Do you rike it?
>>55192545
Fedora is ok I guess.
MacOS is better
>>55192615
Yeah, for browsing facebook
>newest Fedora has some packages more up-to-date than the Arch repositories
But on the other hand some of the software I use has ancient version in Fedora. How does that even happen?
>>55193012
Maintainers being lazy, I guess?
In Arch, do you build from most recent release by default?
>>55193012
Did you use the unstable repo in Arch?
Actually surprisingly better than any distro that isn't arch
dnf is as nice a package manager you can get without it being pacman
>>55192583
gentoo
>>55192615
gentoo
>>55193012
>not using gentoo
>>55193534
gentoo
>>55194032
you mean unmask in gentoo?
>>55194273
portage
idiots.
>>55194432
>gentoo
>not funtoo
Explain yourself.
>>55194478
why would I use a derivative that offers no features I use
all funtoo had going from it was git for the portage tree, and now gentoo has that too.
there is literally no reason to use funtoo in 2016
>>55194432
ebin gentoo memes good gentlemen xDDDDD doth i le fit in yet??!! ;-DDD /g/ techloligy amirite ;)))))))))
>>55194830
your and idiot :^)
>>55192545
>turn 360° and walk away
No, I don't like to use Bloated distros
>>55195086
Fedora isn't a bloated distro at all, especially on the lightweight DE's
>>55195111
It comes installed with >1000 packages.
>>55195121
package # means shit
some distros break out components into smaller packages so that there is more modularity allowed (like fedora)
having more packages actually means you can make the system 'lighter'
