Why does free software community attract so many SJWs?
How do we force them back to crying about video games?
>why blah blah blah i'm autistic
probably because it's freely accessible
>how blah blah autism
you don't.
>>54903351
Because at the moral base level they are the same. It's ethics and practices that deviate the two.
Making software an ethical issue is bound to attract lunatics.
WTF are you talking about macfags are the largest group of SJWs.
i thought it was the gamer gaters that were crying about video games? was it no?
>>54903383
This.
Keep Free Software free.
>>54903351
We don't, we just continue to work. FOSS doesn't need a fucking demographic, it doesn't need a fucking face and it doesn't need to put up with this ethos of mediocrity that's becoming common place.
Let them complain, let them cry, let them piss blood and shit little bricks. At the end of the day, it doesn't change me, what I do or any of the people I work with.
Don't like it? This isn't a safe space. Want to have a whinge? Fork my code and do it better. I will continue to close issues that ask me to add an 'other' gender option out of principle and you can lick my salty piss if you think I have to change to please any of these obese fucking tumblr whales.
>>54903397
the price of freedom is that people can show up and you have to deal with them. it's the same issue we have every time someone on the radio says something outrageous or someone makes an objectionable video game.
OP, stop acting like you haven't been to high school yet.
>>54903404
>FOSS doesn't need a fucking demographic
ITT people that don't understand what "demographic" means.
>>54903351
Because software communism and cultural marxism mesh well, being kike inventions
How much work have you done for free software projects again?
Fuck off shitposting about people you decided you don't like because they're a bit weird, and go write code to solve real problems, OP. The FOSS community needs contributors, not detractors.
they'll die out sooner or later, bosses don't want to deal with people that call programming and AC units sexist.
>>54903419
What isn't a kike invention?
>>54903351
For fucks sake this person is an adult and she looks like a 6 year old girl after doing makeup for the first time. Why would you even let someone like this into your software project? Now let's play a game: guess how many LOCs she contributed to Tor!
Because it's full of beta males.
>>54903351
free software is a communists wet dream
Simple.
They're both incredibly entitled groups.
Free software faggots believe that their shit doesn't stink and that they're entitled to other people's work.
Very similar to how SJWs believe they're entitled to 100k salaries when they do 10% the amount of work and 90% the complaining.
>>54903678
This unfortunately. Even a purple haired overweight mess is better than no female attention at all to the nerds. So they put up with their bullshit more and more.
>>54903538
Maybe she wrote the CoC. What a contribution that would be.
free software is considered a social justice issue, not just a technical one
>>54904036
Even beta males get the "rapist" treatment now. I don't think that's the female attention they desire.
>Free software movement
>Redefines what OS means to push their agenda
>SJWs
>Redefine what racism means to push their agenda
No difference
>>54904120
It a social justice issue. But it's not a "social justice" issue.
The free software community has always been leftist. It has been about challenging power. If you don't know this you probably have never been involved with the community IRL. Go to a local hackerspace and there will be lots of people with commie stickers on their laptops for example.
You're wrong to think someone is taking the community from you. Your reactionary ideas weren't welcome in the first place.
Open source was created to depoliticize free software.
>>54904149
The distinction between the two is artificial, an ideologem created by right-leaning internet communities.
>>54904207
Also I have to point out, I often don't actually agree SJW methods because they're about cleaning the language instead of actually solving problems. But I often agree with them that the things they do point out are problematic. And I agree with outreach programs to get more women and minirities to develop software.
>>54903351
Like I say to every one of these posts.
That woman is my 10/10. Nothing else matters.
>>54904249
name one 'problem' that isn't a non-issue
>>54904207
>leftist ... has been about challenging power.
He says a few days after "leftists" enacted an EU-wide law banning "speech that offends the State" among many other descriptors.
>Your reactionary ideas weren't welcome in the first place.
What ideas?
>weren't welcome
That's very free and open and tolerant.
Anyway, in reality the Free Software movement has always had self-identified members with a wide variety of viewpoints united only by a sense of desiring liberty. That is it.
>But I often agree with them that the things they do point out are problematic.
Such as?
>And I agree with outreach programs to get more women and minirities to develop software.
Absolutely laughable, thanks. I stand to benefit from the money you flush down the toilet, though.
