SO IT BEGINS
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
>custom card
>can't overclock for shit
NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH!
http://videocardz.com/60631/asus-rog-strix-geforce-gtx-1080-offers-poor-overclocking
>>54815762
This gtx 1080 meme came faster than op does when he ejaculates prematurely
>>54815762
still better than anything from MAD
I'd give a shit if it wasn't already the fastest card in the world
>>54815768
sick burn m8
Why do you need to overclock a video card that outperforms every other video card in existence?
>>54815804
Because people were able to overclock just about any GPU that outperformed every other GPU in existence before.
>>54815804
Because it still can't run crysis
>>54815823
And now cards come pre overclocked.
This is an improvement. Instead of wasting time overclocking it yourself, they do it for you.
>>54815780
>>54815804
>wait for custom board they said
>cant OC better than Fanboy Edition
>b-but it is already the fastest card
you nvidiots are a joke
>>54815869
Shilly willy go
>buying nvidia
Enjoy your gimped graphics i suppose.
How 2 get subzero tempz on the jew 1080... BE A GOD GOY AND BUY FOUNDER EDITION WC LOOP
>>54815883
I'm not a gamer idiot. I buy nvidia because of the sweet cuda cores.
MAD cant compete anywhere. fails in encoding, no V-ray tracing, no CUDA, faisl at gaming, fails at CPUs.
literal shit copmany.
>>54815762
But it's already factory overlocked. Would you rather have a factory clock of 500Mhz so you can boast about a 1500Mhz overclock instead?
>>54815762
I tried overclocking my 7970 a few months ago first with MSI Afterburner and then AMD's Crimson and it completely rekt my graphics card. It now only works if i don't install drivers, if i do install drivers the graphics card crashes as soon as i hit the desktop.
I'm too scared to overclock again.
>>54815907
>>54815934
you guys are fucking retarded.
the custom card have 6+8pin and 10 phases.
It supposedly OC better then the FE but it performed worse than it. That's the point.
>>54815907
>Starts talking about MAD
>nobody is talking about MAD, thread has nothing to do with it
Are you sure you're not MAD yourself? Kek'd
>>54815892
This is as much an argument against nVidia as Gameworks is against AMD.
Meaning, nothing at all.
Why is it called the 1080?
>>54816352
Because your mom sucks that many dicks in a single day.
>>54816377
college wasn't free
>>54815762
Welcome to silicon lottery, your first time? Or just enjoy shitposting?
>>54815768
Kek
>>54815869
This post is PURE damage control, holy shit. I'm really starting to believe that there are paid shills acting on forums and imageboards.
>inb4 muh MADrone
I'm a nVidiot myself and I'm able to see this, if you're not, you're just retarded.
>>54815961
you is muckin about.
my 7970 is much easier to oc than my 4870.
>>54816413
It's nothing to do with the silicon lottery, you dumb fuck. All 1080s are voltage locked, presumably because they're Fermi-grade housefires and would literally explode if you put more voltage through them. This kills the overclocking.
>>54815762
>overclocking
>2016
>ishygddt
>Small update, PCOnline tested their STRIX card as well. They manged to achieve 2088 MHz (but only in 3DMark, so it's definitely lower after 20 minutes of burn-in test). They said it crashes on 2.1 GHz though.
>http://diy.pconline.com.cn/795/7950003_4.html
kek
>factory overclocked card
>can't overclock much
oh really? Color me surprised.
>>54816859
This
>>54816859
>nvidia's advertised 2.1ghz is an overclock
kill yourself. Nvidia lied about literally everything they said during the release.
>>54816859
>>54816891
>this damage control
It has nothing to do with how much it can overclock beyond the factory overclock, you dumb cucks. Nvidia claimed that the reference card could hit 2117MHz on air at 67 degrees. Yet even none of the fancy custom cards can get anywhere near that so far. The fact that they're factory overclocked is completely irrelevant. Why can't they even reach the speed that Nvidia showed the reference card allegedly doing? Because Nvidia lied of course.
>>54815961
You sound like a faggot.
I can max the voltage slider on my 280X and it doesn't give a shit outside of hitting mid to high 80s
>>54816477
>ll cards are locked to 1.25V maximum
>when the voltage gets close this value, card become unstable.
Sounds like the average silicon lottery to me. Stability issues at high voltages and clocks. Do you really think unlocking the voltage would yield any other benefits than an extra heater to your room with a card which performs poorly even within voltage the limitations it has? I'm waiting for more reviews on the cards from multiple sources. That 2050 Mhz clock isn't even too bad considering the base clock of the FE. Never seen clock rates that high myself even if they fall short on what we saw in the conference.
>>54816907
>Nvidia claimed that the reference card could hit 2117MHz on air at 67 degrees.
