This is my rifle, this is my gun Edition
Old Thread: >>29643348
>GC didn't make this thread.
Confirmed for real edition.
MUUHREEN DEBIL DOGE
>Primary
>Arms
>Micro
>Dot
>™
>>29647322
Fag
>>29647322
Am I the knew PA shill instead of you nick?
"There is literally nothing wrong with the Primary Arms MD-ADS"
>>29647330
it is bretty good :^
>>29647318
I have real ones
>>29647330
Is the MD-ADS supposed to be bad?
>>29647308
b-but the no sales tax!
and I can also sell long guns to you
How much for a "good" AR--all parts?
>>29647364
1000-2000 shekels
>>29647360
me2
>>29647363
i can get long guns myself, what i need is a handgat
>>29647364
why do people ask these vague af questions
>>29647364
1500 and u have a god tier ar
>>29647373
thats not real ones bro those are fakes have fun with ur potmetal
>>29647361
No, it's a joke, but it's actually great I love it.
>>29647352
Honestly, it's not too shabby, if I get another I'll probably get the cheaper one for something shittier
>>29647327
Thanks~
>>29647330
If the glove fits then you must wear it.
>>29647364
Depends what you consider "good". To some people a "good" AR can be had at $500, but to others you're looking to spend around $1200 for a "good" AR.
>>29647364
depends on what you want. if your criteria for "good" is "functions", as low as ~650
>>29647383
ok TYFYS o7
>>29647385
i can no longer use red dots.
magnified all day bb
>>29647281
>>29647373
RIP, can't sell you that as an FFL
>>29647392
I'm kidding of course, is >>29647385
your rifle? Looks nice mang
>>29647392
I have pretty bad astigmatism, so the dots aren't round to me anyway.
Most Definitely going to go magnified next. I kinda want a magnifier, for signposting.
>>29647387
I like my gloves
>>29647402
p-private PLS
>>29647403
no this is my rifle
>>29647408
>I kinda want a magnifier
kys. for real though the pa magnifiers are cheap
>>29647403
ty, here's what it used to look like
Complete abomination...
>>29647422
Yeah, I might. They are crazy fucking cheap...
>>29647317
U wot?
>>29647422
sorry, how do you like mlok? I have keymod on mine, didn't seem like they do anything different
I refuse to adopt a trip for the benefit of everyone
>>29647431
i have keymod
>>29647408
I'm interested in a magnifier setup but no one offers a quality magnifier that is greater than 3x.
If there were a nice 6x magnifier that would be pretty cool.
>>29647439
woops
>>29647422
I could tell you about da good deals but I'd have to ship them to a warshington ffl. stupid laws
>>29647433
Well, at least you're considerate in that aspect. If only others could be like yourself.
>>29647452
>No one offers a quality magnifier
Fixed. Magnifiers are gimmicky as fuck.
Why do people still run pic rails?
Or are they not that heavy?
>>29647462
ill drive down to OR and you gib gun and tell no one. ill buy you lunch ;_;
>>29647468
dyel
>>29647468
obligatory DYEL
also rail covers / handstops feel pretty nice
>>29647468
Not so heavy that it's an issue. The full length ones , sure.
>>29647475
>>29647502
w-which anon r u
Why does pupper have loose skin?
>>29647478
What does DYEL mean?
>>29647524
this one
>>29647502
>>29647462
>>29647531
Everyone already saw your Ruger in the "new" thread you made.
>>29647541
"do you even lift"
>>29647543
I see. Can you give me dem ammo deals and do ya have a garand in store?
>>29647551
My Ruger?
What?
>>29647562
Well shit, that's not me.
I wouldn't post w/o my trip and I'd have gone with "Sidearm Edition"
>>29647551
>ruger
>>29647534
Easier for fucking
>>29647569
Oh wait that is a ruger, never mind
>>29647464
Is that your opinion or a fact?
>>29647556
what you want? can usually get it. as for garands, currently no, but we do have some pretty interesting things on consignment right now
>>29647569
Yeah I'm pretty fucking adamant about it being a DW, not some shit Ruger
>>29647577
ITS NOT A FUCKING RUGER REEE
>>29647579
Why is this the only picture you post? It proves nothing
>>29647581
Cheap 223/556. What neat rifles ya got
>>29647587
Kek
>>29647551
It's a Dan Wesson, Calico is the one with the Ruger
>>29647534
When puppies grow, they develop rolling skin before they hit their growth spurt. Once the dog is all grown up, the loose skin is gone.
>>29647595
THIS IS NO FUCKING TIME TO BE LAFFIN M8
>>29647596
This.
