What extensions are you guys currently using?
>>55435984
https everywhere
ublock origin
stylish
mega
penis enlargement extension
>>55436632
Is Ublock better than Adblock?
>>55436645
Yes
>>55435984
üBlock origin
Privacy badger
Https everywhere
(And I have third party cookies disabled)
>>55435984
>Chromecast
>Sticky notes
>New tab redirect
>Stylish
>Ublock origin
>Facebook unseen
>Cecil lecture downloader
>>55436668
How so? And are those extensions available on Chrome? Or Firefox omly?
>>55436672
>New tab redirect
What do?
>>55436691
Redirects to a different site from whatever is set to your new tab shortcut/button. I.e I set it to a webpage I made instead of it being that shitty default homepage for chrome...
>>55436681
It uses considerably less RAM. And yeah they are available on Firefox too.
uBlock
HTTPS Everywhere
Greasemonkey
Stylish
New tab homepage
BetterStop
Context Search
Decentraleyes
DevEdition theme enabler
Google Redirects Fixer
Greasemonkey
HTTPS-Everywhere
Menu Filter
No Resource URI Leak
Open WitH
Reddit Enhancement Suite
Secret Agent
Stop Fingerprinting
TotalSpoof
uBlock Origin
uMatrix
Undo Close Tab Replacement
Add to Search Bar
FEBE
Privacy Settings
Skip adf.ly skip!!
uBlock Origin
NoScript
Watch With mpv
Flashgot
Greasemonkey
Refer Control
Reddit Enhancement Suite
Various Twitch Extensions
>>55436718
Cool, and what so bad about it? With a theme it looks pretty fucking nice.
>>55436723
Well I have 16GB of RAM, and never use above 8 so I guess i'm fine. Are there better reasons to switch?
What extensions are a must have? I don't want to slow down my browser.
>>55436749
>>55436766
Why so many? Holy shit. Which are actually truly needed?
>>55436769
Replace Adblock with Ublock O, it's way more efficient.
Decentraleyes is also a nice little extension that might just make certain websites faster.
Oh, and HTTPS everywhere. Everything else is not really necessary.
>>55436799
Thanks dude! What does HTTPS everywhere do?
>>55436781
>>55436781
I'm >>55436766
It's not that many. uBlock for obvious reasons, noscript for security/privacy, Refer control for anti-adblock blocking/privacy, RES since it makes reddit better, watch with MPV lets me watch youtube videos in mpv rather than on the shitty, battery eating website, etc.
Only uBlock, NoScript, Refer Control, and Grease Monkey are what i consider mandatory.
>>55436821
It forces https (or encrypted connections) on sites that support it. It's nice for privacy.
>>55436822
Sorry that i'm such a noob at these extensions haha, but what do NoScript, Refer Control, and Grease Monkey do?
>>55436841
Do a lot of sites support it?
>>55436843
NoScript blocks all Javascript on pages until I whitelist it.
Refer Control lets me pick whether a site can see where i came from.
Grease Monkey allows me to use various scripts.
>>55436850
Most do.
I can't really give examples, but most modern websites do support it.
>>55436781
Yeah, but notice the alphabetical order. I copied the list from about:support.
>Add to Search Bar
>FEBE
>Privacy Settings
>Skip adf.ly skip!!
These I leave disabled until when I need them.
>>55436769
I find my own creation more aesthetically pleasing.
>>55436766
>>55436821
>>55436822
>>55436858
Is it just me or is it hard finding these in the Chrome Extensions, can't find anything official.
Are there any specific sites that require Javascript? That easily exploitable piece of shit.
>>55436871
Post picture
>>55436869
>Skip adf.ly skip!!
This one will come in handy for certain situations.
>>55436885
I mainly use it to hold my bookmarks instead of it being under the search bar..
Does HTTPS everywhere slow down browser speed? I noticed that it is slowed it down a bit, don't know if it's just me.
>>55436975
How the fuck did you do this? That is fucking cool mane.
