Jesus christ, I didn't think it would be this bad.
>>55550564
Are 5 threads not enough? How much are they paying you in poo street land?
>>55550564
ayymd is finished hahahah
>>55550588
AMD? More like MAD
Might actually get the 1060 then if the Linux drivers are decent, I would prefer open source drivers though.
Get destroyed, AMD! Your video card competing with the 980 isn't even as good as my 1080! How does it feel?
>>55551747
1060 is competing with 480
Honestly these threads really helped convince me that /g/ really does get shilled to fuck by nvidia bots/advertisers.
One or two threads over the day I could understand, but I think this is like the 8th one I've seen now and last I checked there were 2-3 others still on the catalog, and they're all the exact same copypasta with similar canned replies
>>55551773
Good think that 480 is competing with 980Ti in DX12/Vulkan.
>>55551800
Lol
>>55550564
how did nvidia even manages those 480 numbers lol
they dont even make sense
>>55552038
Looks normal to me.
1060 is more expensive though
also only 192 bit bus lel
Get destroyed, the card offers better performance for a higher price
Wait
>>55552181
1060 is $250 and 480 is $240
RIP AMD
>>55550564
Are you seriously believing the benchmarks that Nvidia is putting out?
Wait for real benchmarks, moron.
>>55550564
I am looking for a part-time job and am wondering how much are you making per post.
>>55553487
These line up the same with the leaked firestrike results
>>55550564
when are actual reviews coming out?
>>55553527
1 cent per post
15 cents per thread
>>55550564
>yet another lies spreading thread
when will nvidiots accept defeat gracefully?
>>55553781
July 19th probably
>>55553816
>benchmarks are lies
Interesting
>>55550564
DELETE
>>55553835
>believing in fake benchmarks results
at least post the real benchmark results, you stupid goyim
>>55554037
Excellent photoshop skills
>>55554037
kys already AMD shill. You're poor, useless, worthless and probably live in some subhuman country. Stop coming here, I understand, you need to shill for food but if you want I just send you $5 - I've heard it's enough to have curry for the whole month, they'll even deliver it to your shack.
2.5 GIGS
.
5
G
I
G
S
>>55554072
I think I've found me a new wallpaper.
>>55554037
Not changing it to 1488%
>>55551778
>AMD fags shill for 480RX spreading literally impossible rumours about 480RX reaching 1700MHz and being oced to 1070 gtx levels of performance
>FOR WHOLE FUCKING MONTH
>Card turns out to be shit, fries your PCI-e, if it wasn't for few DX12/Vulkan scenarios it wouldn't be able to compete with oced 970 gtx.
>Shills take back their words and blame everything on non-existing falseflags.
>Once again AMD subhumans cry pretending to be victims of conspiracy when Karma bites them back
K Y S
Y
S
>>55554119
>480RX
you aren't even trying
>>55554119
>Brown frames all leaving Syria
So the first competent developer flexing asynch computing has now actually implemented it into a game.
>>55554119
Literally nobody was saying it would equal a 1070, you collosal autist. We bantered that 2x 480 matched a 1080 in some titles for less money, and that it would be near a 980 in others, and THATS IT.
Since then nvidiots have been memeing about these absurdly inflated claims in an effort to discount the fact that the 480 is a breddy gud card for people who wanna play everything maxed at 1080p, some things maxed at 1440p, and really promising results in DX12 for a very tempting price.
Get fucked, you buyer's-remorse having, false-flagging Official Nvidia™ (((The Way It's Meant to be Played™))) good-goy.
>>55550564
PLS DELETE
>>55554186
480 turned out to be awful, it's ok you can admit it
>>55554183
1080 seems to get more out of DX12 compared to the other Nvidia cards
>>55552250
>1060 is $250
Lmfao, newfag alert!
>>55554183
And here's the 1080 results.
