How the heck did Nathan build ava and the other machines by himself ? Apart from the hardware which would be extremely difficult to design and build by 1 human, how did he programm the AI software by himself ?
>>55277421
go rewatch the movie and listen to what he said you twat
also >>>/tv/
>>55277421
>>55277434
Is it a good movie?
>>55277434
He said that he used bluebook as the software, but that was not specific enough
>>55277421
It was fictional you retard
He didn't, he hired engineers and nerds to build that shit for him and he mostly focused on finalizing his AI and robots. He ended up killing everyone he hired to hide his top sekrit dobut steel.
>>55277455
For a normie, yeah. I saw too many contradictions and unrealistic technologies to fully enjoy it. A tiny gel brain capable of providing enough computing power to a conscious AI? lmao.
So you probably won't enjoy it either.
>>55277473
He didn't hire anyone to build the AI's though, he only hired people to build his energy system. Caleb also said that Nathan coded bluebook when he was 13 so he had definitely was intelligent enough to build the AI's by himself.
>>55277455
it's ok
>>55277458
apply machine learning on bluebook and you might be able to derive a fake AI, provided the human search habits can be quantified in a sensible manner.
he said himself it wasn't a real AI because it merely ran it's "escape" the facility program to it's best abilities.
>>55277512
the premise of the processing unit being a blob of gel isn't that far-fetched. if you would want to replicate the functionality of a brain you need a non-static nanomaterial that is both conductive and able to rearrange it's structure.
did you expect a translutient PCB with chips on it or something?
>>55277467
also this
>>55277538
Machine learning AKA neural networks wouldn't be useful in this way. He would need a hybrid structure of genetic algorithms AND neural networks in a closed environment. Apart from the the software part, how did he built the bodies ?
>>55277512
>>55277538
I am trying to find good tech-related movies to watch, with emphasis on "good", rather than realism. For example, Source Code was good.
Will try Ex Machina. Thanks!
>>55277538
>the premise of the processing unit being a blob of gel isn't that far-fetched. if you would want to replicate the functionality of a brain you need a non-static nanomaterial that is both conductive and able to rearrange it's structure.
That sound pretty fucking far fetched nigga.
>did you expect a translutient PCB with chips on it or something?
No but I expected a more realistic emerging technology to be used like a 3D processor. Something like 10,000 5nm process xeon cores @ 1GHz inside a 3D processor that only used ~100W/hour of electricity makes far more sense to be honest.
>>55277593
3d printing and assembly obviously.
>>55277640
Artsy fa/tv/irgin here, I would also recommend.
>>55277662
3-D printing induction plates ? Are you retarted ?
>>55277650
biocomputers are an emerging technology tho.
building a past-uncanny-valley sexbot puts the level of technology in the film way past current gen processor architectures
>>55277640
watch Transcendence
>>55277455
It's a good movie if you're not autistic, like >>55277512
>>55277650
Star trek voyager had bioneuro gel packs.
>>55277712
> watch Transcendence
kek no
>>55277686
do you even know what an induction plate is you dumb nigger?
>>55277729
why not? the guy doesn't want realism, just "good" tech related stuff, and Transcendence is all about technology vs retards, like this thread.
>>55277455
worth watching especially in terms of modern sci-fi but nothing special. nerds on this board keep talking about it because the main character is a billionaire "programmer" who drinks alone on his obscure ranch and screams at his robo-waifu in his unwashed wife-beater.