http://videocardz.com/61844/nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-based-on-pascal-to-launch-in-august
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-gp100-geforce-gtx-titan-launch/
>>55427188
LIMITED EDITION COLLECTORS FIRST TIME BUYERS DEVELOPERS EDITION ONLY $2999!!!
*waiting intensifies*
>>55427188
Those sure are reputable sources friend.
>>55427188
>Ti only two months after regular version
Nvidia Jews at work again.
>videocardz
>wccftech
Didn't these guys go out of business when gawker got hulkster'd?
>AMD HBM2 rumored to be released in October
>AMD is late to the game again
>NVidia HBM2 is $1000+
Even though it will be out of the price range for 99% of people, it's good to see that GPU performance hasn't stagnated at least. As long as it is being made, the price will come down eventually
There is no 1080Ti release anytime soon
This is to replace the TITAN X, which is in the weird position of being slower than the 1080 but costs a lot more
>>55427417
GP100 or GP102?
>>55427452
Unknown atm, have to wait and see what it comes with
14gb?
holy fuck
>>55427417
Titan X is trash. The original Titan was pretty based though.
Nvidia should abandon the Titan if it can't do both DP compute and FP compute well.
>>55427623
>Titan X is trash
>>55427188
See, this is exactly what I've been talking about. Only cards worth buying are ti and *90x.
>>55428600
>Only cards worth buying are ti and *90x
next thing youre gonna tell me is that only unlocked cpus are worth buying
>>55428648
Exactly.
>>55427672
Beaten by OC'd 980Ti and compute wise not really better than the 980Ti
Shit DP performance too
>>55427188
>absolute overpriced gaymen hardware with no compute power
Tesla or GTFO
>>55428840
Overclock the titan too you dumbass.
>>55427188
why is /v/ery niggerish shit like this allowed on g???? its anti tech. its vidya for babbies.
>>55427188
>wccftech
why does this shitposter insist on flooding this particular board with shillshit from a shitwebsite?
>>55427672
0.2 DP TFLOPS
Etu!
my buddy is going to buy an original gtx titan for 210 usd
is that bad or nah
>>55432081
pretty bad
>>55432109
why?
$275 cad for 970~ish performance when the 970 is $450 cad and without the 3.5gb meme
>>55432081
The GTX970 is stronger, unless he is going to use it for CUDA which then carry on.
>>55432170
the 970 is also $175 more and barely outperforms it with less RAM
>>55427235
Been holding onto my 680 for 2012 in anticipation for the next big thing. I want off this ride
>>55432081
the card was a meme near release, getting outperformed by the much better value 780ti
kepler has been legacy'd already (no more drivers)
it's also not going to fare well under dx12
>>55432224
meant for >>55432164
>AMD releases their low end while Nvidia releases their midrange and high end
>AMD releases their midrange while Nvidia releases their enthusiast tier rape machine
God damn what kind of release schedule is this
>>55432188
>the 970 is also $175 more
Where the fuck do you live.
https://pcpartpicker.com/products/video-card/#c=186&sort=a8&page=1
>>55432277
notice how i specified my prices in CAD? Canadian Dollarydoos?
we pay about $100 more for everything even taking the dollar value into consideration
>>55432300
aigh then calm down
>>55432310
you're the dumbass assuming everyone is from your hick, backwater country. don't tell me to calm down, i want no association with that shithole you call a country
>>55432324
*pays $450 for a $250 card*
>>55432324
i bet you live in winnipeg don't you
>>55432345
that's even more insulting than being called american. how dare you
>>55432332
>don't have an overcrowded, overpopulated amount of people
>pay more with the dollar difference because there's less shitters to buy things
i'm fine with that
>>55432324
You're Prime Minister is Justin Trudeeuaueuaueu.
You are like Sweden. I've had morre chinks tell me they are Canadian than telling me they are real chinks. You are omegigahyper cuckolded.
>>55427188
1080ti 999$
1080ti FE - 1199$
Titan "P" - 1499+$ (FE only)
anyone who thinks NVidia will price 50% faster card than 1080 100-200$ more needs to get his head examined.