>>54904256
>woman
>>54903461
The wheel, the English Language.
>>>/pol/
>>54903351
how the fuck did SJW progressive bullshit take over the goth punk scene? 7 years ago a chick like this was an awesome time waiting to happen, and now this look screams stay the fuck away.
fuckin hate progressives for shit like this.
>>54904302
kids with bad home lives too ugly to fit in do not enjoy working, oddly enough
>>54904273
I have a feeling you will dismiss them all as 'non-issues'. Generally anything that drives women and minorities away from computer science.
It's mostly you getting sensitive about it now that 4front talks all day about it
>>54904330
what drives women and minorities away from computer science?
surely it isn't a lack of opportunity
>>54904097
>>54903538
https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/log/?qt=author&q=Andrea+Shepard&showmsg=1
>>54904315
shit. ive known plenty of goth chicks back in the day who were nothing like the spoiled progressive shit bags.
I think it just got invaded by upper middle class twats, and they chased the already established scene away with thier faggotry.
>>54904348
>and they chased the already established scene away with thier faggotry.
every fandom or niche ever
>>54904277
>He says a few days after "leftists" enacted an EU-wide law banning "speech that offends the State" among many other descriptors.
Lol. EU is neoliberal. They are enemies of leftists. I'm talking about communists, socialists, anarchists. People who base their ideas off class analysis of society.
SJWs are a weird mix though. As I said in my second post I don't agree with their methods.
>What ideas?
Reactionary ideas commonplace on 4chan and reddit etc. For example "Absolutely laughable, thanks."
>That's very free and open and tolerant.
Communists don't believe in tolerance lol.
>Such as?
See >>54904330
>>54904302
Commercialization (think of MTV now), sites like tumblr & reddit, the prevalence cameraphones, and so on. Lots of factors have morphed a bit of fringe madness into a full-blown movement.
>>54904330
>I have a feeling you will dismiss them all as 'non-issues'.
See this is why we don't find you lot in /pol/, a place where all arguments must stand on their own merit alone (and no moderators will delete them). It's simply that your viewpoint does not stand up to scrutiny. That's why you stay quiet when queried.
>Generally anything that drives women and minorities away from computer science.
It's all those comments that say "/* 14/88 gas the kikes, race war now, women are garbage */", isn't it.
>>54904340
Stereotypes present from a very young age. They all have roots in the idea of "gender".
>>54903351
on a similar note, I am curious to know how many SJWs are also autistic. It would probably be higher than the average population.
>>54904354
these people fuck up everything they touch...taking hot goth chicks from the world should be grounds for warfare
>>54904371
>"I'm not going to list anything"
Not an argument.
>For example "Absolutely laughable, thanks."
Well enjoy bringing Free Software companies to their knees by persuading them to embark on enormously expensive outreach programs that achieve nothing.
>>54904379
Yeah, nah, to quote >>54904375
>See this is why we don't find you lot in /pol/, a place where all arguments must stand on their own merit alone (and no moderators will delete them). It's simply that your viewpoint does not stand up to scrutiny.
>That's why you stay quiet when queried.
Why isn't the agenda your pushing more about 'you can do it anyway!' instead of 'you can only do it if other people won't hurt your feelings while you do it!'
>>54904379
you are very literally the reason we cant have nice things.
>>54904379
>women and minorities don't have agency
wow lad
By the way, no one raised me to be a programmer. No one stereotyped me as a programmer growing up. I took my own initiative.
>>54904402
you're*
my bad
>>54904379
end yourself
>>54904397
It's not an attempt at an argument on its own, I just expect people to have a basic idea of what 'right-wing' and 'reactionary' mean. Are you unaware of the political climate of the community you participate in? It's very often anti-leftist.
If you want a concrete example: the daily thread where people discuss how women are inferior for logical thinking.
>Well enjoy bringing Free Software companies to their knees by persuading them to embark on enormously expensive outreach programs that achieve nothing.
Yeah not happening.
The fact of the matter is that a competent woman or non-white non-Indian programmer will always attract more respect and praise than a their white male colleagues of the same competence. Why? Because they're like unicorns.
This myth of the dastardly white males pushing women and "minorities" out of programming with harassment and abuse is just that: a myth.
>>54904207
No, its not. "Social justice" is something rich hipsters use to jusify their lifestyle.