>>29647590
this dude came in and brought 16 different "tactical" flavored rifles and a mk 23, most of them with really nice glass, to put all of them on consignment. HK 93, M1A, LMT MWS, a pre-ban AUG... pretty interesting stuff.
Hey guys, what's going on in this thread?
Anyone have any experience with the SilencerCo Hybrid suppressors?
>>29647619
I hope he's not selling his dads/grand dads guns
>>29647604
I feel like you were explaining this to a 5 year old.
>>29647636
nope, he wants to buy a property and needed to make $40,000 relatively quickly and painlessly. when we were drooling over all of his stuff, he said (and I quote) "You guys should see my REALLY cool stuff."
steel or aluminum barrel nut?
>>29647330
Is that a Galil?
>>29647647
>>29647644
Neat. Just to clarify if I drove down there and met some guy on armslist and bough a handgun, that's illegal?
>>29647639
Some people are slow, like him. We gotta try and accommodate them.
>>29647669
ATF bans the interstate transfer of handguns between unlicensed persons, you need an FFL.
(NOTE: This was struck down and the ATF is appealing the decision, so this still stands).
>>29647590
It proves that at one point in time some 20 odd U.S. military guys were using magnifiers.
I consider this fact to be supporting evidence for the claim that magnifiers are not shit nor are they a gimmick.
But I've never owned one.
Here is another picture of someone using a "gimmicky" "shit" magnifier.
>>29647669
sadly yeah. it still happens all the time, but yeah. I'll drop a burner email here in a bit and we can talk about the bulk 5.56 thing
>>29647696
>>29647683
>mfw pb still can't get a handgun
Hurts doesn't it
>>29647683
gay
>>29647696
sounds good
>>29647689
M8 you're expecting thought out, rational replies from Nick.
If you push him too hard he will just spaz out about how you're just too retarded to even reply to and then ignore it.
The only issues I've ever heard of with magnifiers is that they sometimes make the reticle blurry.
>>29647709
>be under 21
>order handgun online with my own money
>tell FFL that it belongs to mommy/daddy
>mommy/daddy pick up handgun and transfer it to me
>mfw
>>29647724
>not just being 21
Lmao
>>29647724
>transfer it to me
a gift is not a transfer
>>29647737
At least I own handguns, pb on the otherhand...
>>29647724
>>29647748
Lul
So pb, you said a glawk as your first handgun, right?
>>29647751
>"m-muh straw purchase!"
>what is a bonafide gift
>>29647579
A fact
>lol look here's a photo of a bunch of operators using it therefore it must be good!!
Is that really the logic you're going to use? Keep in mind operators also often use HK416s even though the Norwegian military has proven they're shit, HK MP7s even though FN Herstal has proven they're shit, and EOTechs, even though the government proved they're shit.
>>29647689
Alright so good, that is your argument and I can keep calling you fucking retarded. If your argument is that the government, specifically a section of the government that has a ridiculously overbloated budget and is used as a test best for adoption candidates, has never put gimmicky shit into use, then I'm sorry to tell you that your last brain cell died long before you were born.
>>29647721
>Sometimes they make the reticle blurry
Therein lies the problem. For the price of a "high quality" magnifier and red dot combination you can get a much better variable magnification scope. Must I remind you that the price of an Aimpoint T-2 and Aimpoint magnifier is almost $1500? How about an EOTech and their proper magnifier? Lord knows they're just as if not more expensive on the magnifier side.
They're a range toy and very little else. A better option would be a fixed magnification optic with an offset pair of irons or red dot, which is why the military issues those, or a variable magnification scope.
>>29647385
Your AR really came together mane.
>>29647433
How is the PA 3x Prism holding up?
>>29647721
I expect rational and thought out contribution from everyone on here. Some are just less capable than others.
I'm sure that magnifier setups have many weaknesses and unique problematic aspects as compared to fixed magnification sight, variable magnification scopes, and simple red dot setups.
I've had several discussions with pb, and skeletor, I believe, about the various merits of different setups. I think we eventually concluded that an ACOG with an RMR or a scope with an offset red dot can be quite functional.
I just want to break down the generalizing statements regarding magnifiers that pb and nick seem to be so ready to make.
>>29647762
>purchased with own money
>>29647433
I like you.
>>29647762
I just want to know how they transferred it to you.
>>29647784
I have them fill out the paperwork and do the background check. Never do I mention to the FFL that it will be gifted to me.
>>29647763
Tbhfam I'm not defending or attacking a RDS + magnifier combo, I was just mentioning the issues I've heard. I have garbage eyesight so it doesn't matter to me anyways
>>29647791
You are using legal words with a clear definition in the wrong fashion.