1080 25% faster than 1070 - difference in price 700/450= 55%
1080ti (25% faster than 1080) 700*1,55= 1100$+Nvidia stupid tax 10-15%=1155$~1265$=1199$
and thats only 1080ti 25% faster than 1080 (5GPC)
Titan (optimistic) 1499$, but knowing NVidia most likely 1999$
>1TFLOPS increase
>almost twice the price
good goyim!
>>55431750
no cool beefy special OC edition boards like for the custom 980Tis
>>55432514
> ~11% performance increase
> +39% more energy consumption
oy vey!
Maybe, I'm a retard.
But I think by the time you are at a resolution where more than 8GB of VRAM is needed, performance is shit anyway.
>>55432267
hmb2 low yields and nvidia rushing stuff to market
gddr5x is a meme and still bottlenecking a 1080
>>55432210
I ditched my 2x 680 4GB Classifieds I'd had since 2012 for a couple of 980ti Classifieds last year. Not worth the $ at all. I was expecting a larger difference.
>>55427607
Who said anythinga about 12 GB??
>>55432615
at 4k 8gb in some games isnt enough
>>55432640
14/16nm probably isn't up to high yields yet either. The packaging is an other factor. I think ankor got it above 98 or so % for fiji, but for TSMC it's the first time, so there is some room for error.
I was out of touch with this stuff for a while, do we know if the consumer gaming cards will use a GP100 chip with all the compute shit disabled or do they really make a GP102 one dedicated for gaming consumers?
Might replace my 980 Ti then, although I might fall for the gsync monitor meme.
Might actual be a better option in terms of perceived smoothnes.
>>55432709
its nvidia of course they ill make a gimped gaming card only.
maybe the new titan wont be as bad but the 1080ti will when it comes to DP and raw power
>>55432736
yes, but the question if they'll use the compute heavy GP100 or a gaming only chip without any compute ballast is still interesting.
>I already bought the 1070
JUST
>>55427623
the problem was that the original Titan cannibalized their quadro/professional series sales
>>55432267
Both would always release high end first
then AMD changed, probably because they didn't want to compete on "day 1"
>>55432984
i don't know if that's the only reason. For a new process it also really makes sense to start with a small chip and work your way up from there, simply because the yields will be fucking terrible compared to what you had on your old node. Also i assume it's easier to troubleshoot a relatively small chip if you find out that something doesn't work on the new node like you intended.
>>55432381
>you're
this is why you're american, you dumb piece of shit
>>55427219
/thread
>>55432514
That $999 is almost what the 1080 costs in Europe.
Anyone who is even remotely interested in VR is obligated to buy this card.
>>55433769
meaning it will cost a lot more in europe
Anons i have the money to buy a high end PC right now (1080), should i buy 1 right now or wait for the Ti version? the wait is killing meh....
>>55432646
I might just settle with a single 1080 if the price on for big Pascal or Vega are over $700-800. Just so tired of waiting
>>55433871
Don't be a waitfag
>>55433871
>>55433873
I feel you ;_;
>>55432477
Nice job copying your retarded comment from the site.
Name a single time a 80ti variant has been that much higher than 80 card.
>>55434010
>nvidia gpu prices aren't constantly going up
>>55432640
>gddr5x still bottlenecking a 1080
No
>>55434032
The delta between the 2 variants hasn't changed
>>55434273
>implying
just wait and you can see how wrong you are when you see the actual price at retailers. (ISHYGD care about nvidia's "MSRP")
>>55428600
Only cards worth buying from Nvidia are 1080Ti, 1070, probably 1060
Only cards worth buying from AMD are 490, 470
>>55434318
480 should be on that list as well.
>implying the 1060 can compete with the 480 on price/performance
the 1060 will have a competitive fantasy MSRP, and in reality be overpriced and useless.
>>55427188
>50% performance over the 1080
Just like the 1080 was twice the performance of a 980?
>>55434344
of course! Preorder your FOUNDERS Edition (tm) today!
>>55432477
1080 will get a price drop after 1080Ti releases
>>55433871
Buy a 1070 then resell and get the 1080Ti if you want it
>>55434340
The performance difference between the 480 and the 470 is only 12%. The price difference is 25%. The 480 isn't a bad deal, but I don't need it.
