It's been two years since Heartbleed, and FreeBSD still uses the pile of shit that is OpenSSL instead of LibreSSL. Two years!! what... the... fuck???
Why have the OpenBSD devs been able to clean their code of the OpenSSL poison and the FreeBSD devs haven't?
>>55416680
There has been some effort done in HardenedBSD for that.
What I don't like about libressl is how the executable itself doesn't have a different name, why?
>>55416680
Maybe it's because FreeBSD doesn't want to use something made by OpenBSD.
Also, OpenBSD has very strict expectations on code correctness, that's why LibreSSL has fewer bugs than OpenSSL does.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGgoBQ0hVpw
not enough devs care? just this one dude?
>>55416729
> What I don't like about libressl is how the executable itself doesn't have a different name, why?
Compatibility reason, obviously.
>>55416781
> Maybe it's because FreeBSD doesn't want to use something made by OpenBSD.
When does freebsd will drop openssh then (made by openbsd)?
>>55416781
>Maybe it's because FreeBSD doesn't want to use something made by OpenBSD.
nah, in the BSD world everybody takes whatever is good, it's encouraged