They indeed showed a card which did that. Temps are something you should take as a massive grain of salt as the test conditions have so many variables which effect this.
>Yet even none of the fancy custom cards can get anywhere near that so far.
How many have you seen measured so far?
>>54816907
They wouldn't have lied.
They would simply have cherry picked the single best card out of the thousands they had made and then locked the fan on 100% in a cold-ass room
>>54816331
you are equating Gimpworks with DX12
>>54816978
The issue is not with the temperature anon.
The initial review suggested that the card were gimped by a single power connector, and that with the extra power the card can achieve the showcased overclock.
But that turn out not to be the case here.
Even with custom PCB and mods, the card simply can't go over 2100MHz before things gets unstable.
Not even the extra wattage could help as whenever you try to go over the 1.25 voltage limit the card simply shat itself.
>>54815768
Fucking sick burn brah
>>54817201
That's exactly what the silicon lottery is.
My old 2500K could hit 5.2ghz on 1.48v, other shittier 2500Ks could barely maintain 4.5ghz at the same voltz.
Nvidia would have looked over the thousands of chips they had and found the one that was able to hit the highest (2200mhz) at 1.25v, and then used that one as the 'norm'. The low temps would be because it was running the normal voltage and that card probably had better thermal paste along with possibly even giving the fan more than 12v.
>>54816961
None of that matters, you cant say anything at this point. This one card PROVES that pascal is a failure.
>>54817260
You are trying way too hard, downright comical if serious.
>>54817260
>>54817256
>then used that one as the 'norm
Why does nvidia always do shit that ends up backfiring?
I think they do it so they can charge ridiculous prices and once the skeletons start coming out they can just lower the price a bit and still make it look like a good deal.
These retards aren't switching on the blue LEDs to keep it cooler while overclocking.
I get it, Nvidia lied. Sure they lied, but seriously, what does AMD have to offer?
I have the money to buy the card without sacrificing anything, if I buy it I just get the card and I get to play my video games because what the fuck else do I do with it?
So I can buy the card right, I can also buy anything AMD has to offer - wait a second, do they even have anything to offer? No right? Polaris? The one targeted for "budget" shit? I'm not on a tight budget, and this card outperforms anything so what's AMD going to do to stop me from buying this card?
>>54817505
>Why does nvidia always do shit that ends up backfiring?
they got larger fanbase and loyal die hard fans. It will really not backfire since those fans will just goes into "ITS JUST A SILICON LOTTERY, NOT THE CARD FAULT" mode.
>>54816331
>I-I d-d-d-dont need good IQ
>m-m-muh FPS
good goy
I still wonder
>nvidia like >70% market share
>amd like nothing, probably similar with intel and their own shitty apu's
>on /g/ the AMD shill force outnumbers every other party by 100:1
how and why
>>54817569
if you have a 390/980 or better you don´t need to upgrade w8 for 80ti or vega senpai
>>54817614
>shill
because you have no clue what that word means
>>54817599
>but not only game
>and got game
>by FaithLV for /r/pcmasterrace
hey guys buy AMD cards I don't care but can you please not spam reddit shit bait here? what the hell is wrong with you
kill yourselves
>>54817669
right
the people here hating on nvidia and recommending AMD cards everywhere I look are not shills
>>54817614
because i've noticed every amd owner i know never actually play games and always like to meme amd shit on r/amd and some on /g/. every nvidia owner i know is some normie that doesn't even know amd still make gpu's and all they use their computer for is torrenting games and playing them.
tdlr;
>amd owners = neckbeard loners that never play games and like throwing benchmarks everywhere
>nvidia owners = normal fags who literally only use their computer for games
>>54817614
4chan is all about being hipster as fuck.
>>54817701
>amd = compute shit
>nvidia = gimped as fuck can only into games
i wonder why senpai
Keep up the good fight goys, your company appreciates it.
>>54817701
>dank meme the post
>>54815892
don't worry Nvidia owners only care about meme image quality bullshit like pcss and hbao+ and other meme features. actual game graphics are of little importance.
>>54817732
>amd
>any computational tasks
KEK, my friends r9 390 doesn't even work with autodesk maya because of shitty drivers. he has to roll back to some 2011 drivers to get one of the tools to work which inevitably makes current game performance shit.
on the other hand i use nvidia CUDA in premiere pro so if anything nvidia is the compute stuff and gaming stuff and amd are just there because they are. literally doing nothing for the industry.
>>54815907
that's weird you sure sound like a gamer idiot
you had us all fooled big time
>>54817691
That word doesn't mean what you think it means.