"Please dont talk about my rich parents or class issues, it triggers me". The occupy movement ended exactly as you'd have expected: destroyed by entitled tumblrinas claiming it was all about their shitty gender identities.
>>54904410
They do but they don't exist in a vacuum. Our culture shapes our choices and our culture is gendered.
>>54904494
I actually agree with you. Identity politics is problematic. Read my other posts.
The problem is that 'SJW' has lost meaning and that actual leftists tendencies are being attacked under that umbrella term.
>>54904483
But gender and stereotypes are not a myth, and they very much shape our choices.
>>54904402
I agree that should be the agenda.
>>54904564
it would at least be less embarrassing
>>54904480
>I just expect people to have a basic idea of what 'right-wing' and 'reactionary' mean.
I bet you haven't even read Capital.
>Are you unaware of the political climate of the community you participate in? It's very often anti-leftist.
And you lot are very often anti-anything-not-leftist to the degree that you remove and silence any such comments. "Not welcome in the first place".
>Yeah not happening.
GNOME Foundation wants a word.
>>54904506
Biology is gendered too. All the outreach programs in the world won't suddenly make women interested in STEM fields. I don't know any women who have hobbies and interests except for drawing and photography. I don't know any women who sit in their rooms writing code. I don't know any women who do woodworking. I don't know any women who do 3D modeling. I don't know any female chemists. I don't know any women who fuck around with integrated circuits. They certainly exist, but in general women just aren't interested no matter how much you try to engage them in those pursuits (and god knows I've tried). I don't understand how you can live without a set of skilled hobbies and interests that can be pursued on your own. It must be boring.
>>54904539
Yeah, but the problem isn't the right. Its leftist males that'd rather keep their mouths shut than having to deal with feminist shaming tactics.
>>54904506
you state your opinions like an evangelical states bible verses, Wholeheartedly and with zero awareness that what you've said is mere conjecture at best.
The thought that the crazy bullshit you regurgitate may be anything less than absolute truth never occurs with you religious types.
>>54904564
And it actually is, in large part. You are participating in a very (right-wing) politicized community that cherry picks examples which are easiest to attack, and isn't interested in a wholesome analysis of the situation.
For example there's a donglegate scandal thread very often even years after it has happened. I agree that event was terrible, but on 4chan it is used as a political example to paint the entire leftist tendency in tech as ridiculous. It fuels rage instead of analyiss.
>>54904539
Also stop saying "problematic". something is either a fucking problem or it is not. Stop trying to downplay shit.
>>54904590
>aint the entire leftist tendency in tech as ridiculous. It fuels rage instead of analyiss.
There shouldn't be a political tendency in tech. I just want people to make things, not push ancillary agendas that are always (always) detrimental to one group or another.
And yes I'm enraged. I tread on eggshells. In this climate I am always a hair's breadth away from being harassed and shamed by SJWs and their complicit "news" outlets like Vox and Salon. Why? Because I have the audacity to be a male who writes software for public consumption.
>>54904584
> I bet you haven't even read Capital.
Lol what?
> And you lot are very often anti-anything-not-leftist to the degree that you remove and silence any such comments.
It's literally me against everyone else in this thread so I can't really silence you can I.
And I would never silence discussion, as many SJWs would.
But as I said. I don't believe in tolerance or free speech for fascists. And I'm open about it. Simply not my values.
>GNOME Foundation wants a word.
And their donators who aren't paying in time.
Also one example isn't exactly proof.
> Biology is gendered too.
Are women biologically less intelligent? Are they biologically conditioned to hate computers? Doubt it.
> All the outreach programs in the world won't suddenly make women interested in STEM fields.
It would take much more than that, I agree.
> I don't know any women who have hobbies and interests except for drawing and photography
Do you believe you woke up one they and chose your interests? Or that they were biologically chosen for you?
I believe it has much more to do with how you were socialized.
My dad showed me electronics and I got a computer all for myself at a very young age. My sister, not so much. Not because anyone was consciously oppressing her, or because she biologically didn't want it, but because people unconsciously propagate their gendered culture.
>>54904590
Are you claiming that a majority of SJWs think Donglegate was a mistake?
This is what they do to this day: naming and shaming, manufacturing outrage over bullshit. It is what they've done to Hunt, Dawkins and many others.
