>Program has an option for both UK English and US English
>No indication of which one is the original
I fucking hate this. I am a purist when it comes to translations.
What are some examples of this actually having differences?
UK English is the original, bro.
>>54836902
Not in the computer world, it isn't.
UK company? probably UK English. Just deduce, faggot.
>UK English
Extra vowels everywhere and it reads like it was written in the 1800's.
>US English
Full of freedom and HFCS.
Those are the only real differences.
>>54836827
All they do is write labour instead of labor. It doesn't matter desu pick the one you're used to reading, they don't change sentence structure at all.
>>54836916
Lovelace, Babbage, Turing...
>>54836995
> Americans
>>54837097
Didn't implement English in their systems
>Being this autistic
Why even live OP?
>>54837105
>Britons
>>54836995
Real world example? I haven't really compared them.
Indian English is the original
>>54836902
Contemporary UK English evolved during the Victorian era and the American one is closer to older Englishes
>>54837300
>diarrhoea
>aeroplane
>doughnut
>neighbour
>>54837429
As a Canadian I don't see the problem
>>54837105
The language is pretty much ours now
We create the lions share of the English language literature and media these days
Your interpretation of our language can be considered a backwater dialect at this point