>>29647763
I'm not making a claim that it is good. I'm just refuting your claim that magnifiers are gimmicks.
>>29647763
>gimmick
>a trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business.
Magnifiers are not gimmicks my prickly and offending friend.
I've made this point countless times but a variable power scope, even at 1x, simply does not shoot the same as a reflex red dot sight.
>>29647800
Ok. Whatever.
>>29647806
Ok. You are retarded.
>>29647813
>getting triggered over me using the wrong words
:^
>>29647805
>that watch
>>29647452
aimpoint came out with a 6x during the 2016 shot show.
Posted in last thread after it hit 300. Probably won't get attention so reposting.
Thinking about an AR. Cheaper to buy a fully assembled one or piece it together?
Either way, what is the best quality for lowest price in both fully assembled or parts?
>>29647833
Cheaper to build, both are easy.
>prebuilt
M&P, Colt, Ruger
>building your own
PSA, not ptac.
If you want a custom gun, build.
If you want off the shelf from a known brand, prebuilt.
>>29647833
it can go both ways now that the AR market is so saturated. you can get p.good deals on completed rifles now, like aero precision's fully-assembled mid-length carbines, which also come in OEM models that don't come with shit like handguards, trigger guards and stocks since most people will switch those out.
>>29647823
At least you admit being wrong. More than most people here
>>29647805
>using the definition to fit your agenda
Literally kys man. It means more than that
>>29647887
You're not technically wrong, but you're still retarded
>>29647781
You don't need a trip though because everyone can already identify you without it :^
>>29647805
If you want to be a literary prick then you should note that never once did I use the word gimmick. I use gimmicky, which means something like a gimmick, but not gimmick. It's like a gimmick in that magnifiers are sold as a quick option to go from x1 to an x3/x6/x whatever fast, quick, and in a hurry. They are often sold as the end all be all of the magnified to unmagnified world. They are gimmicky because they are far from the best solution that many companies and people tout them as and they are nothing other than a waste of money.
If you'd rather I use a word other than gimmicky, I'll just go ahead and call them straight up shit. They're worse in every way than an ACOG with a piggybacked microdot. Your claim that they're not "gimmicky" or shit simply because they're used by operators is an appeal to authority and a very poor one at that.
Even in this photo you've posted a gimmicky optics setup on a gimmick of a rifle used by someone you'd consider worthy of citation even though he's mounted his red dot to his rail, which is a beginner's mistake at best.
Nobody said that variable power scopes shoot the same as a red dot and they certainly have a weird effect from a slight magnification and some tunnel vision, but you're still better off with an optic that's capable at long range with the ability to point shoot at extremely short ranges and shoot fine at short ranges than with a red dot + magnifier where you've essentially paid the same price as the red dot for a dangly bit that sits over your forward assist and, in the event of use, is terrible in comparison to a dedicated, magnified optic.
>>29647856
>>29647860
Alright. Any recommendations on more specific models? I'd kinda like custom, but at the same time I trust brands like Ruger more.
Also, how much we looking at?
>>29647826
kek
>>29647827
I like your clear lancer, MRO, K2, and Aero lower.
Thanks for letting me know about the Aimpoint 6x.
http://www.lightfighter.net/topic/aimpoint-6x-magnifier
>>29647890
Try something other than google. You can kys too fucking idiot.
>>29647891
>nick btfo the newfag wgws
Feels good. Shit tier AR owners need to be gassed
>>29647890
>11:50 pm
Its 2:55 am where i am
>>29647898
A basic bitch PSA will be around $600 (prices excluding ammo and mags of course) where as a similar quality m&p15 will be around $7-800.
The glory of AR's is that you can customize literally everything on it, so if you don't want to hassle with ordering a seperate upper and lower, you just go prebuilt.
I bought an m&p 15. My only regret is buying a shit optic and not changing the furniture
>>29647902
Yeah that's about the response I expected when you didn't get the response you wanted.
>>29647898
>ruger
stay away from them for ARs.
the Aero Precision factory carbines and midlengths go for about $650-$750 depending on where you shop. brownells has the OEM version on sale for $550, before shipping and FFL fees.
http://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/receivers/lower-receivers/oem-mid-length-16-rifle-prod81838.aspx
you could probably get one of these plus your own free-floating handguard, stock, and sights/optics to slap on later. colt makes one like this too.
otherwise PSA (not ptac) like >>29647932 says.
>>29647900
thanks m. night shayalafam
>>29647932
>>29647898
I should also add that blindly trusting a big box brand like colt / Ruger / S&W isn't always better.
A colt flattop m4 is $1,100 at my LGS for literally no reason other then it's a fucking colt.