>>54904637
Thats actually a political statement. If you argue against politization for a particular cause you are being political.
>>54904688
I don't really know any SJWs. I do know many leftists that 4chan would scream at for being SJWs.
Policing language is a wrong method as I have said before.
>>54904692
the denial and double think...
>>54904637
Within the sort of "low class" that doesn't include hobos in my country there's been a lot of hate towards both the left and the right wing of politics. No one likes the blatant corruption of the right, nor the social aspects of the left. It brings me hope when outside the internet, talking to people with not such "high education" it's more common to see rational people who laugh at these idiots on TV preaching shit about feminism or islam. Believe it or not, we're still dealing with a minority no matter how loud it is and we shall point at them and laugh.
>>54904711
You have four options:
1. Ignore the issue
2. Post how there is no issue
3. Post against the issue
4. Post for the issue
Only one of these is apolitical and it's not the one you picked. Your political unawareness doesn't exclude you from reality.
>>54904733
that went completely over your head didnt it?
>>54904770
I really don't get your point please explain
>>54904710
So what, I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about SJWs.
They've taken over my university, I get their shitty newsletters every month. Everyone has to take mandatory feminist courses. They've taken over both left parties in my country and infiltrated all left-leaning newspapers. I know what's up.
The right is not the fucking problem. It's the moderate left that does not dare to speak up against this bullshit.
>>54904670
>But as I said. I don't believe in tolerance or free speech for fascists.
See, brilliant. How about Islamists? What should happen to preachers strongly sympathetic to Islamic State? What should happen to returning fighters? Not that I wish to equate "fascists" with the monstrosity of IS.
And I take it you're in favour of that EU law banning "hate speech", then.
>And I would never silence discussion, as many SJWs would.
Yet you go against that in the very next sentence!
>Are women biologically less intelligent?
No.
>Are they biologically conditioned to hate computers?
Not to hate, but -- being a mechanism, a thing, an object -- it simply tends to interest less of them. This has been shown over and over in apes, unfortunately, and we humans show the same gender divide. Objects tend to capture the devoted interest of males, whereas infants tend to capture the devoted interest of females.
>Do you believe you woke up one they and chose your interests?
My interests are things I found interesting.
>Or that they were biologically chosen for you?
Possibly, because it turns out that my interests perfectly match my father's (whom I never met).
Now list those things pushing women and "minorities" out of programming and other technical fields.
>>54903404
I can't wait for the service you use to dictate that you aren't allowed to close those issues
>>54904692
>If you argue against politization for a particular cause you are being political.
Wow, you got me! I must now silently stand by and watch the transformation of programming into an SJW safe space!
>>54904710
>Policing language is a wrong method as I have said before.
But you're in favour of it; you said so yourself.
>>54904796
There's a handful of popular "leftists" who speak against campus nonsense, gender studies, feminism and islam. People who will be called out on not saying that they're not left wing, but they still tell people "I'm still not right wing, I've been always a leftist".
Of course then many of their friends tell them "see, this is what your side has managed to mess up" but that doesn't change them on specific policies.
Still, I know some leftists nowadays which I talk to frequently and I bring these issues as well. They see many of these problems as moronic but the right is so disfunctional in my own country that they'd rather live with this nonsense. Based on this notion that somehow "you're wrong, things are different here in this european country than in that other european country with the left messing things up" which is a load of crap.
>>54903351
why does socialism attract socialist??
>>54904877
How is "muh special snowflake privileges" socialism?
I mean I understand why it would seem that way nowadays, but its really not.
>>54904808
> See, brilliant. How about Islamists?
I have no ethical issues with banning all religion. Or silencing extremist islamists or catholics.
It's a matter of political pragmatism though. At this point banning all religioun would be politically autistic, especially since allying with progressives religious elements would help fight against domestic fascists.
> And I take it you're in favour of that EU law banning "hate speech", then.
Probably yeah. Again the only problems I would have with it are pragmatic.
> Yet you go against that in the very next sentence!
There's a difference in discussing fascisms and propagating it.
> Not to hate, but -- being a mechanism, a thing, an object -- it simply tends to interest less of them.
I think this is beyond our expertise to factually determine therefore we both base our views in faith.
