AMDOMINATION
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
![eyJ1cmwiOiJodHRwOi8vYS5kaXNxdXNjZG4uY29tL2dldD91cmw9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmltZ3VyLmNvbSUyRndNdHhmTkMuanBnJmtleT1WZHVzcGtab2dJTlBZeHQxNXlDbmRRJnc9ODAwJmg9OTg5In0.FUnZdsabij1hz0t6YZ9gWRPxZsQ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Ha8GffF.jpg "eyJ1cmwiOiJodHRwOi8vYS5kaXNxdXNjZG4uY29tL2dldD91cmw9aHR0cCUzQSUyRiUyRmltZ3VyLmNvbSUyRndNdHhmTkMuanBnJmtleT1WZHVzcGtab2dJTlBZeHQxNXlDbmRRJnc9ODAwJmg9OTg5In0.FUnZdsabij1hz0t6YZ9gWRPxZsQ[1].jpg")
>Nvidia is finished
>$200 card can compete with their $450 card
>look mom, I posted it again
>>55046101
its a new graph retard
>>55046139
it's the same shitpost
>X is finished
>Y on suicide watch
>falling for the Z meme
please leave
>>55046048
great thread just great
kudos
>NVIDIAS WHITE TEARS
>>55046048
I waited this thread/
Imagine the RX480 1.83x CF OC! Nvidia is finished!
>>55046452
Raja is a baller
>>55046473
==NVIDIA FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY==
>>55046048
>AMD fighting over last generation cards
>>55046452
The only absolute based pajeet
>>55046048
This is too good to be true.
Probably fake benchmarks. I'll keep my hype toned down till the official benchmarks come out.
>>55046048
nvidia btfo
NVIDIOTS IN FULL DAMAGE CONTROL
>>55046728
>This can't be happening! I'm in charge here!!
RIP
>>55046452
Raja shat all over the designated shitting gpu manufacturer
AMD going for the main stream market first. the RX480 is good for pc gamers bring down the cost.
>>55046048
OC not even CF, WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
>>55046048
That's really neato. I will definitively buy the 8GB version.
apology for poor english
when were you when nvidia dies
i was sat at home drinking liquid coolant when amd ring
'nvidia is kill'
'no'
>>55046048
Nice shoop
I'm a fan of Radeon graphics cards and there's a good chance I'll be replacing my 7870 with a 480, but this is just the same picture that's been circulating with the titan x bar changed to a 480 OC bar.
The 480 being 75% the 1070 while being half the price (like $200 cheaper) is more than impressive enough.
>>55046048
>beats Fury X
T-thanks AMD.
>>55047787
Can some photoshop wizard check for fuckery?
>>55047819
Here's the other version. Why take out the titan x in the new one?
>>55047904
hm yes, very suspicious
>compete
still behind
lmao
>>55047940
>paying $250 more for half an fps
>>55047904
According to this the fury x is faster than a 980ti yet we all know that in 90% of games the 980 ti will be, on average, faster even if it's by 1%. This clearly shows that this benchmark does not show the real world performance of the cards. I'd still bet on the 480 to be at 980 levels of performance in real world testing.
![perfrel_3840_2160[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/TTRLzTb.png "perfrel_3840_2160[1].png")
>>55048122
the fury x is faster than the 980ti
>>55048042
>still behind
get rekt
>>55046048
Yeah with heavy OC, no do the same to the 450 card and see how things end up then.
>>55048243
>4k
>playable resolutions
>10 fps vs 11 fps
The 980 ti is faster at actual playable resolutions like 1080p which is also the most commonly used resolution in the world. But feel free to buy a fury x to play all your games at 4k 12 fps.
>>55048280
>still playing games at 1080p
>buying a $650 gpu for a $100 screen
nvidiots sure are dumb
also why the fuck would you not compare performance in the most stressful situations?
>>55046048
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUG9jgERvEQ
>>55048297
Like I said, feel free to buy your fury x and play your games in the "most stressful situations" aka 4k 12 fps whilst everyone else with a brain compares the cards at playable settings and framerates.
>tfw it was just confirmed that amdrones would rather play at 10 fps to get a one up over nvidia
Wew
>>55048122
that's not even true. any non-reference 980ti is 20-30% faster than the fury x. the AMDrones get away with their perceived victory by comparing rebrands (they are all OCed) and AMD sponsored games to reference nvidia gpus.