Also, before you buy anything, do independent research and ask around here as well.
>>29647932
Try again
>>29647958
To be fair, Ruger revolvers are absolute tanks.
The semi's.. eh.
>>29647969
Are you underage anon?
When did mommy last take you to see the doctor?
>>29647984
I don't care for them myself.
Ruger revolvers just trigger my ptsd from anon calling my Dan Wesson a gp100
>>29647891
Kudos. Good post, good contribution, and a fine argument.
I really can't speak to the comparison between an ACOG and a piggybacked microdot vs. a magnifier setup. As I've said before I've owned neither.
I can however imagine that one might have a preference for a tube red dot over an RMR, or that one might possibly want 6x magnification but not want to spend $2500 on a 6x ACOG.
At the end of the day your opinion is just that. The "beginner" in the picture I posted is ostensibly some Italian special forces. Even if he has no great love for the setup someone, somewhere, did, and it is quite plausible that their opinion is more well informed than yours.
>>29647929
He really might be one of the more intelligent people on here.
>>29647991
Try clicking on a link retard
>>29648005
Is Google suddenly incorrect?
1/2
>>29648018
>showing half the definitions
>>29648018
2/2
>>29648026
I'm pretty sure you're retarded
>>29648036
>still only half
lmao kys poorfag
>>29647994
It's not an opinion. It's a fact, magnifiers are shit
>>29648046
Ok anon.
>>29647891
I wouldn't say that my argument falls squarely under the definition of an appeal to authority.
Militaries and special forces worldwide generally use effective and appropriate weapons and weapons accessories. While some fraction of the weapons and weapons accessories used by militaries and special forces are possibly gimmicks, It is the case that the majority of weapons and weapons accessories in use are not gimmicks.
Magnifiers are used by militaries and special forces. It is possible that magnifiers are gimmicks, but on their face, all other things being equal, are not likely to be gimmicks.
If you make the claim that magnifiers are gimmicks, or have qualities that make them "gimmicky" (what a terrible word), then please support that claim.
>>29647929
>Make a short post
>"LOL NICK CAN'T ARGUE HE IS TOO DUMB"
>Make long post
>"LOL CLEARLY NICK IS BTFO BY SOMEONE RELYING PURELY ON WORDING TO WIN THE ARGUMENT!!"
Fuck's sake anon I know you want me to lose but it's not going to happen here.
>>29647994
1/2
The thing is that you're asking someone to pick having a better red dot over having a better long range optic. Sure, tube red dots are a shitload better than pipsqueak microdots, but at the end of the day your option comes down to "do you want a better sight for long range engagements or short range engagements?" and over time we've seen the answer become clearer and clearer as the military adopts microdots on ACOGs rather than red dots with magnifiers.
If you're going to war, chances are you're going to want to have the ability to reach out and touch someone and you're going to want a good optic to do it. Fighting at short range is not preferable, but at the very least in short range engagements you can point shoot or pick up a 9MOA dot quick enough, but at longer ranges you're fucked if your optics don't meet the task.
Moving onto the x6 magnification, we once again see something that was molded by combat in the idea that x6 is too damn much magnification unless it's for a specialized role. For a long, LONG time now optics have been fiddled around with by many, many nations and it's no coincidence that almost every military has chosen an optic from x2.8-x4 for their standard infantry magnified optic for the last, oh, eighty years? x3 and x4 optics can be used with relative ease compared to something ike an x6 optic. I know my x3 ACOG is pretty easy to use even down to 10m, and while I'm sure the x4 is probably a bit harder, I can't imagine it's impossible. Could the x6 magnifier be useful? Possible, but it would be extremely situational. The verdict is still out on it, but I bet it'll be trashed like x3s.
>>29648089
I-I was saying you btfo him senpai
>>29648067
>slipry
snek. I'll email ya tomorrow, I'm going to bed.
>>29648113
my real email is my real name, so... T_T
>>29648089
No he is saying you blew me the fuck out. I wouldn't say you blew me the fuck out, but you did make several good arguments, and better yet you offered a well thought out and rational post.
>The thing is that you're asking someone to pick having a better red dot over having a better long range optic. Sure, tube red dots are a shitload better than pipsqueak microdots, but at the end of the day your option comes down to "do you want a better sight for long range engagements or short range engagements?" and over time we've seen the answer become clearer and clearer as the military adopts microdots on ACOGs rather than red dots with magnifiers.
I completely agree. If you're seeing primarily longer range engagements with a smattering of shorter range, then of course you would opt for the setup that favored longer range engagements. This setup would be whichever with the superior magnified optic.
