[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
RX 480 Power Consumption
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2
File: power_average.png (37 KB, 500x890) Image search: [Google]
power_average.png
37 KB, 500x890
This is for all the dumbass faggots who thought the 480 would consume 100W.

Pic related.
>>
Thats impressive given their trackreccord desu
>>
File: perfwatt_2560_1440 (1).png (36 KB, 500x930) Image search: [Google]
perfwatt_2560_1440 (1).png
36 KB, 500x930
>>55317583
It's actually quite horrible compared to the 1070 and 1080. They are 80% more efficient.
>>
>>55317556
>75w from pcie + 75w from 6 pin
>164w power draw without OC

Overclocker dream right there
>>
>>55317626
I hope this is sarcastic
>>
>>55317641
Make a guess
>>
>>55317583
thats literally just the result of die shrink, its still horrible when you compare it to pascal
>>
>>55317556

Who the fuck said that? Those are predictions for the 470, not 480
>>
>>55317556
>>55317626
So much for double the performance per watt...
>>
>>55317758
There was a thread every day with some moron here saying it would use 100W
>>
>>55317775
Ironically enough it is double the performance per W. But only when you compare it to their numerous rebrands of the 79xx series.

Still twice as bad as Nvidia though.
The mobile Radeons will be meme tier again. They might as well give up on the mobile market if you ask me.
>>
>>55317556
>tfw currently owning a 770
>thought about upgrading to a 480
kek might as well continue staying team green until team blue catches up with their integrated GPU.
also where is the 750 TI on that chart?
>>
>>55317832
It's not even more efficient than the Fury though. Not sure why people were saying this card was power efficient.
Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.