Furthermore, the large Nvidia marketshare is largely due to their marketing and appealing to the masses. They do this via mass marketing with websites, blogs, reviewers, etc, giving them special conditions for giving their products good reviews and playing nice with them. By doing this to a much larger extend than AMD has ever done, they managed to sway the public's perception of both brands. And while both AMD and Nvidia are actually rather close when in comes to performance on most cases, and both of them are similarly priced in most cases, the marketshare of Nvidia vs AMD is a landslide. It's gets even worse, when you realize that most innovation on the field is done by AMD (DX12/Vulkan, HBM, list goes on), while everything Nvidia does is locked down behind a black box for them to use and no one else (GSync, GameWorks, etc). All of this, while Nvidia gets so much more problems with their hardware than AMD ever did, yet AMD gets much more flak whenever anything of the likes happens to them, and Nvidia's are covered up and accepted as if it were nothing.
Regardless, being a fanboy is retarded. You should always get the best product you can for your dollar. And in most case scenarios, except the top of the high end, AMD is likely the best, except for some unique scenarios like mATX and shit.
Pretty much sums up why most people here prefer AMD over Nvidia. It's not that their AMD shills, they just dislike Nvidia shady shit.
>>54817797
>their AMD shills
they're*
Country and goals?
>>54816961
>shilling this hard
>for free
CLUCK
>>54817797
>most innovation on the field is done by AMD
>le amd had a hand in some gayming tech which means they've innovated the most
>amd gayming tech = lead innovators in all forms of the tech industry
kill yourself
>>54817837
Serbia. Remove kebab.
>>54817837
Sweden, one united north under the king
>>54817877
You didn't provide any counter examples now, did you.
I'm not saying Nvidia doesn't innovate either. The difference is, like I said, Nvidia keeps it to themselves and puts a black box over it, so that no one else can look at it. On the other hand, AMD shares and makes everything open source, which actively contributes to progress. DX12 being based largely on Mantle is a great example of this.
What's Nvidia ever done that helped other technologies (not made by Nvidia) grow?
>>54817875
>I don't have an argument
>Better call anon a shill
Remove yourself from this board.
Why is it impossible for you guys to have a discussion without taking sides on a fucking computer hardware brand or jumping into conclusions early?
>>54817505
>Why does nvidia always do shit that ends up backfiring?
Is it really just Nvidia? You really think this is going to backfire now when the card performs better than any other GPU on the market while drawing moderate amounts of power, having normal temps and with no competitor? There are people who are obviously going to care about the possible limitations of OC and people who are too gullible to take Nvidia's marketing and hype at face value in who are disappointed probably every single time they release something. Whether the card is a good deal depends on how it performs relative to the competition. Currently there is none and the card makes Nvidia's own previous flagship basically obsolete. If they were proper jews they'd sell this for a lot more until competition forces them to do otherwise.
>>54817582
If we are discussing the OC headroom of the card in the article, it's clearly just the silicon lottery. Whether the card in the article or the one in the Nvidia conference is closer to the average unit is impossible to say right now. We need plenty more tests.
Happened exactly like I said. No reason to upgrade from 980ti. In fact just never buy non-ti cards.
>>54817955
>Nvidia keeps it to themselves and puts a black box over it
so everything nvidia has ever produced has a black box over it? care to show those sources which show nvidia's workstation cards all use black box software
its a simple question with a simple answer. any reply without a source about nvidia and their workstation innovations using "black box" software is damage control and all your posts will be laughed at and discarded like the bullshit they are.
>>54818001
It's even worse when you consider that the 1080 only really beats the 980ti by like 15-20% when the 980ti is not OCd. It wouldn't be convenient for Nvidia to match the 1080 against an OC'd 980ti, because they'd be too close for comfort to show how good the 1080 is supposed to be. But that didn't matter, since it was a stock 1080, and we had yet to see an OC'd 1080, which would happen with the aftermarket coolers, of course.
Now that news are out that the 1080 doesn't OC too much even with a custom PCB and aftermarket cooler, that OC'd 980ti is looking preeeetty close to the 1080. There's really no reason to pay almost double for a 1080, when the 980ti is pretty much the same. Unless, of course, Nvidia starts conveniently forgetting to push performance updates through drivers for the 980ti... :^)
>>54817950
>the country that surrendered to their turkish masters
>removing kebab
Ha
>NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH!
Nah, the opposite is the case.
Have read various reviews to the GTX 1070 now.
It will be a bestseller card for sure.
>>54818045
I mean, you're the one that's claiming Nvidia doesn't put a black box over everything they do, so the onus is on you.
I for one, can't remember a thing Nvidia did and made opensource for everyone to use, but since you clearly remember, maybe you should be the one providing the sources, how about that?
>>54815762
Thankfuly the topcard of AMD is a great overclocker
Oh wait, it can't even overclock 1 mhz
>>54817955
Neither AMD nor Nvidia ever released specifications for their cards. They all are black boxes. This is the reason open source drivers for them are such a joke.