>>55436987
If you know even the slightest bit of html you can make this site.
It's not that hard buddo
>>55437019
I know nothing of html, do you also host your own server? Maybe you can share the source code or some shit.
How do you edit the links?
>>55436766
>NoScript
Grandpa get with the times.
>>55436881
You forgot me: >>55436749
>>55437073
Anything better?
>>55437103
Umatrix? You're already using ublock so why not that too?
>>55437103
Matrix, anon..
>>55437119
Lol, why would I use that over No script?
>>55437119
>>55437123
>>55437138
Basically the same thing as NoScript huh?
>>55437138
>>55437143
Your loss.
>>55437147
I'm curious to what the difference is.
>>55437147
>worse version of noscript
>less reputable
>Why would I use that
>Hurr Durr, ur loss if U no UZ it XD
If you are going to shill that crap then at least try to be believable about it.
>>55437171
sup noscript dev
>>55437152
>more granular than noscript
>more scope than noscript
>less of a pain in the ass than noscript
>>55437203
Is it difficult to use? Don't know if I would get the hang of it.
>>55437214
That's a really weird fucking question to ask given you're using noscript. Yes it took me a lot less time to know my way around umatrix than it took me with noscript. Plus it supports noscript rules now so you can literally just import your noscript backup into it.
>>55437282
Not him...
>>55437203
>doesn't even blacklist by default
LEL
Now fuck off unless you have some real proof that it is better.
For example show me how to block google everywhere other than 4chan.
ublock origin flashgot httpseverywhere greasemonkey
>>55437460
>flashgot
What?
>>55437037
Sorry, went out. But here's a link to the source of my webpage if anyone wants to tinker with it.
http://pastebin.com/5iw9qHba
>>55437516
Thanks mane. I just wish I knew how to edit and shit and make it work for me.
>>55437422
>how to block google everywhere other than 4chan
God, I honestly believed you were just trying to get a rise out of me by spouting blatantly false crap so I tried to not bite what I assumed to be bait, but looks like you really are retarded.
>>55437553
You're an idiot. I am asking you how to block EVERYTHING by default. Google was just an example. No one is going to go through and do that shit for every site in existence.
Part of what makes no script so great is that everything is blocked by default unless you specifically white list it. Holy fuck, you can't really be that retarded, can you?
>>55437531
I added a couple comments if it helps. If you don't have a text editor you could otherwise just use notepad to edit the file
>>55437604
What do you mean? Thanks bro, I just don't know if I could get it running, I wish I could. I would need some type of help.
>>55437597
>I am asking you how to block EVERYTHING by default
>>55437597
>block EVERYTHING by default
Is this damage control? Noscript can't even do that.
>>55437629
Okay, how do you make it so that is the default configuration for everyone that every downloads the extension?
>>55437664
Nigga wut? No script has everything blocked by default. The only ones that are allowed to run are the ones you specifically whitelist.
>>55437672
Noscript blocks CSS? Images? Cookies? .mp4 files?
Did you hit your head?
>>55437621
>Literally save it as a .html file and place it into a folder.
>Add a wallpaper to that folder and open the file in notepad.
>Then change the name of the THIS.png to the name of the wallpaper you saved.
>Close and save. Double click on your new edited file.
>Bingo bango you've got your website up and running
>>55437680
Are you retarded?
ME:
>Most guns comes unloaded by default.
You:
>But can you shave your mustache with it?!!!
You are literally this retarded.
>>55437665
You just click along from 'cookies' to 'other' holy shit.
>>55437701
Yea but I need to edit the sites and the names of the columns.
Also is the site hosted on the computer?
>>55436645
Yes
>>55437735
I installed it, haven't noticed a difference.
I did however find this, and i'm curious to know what tab it is.
>>55437707
kek
>>55437721
Yeah, no server required. The new tab direct redirects the new tab page for chrome to the location of the saved file.
You can easily edit the name and links through trial and error if you have absolutely no idea.
Just look down the name that is associated with the links. i.e ctrl + F /sci/ and see what happens if you change the link and the name.