I'm using a 7950 and it ain't keepin' up anymore. GPU bottleneck with an i5 2550k at 5Ghz.
Gonna grab a 480 and OC that bitch.
>>55048372
Is that OC'd? Those temps look a bit housefire to me.
>>55046048
where is the titan?
>>55048488
Cooler changed for some really werid nda avoidment reason, smells like bs (also why would changing cooler mean shit temps?)
>>55048399
Yeah I've realised that. Even digital foundry admitted that their 390 has a 70 mhz overclock (pretty big for a 390) compared to the 20 mhz overclock (basically stock) on their 970, hence why the 970 loses in some benchmaks. The fact that they actually had to test each card again in the mirrors edge video downclocked and locked at stock clocks and the 970 still won proved that.
What's even more funny is that the 390 with its "mammoth" overclock as digital foundry put it, still can't pull away from the 970 with a 20 mhz overclock lmao. I bet you any money that if the 970 was overclocked in every test (far cry primal etc) and compared to the already overclocked 390, the 970 would absolutely smoke the 390.
>>55048488
I think its the chinese guy from chiphell. Because of some NDA technicality, he switched the cooler from another card to bypass the limitation and put it on the 480.
>>55048513
70mhz is barely over 5%
>>55048512
I'm guessing that is without an overclock perhaps. I hope so.
'Rx480 Firestrike leak proven not to be photoshopped by the leaker'
http://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/4nqu52/rx480_firestrike_leak_proven_not_to_be/
>>55048565
Yeah I saw the youtube videos from his channel, they don't prove shit
>>55048545
It's a 70 mhz increase from 1000mhz stock. I don't know the exact math but considering most reviews get in the region of ~1100 mhz I'd say a 70 mhz oc is pretty damn big. Also digital foundry themselves called it a "mammoth" overclock.
>>55048635
I have a 390, they just overclock like shit, 70MHz is nothing when it comes to performance
>>55048512
why would a chink care about nda in the first place?
>>55046048
wtf. That can't be realy. Seriously ? How will nvidia do ? their 1070 is a "mid tier" GPU that is sold 500€(minimum) in my country. RX 490 isn't even announced.
How will the RX 490 perform ?
Damn AMD. And they even start doing open source stuff everywhere contriuting for the linux kernel. I think I will just go amd
>>55048649
You're probably right based on your first hand experience and I can refute that. I would however prefer digital foundry to run each card stock vs stock.
>>55048545
>>55048635
>>55048649
GTX970 overclocks pretty well, mine can hit 1519 on stock voltage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkbHbzPpG6Q
Not my video but my card also boost to 1405mhz out of the box.
>>55048739
Can't*
>>55048743
Same I have a gtx 980 FTW (god bless evga) and in achieve 1518 mhz on stock voltage. I might try to oc further but the noise levels do get quite loud especially with my custom fan profile which keeps my card in the low 60s.
>>55048743
Yeah and your card has too little detonated vam
>>55048801
Well aim for 80C then retard, when it doesn't even matter
>>55046101
>Nvidiot getting mad now that he already dropped all his good boy points on a 1070.
Dont worry, think of the extra functionality you have on your 1070, its a little space heater AND a graphics card.
>>55048809
you can cry me a river if you want, mine is almost two old and I've had no problems with the 3.5gb thing.
The worst part is, even if this is 100% true, people will still flock to Nvidia because of so much bias
>>55048851
Hyper settings
>>55048874
Fury X also shit itself and it was more expensive than a GTX970 not to mention it was released 1 year after the GTX970. You have no excuses.
>>55048854
No way man
I will be shilling about it in everywhere to ensure that
>>55048851
Yeah this is the same for people I know who own gtx 970. They never encounter 3.5gb issue at playable settings and framerates. Even the mirrors edge thing, if the 970 had over 6gb of required vram it would still be slideshow quality (without the bottleneck) like the 390 at 35 fps hyper settings.
>>55048886
Well fuck the furry x, no excuses needed
Also modded gta v, even stock at certain settings
>>55048899
50fps
>>55048376
No one with a 980TI plays at 1080.
1440 and 4k benchmarks are what counts, might as well compared 480p and 240p resolutions in that case.
