Guys...
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Guys...
I forgot the links
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9258975/fs/9249139/fs/9247799
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9259050/fs/9248958/fs/9247684#
Looks like the 1060 absolutely demolishes the 480 in every single way, while costing only $10 more and using less power.
Seriously, who thought AMD was gonna have the midrange market locked down?
>>55544150
We'll have to see what the AIB 480's bring to the table. If they can push past 1500 they could put the 1060 in a tight spot since the 1060 looks like it tops out at 2126Mhz or about that. I doubt it will clock much higher and even if it does the gains will not scale enough to warrant it.
AMD does have the midrange, and soon the high end, locked down.
This'll be more obvious once 1060 comes out and is largely outperformed by the 480. AMD's driver updates will continue to add performance improvements on top of that, and dx12/vulkan performance basically blows nvidia out of the water - it isn't even a contest anymore.
Anyone actually buying nvidia right now is going to regret it within a year.
RIP AMD
>>55544046
>50% higher clock
>Barely only 3% to 15% higher performance in all test
>sometime lose in other.
I'm dumb, can someone explain how the scaling works in that?
>>55544225
>damage control
>>55544234
Can't compare different architectures clock-for-clock.
>>55544234
Make more cores
>>55544242
This, clock speed isn't a good performance marker
>>55544046
>25% overclock
>comparing to bone stock 480
>totally not a leak planted by Nvidia
>>55544046
DELETE DELETE DELETE
>>55544380
I am OP and I want AMD to win as much as the next AMD fanboy does but I prefer honesty. I really hope the AIB 480's can clock past 450 at least and outperform the 1060 but we will have to wait a few days to find out. 480 Nitro is out on Thursday and the 1060 is for sale next week.
>>55544426
>clock past 1450Mhz
fixed
>>55544046
>more than 200MHz OC
Yes, and? Wait for the actual release you fucktards. It will definitely be faster than the RX480, but you're not getting it for less than $280 with all the founders bullshit Nvidia pushed around.
>>55544046
>>55544075
>extreme overclocks barely win vs a stock alternative
YOU CANT MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>>55544046
>>55544075
At least overclock them both, you spaz.
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/9202637/fs/9188962
>>55544046
So is this good or bad for who?
The big differences of core clocks and barely any significant performance differences confused me.
>>55544714
The Nvidia shill did not post the standard Firestrike score just to make it harder to compare from that other linked score I bet. Anyhow basically if the 480 OC's past 1500Mhz on the AIB's it will CRUSH the 1060 since I highly doubt the 1060 will clock any higher than 2126Mhz and it scales much less than the 480 does so even if it can it will have a hard time beating the 480.
But wait another week and will will all know the truth.
Again with the waiting. Oy vey!
>>55544046
>Using a known Nvidia shill as a source
>>55544781
Well there are only about 3 links on 3dmark's site linking to the 1060 so you take what you will from it.
I've been reading these dumbass threads for the past days because I have nothing else good going on my life so I'll give you faggots my conclusion.
Overclocked RX 480 outperforms stock clocked 1060. RX 480 AIB cards will hover around 1300mhz, AIB 1060 cards will outperform most RX 480 cards by a small margin.
RX 480 will be equal or perform slightly better in DX12 depending on the game.
tl;dr they're basically the same shit.
I'm still gonna get the Nitro+ because I think with Vulkan and DX12 the 480 will perform a bit better than the 1060 and I don't want monopoly.
>>55544150
>using less power.
>at 2126mhz
pick one