Goodluck!
>>55437781
Thanks bro, I appreciate that. One last thing, to make it my homepage, what do?
>>55436987
HTTPs everywhere does take a bit of RAM but yeah can't live without brah
>>55437707
Every single time umatrix passes one more of your retarded "tests" you say "are you retarded?" and promptly move the goalpost yet again (don't even deny this, your efforts i.e. "th-that's not actually what was referring to, it's this other thing!" are transparent as fuck). This butthurt is hilarious. Right now you're arguing about how the config comes out of the box (which shouldn't really matter because as I've already said you can import noscript rulesets into umatrix).
You clearly have no interest in umatrix. You're just here to "prove" that noscript is somehow superior by setting whatever arbitrary, random criteria under which you think noscipt would likely come out on top, probably so you can save your ego or something.
>>55437821
Yea that is true, do you think it can cause this tho>>55437759
>>55437794
If you're using chrome just get the file location
of where you saved the .html and copy paste it
in settings.
>like this: https://gyazo.com/a5603dca4b5293f6e08b0ed1e13080d8
And for new tab redirect you do the same and paste it in there:
>like dis: https://gyazo.com/3a0b0e8bef5a1af422e310e3c800cec9
>>55437826
My test never changed. Right from the start it was "block shit by default until it is white listed". That hasn't changed. Your ad hominem and goal post moving won't change that. It's painfully obvious that you are just trying to shill this shit.
>>55437835
shift + escape inside chrome to open the inbuilt task manager. It has details on which tab/extension is hogging memory. It's pretty cool if you ask me.
>>55437871
You learn something new every day...
>>55437860
>ad hominem
What ad hominem?
>"block shit by default until it is white listed"
Block what shit? I fucking showed you how to block literally EVERYTHING except for text, which is much more than noscript, already. What the fuck more are you even looking for?
>>55437871
>>55437886
Haha that is cool, Thanks mane. I close some tabs and it seems like the issue is fixed.
>>55437904
So what was causing it?
>>55437889
I want it to block everything that it can block, by default, on install, the second it is installed.
That should be the standard. Everything is blocked until it is white-listed, period.
And no that I don't care that noscript doesn't cockblock the dog from fucking your mom every Wednesday like he has for the past (insert your age here) year because that is not what I installed it to block. It blocks what I need it to, and it blocks all of that shit from every source by default.
This UMatrix shit seems to allow any first party shit by default. Just enjoy your drive by ransom ware because you happened to go on a site that was hosting it directly.
>>55437665
Is this serious? It already does that, uMatrix blocks everything except CSS and images by default.
>>55437975
Don't be stupid. It allows images and CSS in general by default (including non-first party). It allows EVERTHING first party by default.
>>55437949
My fucking sides. Have you ever had a look at noscript's default whitelist, fuckface?
>For example show me how to block google everywhere other than 4chan.
>I want it to block everything that it can block, by default, on install, the second it is installed.
>
>That should be the standard. Everything is blocked until it is white-listed, period.
>My test never changed
HAHAHAHAHA. You're literally lying through your teeth at this point.
Is ghostery bad?
>>55438013
I forgot it allowed everything first party, the more sensible default. You're right, it doesn't block EVRYTHING by default. You can change that in 3 clicks. Still better than NoScript.
>>55438018
Dude, google is a perfect example. That shit is everywhere. What would you have used as an example?
>>55438038
That's not sensible in the slightest, and it completely negates the main benefit of using something like noscript.
>>55437975
He's so fucking obviously desperate to prove noscript is superior by whatever means he's literally bitching about the default config which takes one click to change right now.
>>55438049
>example
LOL that's what you're framing it as now? Your old criteria has literally nothing to do with your new one. How does whitelisting google on 4chan.org have anything to do with out-of-the-box configs? Please explain in depth without resorting to insults and gaslighting. I'd really love you see you go through mental gymnastics to string them two together.