>>54815907
>The Nvidiot instinctually begins comparing his bad card to older AMD cards
>>54818069
>15% slower than a 980 Ti once both are overclocked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMr7grvBljk
Anybody with half a brain will buy a 980 Ti when they start selling them off cheap to clear stock.
>>54818100
I wasn't talking about card specifications, I was talking about technologies. AMD opensources a lot of their stuff and creates new standards for the industry, while Nvidia keeps them to themselves.
>>54818085
>he spends time writing a shill post (for free) >>54817797
>gets told to provide sources in his posts
>he obviously can't
>"b-but i-i didn't say nuffin"
>"y-you should be providing sources"
>"S-STOP QUESTIONING MUH BELOVED AYYMD REEEEEEE"
kek
>>54818086
kek
>>54815804
for the mad respekt broseph. nobody actually overclocks for performance
>>54818120
1070 uses much less wattage power, supports DX12 HEVC 10bit 60FPS encoding, newer technologies and has 8GB of RAM
Nvidia spent a year overclocking Maxwell...
>>54818156
Trying too hard only to make yourself look like a retard. I don't care for brands, I care for what's my best option and what they contribute to the industry. But whatever floats your boat, Nvidiot
>>54818197
BUTTCASTRATED HOUSEFIREVICTIM DETECTED
its a damn good thing i DONT EVER overclock
>>54818197
>he still can't provide those sources 5 posts later
kek
KEK
K E K
>>54818120
Nope
First of all it's the Founder's Edition, which anyone with half a brain won't buy.
Custom designs are better, which is not speculation.
And not anyone want to have double the power draw.
The GTX980Ti max OC will become a powerhungry monster.
Also 2GB less ram.
Even if they are sold at the same price, I will go for the GTX1070.
>>54818120
>>54818115
>>54818086
>>54818069
>>54817984
>>54817984
NVIDIOTS AND AMDRONES ON SUICIDE WATCH, THEY'RE FINISHED, DONE, BTFO AND BANKRUPT
>25% less power consumption
>4% faster
>150 bucks cheaper
Into le trash le fury x go's
>>54818239
>And not anyone want to have double the power draw.
980ti is about 25% more powerdraw, not 100% more powerdraw
>>54818269
and to think amd will be selling the fury series as their high end cards for another 8-12 months before vega hits. i can't see this ending well for them considering their top card is worse than the mainstream nvidia card.
>>54818120
What are you saying?
Have you even watched the video?
1070OC vs. 980Ti OC is -7% performance on average, not 15%
Stop talking shit when your link doesn't even support your statement!
>>54818303
If they want to clear any of their inventory they will obviously have to slash prices on the fury x big time.
Or nobody but blind fanboys will pick it up over the 1070
>>54815762
Stupid shills should know better than to promise overclocking potential.
>>54815907
CUDA cores...2014 only about 250 CUDA applications none of which you fucking use.
>>54818304
that's still pretty decent considering it's not even supposed to replace the 980 ti, and some other sites are actually showing a smaller performance gap between oc vs oc. i can already see some high end models of the 1070 being faster than the 980 ti when overclocked. probably the water cooled or the evga classified models.
>>54817582
>Cons: None because we can predict the future
Can their shilling be any more blatant?
>overclocking an already overpowered, overheating, power-sucking card
Idiots. Goddamn shitfucking idiots. Jesus fuck. Stop supporting this goddamn garbage.
>>54818422
Shit, this guy convinced me, I'm switching over to AMD
>>54818214
>Housefire victim
sorry I don´t buy nvidia so, no housefire for me :(
>>54818444
Nobody is talking about OC'ing the fury X though
You AMShit shill fan boys need to shut the fuck up. Unlike you, we have the most powerful card on the market, can the fury compete with that? NO
Can the 390x compete with that? AS IF
You need to shut the fuck up, because you're place is always below the superiority of Nvidia cards, especially considering in not poor, and can actually afford them.
When will AMD morons ever learn. And the coolers are fine, I don't care what you think but you never use the card under full load while gaming anyways, so it won't ever overhear or throttle, unlike AMD cards
>>54818304
It's 15% slower in several games.
>muh average
>>54815762
>buying hardware DRM
Fucking retarded kids
IT'S FERMI ALL OVER AGAIN
>>54818473
>>54818120
>Anybody with half a brain will buy a 980 Ti when they start selling them off cheap to clear stock.
Shills will tell you otherwise but don't worry.