Magnifiers are arguably the bottom of the barrel when it comes to magnified optics. From what I've read, they generally have poor eye relief, FOV, brightness, clarity, and light capture. All in all they are inferior.
>ability to reach out and touch someone
reeee
Thank you very much Nick for the authentic and stimulating conversation.
>>29648135
I feel ya
>>29648076
If I look at what you wrote with my eyes slightly out of focus, for a moment I'm inside the mind of a catagory four AR General triptranny
>Militaries and special forces worldwide generally use effective and appropriate weapons and weapons accessories. While some fraction of the weapons and weapons accessories used by militaries and special forces are possibly gimmicks, It is the case that the majority of weapons and weapons accessories in use are not gimmicks.
>>29647994
At the end of the day, your opinion is just that. The beginner setup is a soldier from a country that has a notably spotty military history and hasn't been known for adopting the greatest combat equipment. Hell, in fact, they've adopted a lot of trash. I don't like the setup, and someone, somewhere might've liked it, but more likely in my mind is that someone, somewhere made a deal with H&K for the rifle and someone, somewhere was pitched the red dot + magnifier combo and thought it was hot shit and, without much testing against other optics setups, rushed to give a ton of money to Aimpoint. I know a guy in the Lithuanian SF and apparently they did a pretty similar thing with their G36s and EOTech/magnifier combos.
>>29648076
You wouldn't say your argument falls under appeal to authority, but at the end of the day your opinion is just that: yours. You're trying to say that because operators use something they clearly know more than either of us do and therefore my argument is less valid. It's the same as how you tried grasping at straws by moving away from the actual topic and onto a test of my literacy with the word games.
Militaries and SFs world wide shouldn't be compared directly side by side. Militaries tend to get the equipment that makes sense whereas SFs usually get the budget to test equipment that has the potential to be adopted OR meets a specific requirement for a mission. Saying that RDs and Mags are useful because SFs use them is like saying black suits and gas masks are real operator shit because SAS used them once.
A whole lot more than a fraction of SF weapons are gimmicks: a whole bunch are. The HK MP7 is the worse of a category consisting of two weapons that have little right to exist, the HK 416 can't stay on one gas setting and freezes shut in the cold, EOTechs, well, we all know about EOTechs, Elcans are heavy, not all that great, and are designed around a fucking terrible mount, and so on and so forth.
Well, guess it's 2/3.
>>29648160
>At the end of the day, your opinion is just that. The beginner setup is a soldier from a country that has a notably spotty military history and hasn't been known for adopting the greatest combat equipment. Hell, in fact, they've adopted a lot of trash. I don't like the setup, and someone, somewhere might've liked it, but more likely in my mind is that someone, somewhere made a deal with H&K for the rifle and someone, somewhere was pitched the red dot + magnifier combo and thought it was hot shit and, without much testing against other optics setups, rushed to give a ton of money to Aimpoint. I know a guy in the Lithuanian SF and apparently they did a pretty similar thing with their G36s and EOTech/magnifier combos.
With all due respect what you posted there is as much a strawman as my previous argument is appeal to authority. Most of the pictures I've posted, including my favorite in this post: >>29647579
are of U.S. special forces.
I'm an fully prepared to accept that some fraction of weapons setups selected for U.S. special forces are motivated not by battlefield merit but by contracts and money.
>You're trying to say that because operators use something they clearly know more than either of us do
It is not the use of the magnifiers signifies operator's superior firearms knowledge. It is commonly accepted that the operators, or their superior who select the contracts, know more than we do regarding firearms.
Word games are where the fun is.
>Saying that RDs and Mags are useful because SFs use them is like saying black suits and gas masks are real operator shit because SAS used them once.
False equivalency, red dots and magnifiers have been used more than once.
If the fraction is large enough then my argument fails.
>>29648076
What militaries - not SFs, straight up militaries - use RDs and magnifier combos? I'd love to know. Once again, I never made the claim they're gimmicks, I made the claim that they're gimmicky. Gimmicky, which is an adjective, means that something is LIKE a gimmick.
>>29648097
Ah, I thought it said "btfo by". My bad, it's that time of the night again.
>>29648141
>If you're seeing primary longer range engagements
The fact about modern combat is that engagements primarily ARE at longer ranges.The only sustained short range engagements that I can think of in the last twenty years (not including durka on durka firefights) would be at the Donetsk Airport, Shyrokyne, and Avdiivka. The similarities? All three are in Ukraine and are between two factions that don't have wide access to any kind of magnified optic. You bet your sweet ass those engagements wouldn't have happened the same way if even one side had access to scopes.