>480
>not hitting 980 performance
>>55554223
>390 gaining 40 fps
What the fuck is this magic
>>55550564
those results does not justify the price difference
>>55550564
PIG TAIL
I
G
T
A
I
L
1060 was rushed to launch because nvidia shat their pants. expect issues with first wave of cards
>>55554208
Yes even compared to the 1070, how can this be?
>>55550564
please OP, show me one independent review of the 1060 please.
the card was launched 4 days ago and nda lifted the same day.
one bench besides nvidias own retarded slied.
come on kid, i know you can do it if you imagine it really really hard
>>55554204
>>55550564
Dayly reminder that these are benchmarks from nVidia themself, while these are independent
https://www.computerbase.de/2016-07/doom-vulkan-benchmarks-amd-nvidia/
>>55554241
390x here its the magic of memes.
I havent been this blown away since Mantle
Future is looking bright as fuck
>>55554366
Bought my R9 390 for 360€ back in march.
A 390X costs 330€ now and a 390 costs 295€.
Just kill me right now.
>>55554343
>the truth is bait
Interesting
>>55554443
Look at this shit bernievoter
>>55554223
>>55554183
>>55554332
Leaked Firestrike results show the same thing:
"3DMark Firestrike Ultra scores 3014 points while the Radeon RX 480 was scoring around 2750 points. The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 11225 points in Firestrike Performance while the Radeon RX 480 was scoring 10800 points in several 3DMark (reference clocks)."
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-6-gb-3dmark-performance-leaked,2.html
It's pretty clear the 1060 is faster than the 480, it's really only a question of how much faster.
>>55554443
This is you.
>>55550564
Vulkan and DX12 is gonna destroy it and will come for the 1070 just you wait and see
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gtx-1060-performance-benchmarks-leak/#comment-2780580773
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAH
sapphire nitro 480 when?
>>55554496
Someday AMD will destroy Nvidia.
Not today...or tomorrow...or next year..or next century....but someday...just keep waiting...someday...
>>55554037
>getting this butthurt
>People keep posting the same suspicious-as-fuck "benchmarks" time and time again despite EVERY time they've been posted it's been brought up that they're from Nvidia's own "review" guide
I can see that n/v/idiots are getting desperate, but not even the AMDrones were this persistent at posting material that had been as conclusively debunked as this in the weeks leading up to the launch of the RX 480
>>55554593
The results are real, see >>55554458
>>55554458
One hundred dollars faster
>>55554615
>They are real
don't show screenshots, show actual 3dmark results.
>>55554552
Didn't you got the memo Bhavesh? it's over, nvidia gave up on Vulkan and DX12 and will no longer pay you
>>55550564
Alright guys, now that both 480 and 1060 are coming, wich last gen GPU should I buy for 1080/60fps? I know this isn't /v/, but I don't think there's a gpu thread there right now.
>>55554781
390
>>55554781
970
Don't get the 390 unless you want a built in space heater
>>55554802
My shillposting >>55554789
Came before yours so he has to buy the R9 390 now.
Also to the original dude asking, the 970 will only become worse from this point on, while the 390 will see performance boosts all over with Vulkan/DX12.
>>55554815
Actually the 970 will just keep getting better, while the 390 will only go down in performance
>>55554789
Well, it seems that I'll need to wait until 490 comes out
>>55554802
But what if the game requires tons of vRAM? Don't get me wrong, 970 is a fantastic product, but this little vRAM flaw is holding me from buying it.
>>55554824
This is like talking to my ex-gf
What are you basing this on? The smell of your ass when you pulled out your other statement?
>>55554866
Well it's true though. Nvidia cards always get better.
>>55554832
RAM doesn't mean much, pic related.
I think 390 is fine too, but it has serious issues with power draw and heat compared to the 970. 970 is also cheaper.
>>55554943
What are the issues with the power draw? Owner since feb this year and haven't seen any problems at all. Also I'd like a link to where 970 is cheaper for same build quality.
>>55554968
390 draws twice as much power as the 970. 390 also puts off twice as much heat as the 970. Check pcpartpicker, 970 is also cheaper.