>>54818492
> you never use the card under full load while gaming anyways, so it won't ever overhear or throttle, unlike AMD cards
reviewer say pascal throttles while gaming
top kek have fun with your housefire nvidiot
>>54818543
>comparing a reference stock card to aftermarket OC'd cards with custom PCB's
You are the idiot
>>54818543
>titan x
>$1200
ayy lmao the damage control gets better and better from these drones
>>54818546
>he uses AMD
>Thinks he has the right to argue with me
KEK
>>54816401
Kek
>>54818558
That's the thing, you retard. Even with a custom PCB and aftermarket cooler, the 1080 can still barely overclock. So that comparison is valid, and the 1080 will be barely better than the 980ti. Something people have been calling ever since the throttling suspicions came up.
>>54818558
>comparing a reference stock card to aftermarket OC'd cards with custom PCB's
Yeah and when people say that new cards cant overclock for shit you say "WHO CARES ABOUT OVERCLOCK, BOOST OC IS ENOUGH!" Simply epic!
>>54818543
GTX980Ti master race reporting in!
>>54818747
Aftermarket cards aren't out yet, so...yeah....you're just a dumbass
>>54818627
sorry I don´t use either poor fag, I use a private server for my job. I don´t gaym
comeback the moment you can afford to drop 1k+ on a cpu alone
>>54818767
You stupid fucking nigger, the link in the OP clearly states that the Asus Strix 1080 can't overclock for shit. It's right there in the fucking OP. How fucking dumb are you?
>>54818767
>Aftermarket cards aren't out yet,
You didnt even read the OP? Hahaha, stop posting, autist.
>>54818773
>HE DOESN'T HAVE DUAL XEONS
KEKEKEKEK
>>54818796
Compared to the Fury X it's an overclockers dream
>I-it's fine.
>I didn't want to overclock it anyway
>>54818767
yesterday a dude try to hardmode the meme edition by whacking an extra power connecter, power phase and bypass load of shit.
The result? Even with all the extra juice GTX1080 still shat itself whenever it goes beyond 2100MHz.
>>54818847
Are you talking about Fury X owners?
>>54818843
>shifting goal posts
The fuck is wrong with you, you fucking autist? No one is even talking about the Fury X. That's a last gen card.
>>54818883
>Tfw I over clock my new 1080
>my house catches on fire
>>54818883
>b-but the fury x guys
>(You)
>>54818897
>>54818900
It's AMD's top card and it's literally the wost overclocking card ever
Yet you idiots are bitching about a 15% performance increase over stock speeds.
Come back when AMD has a high end performing card that can overclock decently.
Until that time enjoy your fury x turd
![7be[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/1hIaXIJ.jpg "7be[1].jpg")
>Either way, the chase of mysterious 2.114 GHz clock advertised by NVIDIA has still not found its conclusion, even on this custom card.
>Nvidia jewing left and right
>b-but Fury x
Fix the shit in your camp first, Nvidiots.
>>54818953
>mfw it performs worse in games than your average i5.
>>54818992
back to /v/ kid we dont game here
>>54818950
NVIDIA marketing, man. It turns people into fanatics.
>>54818944
The argument isn't about the fury x stupid
The question is why did Nvidia release a shit card when we expect more from them
>>54818944
This isn't even about the FuryX, you dumb retard. It's how the 1080 is complete shit because it can't OC, and therefore, is barely even better than the 980ti, which when OC'd, is only 2-5% worse than the 1080.
Nvidia is literally shitting the same 980ti on the plate, and you and other Nvidiots are eating it up for double the price, while claiming Nvidia are gods and AMD is shit.
Literally, what the fuck is wrong with you?
>>54817256
>it's the silicon lottery
>they hand picked the GPU
>that's how lotteries work
Are you fully fucking retarded? If Nvidia did what you're saying they did (and that's precisely what everyone thinks they did), then they misled consumers to think that what they were showcasing on stage could be expected of most any 1080. It doesn't matter that the savvy among us would know better than that because for every one of us, there are two idiots that don't know the difference.
So far today, you are the person that I've seen that most needs to shut the fuck up and I work in the service industry, so let that sink in you moron
Typical consumer: I'm a bit dissapointed with the 1080, it was very expensive and under performs from what was promised, plus it runs very hot, which could lessen the lifetime of my card
Nvidiots response: STFU, YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND BECAUSE THE FURY X IS FUCKING G AWFUL, AMDRONE SHILLS NEED TO FUCKING SUICIDE BECAUSE THE 1080 IS BETTER THAN THEIR SHIT FURY X
>>54819061
>It's how the 1080 is complete shit because it can't OC, and therefore, is barely even better than the 980ti, which when OC'd, is only 2-5% worse than the 1080.
>i enjoy pulling things out of my ass
it's way over 20% faster reference vs reference and still over 20% faster overclocked vs overclocked. stay mad amdrone.
>>54819185
>he posted it again
The amount of Nvidia hate threads proves how butt hurt mad AMD fags are.
