So...
- to network infrastructure architects: why are you still not using IPv6?
- to consumers: why are you still not using IPv6?
- to server operators: why are you still not using IPv6?
>>54957047
But i am.
>>54957047
legacy
>>54957047
I registered at RIPE some years ago and got an v4/22 and v6/29
I am using ipv6
We've deployed it thoughout the network core and are planning to make it IPv6 only with IPv4 on the customer edge.
Unfortunately we don't have our own allocations and AS number.
botnet
>>54957296
lol'd
>>54957285
What kind of business?
>>54957047
>unlocked lock
>international insecure sign
>botnet
d r o p p e d
p r o d d e d
a n d
p o p p e d
Although my ISP does provide a 6rd tunnel for IPv6 use, it's unreliable, and having IPv6 activated breaks more sites than it allows access to (seeing as it breaks at least 2 and allows additional access to 0).
I'll wait for some tangible benefit to its use or non-6rd support for it from my ISP.