Militaries that have been in combat, for example the Marines, have adopted ACOGs with RMRs for some of their weapons because they recognize that modern combat happens mostly at longer ranges. Militaries that HAVEN'T been in combat and are under no threat, like the Lithuanians, adopt G36s and red dots with magnifiers because they DON'T know what modern combat is like and how necessary a proper optic is.
As I've said and will continue to say: at short range you can point shoot and make due with a 9MOA microdot, but at long range you can't make due with a blurry red dot with terrible glass.
>>29648160
My grammar is beginning to fall apart.
I'll yield and take my leave before my arguments follow suit.
Excuse the whiteknight-esque phrasing, I'm watching Game of Thrones before bed.
Your shit is gucci, and you are an engaging conversationalist. If you are actually gay I hope you BTFO fiscal/legal progressives with your gun toting social liberalism.
>>29648209
Once again, US SFs also adopt gimmicky shit. May I remind you that they were the reason EOTech had a military contract? The reason H&K has a military contract? You can say some fraction, but when it comes to SF it's a pretty large fraction of crap weapons thrown in and used once or twice that are made popular by photoshoots like the ones you've got that spur more adoptions by more militaries with less in-the-field experience.
>It is not the use of the magnifiers signifies operator's superior firearms knowledge. It is commonly accepted that the operators, or their superior who select the contracts, know more than we do regarding firearms.
Lots of things are commonly accepted that are complete bullshit, such as the old adage "your weapon is made by the lowest bidder". It's a crock of shit that people in the chain of adoption know what they're talking about, because if they did the US Army wouldn't have just announced they're adopting the H&K G28 over the SR25EC. Saying something is common knowledge just means that a better argument is lacking. Assume nothing until you've tried it or read up on it. The military adoption process is pretty terrible, and at this point its more like throwing darts at a board.
>False equivalency, red dots and magnifiers have been used more than once.
Not the best of comparisons, but a comparison it is. How about we go with desert night vision camo then? Something that was worn by SFs for years and years and was touted as useful by many, even though it's noted to be worse than snow camouflage through a night vision device?
>>29648228
It's fine, see ya, and only half faggot.
>>29647281
>gucci rail
>still uses the stock PA-MDS moutn and not an AD-Co one.
Want to know how I know you're a pleb?
I want to build a case similar to pic related for my new AR Pistol. I don't want to pay pelican prices, what are my options?
>>29649088
seahorse, masco, or SKB.
of those, masco is closest, SKB is generally better quality, and seahorse has the best price for the quality. none of them are crap.
>>29649094
thanks for the info.
yet I have this compulsion to pick up some beat, $50 guitar case off craigslist for that greyman...
>>29649388
cool. carrying a guitar case that's totally not a rifle in there while there's some kind of disaster won't mark you out at all.
>>29649412
I was thinking more for when I take my city friends shooting...
>>29649412
>be in shtf doing shtf things
>see rando carrying guitar
>kill him to take guitar
>it's just some shit AR
Is the ruger AR-15 worth 700?
>>29649768
not unless you think a warranty is worth $100
Thinking of getting the hand guard and both upper and lower receiver cerakoted in some sort of grey for a nice two tone finish.
>>29649768
Not if their barrels have their ugly fucking logo on it like that. You could slap together a BCM M4gery for close to the same cost, for what thats worth.
>>29649768
The M&P15 has always caught my eye
I wouldn't pay out for the ruger unless it has an improved trigger or barrel
Do we all have fake USMC sights?
>>29649889
The logo is just a sticker. I physically went to a gun store and saw one of these.
>not choosing mobility when SHTF
>>29649955
I think that there are no real ones, and that KAC doesn't actually exist.
>>29649993
>shtf
>no buis
Do yourself a favor and move the light up too
>>29650007
you might just be stupid.
Remember, this is the year for mags and ammo. Be sure to include a couple in each order. A few more is better than a few less.
>>29649932
No.
>>29649969
>sticker on barrel
Oh boy that'll go well. That being said the rifle would be fine. So would a DPMS.
If you are asking if its an AR /k/ will respect...fuuuuuuck no. /k/ has no respect to give.
Daily reminder that a TA31 can be used for ranged targets and close range engagements if you use both eyes, there is a reason the cross hair has an illuminated reticle.
Magnifiers are awful.
>>29650071
At least you didn't do the eokek+magnifier
>>29650053
>Oh boy that'll go well.
just like, take the sticker off.
>>29649320
How do you like your top mount RMR? I'm thinking hard about putting a 3MOA on mine because while I can use a TA31 with both eyes open, for super short to 100 yard rapid engagements I think that would serve me a little better.
>>29650108
offsets a better option.
>>29650091
It used to be an exps3 until I sent that shit in for my eokek bux.
