>NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Gaming Performance Results Leaked – Faster Than The RX 480 in DX12, DX11 and VR Official Tests
>The GTX 1060 been reported to retail for $149 USD, giving gamers on a very tight budget the freedom to enjoy the latest games with a large number of GPU taxing settings enabled at their highest configurable point
http://wccftech.com/gtx-1060-3gb-detailed-specs-leak/
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gtx-1060-performance-benchmarks-leak/
It has a $250 MSRP...
So its going to be $300+ for the next six months.
inb4 amd shills
AMDamage control in 3, 2, 1...
>amdfags on suicide watch
>>55544879
>$249 for Non-FE not $149
>Benchmarks are from Nvidia in their PDF file handed out to reviewers before launch. See the original link at videocardz
http://videocardz.com/62122/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-official-performance-leaked
Benchmarks are using older 480 driver pre-powergate.
They are also using a slower 4GB 480 with slower memory clock speeds and slower overall clock instead of the 480 reference boost clock of 1266Mhz.
They are also using various settings like SSAA which are fishy since no independent reviewers use those settings.
Make of that what you will. But NEVER trust benchmarks from the manufacturer.
>>55544879
>4th thread of this
>spreading fud
>/v/ kid being "sponsored" to post that
pls leave...
>http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9202637/fs/9188962
If it's $150 I'll cum on my shoe and eat it
btfo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyuoQIuEZj0
>wccftech
>>55544879
I swear to god that fucker on currytech must be browsing this place.
Not even reddit gpu thread are this retarded.
>>55545061
the cum or the shoe?
>>55545087
Both
>>55545013
>$249 for Non-FE not $149
OP is talking about the 3 GB version, which also has fewer CUDA cores has TMUs.
>Benchmarks are using older 480 driver pre-powergate.
True, but the performance benefits with those drivers are minimal.
>They are also using a slower 4GB 480 with slower memory clock speeds and slower overall clock instead of the 480 reference boost clock of 1266Mhz.
Source?
>But NEVER trust benchmarks from the manufacturer.
This is true, however.
>>55544879
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9202637/fs/9188962
>960 6GB $250 > 480 8GB $250
>960 3GB $150 = 480 4GB $200
>mfw
>>55544879
>wccftech
>>55545013
Kek, nvidia is on heavy damage control, they promised that the 1060 would be 15% faster.
> 1060 launches
> Rx480 is faster
Kek if this happens im going to shit my pants, also the amd aftermarket cards will very soon be out.
Also you can see from the benches that in 1440p the rx 480 scales better
B T F O
Can someone start making screenshots of those delusional AMD shills and make a video or something to btfo them once and for all when 1060 gtx comes out? Subhumans need to be put down.
>>55545175
>Also you can see from the benches that in 1440p the rx 480 scales better
This was pretty obvious from specs alone, but it also makes the complaint about them using SSAA in their benchmarks silly, considering scaling better at higher resolutions also means scaling better with SSAA.
>>55544905
Nvidia pricing is always identically like the predecessor, gt 960 is like $200 it's possible 1060 could be $150.
>currytech
>>55544879
shit still expensive here, so no lolo
>>55544879
>setting Nvidiot-fags for disappointment when retail prices are $249 or higher due to sheer demand
>scalpers are going make another killing off poor gayming-fags would can't wait until supplies stabilize
>>55545160
I do not get why people support huge companies which do immoral things and screw over consumers. Fucking Nvidiots, man.
>>55545265
>Nvidia pricing is always identically like the predecessor
>>55544879
>149 bucks
Proofs.
sure it will
>>55545201
Yes you are. Posting Nvidia benchmarks from their biased PDF file like it is the truth.
kek
>>55545160
480 8GB is $240, though.
If 1060 3 GB ends up being $150, then that's some aggressive pricing. Based on specs, it shouldn't be much far behind the 6 GB version, so I have my doubts on the price tag. Probably ends up being $200.