>>55434340
Also the 1060 will be significantly better for VR in the near term (simultaneous multiprojection). By the time DX12 gets widely used, you'll want a new midrange card for VR. I'll be trying to hold off getting a VR card and headset until the next die shrink which hopefully will occur in about three years.
>>55434405
>1080 will get a price drop after 1080Ti releases
Kek, just like Intel's Haswell-E chips right?
Also the 1080 Launched at an increased price compared to previous generations
>>55434452
>VR
useless meme
>>55434461
I really don't believe that the market will support a 1000USD gaymer gpu. Either they don't have many of them to sell, they don't expect the market to be large (4K is tiny), or they're completely out of touch, the last of which is unlikely.
Enjor your VR :^)
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-vive-displayport-incompatible,32204.html
>>55434465
I tried it while you were materbating in your mom's basement. The Vive is awesome.
>>55434405
>then resell
how
>>55434504
They already make the Titan X which makes no sense for anyone to buy, this will probably replace the titan cards for gaming at $1k
>>55434523
I tried it as well. the vive is overrated, and the games are laughable. the performance (hardware) is not here yet for full blown AAA games to be playable in VR, and the headsets are subpar.
>>55434536
To your friend, on a hardware forum, on craigslist, on eBay, on whatever auction site is popular in your shitty country, etc. You live on an island with no internet or something?
>still no hardware async
They might as well release Ti too and save everyone the trouble. No one is going to buy that shit late in 2017, when their actual dx12 cards will come the year after.
>>55434567
I agree the headsets and ecosystems need improvement, but there are plenty of people who are OK with being early adopters. For those people who are also on a budget, the 1060 is a viable choice, quite possibly even better than the 480. Also the performance is here. The 1070 can easily push 90FPS at the Vive's resolution, which isn't that much greater than 1080p.
>>55434627
>VR
>on a budget
no such thing. the headsets alone are overpriced, mate.
>>55434653
OSVR is coming out for 400
Is AMD coming out with a 480X? or are they getting rid of the X class of cards?
>>55434693
Yes and they will rape the nvidots
>>55434693
Nop
>As we await custom Radeon RX 480 cards, there’s not really much to talk about regarding Polaris 10 architecture anymore. However, one rumor is still floating around, even though reviewers tried to make it as clear as possible that it’s not true.
>The rumor was that Polaris 10 could feature 40 Compute Units and therefore 2560 Stream Processors (so just as Pascal GP104). Unfortunately this is ultimately confirmed not to be true
http://videocardz.com/61840/full-amds-polaris-10-gpu-has-2304-stream-processors
>>55434405
>1080 will get a price drop before its even in stock at a consistent rate
lol
>>55435005
>Doesn't even know when the 1080Ti will be released
Stay salty, friendo
>>55434569
btw that was a different anon im the one who posted the suicidal pepe, might have to resell the 1070 im fucking done waiting for now thx for the advice.
>>55435021
>thinks the 1080 will be available by then
you would know salty, given the nvidia chink cock you're sucking on right now
>>55435132
I use AMD, fanboy. I'm getting the 470. I had a 280x, and I'm using an FX-6350, soon to be FX-8350.
>inb4 driver overhead meme
>>55427188
1080Ti release in August would be the biggest middle finger to enthusiasts in modern consumer computing in living memory.
> hey look at this awesome new card, it's only $600! *
> * actually $700 **
> ** more like $800+ street price for the first month
> oh btw, two months later we're gonna have something 50% faster that we previously gave no indication would be out before 2017!
1050 WHEN REEEEAGGGGHAHHHHHHHH
1070 owner, no fucks given.
>>55434504
We are already at $800. The $500 card is not even considered high end but upper midrange. Poorfags get their $250 cards that are as powerful as a $300 card from 2 years ago.
>>55427452
probably gp100. i can't imagine yields are great for a 610mm2 die though, the p100 already ships with 4 of the SMs disabled and that's a $5000 card. perhaps nvidia will go full jew this time around and charge $1500 and cut down the card.
>>55435632
You're exaggerating on many accounts; a supposed 379 MSRP card is High of this gen, while last gen a 300USD card is high; poorfags get a newer 200USD card to match the power an older 300USD card.
Clearly cards don't become complete obsolete after 2 years, so of course there will be performance tiers with both new and old cards.
tl;dr You're a moron