>>55550564
why did 480 leaked benchemarks looked exactly like this and were even more flattering?
>>55554994
I've got a 780Ti ref putting out 250 watts and being OC'd and crunching 24/7 and never felt like my room was being too hot or my PSU wasn't enough for the job (500W 3770/780Ti/3 HDDs).
What have you got, menopause?
>>55554943
Bullshit comparison 2bh, you are comparing less powerful gpu's, I doubt the 960 has the grunt to exhaust full 2gb, let alone 4.
That being said, my cousin owns a 970 driving a 1080p screen, and he's yet to run into vram issues. I plan on buying it for cheap when he upgrades to the 1070/80, to replace my 760.
>>55554931
They get fucking gimped
>>55555085
Do you live in a cold climate?
>>55555111
The 970 wasn't meant for 1080p, it's overkill for that res.
It was meant for 1440p.
The 960 is meant for 1080, but it's a bag of shit. A 7950 is better than that.
>>55555130
970 is basically perfect for 1080p desu senpai
>>55555129
I live in Belgium.
It's been pretty fucking hot last sunday though and the entire house was pretty hot, including the office. There tends to be heatwaves in the middle and end of June but it's not displayed in the graphs.
http://www.yr.no/place/Belgium/Wallonia/Liège/statistics.html
>>55551518
Classic nvidiots with dyslexia
>>55555138
It's maybe perfect, but it's spending way too much money for playing at that resolution. Just saying a much cheaper card can do as good.
Fucking /v/aggots need to gtfo of my /g/
>>55554931
nope they won't nvidia will cease product support after 2 year, but it's not gimping m'kay
>>55550564
>Jesus christ, I didn't think it would be this bad.
That's the 6gb 1060 though which costs premium.
The normal 3gb 1060 will actually use a cut die and will be on par with the 470.
Nvidia at its old tricks again.
>>55555189
sure, so you can post more pictures of your dragon dildo inside of your PC case or what your chinese 2D girlfriend looks like on your desktop with your brand new i3 desktop? Oh, forgot you can't do the latter anymore.
>>55554346
>>55555176
The thing is what's good today at 1440p, tomorrow with future games is only good at 1080p, and this is precisely where the 970 sits. Was great at 1440p when it came out, but not só much today.
Curious to see how will it fare with my 2 1080p monitors though.
>>55555264
This, thats why i still have my 390X at 1080p from day one, but looking at Vulkan and DX12 it looks like i can still jump to 1440p during the next years
>>55555264
The problem is that AAA games are just going to get more and more bloated, and the 3.5 problem that wasn't so apparent here and now will become one, because textures will get heavy.
My 780Ti is fine for now, but I am still considering getting Vega. Look how the 680 aged miserably with its 2 gigs.
>>55555263
How does hell does Fury X suddenly perform good enough to be within range of 980 Ti/ 1070?
>>55555369
Vulkan magic
>>55555369
Having actual DX12/Vulkan support
>Nvidia beats AMD on release
>a year or two later AMD beats the same Nvidia cards
>newer AMD cards won't beat the newer Nvidia cards though as expected
Same shit, different year.
>>55554615
lol
>>55555295
I'm replacing my 980 with Vega. Nvidia cards don't age well at all, I mean if you're fine spending $400+ on a gpu every 16 months Nvidia cards are good I guess.
>>55554615
Meanwhile
>>55555200
>That's the 6gb 1060 though which costs premium.
6gb 1060 is $249
A M D
M
D
B T F O
T
F
O
>>55555449
Nvidia makes the best graphics card you can get, for of course a premium and for about one year.
After that, it turns to shit.
Also a bit unrelated, but there is people out there that buy a 1080 for a delusional price and that don't wait for a 1080Ti that gonna blow the shit out of the old model. Idiots.
>>55555479
Nvidia suggests $249. It's not a price set in stone, am I'm sure it won't price that low
NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>55555479
Just like the 8gb 1070 is $379, right?
1060 > 480
Omg 5555555
>>55550564
Sorry, i went in vacation for 1 week.