>>55048916
it's still sub 60 fps. there is nothing to brag about over the 970, fury x or any other 4gb or lower video card when your 390 can't even touch 60 fps at this setting.
there are people in this thread right now who will defend 39 fps just to claim a lead over nvidia users, who themselves can defend superior performance over the 390 at actual playable fps and settings.
the main point here is that even though the 390 can play at that setting, it shouldn't be played at due to the shitty performance.
>>55049028
Ultra with hyper textures man, 60fps for those that care, 970 can't do it
My R9 290 has terrible OC before I get artifacts. Anyhow with the best OC I can get before glitches appear I get 2835 on Firestrike Ultra. The RX480 needs to do a lot better on OC before I contemplate an upgrade.
>>55049046
>970 can't do it
that's a bold claim. we don't know if it can or can't yet. there might be enough vram to use only hyper textures on 4gb video cards. so far we only know 4gb cards can't run properly with >everything< maxed out. hyper shadows, effects, mesh etc will all contribute to the overall vram usage. hyper textures might not be that much of a hit to vram. i know in some games i've played that i can run them at 4k with high/medium settings at 60 fps on my 980 but i can always run with ultra textures without being bottlenecked. it could be the same situation with this game.
lets not jump to conclusions.
>>55049135
Yeah we do and when accessing that .5 gigs of shit the entire vam runs at the slower speed so it's useless
>>55049161
Again posting memes?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COEwgUI6D3w
Why aren't there more leaks if press and stores already have 480 on their shelves?
I've seen a well know European PC builder selling a Fury X to customers a week before release.
>>55049188
yeah I'm not watching that just because of th ei intro and video length, just enlighten me yourself
>>55049212
Also inb4 afterburner shows over 3,5
It shows reserved not used
>>55049212
Remain ignorant and meme on.
>>55049161
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6MDUjFiUR4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COEwgUI6D3w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljHgKO1E3s4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW-H0qNw38M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnQW-60ZaA4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gx9YVklTYTk
ok well here's my proof that it has no effect at playable framerates. where's your proof that it does? if you can't provide any then you just got BTFO.
>>55049242
>>55049233
of course without watching anything but the thumbnails
>>55046473
You'll never ever get 1.83x scaling in crossfire. AMD's demo did not use crossfire. It used a game that natively supports multiple GPUs.
>>55049242
welp, i guess he got btfo then.
>>55049346
are you thick? it shows instantaneous vram USAGE. if it shows reserved then as soon as you boot up any fucking game you'd have 4gb of fucking vram utilization on msi afterburner as the game will reserve 4gb or a similarly high amount.
you still haven't provided proof that the vram partition causes issues at playable framerates.
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
Correct me if I'm wrong, but assuming the rx 480 draws 100w under load and the gtx 1070 draws 150w under load, then the 1070 has a slightly higher performance per watt as the 480, and the over clocked 1070 has an almost exactly equal performance per watt as the 480. This means whatever Nvidia puts out in the same performance bracket as the rx 480 could be ever so slightly more power efficient as the rx 480.
[spoiler]It's over, AMD is finished and bankrupt. Poolaris housefires confirmed.[/spoiler]
>>55049441
From the engine not the OS
>>55049456
>this backtracking
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
BTFO
>BTFO
>>55049477
Also at 9GB afterburner usage my game runs fine
>>55049504
Same with 970 games showing over 4GBs
>>55049504
>he's still backtracking
we're all waiting for that incriminating evidence from you to prove your claims of
1.mirror's edge catalyst will not run with only hyper textures on a gtx 970 or any 4gb vram or lower video card.
2. the vram partition in the 970 causing problems at playable framerates.
>>55046048
>rx 480 faster than fury x
its over AMD IS FINISHED
AMD IS THE KING NOW
>>55049584
>overclocked 1070 outperforms a 1070
NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH. 1070 CONFIRMED WORTHLESS.
>>55048280
At 1080p it doesn't matter which is faster because they're both overkill for that
>>55046048
and here I am with my trusty 980 still maxing out new games at 1080. Don't see a point in upgrading desu.
>>55049644
Why? Even on my 7870 I run games in 1440p
fuck benchmarks
>the gtx 980 came out like a year and 9 months ago
>people think that the rx 480 being a cheaper gtx 980 is amazing
Isn't this just where we should be in terms of price/performance now because of Moore's law? If Nvidia's direct competitor to the rx 480 is more than $200-$250 for gtx 980 tier performance, it's because of Nvidia's Jewery, not AMD providing an amazing value. I mean it'll still be a good value for money, I'm just tired of the "this is a revolution, Nvidia confirmed bankrupt" shitposting.