Sold the magnifier too, it's pretty gimmicky.
>>29650111
Not really for the RMR.
You put the RMR on top, then a 1x6 where that RMR is mounted.
>>29650125
>1x6
sounds like a terribly small objective lens.
and don't use a RMR then.
>>29647900
>>29647826
>>29647774
>>29647689
D E S I G N A T E D
S H I F T I N G
S I G H T S
>>29650099
Why fucking do it in the first place? Shouldnt you have been dropped off at adult autism daycare by now? Ive got better things to do with my last 10 days at this office/career than drink lots of coffee and argue with you. Actually, no i dont.
>>29650131
Don't tell me what to do, syrup nigger.
If I want a TA31 with a top mount RMR and an offset VCOG I'll do what ever I fucking want.
>>29650108
i personally love it as having it top mounted allows me to focus on my surroundings more than the gun/sight
>>29650111
i don't like that, puts my head too low and gasses my face.
>>29650147
no sticker would be better but taking 7sec to remove it is no big deal.
it's like removing stickers from clothing.
>>29650038
>tripshit
>able to joke and have a sense of humor
Never change, /Arg/
>>29650172
it's too early for jokes
I legitimately had no idea how much people here hated magnifiers. Granted I don't use one currently but in the past I always enjoyed them.
>>29650150
>puts my head too low
you literally turn the gun from a normal cheekweld and its right there.
running suppressed I do see that being a issue though.
>>29650183
we are nutn's disciples, we preach his word and his word is that magnifiers are heavy and therefore bad.
>>29650209
problem is, with the rmr i don't like a normal cheek weld.
just my preference.
>>29650209
If you fucking pay attention you'd see Giddy runs suppressed, so that's an obvious issue for him.
>>29650164
This is where i insert dank meme about being too stupid to remove sticker if stupid enough to buy a ruger AR.
Please send dank bux.
>>29649821
>senpai! my cherry blossoms are wilting!
>>29649955
I have fake Air Force ones
>>29650235
>Giddy runs suppressed
He hasn't been able to for a long time. :^)
>>29650266
Rekt
e
k
t
Are the prices of ARs expected to rise/fall/hold steady during the upcoming months and political happenings?
>>29650272
Do you really not remember what happens every single election cycle?
>>29650272
I can see them rising bad. Look back to Sandy Hook.
That's why you should order a couple mags or some ammo with every order.
>>29650272
Undoubtly. It remains to be seen if it will be as bad as the sandy hook era but the prices will be going up all the way till late October, and depending on who gets elected, it'll go up again/
Give it to me straight, /arg/, is an AR pistol really only going to set me back $400?
>>29650235
thats literally what I just said you mongoloid.
>>29650266
It's not my fault he's retarded.
>>29650299
Doubt it. Does that include BUIS, some sort of red dot, mags, a light, and ammo?
>>29650318
Sometimes I wonder if you don't just roll your head on the keyboard then post. You really are as bad as CG.
>>29647762
That's the textbook definition of a straw purchase.
>>29650266
:'(
>>29650251
i don't pay you for meme ideas, only for the finish product.
>>29650235
he knows that, which is why he said that he sees how that could be a problems.
chill out
>>29650299
if you buy all used parts
>>29650330
not my fault that you lack reading comprehension.
>>29650337
Did they say how long the actual repair would take?
ARs really are the barbie doll of guns.
No wonder AKs are so superior.
>>29647364
If your idea of "good" is being reliable and capable of putting 30 rounds into a ~4" circle from a bench at 100 yards with irons, as low as about $650.
If your idea of "good" is full gucci with an optic, more like $2500.
>>29650359
Haha! you got me man! I was trolled so hard!
>>29650354
haven't gotten an email back yet, just the one with the cost of repair.
>>29650359
i agree 100%, now go kys, your work is done.
>>29650325
$230 barreled upper
$40 lpk
$50 lower
$90 BCG
=
$400
It can share from the existing ammo/magazine trough with its bigger brother, but it's still short the charging handle, not-buttstock, and the sights
>>29650359
>reliable
In everything but fine sand and mud. :)
>>29650286
>>29650294
>>29650298
>I get back from deployment September
Well fuck, guess im not getting a new handgun I wanted. Shotguns are usually stable through times like this so maybe I'll pick up shooting clays.
in
>>29650272
ARs prices have slumped a tiny bit, but there's still several cubic buttloads of them in surplus that will need to be liquidated before the next cost increase. You'll have more trouble finding good ammo than good AR parts for cheap.