Is the 1060 already a thing or is it just a PR card? I missed the last news.
>>55555608
It comes out July 19th
>>55555507
I kinda rushed to get my 980 since it was the best GPU out at the time for Witcher 3.
I would have got the 390X or the Fury but they kinda launched them late..
>>55554037
I can tell this is real because it has a watermark.
>>55555662
I understand. I didn't upgrade from my 780Ti because the Fury was too expensive, the 970 had 3.5, the 390 was a rebrand and the 980 was a bit too expensive for its specs.
These benchmarks are fake,just compare the tomb raider bencmarks to the ones in RX 480 reviews and you'll see that its gets 50-60 fps and not the 40 seen here.
480 is perfect for me because I play 480p. Nvidia is bankrupt because 1060p isnt a resolution, and 1080p cards are out of stock!
>>55555802
it gets even more now that tomb raider supports async
>>55550564
>SteamVR
>6.6
This is how we know it's fake...
oh boy it's another nvidya brainwashing hivemind episode. i hope it ends soon, this board deserves better.
>>55555859
What?
>>55554119
this is an old benchmark, check out fury X beating 980 Ti and titan in patch 7 :P
>Buy 8GB 290X
Still good 2 years later, only getting better with DX12 and Vulkan.
Feels good to be a gangster.
lol at Fury/Fiji, maxlel, 1080 and 1060 buyers, you got gipped.
1070 buyers are top notch though, you know what's up.
>>55555884
The pic op posted has been edited to remove several benchmarks, one of them was SteamVR where the RX480 was only scoring 6.6, which is rather low for an RX480.
The benchmarks themselves were performed by nVidia marketing and were part of the reviewers guide for the 1060.
They also used the old press alpha 16.6.2 drivers.
SSAA 2x vs FXAA
good job amdtards
>>55556003
My vcard hasnt been relevant for a while so I wasnt paying attention
All I know back then was the regular AA
What the hell are these SSAA and FXAA
ssaa is like doubling the resolution then restretch back to your resolution much more demanding and the fx aa is poor man aa make your image quality much blurrier with very little fps hit
>>55555500
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCHmV3c7H1Q
do anyone remember mantle
>>55550564
Of course. A 1070 is only 7% faster than an RX 480 in Doom, so the 1060 will absolutely destroy them both!
>>55556213
oh i see
fxaa can work on those games that you can see annoying jaggies even on max aa like those vegetation stages
ssaa for highend videocard
So if the Tomb Raider ssaa is disabled, it will hit 60fps or more?
This is what happens when you put too much poo in the gpu.
>>55556495
yeah you can say like that, but fxaa is so bad in few games, even some people cannot see the different between fxaa and no aa
>>55553835
Leaked "benchmarks" coming from Nvidia marketing team are lies.
>>55550564
>posting numbers directly from nvidia's marketing department
Hello shill.
>>55555905
Now time to wait till Vulkan and DX12 step out of fucking beta in the next 3 years. Tbqh mainstream games besides like 5-6 use DX11 so why bother unless you only play DOOM or Tomb Raider
>>55556896
The benchmarks are real
AMD BTFO
Typical nvdidafags.. pay $100+ for 5 fps
>>55557896
*15 fps
>People comparing benchmarks of one specific game running on one specific API and completely ignoring real world performance in any and all other games
>>55557987
*2fps
Doing more research
1: It's really hard to tell how accurate nvidias benches are because nobody seems to bench with 4xMSAA anymore
2: AMD hits 60fps or higher with FXAA in pretty much every game except crysis 3.
So 1060 seems to mostly be good if you want higher AA settings at 1080p or <60hz framerates at 1080p. 1060 has a pretty nice niche but AMD isn't quite BTFO.
>>55558609
Oh wait it doesn't hit 60fps in ashes either, but really its performance in ashes is pretty gud for the price.
>>55558151
*15 fps
amd being dogshit as usual... heh..
