I do not understand the appeal of this band at all...
I'm sure if you heard it in the 70s you could be excused for finding it amazing, trippy, revolutionary etc but it just does not hold up today. I like me some ambient but there's just nothing to hold onto here.
>>60675279
Nothing wrong with that OP. It's the same with Pet Sounds, Doolittle and all Tangerine Dream for me; I appreciate that they were innovative at the time, but after hearing so much similar music, those albums just put me into a deep coma.
>>60675279
Too bad that you don't like TD. However, they changed their style during the years. Just 4 examples:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O95GrfhmkM0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2vKRdK_PXM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obukg_6thhE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K6BhBqa6aE
I like the first 2 I-box CD's.
>>60675279
I love TD, but seldom listen to Phaedra or Rubycon. Alpha Centauri and Zeit are the ones I listen to heavily. Those and Edgar Froese's brilliant solo stuff.
>>60675330
>Doolittle
>deep coma
lol. What the hell are you usually listening, death metal?
I agree that it doesn't hold up as well as some of the other synth stuff of the period. I still enjoy Phaedra from time to time though.
>>60675420
>some of the other synth stuff of the period
Like what?
>>60675561
Oxygene for example.
>>60675561
early Popol Vuh
Klaus Shulze
Cluster
Harmonia
>>60675738
Oxygene still soudns fresh.