I just think that culture has a much larger impact.
> Objects tend to capture the devoted interest of males, whereas infants tend to capture the devoted interest of females.
Still this doesn't prove that this is not cultural or that we can't shape our society to counter it. Apes which are mentally retarded are left to die but we should work towards a society where this doesn't happen.
> My interests are things I found interesting.
No shit sherlock. Why did you find them interesting?
> Possibly, because it turns out that my interests perfectly match my father's
Lol biology doesn't work like that.
>>54904829
No you don't! You can be politically against it, as you are. Which is my point, you are political.
>>54904865
>There's a handful of popular "leftists" who speak against campus nonsense
The only ones I know are from the US and they're more libertarian than left.
Oh yeah, and one german Biologist who basically is a pariah now.
>>54904840
Let me clarify: I don't think that yelling at people on twitter is unethical, I just don't think it's intelligent.
Why do leftists always go on about rightists calling them facists?
What do you call outlawing saying things you don't agree with?
What do you call beating up people you don't agree with?
>>54904796
And I'm talking about how much of this narrative is just right wingers going apeshit how they can no longer insult people of lower social status.
Which I don't care about and find funny.
>>54904946
I don't think silencing fascism makes you a fascists. I don't care about your free speech. Fascism has a specific definition and "silencing other fascists" is not it.
>>54904966
No anon, you are the facists.
Your head is just so far up your ass you don't realise
>>54904952
Lets all bathe in male tears and enjoy our moral superiority!
(obviously not the male tears of refugees, though)
>>54904916
>especially since allying with progressives religious elements would help fight against domestic fascists.
What fascists? It's not like Europe is riddled with great big snaking blackshirt marches on the precipice of storming parliament.
>Probably yeah. Again the only problems I would have with it are pragmatic.
You disgusting cunt.
I assert the right to like and to hate whomever and whatever I want, for whatever reasons I want, and I assert the right to make my opinion known, and I assert the right for people to ignore me or to respond to me in kind. I assert the right to criticize and insult any political policy and any member of government. Fuck off.
>>54904966
"The fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists".
>>54904985
No we're really not you're just politically illiterate
>>54904670
>And I would never silence discussion, as many SJWs would.
>I don't believe in tolerance or free speech for fascists
>I would never silence discussion
>I don't believe in tolerance or free speech
stallman is a Bernie supporter as well (expected)
Free software is socialist and edging communism
>>54905008
>being so scared to engage the centre (yes, the centre) because of your intellectually and morally bankrupt ideology, that you enact laws to silence criticism
Can't wait for your own laws to be used to silence you. It's alright though, we'll sort it out and bring moderation back to the rule of law. Nigger.
>>54904995
Of course I wouldn't wait until that happens. Did you miss the rise of right wing parties and militias in Europe scapegoating refugees? Those people are fascists.
> "The fascists of the future will call themselves anti-fascists".
I can literally just quote that back at you since people here are calling me a fascist.
> You disgusting cunt.
Right back at ya
Antifa
Fighting "facism" via use of extreme facism.
Combating hate by building a monopoly on it.
Promoting freedom and democracy by encouraging a huge communist government that stomps all over its people.
>>54905050
>scapegoating refugees
Scapegoating them for...?
>I can literally just quote that back
You are not clever.
>>54905062
What is that picture trying to convey?
>>54904553
Holy shit. I'm retarded. This post just made me realize why logical people don't understand the gender and race discrimination meme.
Logical people are only 'racist' when facts support it. Idiots like this are racist based on stereotypes and ideas. People who want to fight racism are the racists.
Fuck.
>>54903461
Ovens.
>>54905058
Words have definitions. Just because a political tool is repressive, does not make it fascist.
>>54905050
do you wish to criminalize criticism of an open borders policy to the islamist-plagued third-world?
you still haven't listed factors excluding women and minorities from programming by the way
>>54905084
I'm quite sure that the dictionary definition of fascism is not "Speech or anything else that this one faggot on /g/ finds objectionable".
>>54905079
Not him, but it's obvious.
That kid would integrate far better in any of those countries and be far more at home there.
Instead he goes to Germany so he can collect welfare for the rest of his life.
>>54905085
I don't have an opinion on that. Probably not. I have already stated that I have no ethical issues with banning islamic extremists.