>>55557354
considering at 1080 in rotr the 480 maxed gets 60~fps... this benchmark is fucked from the get go
>>55559510
haha yeah. these benchmarks provides OFFICIALLY from Nvidia pinpoint accurate and unbiased results of how great it is to be a Nvidia dude. Dog bless Nvidia
>>55559576
The benchmarks are actually legit
>>55554458
>3DMark Firestrike Ultra scores 3014 points while the Radeon RX 480 was scoring around 2750 points.
so the 1060 and 480 both can't even beat an overclocked 3.5 meme card?
>>55559715
Yes they are. Very legit.
>mfw DX12
>Banana speculation
Fair and Honest Review, keeping you safe from the lies
>Ashes
legitimate victory although it's unknown whether or not Nvidia fixed the low-spec shader bug
>Forza
No Async, No shader intrinsic functions, was built on DX11 and basically uses DX11, just win10 exclusive. No Idea how proper DX12 would affect the 1060
>Tomb Raider
Patch 6 or 7?, enough said- noting the improvements in patch 7 to AMD hardware, tomb raider would be a loss for the green team here if this ends up being patch 6...
>DX11
If the 1060 did worse here I would expect Jen Hsun to commit suicide. The obvious DX11 edge Nvidia holds is not going to change, but the amount of DX11 titles released are dwindling
>SLI
It's non-existant on both the 3 and 6gb models
>3GB model
for 150$ with less cores and lower clocks apparently, great card for low-spec gamers looking for 1080p gaming, most OC's will be worthless as most games use more than 3GB of RAM nowadays, we'll see how it does up against the 470
>6GB
250$ for AIB, <300$ founders>, has no SLI, great DX11 performance, unknown OC potential (probably pretty good)
>Conclusion
we'll need to wait and see from 3rd party reviewers whether or not this is more Nvidia trickery as Nvidia and AMD always (and I mean always) lie when it comes to 1st party benchmarks. We don't know how much the 1060 will OC and we don't know how much the AIB 480's will OC. So right now it's still a crapshoot
>>55560144
You realize you can't compare benchmarks between two different setups
Just lol @ all the dumbasses who bought a 480
>>55560063
Why are you comparing random benchmarks to each other again. It doesn't work like that.
>>55554346
Computerbase is pretty shill towards whoever gives them the best goddies at the time.
I know that because one of my prior colleagues now works there.
I would tell more but it would directly track back to me and I have no interest in a lawsuit and the trouble of losing my job.
>>55554552
THat is why AMD is constantly losing market share in the dedicated GPU area right.
Right now we are at what 82 to 18 if I remember correctly.
They have less than one fourth the share of nvidia.
>>55554593
AMDrones just like repeating shit from shills like charlie d. and the guy that made some benchmarks showing the FX8350 being significantly more powerfull than an i7 all around, which nobody could replicate.
I'm gonna end up buying a 1060 because aftermarket 480's are taking 12 years to release
>>55560174
Goddammit I thought AMD finaly fixed the single GPU microstutter that they created in the 7000 series.
>>55554346
LOL the 1060 isnt even on the chart. NVIDIA dead, bankrupt, buried and cremated.
Nvidia have cancelled the 3GB 1060 and are instead releasing the 1050 with 3Gb in December.
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/52996/nvidia-culls-geforce-gtx-1060-3gb-arrive-1050-december/index.html
>>55558058
Because those games are old or were in development for a long time or just don't have devs capable or willing to learn/implement DX12 or Vulkan. There are many variables at play here. The thing is that a lot of triple A titles (especially those ported from consoles) are more and more likely to see DX12/Vulkan implementations. MS want DX12 to succeed as it means more games sales from their Winblows store from both teams. Vulkan also benefits Linux etc to some degree. But we shall see how this pans out over the coming months.
>>55563122
Indeed. You run the same benchmarks on the SAME system using different cards with the latest drivers and then you get a pretty accurate result. Anything else is pulling shit outta your ass.
