>>54820548
BSD is basically a direct offshoot of Unix, while Linux is a reverse engineered version of Unix.

BSD, much like Unix, was designed to be used to one thing and do that one thing well.

>>54820642
I love it...
BSDs are so neat

The way I see it this is just a result of how the BSDs are developed. The base system is deliberately kept minimalist because the devs cannot afford to allocate their time and effort to every single function. Being so minimal also has the added benefit of staying out of the end user's way.

GNU/Linux distros are not managed the same way. A typical GNU/Linux system is more like a compilation pack of various projects and the distro maintainers don't necessarily work on these projects aside from backporting fixes when needed.

>>54820642
>Linux is a reverse engineered version of Unix.
Bullshit.

>>54820941
He worded it a bit awkwardly, but the gist is basically right. Google it. Or DDG it, whatevs.

>>54820991
Linux is not a reverse engineered version of Unix period.

>>54820548
Why are bicycles so minimal?

No tank, no gas, no steering wheel, just two circles connected by a stick.

>>54821010
It's even worse

>>54821010
The correct term is UNIX-like

>>54821010
I think the point is going straight over your head, though he did word it a bit awkwardly
>>54821040
>not using bikes when you live inner city and don't need a car

>>54821286
>it's the year of bicycles on the highway