>>54905108
But you did just suggest criminalizing "fascists" for "scapegoating refugees" (which you failed to define).
Things might get a bit nasty if you try to silence the people you are trying to replace.
>>54905084
1. (historical) A political regime, having totalitarian aspirations, ideologically based on a relationship between business and the ____centralized government____, _____business-and-government control of the marketplace_____, _____repression of criticism or opposition_____, _______a leader cult and exalting the state and/or religion above individual rights_______.
Emphasis added.
Sounds a lot more like what leftists and SJWs want than who you call "fascists"
>>54904330
Why so much attention to CS? There are dozens of jobs where there is much stronger gender imbalance: teaching, nursing, truck driving, coal mining.
It is especially hard for a man to work as a teacher because parents and coworkers suspect he is a paedo by default. The level of discrimination for women in software is nothing like this.
It is simply unfair to focus on one profession and gender.
>>54905050
>scapegoating
You mean raising concerns about letting in millions of undocumented migrants into Europe?
We literally have no idea who these people when they turn up at the border. They are whoever they say they are until we can prove otherwise (scandals in sweden and germany when it is suspected that most of the unaccompanied "children" are not actually children).
I come from a traditionally labour voting working class background, and most of the people I know don't like this open borders policy. Does that make us all fascists?
>>54905127
>Things might get a bit nasty if you try to silence the people you are trying to replace.
Which is exactly why I have emphasized pragmatism.
I didn't say I would do it, just that I wouldn't have an ethical problem with it.
Secure the borders, build physical border barriers, and shoot dead anyone coming over the border after firing warning shots.
Is this hate speech?
Eventually all this SJW stuff will blow over, it already feels like the tide is turning and more people are being exposed to the pol-esque way of looking at things (via memes or otherwise), more and more people are getting sick of political correctness. The only question is, how long will this take, and will too much damage to the FOSS/tech world before the SJW trend dies.
And eventually, after big tech companies spend enough time stagnating and losing potential profits, they will be forced to tighten up again, fire these types of people, and bring back the white males to run the company and go back to being profitable and innovative. Eventually the shareholders will demand it. And when the SJW's can't milk the industy getting paid to do nothing other than implement genderqueer office policies at these companies, they'll loose interest and won't participate much in FOSS either.
>>54905099
oh well. that wasn't immediately obvious.
Why do you think we like them to come to us? They are in a fucking war then better stay and fight instead of running away like little shits.
My father fought when Iran was invaded by Iraq, so will I if ISIS inavde Iran. Syria is not my problem.
>>54905153
>I wouldn't have an ethical problem with it
Then your ethical compass is fucked.
>I didn't say I would do it
You just expressed happiness and amusement that the EU is doing it though.
>>54905143
I agree except for coal mining. Women are physically inferior.
People should listen more to this man
Also where's the technology
>>54905177
>Then your ethical compass is fucked.
I don't believe in ethics. Class analysis is all that matters for my political opinions.
>>54905177
> You just expressed happiness and amusement that the EU is doing it though.
Happiness? Where? Again maybe I did I just honetly don't consider it very important
>>54905193
Why do you keep bashing the working class for being "fascists" who aren't too happy about population replacement, then? Do you understand that mass immigration suppresses the wages of the working class? Have you even read Capital? Do you understand the concept for the Reserve Army of Labour?
>>54905223
Rightists praying on working class people and misdirecting their frustrations towards immigrants are the ones who deserve bashing.
>>54905249
Yes keep insisting there are no problems with immigration to Western Europe and Britain at present.
>praying on working class people and misdirecting their frustrations
These views grow on their own as a reaction to the impact of immigration on their lives. Cause and effect. Action and reaction. There is no Master Jew figure pulling strings.
>>54905282
The problem is capital and imperialism. Not brown people.
>>54905249
>misdirecting
I'm part of the working class and all I can see is a lot of middle/high class trash being all "caring" and "tolerant" about this like it isn't a fucking problem. All I can see is the media taking a long of steps into ensuring that the population is fucking complacent. All I can see is a lot of bashing the moment someone "dares" to speak against a fucking ideology. Take your head out of your filthy ass. There's no big people, there's no big media trying to manipulate us into this "hatred". Try living in a less comfortable place.
