>>55515627
did people actually watercool 960s? I dont see the problem with no water cooling support. hell, that FE cooler has 50% more area than the 960 stock.

>>55515649
noise brother, noise. i don't want any

>>55515686
You won't have any with an aftermarket design. My MSI GTX 980 makes no noise and that takes like 60W more power than the 1060. I bet the average watercooling setup makes more noise.

Wait a second here. Are you rusing me? A water cooling setup costs hundreds of dollars and even a water block costs tons of money, why would anyone put that on a card that costs like 250 bucks?

>>55515686
eh. aftermarket then. Ive never even heard of people watercooling amd x80 or nvidia x60 cards.

>>55515627
low end cards have founders edition

>>55515762
Nice shilling, Rajesh.

>>55515762
gotta pay 50$ for literally nothing just a FE Nvidia are literally Jews

>>55515779
That's what happens when there is no competition. Intel is like that too. They have seriously sick chips hidden in their locker, but they ain't showing.

>>55515792
yeah its sad sure amd isnt the best but i support them for the sake of avoiding a monopoly imagine is nvidia were the only card makers

>>55515902
They technically are. AMD is almost at a level of irrelevance. Hopefully that'll change, but I'm not holding my breath.

>>55515686
>buys poorfag card
>WAAAAAAH TOOO LOUD

>>55515627
>Buying reference cards especially when they're midrange overpriced FE

You're either gasping at straws or you really want to be cucked.

>>55515730
There is no point to watercool an r9 380, the sapphire one anyways stays below 70c for me all the time, only goes higher if my ac isnt working

But that's just the reference card.

This exact line is something I heard a hundred times in RX480 threads.