[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
General CPU Thread
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 55
Thread images: 20
File: Xeon CPUZ @ 4.2Ghz.png (57 KB, 806x404) Image search: [Google]
Xeon CPUZ @ 4.2Ghz.png
57 KB, 806x404
How did I do, /g/? I got the CPU for US$15 and the motherboard for a solid US$100.

What CPU's are you using on your main PC's?
>>
File: cpu.jpg (136 KB, 815x405) Image search: [Google]
cpu.jpg
136 KB, 815x405
>>
>/g/ is NOT your personal tech support team or personal consumer review site.
>>
>>55223309
What cooler do you have for the CPU? I have a 212 evo and it can harly cool 4.3Ghz without reaching the thermal limit.
>>
>>55223365
Thermalright HR02 Macho.
>>
File: 2016-05-28 13_59_28-CPU-Z.png (13 KB, 403x395) Image search: [Google]
2016-05-28 13_59_28-CPU-Z.png
13 KB, 403x395
5820k
>>
File: Capture.png (99 KB, 827x813) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
99 KB, 827x813
$175 for CPU, mobo, 212 EVO, 8GB (and got another 4GB free elsewhere), and case

$175 for 3770/12GB/500GB XPS 8500.
>>
File: cpu.jpg (106 KB, 805x401) Image search: [Google]
cpu.jpg
106 KB, 805x401
>>
>>55223396
>6 core CPU
>still the highest single core performance in the thread

5820k really is the 2600k of 2015.
>>
File: image.png (66 KB, 747x417) Image search: [Google]
image.png
66 KB, 747x417
rate my overclock
>>
>>55223330
Kill you're self
>>
>>55224184
>that cpu-z
>>>/v/
>>
>>55224359
>not using superior BLAZING FAST red color scheme
>>
>>55223309
that voltage

the fuck are you doing son, thats more than my 2500k needs for 4.5ghz
>>
>>55224137
He probably paid more for his water cooling than I did for my system.
I could OC the 4670k way higher but I just keep it to a stock volt 4.0GHz so it stays silent while encoding.
>>
File: hp laptop.png (115 KB, 528x507) Image search: [Google]
hp laptop.png
115 KB, 528x507
>>
File: [email protected] (79 KB, 383x373) Image search: [Google]
5820k@4.7GHz-1.274v.jpg
79 KB, 383x373
>>55224453
>He probably paid more for his water cooling than I did for my system.
Is $150 more than your whole system...?
>>
File: Untitled.png (24 KB, 403x402) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
24 KB, 403x402
>>55224479
Not counting the 5 drives, it was $285 w/ a 7870.
>>
>>55224184
Rate this
>>
File: 6700k.png (102 KB, 828x417) Image search: [Google]
6700k.png
102 KB, 828x417
muh 6700k
>>
>>55224541
So to recap, no, I didn't spend more than your whole system on my cooling.
>>
>>55224641
Just more than half.
>>
>>55224712
I spent over $800 on hard drives, what's your point?

If you go dumpster diving eventually you'd have had most of that for free.
>>
File: 1466519131815.jpg (771 KB, 3264x2448) Image search: [Google]
1466519131815.jpg
771 KB, 3264x2448
Not OP here

Should I wait for Skylake X? I can buy a new desktop PC next week already
>>
File: cpuz.png (24 KB, 417x414) Image search: [Google]
cpuz.png
24 KB, 417x414
bought it in 2008
>>
>>55224796
Can't OC?
>>
File: 1055t.png (37 KB, 806x402) Image search: [Google]
1055t.png
37 KB, 806x402
6yo.
>>
>>55224822
back in 2008-2011 I used to run it at 3GHz, but haven't bothered since.
>>
>>55224767
Anybody? I mean I know it's objectively better, but is it worth the wait?
>>
>>55224849
whats sad is piledriver didn't increase ipc that much... 4ghz piledriver (8350) scores around the 900 range for single threaded.

~~~250 score increase with a 1200mhz increase.

all piledriver has the phenom generation beat is core count.
>>
File: cpu-z bench.png (46 KB, 807x403) Image search: [Google]
cpu-z bench.png
46 KB, 807x403
Breddy gud considering.
>>
>>55225023
>4.7GHz
>still 30% lower single core performance than a stock 6700k
>>
>>55225092

>newer cpu is faster than older one

SHOCKING NEWS.
>>
>>55225106
Not just that, but slower by a significant margin, while being clocked 700MHz higher.

Once you OC the 6700k it would be greater than 50% performance difference for single core.
>>
>>55225115
Autist still thinking speed = performance
>>
>>55225151
we can pull out cinebench R11.5 if you want to embarrass yourself.
>>
fight me faggots
>>
File: Untitled-1.png (74 KB, 834x419) Image search: [Google]
Untitled-1.png
74 KB, 834x419
>>55224632
>he fell for the 6700k meme
>>
File: ss+(2016-06-23+at+08.43.35).png (40 KB, 806x405) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2016-06-23+at+08.43.35).png
40 KB, 806x405
>>55223290
Used to have FX-6300 so I kinda miss having 6 cores
>>
File: shit.png (272 KB, 1026x449) Image search: [Google]
shit.png
272 KB, 1026x449
>>55225262

Wish I had picked the i7 instead of this piece of shit.

>m-muh IPC
>>
>>55225188
It will obviously win, but your arguement with the .7 ghz oc is retarded. It's just an old cpu
>>
>>55225023
>>55224109
>TDP ~178W vs 45W
>literally 4x TDP
>worse single thread performance
>only 48% better multi thread performance
>while being newer and supporting more instructions
Can't make this shit up.
>>
>Buying a dieshrink of Nehalem instead of any SB
>>
>>55225429

>VT-x
>>
>>55225410
It's clocked 700MHz faster, while still being 30% slower, that's significant no matter how you slice it, especially when compared to the OP or similar CPUs.

The Vishera CPU design came out in October 2012, the 3570k released June of 2012. Several months earlier.

as we can see here >>55223309
The 3570k once OC'd easily manages to match the stock 6700k scores and it came out long before your 8320e (which while based on the 2012 design, released in 2014)
>>
>>55225474
>what is AMD-V
>>
>>55225494

Something not locked behind various skus, thats what.
>>
>>55223309
That is one shitty silicon (for 22nm Ivy) with vcore so [email protected].
I can only wonder how hot that fucker gets with the TIM'd IHS (or have you removed it?).
>>
File: before_oc.png (223 KB, 602x1158) Image search: [Google]
before_oc.png
223 KB, 602x1158
My 4670K scores below average.
Stock clocks.
>>
>>55225371
1.34v gives me 4.6ghz ever try anything lower?
>>
>>55225371
>1.4v

kek, that's disgusting mate.
>>
>>55226534
I can ge 4.6ghz on my 2500k with 1.34v
>>
>>55223290
You did quite well. Perhaps in the future you will upgrade to the X5650?
>>
>>55224453
>tfw spend €1250 on my WC cooling.
>>
File: CPU.png (63 KB, 800x400) Image search: [Google]
CPU.png
63 KB, 800x400
Still going strong
Thread replies: 55
Thread images: 20

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.