>>54905303
I'm too and I don't live in a very comfortable place (eastern europe). Our enemies are the same as their enemies: global capital.
I'm Andrea and why the fuck have you got my picture, OP?
>>54905315
>Muh capitalism is evul
Would you rather live in the US or the USSR?
Fuck off with your tall poppies bullshit
>>54905297
top kek, imperialism.
I don't know if you've noticed, but Sunni Islam has on-and-off been trying to conquer Europe for nearly 1,400 years. Now they have a fifth column of millions and millions of people, who pray in Saudi-funded Salafist mosques. What's more, our culture is being suppressed to accommodate these aliens and their perpetually-offended Salafist ways. Criticism of Islamism often leads to you being warned or arrested and charged. This is all Sunni imperialism. Finally the conquest of Europe is simply a case of getting a large enough voting bloc to suppress the native population entirely. Keep your eye on Sweden and Germany especially.
By the way, mass immigration serves capital very, very well indeed.
And no one said anything about brown people.
>>54903351
this needs to be done
>>54903422
but their code is ultimately bad mr pottering
>>54905326
There, you can no longer have a claim on working class interests. It is evident that people like you leverage frustrations caused by capitalism for fascist goals, like racism.
>>54905375
The US is better for the working class than the USSR.
A lot better.
And racism has nothing to do with fascism.
This thread has gotten terribly derailed, so before I go I will just sum up my points in hopes that I may change someone's views here:
1. Policing language is a tactic promoted by liberals who want to hide racism and sexism instead of addressing their root causes. However, the term "SJW" is now used as an umbrella term for anything remotely leftist, it is an attack tactic by the right which reduces otherwise legitimate goals to just those liberal elements concerned with language and form.
2. Women are perfectly capable of programming and working in IT, it is our gendered culture keeping them from it. Not workplace harassment, which is horrible on its own, but ideas that society teaches us about gender from the moment we are born. We should work towards equalizing opportunities by deconstructing these stereotypes.
>>54905389
This isn't about USSR vs US, it's about the working class vs the owning class. The USSR industrialized a peasant nation and created a superpower out of practically nothing. However, I don't agree with Stalinism (socialism in one country) or with totalitarianism. We need a movement of the working class for the working class.
>>54905439
Yeah Russia sure is a superpower.
A superpower in child porn production, black hat hackers, poverty, and corruption
>>54905439
How do you address the root causes of sexism and how is that not a form of b"policing". Social policing is not inherently bad, especially when it's policing against racist retards.
>>54905050
don't worry the rapefugees will be fine in the upcoming upheavals. we from "the right" fully understand that they are mere pawns in a bigger game and our true enemies are cucks and grave diggers like yourself. but make no mistake there will be a resolution to this whole crisis in one way or another. and not necessarily democratic.
>>54905439
I would agree, at least on the part of being taught about gender. When I was a kid I was constantly being told to respect women even when being disrespected, to consider that they may be more capable and hard working than I am and that they have always suffered since the beginning of time. This has led me to treat them differently than humans for a while, to treat them as goddesses, deities. To fear them. As an adult I learned that we're worth the exact same. I had to do some research and educate myself into that.
It's like racism. You're always taught to be racist and treat the minorities as special children who need special care and to always accept what they say without rebuttal. Then you grow up and investigate, stop being racist and treat them as equally capable, and engage into conversations with them without falling for tricks or feeling worse because of their color of skin.
Both the SJWs and the anti-SJW crowd are about as toxic as each other. I guess the SJWs are worse overall, but from my experience I know that the anti-sjw bunch (gamergate, etc) has many people who are equally as hateful and repulsive as the sjws
>>54903384
THIS. 99% of SJWs are macfags.
>>54905764
and then are morons like you spouting unreflected bullshit to look totally meta and smart and above everything
>>54905792
He's right though. Both the SJWs and the /pol/ tier anti SJWs are equally as bad.
>>54903351
I'd fuck her
>>54905975
It is difficult nowadays to even talk about certain subjects. You don't hate the jews = SJW. You are concerned about economic migrants = stormfag.
You think women should be treated equal = SJW. You think women should be treated equal = stormfag.
It never ends.
>>54905983
You can't "fuck" her moron.