>>55564848
It's not an issue and has been mostly fixed in the latest drivers. Check here. Although it uses FRAPS instead of FCAT (why they did not just get a DP to DVI-D connector I don't know).
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_radeon_r9_rx_480_8gb_review,27.html
>>55560174
o thought FCAT tests are broken in DX12?
>>55564727
lol i know who you are.
>>55564727
my dad also knows someone from there too so i agree
>>55550564
I preordered a 1060 and can't wait to be playing AAA games with 2.5GB of DDR5
>>55557896
1060 is $10-20 cheaper than 480 and perform 1-15% better, oc better, drain less power
amd fanboy just got mad
It has 6GB RAM
>>55567607
so? 6gb or 8gb makes no difference at 1080p even with 200 skyrim/fo4 mods. gtx 1060 has 10% better performance and oc better so i'd take performance rather than 2gb vram
>>55554186
check dx12 results(even on the latest patch 7 480 gained quite a lot )
do the math
480 is 8 to 10% slower than a 1070
480 200 bucks
1070 450
remind you of something?
4870 7% slower than gtx 280
4870 300 bucks
gtx 280 650 bucks
history is a bitch for nvidia
>>55568222
Uhh 480 is 50% slower than a 1070
>>55568288
480 in dx12 is 50% slower? in what universe?
>>55551800
you can play all 12 of those games with such a good framerate!
>>55554223
Tfw 390x
>"AMD BTFO haha suck it fags poo in the gpu"
You retards must really like paying $700 for a $600 card.
>>55555169
lmao
>>55568682
1060 is $249
>>55568311
Check techpowerup, 480 is literally 50% worse than a 1070
480 is incredibly underpowered.
The percent change in FPS is lower than the percent change is price. The 480 is still beating Nvidia the fuck out.
>>55570322
480 can't even compete with Nvidia's 2 year old cards at the same price
>>55570347
{citation needed}
>>55570271
pfftthahahaha, no.
>>55570283
talking about dx12
bring tpu
a site that used bf3 wow wotanks as a benchmark
kek
>>55554241
Bro the 7970 gained like 20-30FPS in the same DX11 games throughout its life, the 290/X+ are absolute beasts of cards and just needed proper hardware support to show off
>>55554458
So basically 5-10% faster with old drivers at reference clocks.
So 'overclocked' (defaults to 1288mhz for some reason) with the current drivers, the 480 and 1060 will be trading blows in games.
For $100 more.
>>55554458
so 1060 with 1911 clock and 2000+ clock literally overclocked to the max will be able to compete with 480 at stock?
sounds about right kek only nvidia will build such a card
>>55570428
1060 will always be faster than the 480.
Overtime as AMD gimps their cards, the 1060 will just gain an even bigger lead, will probably end up being 50% faster.
>>55555407
holy shit that image... do people forgot about LAN already??
Buy a 1060 because it beats the 480 in "lel" game by 8FPS in DX11, Weeks later "lel" game get a DX12/Vulkan update. 480 now beats my 1060 by 24 FPS.
>>55570460
What's LAN? Is that a new type of internet?
>>55570492
Never gonna happen, 1060 will always be faster than the 480, 1060 just has superior hardware
>>55570460
Idiots are everywhere anon, it's always been like that and it always will be.
>>55570515
kek
that must be the new nvidia meme
>superior hardware
>>55550564
Picked up a new GTX 1070 for my wife's son. Jamarcus loves it so much after he upgraded to Win10 he almost called me dad. He's thinking about becoming a DJ now and makes the freshest of memes. Almost two thousand so far. Best purchase ever!
>>55570530
It's just the truth. Nvidia makes high quality products, while AMD makes bargain bin garbage.
>>55570531
imagine if you got him a 970
>step dad
>>55564727
Jokes aside, I've never trusted computerbase and I probably never will. They always get massively different results to other benchmarkers who test similar scenarios.
>>55570515
>>55550564
http://wccftech.com/geforce-gtx-1060-aots-dx12-benchmarks/
Uh-oh...