>>29650444
True, the number of people making a run on guns should be diminishing every time. The number of 30 rd mags in circulation should be astronomical at this point.
thinking about picking this up, but i dont know if $800 is a good price
>http://www.armslist.com/posts/5394888/washington-rifles-for-sale--aero-precision-ar-15
What's a good all day sling for an AR. Gonna do some OC at the Applebees and my rifle ain't light.
>>29650398
Try to find someone who can purchase it now for you? Sorry man.
>>29650520
Literally millions
>>29650520
>tfw academy sports near me had 30 rnd pmags on sale for $10
>>29650527
$1100 is what I would expect an aero precision ar to be, without doing any additional research into how much they actually retail for.
>>29650636
>tfw lancers are better anyway
>>29650527
Seems like a decent deal. That upper is around 650 new. Find out the round count
>>29650645
Where do I even find those for cheap?
I want some clear polymer mags.
I hate you all so very very much.
>>29650691
The smoke ones can be found online for $16-20 a pop or so. I got my non smoke ones for $8 a piece but that deal expried a long time ago.
http://www.atlantictactical.com/product/lancer-l5-awm-30-round-magazine-translucent-smoke
>>29650668
>>29650643
a new gun from Aero is 800 bucks, I don't know what all those accessories are worth...
>>29650742
He has a bcm upper. Aero is the lower
>>29650732
D I L L O
Yep, kinda knew this was gonna happen
And to the surprise of absolutely no one
>>29650774
>>29650776
Haha serves you right.
Can't wait for Milsurp and pb's tears.
>>29650776
Guarantee it'll all go back in stock as 500 round cases real soon.
>>29650776
>>29650774
What did you order?
>>29650774
>>29650776
rip in piece
>>29650783
No tears here bb
>>29650732
>>29650761
Where do I get a dillo?
I want a dillo!
>>29650783
Serves me right for what? Trying to buy something?
>>29650797
Steel case .223 at .15/cpr shipped
>>29650799
You can't get the rare blue dillo, it was a limited run :^
You can get a basic black one with any sizable purchase from LaRue Tactical though.
>>29650798
It was 1000 rounds of Wolf gold for like $145
>>29650799
Buy something from Larue. Get the meme bottle opener and dilo dust.
>>29650810
That's what you get for shooting steel cased like a filthy combloc conscript. Just buy overpriced brass cased from Walmart like a real American who doesn't value money.
>>29650799
>>29650811
This.
Also included:
x2 LaRue catalog
x1 LaRue Tactical Paint Mixer
x1 "Dillo Dust" steak rub
x3 rifle zero targets
x3 Constitution of the United States of America
>>29650829
Oh, and some gay-as-fuck bumper stickers.
Real customers own the black ones ;)
>>29650815
It was too good to be true anon.
>>29650829
Guess I'll have to save up to buy some shit from them.
Money is tight since I just shot in a Steel Challenge and wasted 300 rounds of ammo to place nearly last.
>>29650815
Wasn't Gold, just their standard 62gr steel case
>>29650846
This was meant for >>29650811
>>29650821
You know I actually tried doing exactly that with .308 yesterday because their deals on ZQI arent actually that bad. Except I can only buy 2 boxes of ammo at a single time. Fuck that shit.
Why is ammo still so fucking expensive except for that rare unicorn deal you find every once and awhile?
I got about 150 rounds of 5.56 the other day for about 30 cents a round but that was a person to person purchase and not retail.
I need to start reloading.
>>29650865
>>29650846
My kink is getting free shit from businesses I don't support.
>Glock
>VLTOR
>LaRue
>Vortex
>CZ
>>29650851
hope you have a tax stamp for that suppressor...
>>29650905
What you barely save in reloading rifle is made up by the time occupation.
>>29650911
shhhhhhhhhhhh pls no ATF
>>29650906
Teach me master.
>>29650919
Just bullshit them about being a fan, or claim to be a dealer and that you need promotional items for your business. They'll mail you a shit ton of stuff :^
>>29650927
What companies have you been successful with?
Can you provide me with an email example?
>>29650932
A magician never reveals his tricks :^
>>29650906
>Free shit from LaRue
>implying Mark LaRue would give you any free shit
Handouts from BobDole don't count :P
>>29650961
Is that a new IR laser I see, friendo?
Anyone looking for an illuminated Crossfire ii 1-4x24?
Looking for $200 OBO
What size gas block is needed for a government profile barrel?
>>29651025
pic related
>>29651025
I might buy it from you. got pics.
Mail them to me.
[email protected]
How does one go about getting a silencer. Is it difficult, and is it worth it? I live in Alabama so not the strictest gun control here.
also my friend is looking for $500 OBO on a BCM middy upper
comes with everything you see, including the BCG, Fagpul handguard, and scout light mount
