>he actually uses Google Chrome
>>55624725
>implying that Google hasn't been doing this all along
>>55624725
KDE/Qupzilla master race
>>55624725
literally my face when I saw your pic
>>55624725
So use Chromium and don't log into a Jewgle account.
>muh botnet!!!
Feel free to audit the code yourself.
https://chromium.googlesource.com/
>>55624725
>Will soon be used
I had assumed it already was. They already scan emails for terms and track what websites you look at and what products you look at. Why would them looking at your browser use with their browser be anything new at all?
>>55624782
>don't log into a Jewgle account.
Bwahahahahaha you really think that makes a difference? It's like thinking facebook don't track you if you don't have a facebook account, hopelessly naive.
>>55624782
Sure. Just link me the source code for Google Chrome.
>>55624725
Yes, if you're an idiot and are logged into chrome
>>55624823
>Bwahahahahaha you really think that makes a difference? It's like thinking facebook don't track you if you don't have a facebook account, hopelessly naive.
How, I don't have a Facebook account and have uMatrix setup to block everything from 3rd parties?
I work at an ad tech company.
We already track you on everything. Cookieless devices, everything.
We can make very educated guesses that you are the same person on two different devices. We follow you to work, we follow you home.
Dont think google and microsoft and apple are the botnet.
The internet is the botnet.
w-what if I adblock?
>>55625184
>Oh yeah? Well I (special circumstances)
Yes you're very special anon. In fact the way you're blocking things is probably being combined with the information they can get on you to get just as complete an image as they otherwise would have.
>>55625246
We get 500s on our beacons and still know almost everything.
>>55624894
He said chromium you autist
>>55625275
that's ok
recommend some animus
>>55625218
How prevalent is fingerprinting?
Recent studies suggest only 5% of websites use canvas fingerprinting, but that number feels low
>>55625310
Depends on if the site cares. Most sites dont care, but some sites host feeder code to gather info on users that then marks them in a category a publisher might pay a premium for.
Youre tracked on more than just the sites playing ads. Other sites make money simply by telling people about your interest in said site.
Why are advertisements I block being relevant to my interests a bad thing?
>>55624782
It's still not net, believe me. Look at Inox and see how much shit is disabled. I use Chrome and I like it, I don't have time for the privacy meme. Data is collected, I'm fine with it, the services are great. Also I am not a pedophile. I'm not concerned.
>To opt out of Google analytics tracking please install this browser extension by Google's analytics team
>https://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout
Lol.
>>55625993
it's like calling you a retard right to your face and whats worse is that there'll still millions of idiots installing it
>>55625993
>a billion dollar company like Google straight up lying to the public in such an obvious way
>implying
>>55625218
What do you get out of tracking users with adblock enabled?
Genuinely curious. Do you still sell their personal data, or are those users just a waste of space since they don't see your ads either way?
>>55626044
But... but, muh botnet!
>>55626076
He's just baiting man, there's a reason canvas fingerprinting never took off. The people it would be used on aren't profitable and the rest of the people can be effectively and more cheaply tracked via cookies and JS.
>>55626076
>>55626129
https://youtu.be/Cj3PN5-n108
>>55626129
You realise it's 100% piss easy to prove google still tracks you even if you have an adblocker, right?
>>55626403
i was the first one to do that experiment, noscript captcha and umatrix solved it
also that idiot had third party cookies on which wasn't part of the experiment
>>55626403
>what are cookies?
Unless you are implying that Google is actively bypassing privacy features on browsers you have nothing.
I'm sorry but how exactly is getting ads more suited to my taste a bad thing?
>>55626440
That's not really relevant here.
What's relevant is that google tracks you
>>55626464
nice goalpost moving
of course they track you faggot, no one denied that
>>55626457
Google is giving its information to certain governmental agencies for free in return for favourable regulatory treatment.
>Implying I dont want google to know all about my cp
I want to be on all the lists
>>55625751
but what if one day you accidentally slip on a slice of cheese pizza, and no one believes it was an accident?
>>55626488
So I what? In exchange for giving my data I will get better ads. Less effort when I'm shopping. How is this bad for me?
>>55626453
>implying you need those enabled
Only websites I allow cookies for are 4chan and searx.me. Pic related was after I tried shitposting on /pol/ some with the normal captcha.