>>55048743
Yeah, and my brother has to downclock from the factory oc on his card in a couple games to keep stable.
A sample of one means nothing.
NVIDIA MASTER RACE
so lonely at the top ;)
>>55049717
Well I too don't see anything extraordinary here. AMD didn't release anything new since 7970 so such performance increase is a given. Relative to Nvidia jewish policy it's much better performance/price offer but still nothing special for AMD.
>>55046048
>30% OC scaling
>1070 only get 14%
nvidia can't OC worth shit
>>55049836
I suppose memory OC matters too and nvidia's base memory clocks are sky high
>>55049836
the lower one is underclocked. Silly Chinamen not benchmarking with proper clocks
>>55049876
I think AMD has the same memory clocks this time too.
>>55049917
Oh wtf, why would people bench underclock?
>>55046048
I got my 980 in the year 2014..
>"omg amd beat them look how cheap it is!"
>nvidia fighting in a whole different class
>last year they rumoured amd to go bankrupt
>>55049766
>AMD didn't release anything new since 7970
290x, Fury
>>55050349
290x is same shit but more cores
Well fury features new memory but has horrible TDP and perf/price value. That is not a consumer product.
>>55050417
290 is a new chip design you mong
>>55050417
where do people get this idea?
>>55050463
nvidiots
>>55050473
my head hurts anon
>>55050463
they wouldn't be buying nvidia cards in the first place if they weren't severely brain damaged
>>55050417
This concentration of faggotry, retardation, and delusion shouldn't be legal.
>>55050458
it's not. hawaii and fiji were both scaled up versions of gcn 1.0 with minor architectural tweaks like updates to the sip core(s) and a wider memory bus.
>>55050621
you mean like pascal? oh wait pascal wasn't even that much, it's just maxwell on a new process
>beats 980 and 390x
>for $200
B A S E D
A
S
E
D
>>55049734
Are you so fucking retarded you can't tell when you've got faulty hardware?
RMA it, idiot.
>>55050621
Let's see, GCN 1.1 added async compute and shader engines, GCN 1.2 added delta color compression and Mesa, and now GCN 1.3, which is providing at least as much change as Maxwell to Pascal by going to a 14nm process from a 28 nm process.
>>55050621
Fiji has literally twice the performance per watt of Hawaii. GCN1.2 is much improved architecture compared to GCN 1.1
>>55050621
source, please?
>>55046048
>"can compete"
>people always forgetting about AMD's shitty drivers
>>55050621
Looks like the same old to me too.
>>55050751
better than the shit nvidia has
>>55050751
why do nvidiots always confuse 'working drivers' with 'drivers that brick your card'
>>55046048
SOURCE PLEASE!
IT'S OVER NVIDIAKEKS ARE DEAD AND BURIED
>AMD wins AGAIN
>linux on the desktop postponed EVEN FUCIING LONGER
F U C K
U
C
K
AMD WILL NEVER FUCKING HAVE GOOD LINUX SUPPORT
>>55050922
nobody cares about your literal meme os you dumb sperg
>>55050922
>postponed
write a complaint to AMD about Wayland, Vulcan support and open-source drivers/
>>55050938
Windows is finished, remained GNU/Linux and OS X
>>55050972
t. neet trash who contributes nothing to society
>>55050979
4chan, Google and pornhub servers work on GNU/Linux OS/
>>55051017
services run by people too retarded to understand bsd is superior in every way
>>55050979
most of crypto cash mined with GNU/Linux OS/
>>55051033
actually it's just called Linux.
>>55051033
oh look gentoo took ports and made it 10x worse
but portage is still the best package manager on linux!
LOL!
>>55051039
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.
Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
Anyone know how much power this thing will need? Thinking of using it for my first self built pc. Will a 600w PSU do?
>>55046048
>4GB card
>in 2016
It's already obsolete, man.
>>55051054
pentoo - is essential distro for security testing, like kali.
funtoo - good fork
systemrescueCD - best liveCD/
>>55051072
600W is more than enough.
