I want to pick up the geforce 1070. Most AAA titles can't run at 60+ fps with 4k at max settings.
My question is...
4k resolution with less than max settings or 2k at max settings?
>>54986359
How can you afford a 4k display, but you can't afford a 1080? Just wait for Vega and the 1080 ti
1070 isn't gonna do 4K
I can get a 4k monitor for about $450 USD. pretty decent price.
In my searches, 1440p monitors go for around the same price as 4k monitors.
Given some recent benchmarks, the 1070 could probably handle 4k resolution if the games are turned down to in graphics quality
>>54986393
what?? It'll do 4k just fine, just not at max
Like what the fuck are you smoking LOL
>>54986359
1070 was meant for 1440p and it probably won't run 4k too well
>>54987198
>1440p monitors go for around the same price as 4k monitors
Here's the thing: there's no advantage to 4k if you're getting a standard 22-27 inch monitor. If you get a 4k monitor at a size that actually accommodates the pixel density, they are not similarly priced.
>>54987450
You still get a much sharper image with a 2160p resolution on a 27" display and screen real estate
>>54986359
>Not waiting for big pascal
If you aren't a retard you'd upgrade every two years when the Ti version is released for cards
>>54986359
"The GeForce GTX 1070 will be available on June 10 with starting price of $449."
wtf why, when the fuck can i get it for cheaper? i can't wait all summer
When do the Ti's usually come out?
>>54987647
5-8 months after the original
>>54987647
as soon as ATI/AMD comes out with a card that can contend with the (*)80 card, and every customer dumb enough to buy a (*)80 has already done so.
Vega is slated for Q1'17, so I would expect the 1080 Ti to come out around then as well.
>>54987712
>>54987808
Alright. Thanks.
>>54986386
Oh God I can't wait to see the price of the 1080Ti in Dollarydoos. I reckon it'll push $2000AUD, easy.
>>54987537
who got eyes for that real estate? people with perfect eyes struggle sometimes
>>54988305
It's about 150 ppi, not too bad if you sit somewhat close
>>54988319
You're not supposed to look at the sun anon, even if it's artificial.
>>54986359
8k at max settings!
Note how Huang said that the GTX 1070 will be faster than Titan X. He didn't say faster than 980 Ti, because Titan X is a poor overclocker, unlike custom 980 Ti's that can hit 1500 Mhz. The best 980 Ti's such as Gigabyte G1 gaming will still be faster.
>>54987450
1440p monitors can do 144 Hz. No 4k monitor can yet, and it's hard enough to get 60 FPS.