>>55545359
What else am I supposed to support? Another huge company that would do the exact same thing in their position?
>>55545403
The $149 price tag happen maybe because its actually 2.5GB instead of 3GB.
the 1060 3GB is basically nvidias answer to the RX 470.
>>55545403
>$249
>not buying a $199 one and flash it to 8GB
You sure like getting fucked in the ass don't you? Why not go the jewVidia way for maximum ass pounding, you twink?
Holy shit this place is a fucking shit hole.They do it for hotpockets.
And i thought /v/ was full of shills but that's nothing compared to this.
>>55545472
>AMD are scammers
Thanks for provre it point...
>nvidia
lol
>>55545472
>buy 4gb 480
>try to flash it
>doesn't work because you got an actual 4gb version
whoops!
I wouldn't buy a 480 anyway. Nor would I buy a 1060.
>>55545121
according to this the 1060 is overclocked roughly 200mhz on the base/boost clock.
Other benchmarks show the 1060 clocked up to 2000mhz.
Most likely that the 1060 FE will be slightly faster than the reference 480.
AIB cards from both sides should put the cards on par with the 480 excelling in amd titles.
ITT: Enjoy your gimped performance when new generation hits the stores.
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/831639/nvidia-is-deliberately-downgrading-kepler-gpus-performance-in-favor-of-maxwell-/
[H]ardOCP was right. Polaris will be a disappointment, hotter than Pascal, draw more power than Pascal, don't overclock like Pascal. The GlobalFoundries/Samsung 14nm is a mess.
End of the story.
POO IN LOO NOW I SHIT ALL OVER YOUR GPU
>>55544879
HOLY SHIT
>>55545545
>things that haven't happened
>[citation needed]
>>55545512
>novidia takes away 0.5gb
>>it's better this way, who cares
>amdont gives away 4gb
>>scammers
just say you like taking it up the ass already. there is no shame in that, as long as you don't factor in you father's opinion
>10 frames on games nobody gives a shit about
>more expenisve
>drivers will eventually make the 480 better
>>55545666
>pay more shekels for 8GB
>the 4GB is the same card
>not scamming
both are evils
>>55545685
>games nobody gives a shit about
can you elaborate?
>>55544879
I guess Nvidia is now for poor fags.
The NDA end when?
>>55545711
>discounts are scams
Stupid noVidia fanbois can't even get proper shilling pasta from their handlers.
>>55545594
Pascal and Porlars both throw out a ton of heat at load and are a PITA to cool because the dies are bloody small and dense
Pascal is more power efficient but the gap isn't as large as Tahiti versus Kepler
Implying that Pascal overclocking gains aren't bottleneck by memory bandwidth
The real story is that GPU guys are running out of steam due to physics.
>>55546183
>Pascal is more power efficient but the gap isn't as large as Tahiti versus Kepler
The 28nm to 16nm is a big step
>$149
>wccftech
Nvidiots will believe this
>>55546081
pls this
>>55544879
So 3.5 all over again?
>nvidiots see 1060 for $150
>find out it performs 10x worse than real trusted benchmarks of a card called gtx 1060
>they find out 3gb and 6gb are nothing alike and nvidia tricked them
I have a feeling that AMD are going to drop the 4gb SKU and "drop" the 8 down to $200, or maybe even $185
>>55544879
sorry but the 1000 series will only enjoy superiority on a short term and it will die a gruesome death when dx12 and vulkan becomes a norm. Heck even now amd is already flexing its true power and its just the start.
GeForce FX all over again. Prove me wrong
>>55548749
I feel like we haven't even seen Tahiti's final form yet.
>>55546394
I'm taking about actual power consumption
The jump from 28nm to 16nm isn't that big. For goodness sake, GP104 is barely 50% faster in the best case than GM204 that it replaced only consumes 40W less when fully loaded.
Not exactly earth-shattering when compared to gains from previous die shrinks.
how quick would 3GB of VRAM fill up?