>>55051072
if you buy the version with a single 6-pin it physically cannot draw more than 150w
>>55051097
Novidia 9XX with 3.5GB even worse
>>55050860
I've had 2 Nvidia cards that have been bricked because the drivers decided to just *turn off* my cards' fan during heavy loads..... (8600+460)
"AMD has bad drivers!"
It hasn't been true since the 5000 series the meme is seriously old
>>55050518
>>55050473
I own radeon though. What's so good about being delusional?
>>55050629
More like Titan/780/780ti
But well pascal isn't anything great too, just higher base clocks with same design.
fags
>>55050922
Not really, amdgpu is coming along nicely
>>55051258
sounds like freetard trash just based off the name
>AMDOMINATION
>Nvidia still om top
ayy lmao
Pretty sure that's crossfire.
>>55051357
you can't read then
>>55046452
fukken saved
>>55049836
>>55049993
it was to test it out at a lower clock to see what power/temps it drew.
Still, it has nearly perfect scaling at the 1080 to 1400 overclock. 29% overclock results in 28% performance increase.
If it gets better overclocks than that it's a strong contender to fight the 1070.
>>55049717
Moore's law is no longer valid. It now takes longer than 2 years to get double performance.
>$199
muh wallet
Since this is a gpu thread, are temps in the low/mid 80's after an overclock safe? My card averages at like 81°c but I've seen it go as high as 83°c for a short amount of time.
>>55049296
Some games get really good crossfire scaling. Getting ~140fps in bo3. I get like 80 frames on single over clocked card 1150 core vs both stock xfire.
>>55051871
>300€ for the 8 GB version
>Still costs 40-50% less than than the 1070
>>55049296
When you CF on DX12 it does not work the way it use to. Also drastic reduction in micro stutter. See image.
>>55051877
GPUs are fine below 90
>>55052168
This.
can someone explain to us the reason for these big jumps in computing power? do these cards use more electrical power, even at a 14 (16?) nm, or wtf?
>>55052213
smaller transistors are more efficient
>>55052213
less power as it scales down because the chips produce less heat and require less energy.
>>55052251
I don't think it's only that. actually, I was reading about GDDR5X, and I think that's the real answer. GDDR5X has:
- higher bandwidth
- wider bus
- higher energy efficiency
so yeah, the transistor process helps... both the GPU itself and the memory.
>>55046452
poo in loos know how to party i know personally
Fun Times
THE STOCKHOLDERS ARE NEVER WRONG BOYS
>>55052288
gddr5x is a meme
>>55052293
Top kek the guy who was trying to push the 3.5gb meme got blown the fuck out
>>55052293
>>55052760
It is technically 4GB but that still doesn't change the fact that the last 0.5GB is much slower than the rest.
>>55052296
The absolute value of stocks is meaningless. The only thing that matters is their relative growth rates.
>>55052925
This argument has ready been had and won by 970 users
>>55048743
>>55048809
>>55048851
>>55048874
>>55048886
>>55048899
>>55048916
>>55049028
>>55049046
>>55049135
>>55049161
>>55049188
>>55049212
>>55049242
>>55049441
>>55049577
>>55053361
Not the point I arguing but sure, that argument's been won.
>>55052288
But the 1070 doesn't have GDDR5X. It also doesn't have a vapor chamber cooler in the Founders Edition.
>>55051994
what happens when one half of the frame contains more demanding stuff? does the card that completed the other half move to the next frame or does it just wait?
>>55053361
You still have 3.5gb of usable ram
cuck
>>55049577
I don't know what incriminating means but mirrors edge hyper uses a lot of vam
and my friend modded GTA V with his 970 and it runs like shit
>>55054039
no. it has 4gb of usable vram with the last .5gb segment slower than the rest which only matters in very, very specific case scenarios hence why literally no one is having issues with it any more.
>>55050807
>implying Nvidia's architecture hasn't been mostly the same for 8 years
ATI had tessellation in their 9000 series
>>55050807
what the fuck is a geometry processor when you already have a rasterizer?
>>55046048
NVIDIA IS FINISHED AND BANKRUPT
>>55051546
>'nearly' perfect scaling
GCN has always been 12-15% per 20 and I seriously doubt this has increased much if at all.
>>55054121
I've wondered why increasing clocks peeds wouldn't scale perfectly, any reason? or is it just based on observation?
