!: 2/2
>Rubber Soul: 2/2
>Revolver: 2/2
>SPLHCB: 2/2
>MMM: 2/2
>The Beatles (disc 1): 2/2
>The Beatles (disc 2): 1/2
>Yellow Submarine: 1/2
>Abbey Road: 2/2
>Let it Be: 1/2
>Let it Be... Naked: 2/2
are you rating albums on a 2 point scale
>>66111389
Yes, it's the only non-pretentious way to rate albums. Consider killing yourself if you rate anything with 1-10 or 1-5.
Rubber Soul is a 2/5.
>>66111444
nice double-trips-dubs
>>66111444
those fucking digits goddamn
I agree with most of these but make Help! 1/2 and disc 2 a 2/2
What's the best versions of their discography?
2009 remasters?
>>66111215
why not 0/1? I like your binary system of rating and it makes a lot of sense to me but using 1 and 2 instead of 0s and 1s is faggotry. 0 (lack of positive response to an album), 1 (positive response).
>>66111444
dubs-trips-trips confirms it, this is my new way of rating. 2/2 post lad
>>66113566
why is MMT over there?
>>66111444
I like it. It's a simple way of saying what's bad, good, and great. Thanks for the new rating system.
>>66113566
>AHDN
>6
kys
>HELP
>5
KYS pls
Early beatles is so unappreciated
>>66111215
Do you realize that no album can be 2/2 or 0/2 so the only rating you can give is 1/2?
