Question from under a rock: how big was actually the progress of display industry for last 10 years? I have a cheapass Acer 1360x768 LCD display I bought like in 2007. Previously I had 1280x1024 Dell LCD from 2003 and only difference Acer had is a bit better upscale quality from low resolutions. If I buy similarly cheap modern display will I notice any difference? Did LCD technology overcome motion blur problem and how expensive are LCD displays which have 0 amount of ghosting like CRT had, if there are any?
>>55508957
>0 amount of ghosting like CRT had
I mean perceivable ghosting, because lets be realistic.
Ghosting on a CRT? Are you high?
>>55509039
Do you know what "zero" means?
>>55509039
Ghosting in CRT is possible.
Wikipedia/wiki/ghosting
If you're using a 10 year old LCD, throw it away and buy a new one. You will save enough money on your energy bill in a few years to pay for itself, literally no reason not to upgrade unless you need the money for food or rent.
>>55509420
It's only 19W anon.
It's OK for typing text. But I bought few games on steam sale recently, and the experience is just cringe worthy compared to what I remember about playing UT99 on CRT. So I'm asking, do modern displays offer acceptable performance or just anyone but me learned to deal with LCD flaws in these years?
>>55509561
Yes, better upscaler, digital connections, more inputs, better color. Just buy the cheapest IPS panel monitor you can find and it will be a huge improvement. Old LCDs tend to have this piss yellow tinge to them.
>>55509638
Allright then. Mine has morgue blue tinge though.