>>55054062
i have a friend with a 290 and another friend with another friend with a gtx 980 ti. both of them have problems on gta maxed out if they have like 200 different mods. it has nothing to do with vram, its the graphical demand of those mods. your friend is probably some next level retard who installed some uber realistic mod pack which requires like 2x980 ti to run at a stable framerate.
>>55050922
>using linux in 2016
>I bought a 960 for €180 4 months ago
>>55047765
>>55054094
>ATI had tessellation in their 9000 series
Already the 8500 had truform which basically was tessellation.
>>55054132
well I installed some meme mod that was popular a few months back and it ran at 50fps on my 390
I told my friend to check it out, he did and couldn't run it properly
I'm trying to remember what the fuck it was called, it even had a webpage made for it
like essence of v or something like that
>>55054121
Take a look at this
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/R9_290X_Lightning/27.html
14℅ gain from a 8% core overclock, just goes to show how Hawaii was actually bandwith starved
>>55054158
amd pioneered tesselation
>>55054140
I'm feeling bad for you
>>55054140
The 480 will cost 300€..
>>55054184
[Citation Needed]
>>55054184
270 euros for 8GB model and 220 for 4GB
>>55054189
>>55054184
Uhh it will cost $200
No idea how that translates to euros
>>55054164
http://thepinnacleofv.com/
>>55054208
lol it funny you mention that because i was just searching up gta 5 gtx 970 videos on youtube to see how it handles mod and i was watching a video with the exact mod you mentioned. it runs perfectly fine for this guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3GQC6oVFxo
>>55054235
worth noting we both play at 1440p and a minor note, grass quality on ultra looks way better than high
>>55046048
Holy fuck lol
>>55054289
Holy fake
>>55046048
>OC'd 480 can nearly compete with a stock 1070
>stock Nvidia btfo
okay
>>55054296
>F-fake its f-faaaaake
Kys
so do we know the firestrike (regular) results for the 480? i want to compare my 980 to it but i don't want to buy 3dmark 11.
>>55054169
That was actually 12% on the core and 35% on the memory. If you put +35% mem on anything it will see some kind of better boost from the core
>>55054307
The Titan X is missing and the score is the same of the Titan X but with the last two digits of the RX480 (1080)
>>55047904
>>55054307
I'll just point out that kys is associated with a strange youtuber who has a strange following of children who tend to spam kys and hisss in the youtube comment sections, this strange youtuber even sounds as if puberty skipped him
>>55054121
The numbers are literally right there to calculate out. It's not like I pulled them out of my ass.
>>55054129
Other subsystems and other parts of the chip will restrain performance even if the rest of it is sped up.
For example, the early Kepler chips were heavy bandwidth starved. Clocking up your GPU by 10% might only give a 5% increase in performance, but clocking up your VRAM by that same amount might give you 7-8%.
All the systems work in synchronicity with each other, and if one is lagging it becomes a bottleneck.
>>55054366
so OC only applies to compute units or whatever the shader cores are called
and then there's separate OC for memory?
>>55054462
Yes, the GPU core and the VRAM are clocked at different rates.
>>55054483
so is memory speed/bandwidth the only main factor that keeps GPU clocks from scaling with performance?
>>55054504
No, there are a variety of architectural and design factors within the GPU core itself that prevent that and which prevent perfect scaling from ever happening on a core overclock alone.
>>55054235
How is it reading 7GB ram usage on a 970?
>>55054537
system ram not vram
>>55046048
don't post the clearly bullshit image.
>>55048297
144hrz is FAR more noticeable then a hardware aa pass.
get that 144 all the time you need a high end card.
It's gotta be fake.
AMD is historically incompetent and unable to compete.
>>55054652
in the last image there was titan x
now there is no titan x
the source is same
no sense make
>>55054652
Actually historically AMD has had the best price-performance video cards for a while.
The 480 is no exception and just solidifying their position as making the best value GPUs.
>>55054619
don't post the clearly bullshit bait
>>55051249
id argue sense the 4000, and even at that, the turning point i think was the 3000.
>>55054304
nvidia down clocks lower the base on the regular with stock coolers, the only ones currently available... so yea... way to go nvidia.
>>55054366
>the numbers are right there to calculate out
Performance of an unreleased card, and with absolutely no confirmation of anything besides a crossfire AotS benchmark?