The only way you can become close to her sexually is cleaning her up after she comes home in the morning
>>54903351
They are the female neckbeards. They are attracted to both technology and video games as these attract all kinds of losers.
>>54906046
that sounds like something a literal cuck would say.
>>54903351
Because they both adhere to delusional ideologies.
>>54906038
Yeah, both sides do it. If you don't agree with batshit crazy modern feminism, they brand you an 'MRA'. At the same time if you think that homosexuality is OK and you don't have anything against transgender, the /pol/ people brand you an 'SJW'. I think they both suck.
>>54905082
underated
>>54903351
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>54903384
>>54905772
/thread
>>54903351
It doesn't. It's just their current target. Once they drive all the good developers away they'll move on to something else to complain about. SJWs literally exist only to destroy.
Isis is still my waifu
>>54903351
I hope this girl is opensource, everyone should be free to cum inside her.
>>54908531
She is.
You will, however, be taken to jail due to licensing issues.
>>54904814
Then don't use it? Make your own? Famiglia the only traction these fools have is when they can whine to an authority figure to help them. If you use someone else's tools, you ultimately will have to abide to their often arbitrary rules.
There are only two real bottlenecks for doing development that will actually limit you as you fear: if your means by which you can connect to other people are cut off (see China, Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, Egypt, etc) then whatever you write will stay with you. Secondly, if acquiring hardware in which to work becomes politicized (Venezuela is a good example of tracking PSUV party members with phones they give away for free with the threat they can be taken from you if you don't act in accordance to party guidelines) then you can at best work on problems with high abstraction and low computability. Even so though, when devising approximate solutions for many bodied quantum mech, Fock actually did a lot of the incredibly tedious matrix arithmetic with a mechanical calculator, so if you have passion (maybe autism) this will prove an irritant and not a stopping point.
>>54903351
maybe stop crying every time a sjw says their opinion like it's somehow physically hurting you ro something
ignore them you pussy
>>54903351
>Why does free software community attract so many SJWs?
It doesn't, compsci in general attracts SJWs because they think it's instant money but they're leaving after 10 years when they realize they can't compete with guys who have been taking apart shit in their preteens and fucking around with linux in their teen years.
They're already leaving en masse
Please just report and ignore paid Microsoft shill trolls spreading FUD about free software/GNU/etc.
Microsoft shills, stop trying. You're getting absolutely pathetic now.
>>54908531
Oh wow look at yet another shitlord using rapey words whilst hiding themselves behind a monitor
I'm pretty sure you won't use that words in IRL situations, unless you're genuinely psychopathic
>>54903351
This bitch deserves to die.
All she has done is fuck the Tor project, cry and be a fucking freak. Her end is coming soon.
Both /g/ and the sjw crowd love free shit and love complaining about that free shit. You're going to have to deal with each other.
>>54905062
Fuck off we're full.
>visit that other chan
>see /tech/
>mitebcool.jpg
>it's discussion about technology
>lurk for a bit
>see /christian/
>mitebcool.jpg
>it's discussion about christianity
>lurk for a bit
>see /atheism/
>mitebcool.jpg
>it's discussion about atheism
>lurk for a bit
>see /rel/
>mitebcool.jpg
>it's discussion about religion
>lurk for a bit
>see /islam/
>mitebcool.jpg
>it's nothing but durka durka jihad terrist shit
>close tab
fucking muslims
>>54903351
Anything that is enjoyed by primarily males will attract SJW's.
>>54903351
Are you just realizing this now? LOL all free software is inherently about social justice and activism. They think free software helps their little crusade against capitalism.
Real men use the Microsoft toolchain.
>>54903416
are you autistic
If y'all chucklefucks are my competition, I have a bright future :D
>bullying andrea
She's one of the few sane dykes on the internet, actually contributes swaths of code to the project, and is pretty anti-crazy-sjw if you actually read her twatter. /g/ pls.
I identify as Linux Ubunto
Free software and SJW/feminism are the same shit, emotional responses at the expense of logic and facts.
>>54908511
Why does TOR have so many women?
Is there something I'm missing? Perhaps plans to integrate TOR into kitchen appliances?
>>54911560
this
>>54909686
Turkroach, plz.
>>54911591
So they can hide their cheating from their boyfriends
>>54904584
>I don't know any women
Sounds about right
>>54903351
WITSD?