>>55438104
Simple. Noscript blocks it by default, but it is an all or nothing thing. If UMatrix blocked it by default (even as a first party) but you could then white-list it on a singly site then you might have a point about umatrix being useful. Google was just used as a convenient example because it has it's hands in everything, including 4chan. Since we are both on here, google and 4chan make good examples because we are both familiar with them.
>inb4: the shill claims to have never heard of Google
>>55438059
You would look me in the eye and lie about not regularly enabling the first party scripts when using NoScript?
>>55438157
Are you retarded? Of course I would enable them on sites I trusted. I didn't just automatically enable them on every site I ever visted. That's the fucking difference.
>>55437516
First, thank you for sharing
Second, I truly admire your patience.
>>55438150
You did nothing to explain why the fuck you even demanded a HOW-TO on blocking scripts if your point really was that umatrix's defaults are unacceptable. First you ask for user interaction, then you say user interaction isn't what matters.
4/10 that's the best I can do for you. You didn't even do any mental gymnastics; you only dodged the question.
>>55438192
We've already established you're the retard here.
Admit it, you're always enabling first party scripts on everything because everything uses those scripts to make the page presentable/usable.
>>55438266
I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. When I saw all first party shit was unblocked by default, I thought maybe I had miss-clicked an option during install.
>>55438278
shh, adults are talking.
>>55435984
AutoScroll
Custom Redirects
Enhanced Steam
HTTPS Everywhere
Magic Actions for YouTube
Reddit Enhancement Suite
Stylish
Tampermonkey
uBlock Origin
Wappalyzer
>>55438297
>Magic Actions for YouTube
>Reddit Enhancement Suite
What do?
>>55438288
>still evading the question
Please explain why the fuck you even demanded a HOW-TO on blocking scripts if your point really was that umatrix's defaults are unacceptable, thanks.
ublock origin
awesome screenshot
rikaikun
tampermonkey
>>55438314
Like I said. I thought that "I" had made a mistake. I didn't think such a stupid mistake would have been by design.
Feel free to keep pushing this red herring though, now that you know you have lost.
>>55438288
>shh, adults are talking.
Adults can be retarded too. e.g. you.
If you can make uMatrix block everything by default with 3 clicks and it allows you to block much more and more specifically than NoScript why would you ever use NoScript?
>>55438329
See:
>>55437707
>ME:
>>Most guns comes unloaded by default.
>
>You:
>>But can you shave your mustache with it?!!!
>
>You are literally this retarded.
Because I only use either of them to block scripts. I don't care that I can't shave my face with my pistol. That's not why I bought it. In the same way, I don't give a fuck that um can block images because that's not why I would use it or no script. Bloat != better.
>>55438326
>Like I said. I thought that "I" had made a mistake. I didn't think such a stupid mistake would have been by design.
Still doesn't make sense. Your previous criteria still has no apparent relationship whatsoever with your current one. Your """mistake""" does nothing to change this. Please explain how the two are the same and, like you said, "My test never changed". Thanks.
>>55438382
Of course it does, retard. The test was always, how to block everything by default. My first post was the same as that, but I was assuming the mistake was on my park not the part of the extension itself.
>>55438367
Then what's your problem? If the tools have different goals use what fits your needs better. uMatrix still does what NoScript does and more. Not blocking first party by default is not a shortcoming.
>>55438428
>Not blocking first party by default is not a shortcoming.
It really, really is, especially for people that don't know better.
>>55438401
>how to
>block everything by default
Hiding under semantics now, are we? If "by default" you meant "clean install, no user configuration whatsoever" then it directly contradicts with "how to", thus rendering your question invalid from the get go.
Admit it, you set the bar too low when you asked me how to whitelist google on 4chan thinking umatrix won't be able to do it, then changed your rhetoric when you were shown that umatrix could in fact do it and realized you fucked up. You're not going to bullshit your way outta this one. Just give up.
>>55438459
Are you saying you're one of those people?