>>55544879
>believing Nvidia MSRP
>>55548835
>full damage control mode
it's ok, rakesh. you win some, lose some. don't get salty.
>>55548852
just a fact. try to get a 1070 or 1080 for the MSRP
>>55544879
nah I'll buy the 480 I'm not a poorfag lmoa
>nvidiots are dumb enough to believe wccftech
the only thing that the GTX 1060 has that is stronger than the RX 480 is the shilling team behind it.
>>55548860
then also the fact that you can never get them at msrp out of burgerland even actet some years later.
Calling it now:
Nvidia will use biased "reviews" like in the OP to claim the GTX 1060 outperforms the RX480, and will then subsequently mislead as many customers as possible into believing it is the 3GB 1060 that's getting the faked performance.
They really are a slimy company.
>>55548856
>>55548907
nvidia engaged full saturation attacks for the 1060's pre-release. Every review site is posting at least 3 daily articles for it since last week.
>>55548957
>will
see >>55548856
>>55544879
I thought that the original price of the GTX 1070 was only for the "Founder's Edition" and that third party version would be a lot cheaper
So why are they fucking $580 in my country, same as the Founder's one?
>>55549042
market demand and supply
>>55549042
Nvidia launched so early they can barely manage to ship 100 a week.
>>55544879
So why the fuck are they calling the GTX 1050 a '3gb GTX 1060'?
>>55549042
demand and supply plus taxes and shipping. Burgerland is the only place you can get close to msrp and its not happening for the next few months
>>55549042
Same reason why 480s are $300+ on Amazon
>>55549100
I doubt that nvidia didn't anticipate this situation and they themselves never expected their partners to remain below the FE's. IMHO they slapped the MSRP for shits and giggles; or to bring the perf/dollars graphs artificially down.
>>55549128
Thats already cheap. Reference 480 here are at 310+ usd and the custom ones will most likely go up as high as 330 to 350 usd.
I'm starting to believe that for every mention of an AMD product there must be at least thrice more for Nvidia's.
paying the green price for review samples.
>>55545666
keep bringing out the 3.5 thing, its shows the lack of arguments for current discussion.
>2016
>b-but muh 3.5gb
>check 480 prices
>$400 CAD
>actual exchange rate is $260 - $310 depending on 4GB or 8GB
Why do we always get jewed?
It'd be cheaper for me to just drive across the fucking border and buy one.
>>55548957
>he thinks amd doesnt have review guides
>>55545086
They do. They have even written "articles" with a 4chan post as their source.
>>55545723
read it again and again until you understand, keep reading it, don't reply until you fucking manage to understand so he doesn't need to elaborate, if you don't get it, smash your head against a rusty rail until you can't function to use this website.
>>55545013
videocardz is the most unbiased official source I've seen
>>55545061
same
that's nice, while everybody slurps on 14nm dick, i just picked up a 970 for 230 shipped
>>55550117
Some dumb ass just picked up my 970 for 230! Ah HAHAHAHAHA
>>55550117
people like you actually exist
RIP AMD
>>55550117
>buying a maxwell before 1060 is out
>>55550117
Don't mind the haters, that's a good deal desu senpai
if you could get two 1060s for 300$, why would anyone buy a 1070?
>>55550542
Nvidia thought of that. 1060 does not support SLI
>>55550542
Cannot SLI 1060s.
>falling for the bait and switch
Why do people think the 3gb card is a cut down 1060? Its a fucking 1050.
>>55544879
Are you actually suggesting that it doesn't ruin your pc and overheat your motherboard like the 480 does?
none of these arguments matter because in the end developers don't give a rat's fuck about amd and therefore it will always be inferior
>>55550708
They will now because amd chips will be in every console and iphone/mac
Nvidia has no endgame
>>55550117
this. my oced 970 outperforms a 480 and i paid $250 for it over a year ago, it has been a good value.