I hope it clocks well with 1 8pin and a 6pin
>>55051994
>mfw half of the screen has 2ms delay than the other
I would definitely smash the monitor
>>55051249
I have the fan issue constantly on my r9 390, not kidding
>>55054779
It doesn't need more than a single 8 pin to OC well, it can probably do real well with a single 6 as well
>>55054798
obviously both halves would be completed before displaying but the real question is if it's a waiting game for the card that completed its half faster
>>55053361
nvidia conveniently forgot about missing cache and ROPs as well.
The vram is the least significant of the issues with the 970
>>55054779
Needs 3 fans to keep cool
HOUSEFIRE
HOUSEFIRE
>>55054815
>not having a fan directly over the GPU core
It's like you want to be in the Sahara when you could be swimming
>>55054815
That's a 290x, someone is fucking with you
>>55054815
The same could be said about every amd and nvidia card in history as it isnt even the reference card you mang
>>55051994
this is bullshit. When sli and crossfire barely started out, there were like 6 different methods of multigpu rendering; they were not limited by directx whatsoever.
There was checkerboard type rendering, alternative frame, interlacing, screen divided into areas, and whatever I forgot. Weren't driver profiles invented to suit each game engine?
and now they supposedly invent a new one?
>>55054808
None of these are a problem to anyone as we can clearly see. In fact, the only people I see caring about the 970 so much are 'concerned' amd users. Not one single youtube video I've watched about the 970 shows any issue at playable settings and framerates and no one I know who owns a 970 has complained about it.
It's funny because my one of best friends owns an r9 390 and an amd fx 8350 and he hates amd with a passion. I'm not joking, he's had nothing but problems with amd especially his 390 when he tried using autodesk (which he uses for his hobby). If you check the catalog he even made a thread about it where he couldn't use one of the tools and it was concluded that it was due to amd's shitty drivers as many other amd users were having the same issue.
>>55054826
You don't want the fan directly above anyway, you want the blades of the fan to be above the core.
>>55054897
go to reddit and you will see 970 users complaining
>>55054897
>AutoDesk
>390
He should have a got a workstation grade card aka firepro
>>55054960
Go to reddit and you will see people complaining about everything
The point is that in practice the 970 works perfectly
>>55054960
I can find anyone complaining about anything with a quick Google search. I have yet to see anyone complaining about "my 970 is slow because of rops" like you claimed. Also I'd rather believe first hand accounts than plebbit posts. Anyone can falseflag. I know 2 amd owners and 3 nvidia owners with 970's and none of the 970 owners have had any issues yet the 2 amd owners I know are both going to be upgrading to nvidia this year, including the guy I mentioned. You'll probably call me a liar but I know I'm telling the truth.
>>55055018
ah it's just a conspiracy
>>55055036
There's no conspiracy, just look at the actual 970 benchmarks, it performs great.
There's a reason why the 970 is the #1 most popular GPU on steam and it's not because it's riddled with issues that's for sure.
My 970 was great, only reason its back in the box is I bought a 1080.
Im tempted to keep it to stick in a secondary pc.
>>55054960
And yet my 970 performs like stock 980 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8776950
>>55055050
yeah remember fermi
pure dog shit and look how well it sold
>>55055031
I call you an Nvidia shill.
I know five people with GTX 970s and they're all super buttblasted over the whole 'sell 3.5gb fast and 0.5 gb slow ram as 4gb fast ram' thing. One even had his card bricked by an Nvidia driver fuck-up.
They're all going to be switching to AMD for their next GPU.
>>55055076
It's funny how people complain about the whole 3.5gb thing when in practice it makes almost zero difference.
Your friends are dumb.
>>55055089
And because it doesn't matter, Nvidia had to take back the 970s due to false advertising and had a class-action lawsuit filed against them?
You're either an Nvidia shill or a mindless drone. Or an Americuck. They like taking corporate dick up their asses.
>>55055076
Yeah so all 5 dislike the card and all now are going AMD. Sure thing totally believable story there
>>55055076
>you
>friends
Lol you're so much of a fanboy that you probably are disgusted at nvidia users so much that you don't even want to talk to them and your post is obvious falseflag lies. I can literally get my buddy to post in this thread with his speccy and the date to prove you that I'm not lying.
>>55055089
>falling for the obvious b8 of a buttblasted fanboy that is upset people are leaving amd for nvidia
Wew lad
>>55055089
if it makes no difference why not just put 4GBs of shit memory and save even more money?