>>54819170
Typical consumer: I'm a bit dissapointed with the *insert amd card*, it was very expensive and under performs from what was promised, plus it runs very hot, which could lessen the lifetime of my card
AMDrone response: STFU, YOU WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND BECAUSE THE 1080 IS FUCKING G AWFUL, NVIDIOT SHILLS NEED TO FUCKING SUICIDE BECAUSE THE FURY X HAS DX12
>>54819185
>and still over 20% faster overclocked vs overclocked.
ayy! brainwashed as fuck.
>>54819185
Except it isn't, you retard. Even in the OP link's chart, it shows the 1080 stock being 10% better in relative performance than a factory OC'd 980ti by Gigabyte, which we know can go higher if you sacrifice power/performance, and 1080 OC less than 20% better than the same 980ti. You're the only one pulling shit out of your ass, but then again, you probably like that, don't you faggot
>>54819061
>It's how the 1080 is complete shit because it can't OC
but it is overclocked by default by boost clock..
>>54819224
Boost clock is bullshit to increase values in benchmark. After 20 minutes, in any demanding game, you "boost" is back to stock clocks because it can't possibly hold it that high for longer than 15 minutes.
Boost clock isn't an overclock, not even close.
>>54819218
>l-look this one game doesn't show good gains
>t-this one game negates any average because averages are bullshit!
You amdkeks make my work harder here today. Shilling was easier before.
>>54819047
>>54819061
Ofcourse you don't want to talk about the fury X because you guys realize what a complete piece of dogshit it is and how it just became obsolete by the release of the 1070.
Fact is AMD has been the one that has produced the poorest overclockable high end cards so far.
Yet all you idiots are talking about is "HUURRR LE 1080 SHITT OC HUUEUEUEUE"
I will repeat, come back to me when AMD has produced a solid overclockable high end card with a baseline performance that is better than the 1080's at the same price.
Then you have a right to boast, until then you guys are like a guy in a fiat panda making fun of a guy in a ferrari enzo because his ferrari doesn't have a cupholder
>>54815961
Because the overclock profile is stored in %appdata% so when you reinstall the drivers it loads again.
>>54819260
>proving my point
lelkek
>>54819223
>You're the only one pulling shit out of your ass
>posts screenshot of perfectly legitimate video
>"i-it's all a lie, i-i swear"
kek stay mad
>>54819267
>buying a car with no cupholder
Whats wrong with you?
>>54819277
>confirming you're an idiot
lelkek
>>54819267
>He thinks I like the fury x
>He's so Asshurt he doesn't wanna be a pissed of consumer like me because his brand is too important to his poor little heart
>He's literally the reason Nvidia is doing what AMD is famous for
>>54819314
>y-you all idiots!
>excuses, excuses
Stay mad!
Poor slavnigger AMDkids are awake.
The memestering has begun.
They need some way of dealing with their inability to buy a nonshit card. It's ok. After all tears are all they have left.
>"POOLARIS" - a scream is heard in the distance
Can't wait for those stacks of tears.
>>54819353
>y-you all idiots!
>excuses, excuses
Stay mad!
>>54819286
>That said ComputerBase confirmed the rumors from PCGamesHardware. The so-called Extreme overclocking (2050+ MHz) on STRIX GTX 1080 is poor. All cards are locked to 1.25V maximum, and when the voltage gets close this value, card become unstable. Neither bypassing VRM controller nor removing TDP limit has made any difference.
>YOU ALL LIE. ALL OF THESE REVIEWS ARE INCOMPETENT! THIS AUSTRALIAN YOUTUBE DUDE SWEARS ON HIS MUM AND KNOWS BETTER!
>>54819363
>Full HD.
Literally who but poorest of pajeets use 1080p anymore
>>54815804
Because it reaches for a higher standard than any other card ever released
You're not playing games at 1080p on this thing. It squeezes by at 4k with little to no wiggle room. Overclocking is the wiggle room
>>54819386
>starts off claiming 1080 is "only 2-5% worse than the 1080"
>gets BTFO
>moves the goalposts to some speculation about 1080 overclocking potential for a specific vendor because he can't back up any of the claims he made about the 980 ti being 2% slower then a 1080
AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA
>>54819363
Nice try!
>>54819419
>>54819427
>gaming at 4K
The human eye can't see past 4 million pixels.
Seriously though, assuming your display is 27" and you're sitting three feet away from it, you will not be able to see individual pixels unless your eyesight is better than 20/20.
So unless you got a 30" monitor, 2.5K (2560x1440) is perfectly adequate.
>>54818319
>Giving away a free complete packaged die to every Pro Duo customer...
They've already been doing that, I assume they'll go into overdrive soon and drop the price to match the 1070.
>>54819419
I don't know why you expect anything different in a card aimed at 4k.
>>54815762
Does it have async compute?