>>55626487
But the anon I was replying to implied that they wouldn't track you if you have adblock installed... dumbass
>>55626516
you fucked up on umatrix
>>55626530
where did he imply that?
he said most tracking is done with JS and cookies, he never said anything about adblockers, get glasses
>>55624725
>all this google hate
Why? The only big tech company that is truly dangerous is Facebook.
>>55626557
>>55626586
Misquoted
>>55626403
>using adblocking
>using extensions
>not browsing incognito
>not setting program target to -incognito
>>55626510
Who said the ads have to be truthful? You do know that companies regularly pay for fake reviews on Amazon and other places to try to manipulate people's opinions. Are you okay with buying shit that won't last or won't work as well as other products because the company that you're buying from paid advertisers to tell people their products are good?
>>55626557
How so?
>>55626598
>implying both along with many others aren't dangerous
>>55626604
Does that actually help?
I thought all that means is your history isn't taken.
>>55626611
show me your umatrix grid on youtube
>>55626651
It's the bare minimum to get videos to play.
Soon? Wife gets tailored ads between her laptop and phone.
>>55626403
Doesn't work
>>55626487
Though his "tracking experiment" never worked for me, you're the only one moving the goalposts, shithead.
>>55626688
>Google shouldn't be allowed to record how its users use the internet
>>55625218
Even Tor Browser or Chromium/Firefox with µMatrix / µBlock / HTTPSEverywhere and spoofed User-Agent enabled?
>>55626639
no cookies, no history, no cache, etc etc.
>>55626684
check your dom storage for some google zombie cookie and block everything google related on 4chan unless it doesn't let the noscript captcha load
>>55626684
Will gorhill ever bring back recipes?
>>55625751
And what if all 4chan users become illegal terrorists?
You’re maybe totally legal and thing you have nothing to hide now but it may be false actually.
>>55625184
by IP on any site you visit with a facebook button
>>55626688
Yeah.
I found it pretty spooky the time I was on the shitter using my new phone (with new google account) and opened up YouTube and it recommended me the same sort of stuff that I watch on my desktop
what browser respects my privacy?
>>55626754
Tor Browser Bundle and IceCat.
But TBB requires you to use Tor... which has downsides.
>>55626736
sounds fun man
>>55626747
maybe you're just a pleb who watched what everyone else watches
>>55626760
Am I screwed if Im on winblows?
>>55626768
No I do not watch American Idol or Jimmey Kimmel (sp?)
>>55626793
Depends on what you're referring to.
You're probably harder to track via fingerprinting on windows since windows is so common.
On the other hand you have back doors that probably send your browsing history to Microsoft, so that's worse.
>>55626722
>check your dom storage for some google zombie cookie
I'll try that. I've been keeping dom storage turned off a lot recently but I think it might have been on at that time.
>and block everything google related on 4chan unless it doesn't let the noscript captcha load
Already have been doing that. My general habits with uMatrix include blocking absolutely everything that isn't necessary for what I want to do.
>>55626742
IP is an almost meaningless way of tracking compared to other methods as they get passed around randomly in an area.
And I'm supposed to care about this?..... Why?
the noose is rapidly tightening
we need a genuine alternative to Google and Mozilla sooner rather than later
>>55626867
I'll make the logo
>>55626873
I'll be the ideas man
>>55624743
Minus the KDE part, this.
>>55626867
It really doesn't matter, they can still track what you're doing by looking at what you're accessing.
The only way to counteract this would be to flood basically the entire net with false requests at the same time as you're making actual requests so they don't know for sure what you're looking at, but that's really not feasible.
>>55624782
>don't log into a google account
just get a build without the api keys so most "functionality" won't work
>>55626867
>not using Vivaldi
>>55626813
As far as we know though Microsoft isnt using that, and it seems that it only does whn you use Edge or IE
>ad tailoring
>implying I don't run a bigass hosts file and adblock so that I never see that shit
who the fuck cares
>>55626999
I could have sworn that there was an add-on that did this which was recently released, but I dont remember the name of it
>>55624725
I use a hardened custom Firefox, no EME and proprietary cuckware features removed. Not a problem for me, Chrome is nice when it comes to speeds though
>>55627524
TrackMeNot?
I heard someone mention that in a previous thread.
http://cs.nyu.edu/trackmenot/
>>55627560
Yeah, thats the one
What's a good alternative to chrome as a secondary browser?
>>55624725
BIG DATA WONT KNOW SHIT
>>55627633
Opera is pretty decent.