>>55570540
>kek
>fails at dx12
>fails at vulkan
>cant compete with a card made on 2011
>full of problems
https://forums.geforce.com/default/board/172/geforce-1000-series/
>>55570543
I think being a DJ would make him trespass the 3.5 barrier, and we all know there's no going back once you're there. (you become skrillex)
>>55570399
>it's wrong to test these popular mainstream games because they don't have dx12 support and/or give amd an advantage
Like clockwork.
>>55570560
You can make up all the stuff you want, but we all know Nvidia cards are much better..
>>55570540
/thread
>>55570556
How will Nvidia recover? Bankruptcy? Intel might buy out Nvidia. No way they'll be around after this travesty. 970 flop plus the 1060 and 1070 ugh.
>>55570579
AMDummies don't have anything but their spin
>>55570592
Nvidia - 82% market share
AMD - 18% market share
AMD is going down the drain desu senpai, and it's all because they have made so many fail products.
I'm just thankful I don't have to buy a new GPU every year or two to remain relevant gaming wise. Ages like fine wine with all the sweet CPU's Intel has released in the last five years or so. Poor Nvcucks probably live at home still check to check.
>>55570592
>970 flop
>the number 1 most popular gaming video card
>flop
That's a good one.
>>55570607
That's interesting considering AMD GPUs fail way more often than Nvidia, pic related.
>>55570604
That and because they have fuck all marketing. If I didn't browse /g/ or follow tech news sites I wouldn't even have known the 480 existed compared to nvidia cards like the 1070 which has adverts everywhere.
>>55570651
Or maybe it's because Nvidia makes objectively better cards
>>55566352
I see what you did there.
>Ashes of the Singularity for some reason is used in every fucking benchmark despite having sold like 500 copies total and not even being particularly graphically impressive
You can smell and taste the sweet sweat of the diabetic Nvidia cucks. They're like a Cowboys or Patriots "fan". It won't be long now before we collectively hear the sound of thousands of memecards being broken over a Dorito bucket. A new smell permeates the air with a bit of coppery blood and game fuel.
>>55570709
Someone sounds mad
>>55550564
This shit is worse than /v/ and their pathetic console wars.
>>55570715
But he don't sound mad. You need to working on your meming.
>>55570556
>Let’s start with the Extreme 1080p preset. The GTX 1060 is able to score an average frame rate of 44.4 fps with the DX12 API... At this very same preset the RX 480 scores between the 40-46 fps range averaging around 45 fps. At the 1440p preset, the 1060 scores an average 39 frames per second. The RX 480 manages to clock in at around 38-43 frames per second, averaging a solid 40 fps.
>At the 4K Extreme preset, the GTX 1060 scores an average of 30.3 frames per second which is well within the 4K 30 standard and safely above the VR-Ready limit (remember the 4K 30 standard is roughly 40% more demanding than the current VR standard (2160 90p) Ceteris paribus. The RX 480 ofcourse, fares just as well (more in fact) clocking in at around 30-32 fps.
Post yfw
>>55570701
it is the only native dx12 game built for pc exclusively. what did you expect?
>>55570657
I'm not denying that I'm just saying amd are incompetent in everything they do from a business viewpoint.
Shit products + no marketing = failure
>it's another /v/ thread
>>55554223
>RX 480 121 fps
>GTX 980 117 fps
>Somehow not hitting 980 performance
I hope you read your own statistics next time
>>55570862
he is on your side. he is just being cynical.
>>55570579
>mainstream
>demanding
>wow
>bf3
>wotanks
kek
>>55570583
so everything is made up lol
green tin foil hats
>>55570898
Are you claiming nobody plays those games?
Again, see >>55570579
>>55570447
Yeah i hate dickish business practices done by red team. Planed obsolence of their gpu's you have to buy new one every 1.5 year to stay revelant.
>>55570763
>>55570604
It is more like Nvidia has superior marketing since mid-2000s and the momentum that it build allow them to weather fuck-ups like the 480.