>>54819455
Nigga u got BTFO, just admit it and improve your shilling skills.
>>54819455
Claiming 980 ti*
>>54815762
Who gives a flying fuck?
Overclocking GPUs have always been exercise in epenis wankery.
It is not worth the headaches (CTD, BSOD and killing your GPU) and you only get 10-15% gain if you are lucky on most silicon unless you win the silicon lottery. You are usually held back by the architecture (memory bandwidth, fill-rate, shading-rate etc.)
>>54819471
>1920x1080
When will you fucking 2005 fags kill yourselves
>>54819476
>The human eye can't see
>>54819488
>he still doesn't have those sources
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
this just gets better and better
>>54819476
Except I got a 65" LG OLED and sit in about 1.5 meters in front of it.
>>54819476
Except that's actual bullshit.
I can see the actual pixels on my 24" 1920x1200P monitor.
Your eyes are just shit and/or you bought into bullshit graphs made by trolls who supported Plasma TVs back in the day (see: your pic)
>>54819476
>You will not be able to see individual pixels
That's the fucking point
>>54816413
>silicon lottery
I guess every one who plays the 1080 Fanboy Edition loses.
>>54819518
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>i will pretend to laugh it will totally hide my butthurt and BTFO
>>54819540
Well according to the OP, it's actually anyone who buys a non reference card is now a loser.
The affected card is the Asus STRIX non-reference design...
>>54819520
His graphic is still applicable.
>mfw I'd buy a 1070 if it had freesync
>>54819520
>gaming on a 65" screen from 6 feet away
For what purpose
>>54819518
Woah relax there buddy.
>>54819563
I can tell you waht's optimal in reality. It's not 60cm.
>>54819476
>The human eye can't see pixels at 4k
That is literally the fucking point of 4k
>>54819558
Asus was always shit
If msi or gigabyte can't put out a good card then it's time to be worried
>>54819518
Embarrassing.
I will wait for Polaris, thanks for heads up friends.
>nvidia gets BTFO in every thread
>>54819627
>Weeb
>Poor fag
>Uses am gross
Typical
>>54819581
Not him, but Jesus fuck that graph isn't that hard to follow
>>54815762
I love how eager you people are to jump on any issue, doesnt matter how small. Who gives a fuck about brands and stuff? Im gonna buy the best bang for the buck card, thinking about the gtx 1070 those benchmarks seemed pretty sick. But waiting for polaris to make a final decision. Does anyone have any indication when those are gonna drop? Need to build 3 pcs in august for friends who cant do it themselves, i hope polaris is on time for that.
>>54819555
>he thinks deflecting the original question will make everyone forget he's an amdrone retard
kek
>>54819689
Woah buddy, you're being too impartial and logical here, you sure you're in the right place? This is /g/, you better side with a company and blindly defend them, or get the fuck out of here.
Anyway, NDA on Polaris ends on June 29th, and the GPU should reach mainstream stores early July, mid July at worst. On June 29th, you should expect benchmarks to be everywhere.
>>54819267
Why are you so obsessed with a corporation? You are the only person here making nVidea/AMD comparisons. What the fuck is wrong with you?
>>54819476
According to your graph using 4k on a 24" desktop monitor is worth it
Damn you're dumb
>>54819689
>typical AMDrone
>>54819761
Look at his reddit reaction image. Then take a guess.
>>54819782
Not him, but would you say 32" is the min for 4k?
>>54818900
>tfw planning a 1080 build and there's nothing you can do to stop me
>>54819761
>You are the only person here making nVidea/AMD comparisons
>>54819814
No. Look at the graph. You probably sit 2 feet away from your monitor. 4k, for sharpness, is good at any size. 4k for desktop workspace I'd say 28 inches. That's like 4 14" laptop screens.
>>54819471
wow....really makes you think
>>54819844
Why would anybody want to stop you? I actively encouraged people to buy the 970 after 3.5. Getting people to waste their money is fun.
>>54815856
But it can run doom
>>54819844
>thinking anyone cares what you do
>b-but it d-d-oesn't overclock as w-well as Maxwell!
Who gives a shit when it's baseline performance already obliterates anything that's out right now, anything on top of that is just gravy
AMD doesn't have an answer to the 1070 and it doesn't have an answer to the 1080, and it won't for the remainder of the year because Poolaris will be a budget card with budger performance.
>>54819957
>It's bad to offer budget performance at budget prices
>A $300 fury isn't a good deal
Wew lad. And you're pretending that Vega doesn't exist. God, it's literally against the rules to troll outside of /b/. fuck theb4chan administration for letting the entire site get this bad.
>>54820045
>>A $300 fury isn't a good deal
It isn't when you can get a 980ti for $380
>>54820055
Both are good deals. Fucking Christ. That's the same percentage difference that currently exists
>>54820045
>AMD waiting how long to counter the 1080 with Vega.