>>55548856
Hmm, I think it's tricks with the nvidia control panel, implementing some "optimizations" to get to those number and since AMD wouldn't have them, it gets throttled by SSAA. The 480 score matches pretty close with 1440p.
>>55550413
where you sell it?
>1060 3 gb
Sure, "1060"
>>55548898
Where on jewtube you got that cancerous nvidiot shill famalan?
>>55545265
Are you stupid, hav eyou even looked at 1070 and 1080 pricing in comparison to last generations equals?
>>55550772
>my overclocked card is more powerful than a non overclocked one
why don't nvidiots like comparing cards in a 1:1 setting? really makes you think..
>>55550999
>it's nvidiotry to buy the best perf/$ regardless of brand
kek, i owned several amd cards before i bought my 970, and will probably own some in the future too unless amd or pc gaymen dies completely.
> comparing cards in a 1:1 setting?
because the 970 overclocks much better than a 480 and doesn't kill motherboards.
>>55551155
except that 970s aren't the best price/perf cards. the 480 beats a 870 when compared at the same clock speeds
e.g.. a 480 at 1350mhz > a 970 at 1350mhz
not to mention you get 8gb of vram and not 3.5 which can run into problems like in the picture i posted. and 970s can't into async coomputer etc etc. your card is garbage, it doesn't matter what how much money you spent on it when you own a literally defective card.
>>55545359
because Nvidia is just better
>>55544905
except it's not, in Europe gtx 1060 is cheaper than ayymd rx 480
>>55548735
good it will be better for us all
>>55548835
>>believing AMD MSRP
what would be the best time to upgrade my gpu. i wanna spend bout tree hunnit dollarydoos but with all these new gpus being released atm i am unsure of what to get. please assistaance.
>>55551593
want dx11 performance get Nvidia, want dx12 performance get AMD
>>55551374
>except that 970s aren't the best price/perf cards.
they are at the $250 and less price point.
>e.g.. a 480 at 1350mhz > a 970 at 1350mhz
irrelevant. the 480 didn't exist when i bought my 970 and my 970 does 1560mhz core clock @ 1.187v.
>not to mention you get 8gb of vram and not 3.5 which can run into problems like in the picture i posted.
literally isn't a problem at 1080p, if i wanted to game at higher resolutions i'd buy a card that isn't midrange
> your card is garbage, it doesn't matter what how much money you spent on it when you own a literally defective card.
it was either a reference 290 or $250 970. reference 290 is close to 10% slower than a 970 and has a huge failure rate with the stock cooler.
>>55551374
the 480 beats a 870 when compared at the same clock speeds
e.g.. a 480 at 1350mhz > a 970 at 1350mhz
Because another architecture you moron? rx 480 really can't oc more than 1380mhz while gtx 970 can oc easily higher than 1450mhz.
>>55551590
do you want to see GTX1070 price in Europe?
https://www.amazon.de/MSI-PCI-Express-Grafikkarte-GeForce-GTX-1070/dp/B01GRCYPE6/ref=sr_1_1?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1468395013&sr=1-1&keywords=gtx+1070
same card on newegg is 440bux.
>>55551507
>Better
>Mainstream series is the most expensive yet
1070 might have the excuse of being a cheap Titan, but the 1060 is fucking borderline at $250. The premium is not going to offset how fast the cards may age down the line.
>>55551638
Do you wanna see gtx 1060 price in europe?
http://benczmark.pl/uploads/backend_img/b/fotki_recenzje/gtx1060/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1060-ceny.jpg
it's 30 euro cheaper than rx 480. AYYY
>>55551374
>literally defective card
if the 970 is defective despite being both cheaper and faster than the 480 and 390, what does that make AMD's rebrandeon cards?
>>55551668
>Suggested price
never going to become a reality, this price doesn't include shipment and handling.
This is very nice. What processors would pair well with this card on both Intel and AMD fronts?
>>55551717
just like amd prices, you have to add $20-50 more unless you want shitty palit cooler for $10 more. It does include shipping and handling since prices vary from country to country.