>>55438464
>then it directly contradicts with "how to"
Not really. It's like installing shit and miss-clicking an option box then ending up with a hundred browser toolbars. anyway
GB2: >>>/v/
>>55438480
No, I am saying those are the kind of people that read these threads for suggestions.
>>55438459
For people that don't know better blocking first party will just make them uninstall the extension.
Hell, with youtube you need to enable a boatload of other scripts. Neither NoScript or uMatrix are for people that don't know better. There's just too much reliance on scripts in the average webpage.
Man that autist is a retard, okay, it's done. Now is ghostery good?
>>55438494
No script will let you allow it to run on a temporary basis, so even if you don't know what you are doing, when you are on a "safe site" like youtube, you can just temporarily allow the entire page.
That makes it easy to use even for them, while still protecting them from first party malware downloads on shady sites.
>>55438533
In that case uMatrix allows that too, just press the turn off button.
Teaching "them" how to disable all restrictions in a website temporarily leads to them disabling them permanently and then disabling restrictions globally cause why be bothered?
>>55438491
>Not really. It's like installing shit and miss-clicking an option box then ending up with a hundred browser toolbars. anyway
Ooh, so your problem is that it should have came with an installer that lets block 1p scripts _during_ install instead of after now.
>No, I am saying those are the kind of people that read these threads for suggestions.
So then it's not a concern of yours. What else makes noscript superior again?
A noscript user complaining about something not being "retard proof" enough is some funny shit tb.h btw
>>55438503
If you trust the ad company who wrote it and closed source software in general then there's no problem.
It might have some entries other blocklists have overlooked. Nobody knows for sure though.
>>55435984
This is all anyone could ever need, really.
carrot
uBlock Origin
uMatrix
FlashGot
Reddit Enhancement Suite
>>55438591
>classic theme restorer
How much does your firefox lag?
>>55438565
no umatrix turns it off. No script disables filtering temporarily on that page only and will turn it's self back on.
>>55438616
I think you replied to the wrong post but all rulesets in umatrix are temporary until you click on the lock icon.
>>55438608
A lot, to be honest. But I can't stand australis and I like compact UIs, so I'm stuck with it.
>>55436749
You're missing some :^)
CanvasBlocker
No Enumerable Extensions
Pure URL
Smart Referer (you can set this in about:config but the whitelist can be useful)
You might also be interested in these modifications to user.js (basically loads values into about:config)
http://www.ghacks.net/files/user.js%20[ghacks]-0.10-dark.html
https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js/ (after you read it once you can check https://github.com/pyllyukko/user.js/commits/master once in a while for new additions)
>>55438673
Thanks man, I'm always looking to expand my collection.
>>55438766
I'm having some doubt about the add-on called Stop Fingerprinting. I didn't have it before but I tested it and found some flaws which basically renders it useless.
>* window.screen: emulate standard fullHD screen with 40px task bar at the bottom and devicePixelRatio = 1
The window screen size is useless to spoof since you can always get the inner window size. Most people keep their browser window maximized so it essentially gives away your screen size. According to JonDonym there's no way to spoof the inner window size.
>* window.MediaDevices: hide media devices (microphones, cameras)
Don't have either so can't test this but I guess this is useful if you do have.
>* window.navigator: make all properties match to the current userAgen (if modified)
Not exactly sure what it changes.
>* navigator.plugins + mimeTypes: hide all plugins (they can still be used, just not enumerated)
No plugins installed but I assume you could get the same result by making plugins click-to-activate or use uMatrix and deny plugins by default.
>* font detection: add a bit of randomness to inline elements width and height to confuse font detection
Fonts can still be detected through CSS.
http://pieroxy.net/blog/pages/css-fonts/font-detect.html
Only way to protect against this is to set browser.display.use_document_fonts to 0. This does of course limit your available fonts which can make websites uglier.
>>55437904
>Google Chrome (32 bit)
get 64bit and try again
>>55438673
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>55437152
it can block css, cookies, scripts, images, plugins (flash player), scripts, xhr, force https, block hyperlink auditing, and spoof http referrer.