If they released it sooner it might actually make things interesting.
Did Nvidia say this card was going to be an over clockers dream?
>>54820074
Yes but performance doesn't scale linear with price, you should know that.
Fun fact
EVGA released a tool for their cards that unlocks the voltage. These cards can hit a max voltage of 1.65v
Who else here is getting a classified?
>>54820074
Also those are two big IFS
A: that polaris 10 will be Fury levels of performance
B: that it will be sold for 300$
Meanwhile, we do know for sure that the 1070 offers 980ti performance at 380$
>>54820143
>Meanwhile, we do know for sure that the 1070 offers 980ti performance at 380
Thats funny, the 1080 isn't even as fast as a 980ti, the 1070 will get stomped by it retard.
>>54820211
>the 1070 will get stomped by it retard.
is the wittle 980 TI owner going to cry?
>>54815768
Hahahaha straight into /r/4chan
>>54820139
Link?
>>54815856
Underrated.
>>54820211
>the 1080 isn't even as fast as a 980ti
?
Given the difference price/performance between the 1080 and 1070 anyone getting a 1080 is just a nvidia cuck.
>>54815762
Don't worry lad they will release the Ti edition so they can jew us out of more money. Don't forget, a monopoly in growing keeps the shekels flowing.
>>54820610
Buying a 1070 is bad enough. You can get 980 tis for cheap that will smash a 1070
> It's another "Nvidia lies about everything" episode
>>54820638
>980 ti
>cheap
>$400 range
no.
>>54820610
>being poor
>>54820673
>being this stupid
>>54820653
Yet, people keep defending them all the way through. Not a single word of what they said in the 1080/1070 show was true, it was all manipulated through and through, and people keep defending them. Yes, the 1080 is the fucking best, just barely, but the way Nvidia keeps tricking everyone is fucking disgusting. And people on /g/ of all places are defending it.
>inb4 le amd shill xDD
I don't fucking care. I don't like a company over the other, none of them owes me nothing. Is it too much to ask that a company is fucking true about what they show to the public?
>>54820766
But there website is black and green!!!!!
>>54820766
>I don't fucking care. I don't like a company over the other, none of them owes me nothing. Is it too much to ask that a company is fucking true about what they show to the public?
No because that is fucking stupid, why on earth would you want a company to be truthful? fucking retard
>>54820673
>>54820766
>the 1080 is the fucking best, just barely
That's exactly why I want one.
I don't give a fuck about their press conference bullshit, no company tells the truth.
>>54820805
You could probably wait a few months for the 1080ti to drop, you know. Like the 980ti dropped after the 980, and the 780ti dropped after the 780.
But if you got the money, by all means, go for it.
>>54820825
I'm doing an entire rebuild that I've been putting off long enough.
I'll probably debate selling the 1080 and getting the ti, but it's too far down the road for me to want to wait.
>>54820143
>Meanwhile, we do know for sure that the 1070 offers 980ti performance at 380$
Keep dreaming. There's no way you'll be able to get either card at the MSRP in the foreseeable future.
>>54818303
>>54818319
I can't wait. If I can get a second Fury X for cheap, I'll jump all over the chance.
More power than the Fury Pro (because remember, that's two Nano's, not X's) and it'll look beast in my custom loop.
>inb4 people warn me off because crossfire
Raja himself said MGPU is the future for AMD.
>>54817614
People shitpost non stop about ancient thinkpads and maximum autism Linux
>>54817797
Only sane argument in this thread.
>>54815856
>mfw this is actually true
>>54819476
I have a 27 inch 4k display and the difference between games running at 1440p and 4k is night and day. 4k is crystal clear while 1440p is blurry as fuck. Not to mention having a desktop at 4k gives me more space to work with.
>>54819476
At the closest distance I can be, I sit 27.5inches away from my 27" 2560x1440 screen.
At the nominal distance, I sit 31 inches from my screen. (All measured at eye level, from beside the eyes).
According to http://isthisretina.com/, I am at roughly the perfect distance.
I'm not saying this to disagree, nor to agree with you. Just as a statement.
>>54818543
>Titan X
>1500MHz
>>54819476
>27" monitor
Well, if you're an underage and don't mind playing on a tiny screen then you won't care about 4k.
>>54821176
>4xsmaa
>>54821798
>I'm literally retarded and don't know that 4xSMAA is NOT the SMAA postprocess filter applied four times
>>54819275
but I completely reset my pc (full wipe of hard drive) how can the appdata still be there?
>>54820881
Probably won't be available till august in any real quantity.
>>54821829
What even makes you think that is the implication behind the post? No the implication is why the fuck is someone using 4x of any AA at 4k? SMAA still has a noticeable performance hit.
