Was browsing WIRED and got this.
Forbes pulled this shit before. It seems like they turned it off finally.
(I actually don't care about the content of the sites, so no problem on my side.)
Does anyone here not use an ad blocker?
>>54926876
use web archive
>>54926924
The articles are of no interest for me to do that. I was just there for shit and giggles.
>>54926876
>he doesn't block ads with a hosts file and a script that auto updates every week
Just use anti-adblock killer
>>54927121
I should really get a better router that does this..
Though adblock does allow you to block some things you cant block otherwise.
>>54926876
Just use pic related, never saw one of those pop-ups with those on.
>>54926876
>browsing Wired
Find a better site for your "news".
If you insist on continuing to browse Wired find a better ad blocker or start trying harder.
>>54927232
lol, maybe its not adblocker killing their revenue, maybe its their shit leftist propaganda.
I usually disable adblocker on my own for certain sites.
>>54926876
>Was browsing WIRED
there's your problem
>>54926876
>supporting left wing "journalism"
nope
>We notice you're using an ad-blocker. Perhaps you'll support us another way? Become a Supporter for less than $1/€1 per week
>>54927232
aw how sweet they put felicia day on the cover
>We get it: ads suck
no you don't.
Blocking ads should be a basic part of overall internet security as it's easy to inject malicious code into them
It's not about the money
I installed ad blockers on all my parents machines and since then they haven't had a single issue for me to fix
>>54926876
>Here's The Thing
>We get it
Just ask for money. Don't use condescending click-bait bullshit.
>>54927232
>mixing six serif and sans serif typefaces on one fucking page
They will never get my money.
