>$379
>FASTER THAN TITAN X
AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
>>54805452
can we please agree that this bait call out (finished/bankrupt) is simply lame?
>>54805484
Shhh, it's a meme.
BOTH AMDRONES AND NVIDIOTS BTFO BEYOND PROPORTIONS, IT'S FINISHED THEY ARE BOTH BTFO AND BANKRUPT
>>54805505
it's worse than ayylmao desu.
even worser than rickrolling
>>54805452
480x will be better
>>54805736
AMD literally cannot compete at this point
>look /g/ the newer generation cards will be faster than the old generation cards
>>54805624
are those real tattoos?
>>54805505
My 17 year old cat died last week, she looks... looked exactly like that one.
Thanks.
Why is the 980 ti suddenly hot garbage? Fucking Fury X is beating it.
>>54806342
Dx12 most likely
>>54806342
Maybe in the 2 games that use DX12 that's' about it
>>54806342
nvidia's gimping kicked in.
>>54806300
was I supposed to know that she died
>>54805452
>Dirt Rally
Has there ever been a game more biased to Nvidia for performance?
>>54806141
not in case of polaris :^)
>>54806475
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>54806461
idk, has there? i didn't know it was biased towards nvidia
>>54805452
Every day with this thread who fucking care was stupid looking gpu you use to play your baby games
>>54806475
i'm excited about polaris. i'd like a proper 1080p beast with the power effeciency of the 970 and a lower cost. i'd get the 970, but i'm going amd this time out of principle
>>54806455
you heartless piece of shit
>>54806630
I mean, my condolences and all, but I'm not a fucking mind reader
>>54806619
480x will be 95% as powerful as a 980ti and cost $250
get that mate
>>54806698
source?
>>54806773
His dreams
>>54806773
http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
inb4
>synthetics
>rumours
completely possible 2bh
>>54806773
he doesn't have one
most of /g/ speculates about consumer technology and speculates incorrectly
just wait for the benchmarks like a reasonable consumer
>>54806773
his ass
>>54805452
WHO THE FUCK CARES
GRAPHICS CARDS ARE RELEASED ALL THE TIME
>>54806461
project cars
arkham knight
>>54805550
IT'S TIME FOR INTEL TO STRIKE
Behold, the RX 480. New naming convention for the R9 480X.
>AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
>AMD literally cannot compete at this point
Silly Nvidiots.
Is there a good reason to upgrade from a 4690k for a 1080? Currently have a 290x
>>54806773
A cow's rectal cavity
See
>>54806932
It's total bullshit
>>54807075
No, just overclock it if you haven't already
>>54806483
caret
>>54807052
>running a game at 1440p on a 1080p monitor
Who are they trying to kid?
>monitor is 144Hz
Yeah fucking right, I know what AMD is doing here. They're running the game downscaled and not telling anyone that the monitor is actually 1080p, but at the same time dropping hints that the monitor has a 144Hz refresh rate.
>muh 480 can do 144 Hz at 1440p!
Fuck off with this shilling, it's not even good shilling.
So £380 britbongmonies then? Fuck that
>>54807052
>openGL
>Not Vulkan
So... shitty drivers?
>>54807075
>>54807101
Would a 4790k be fine for a 1080?
>>54807215
no it wouldnt
>>54807215
No, that's a shit cpu
I'd rather buy AMD than support scummy Nvidia.
>post yfw 490 = $350 and beats 1070
>>54807215
CPU is fine senpai. My i5-2400 does just fine at 1080p.
>>54807265
>his mom pays the electric bill
>>54807094
that link has the potential 480X at ~10% behind a 980Ti.
>>54807289
>post yfw equal tdp
>>54807319
Nah, Poolaris is apparently a lot hotter and hungrier than AMD lets on. If the 1070 and 1080 can make do with a single 8-pin PCI power connector, then a much smaller GPU should be able to run off of a single 6-pin or draw only from the PCIe slot. But Poolaris has been confirmed by AMD to need at least one 8-pin PCI power connector.
Even the GTX 1060 will only use a single 6-pin.
>>54807186
Vulkan version of Doom is not released yet.
>>54805452
>$379
>Believing imaginary MSRP
You can not buy a single 1080 for MSRP. What makes you think 1070 will be available for MSRP?
>>54805452
>2x the perf 3x eff
>chart shows 1.5x perf over 980
>costs $1200 on ebay
Oh cmon I can buy 2x fury nanos and beat 1080... Or 2x480x for €400 would be top kek, only a madman would waste 1000 burgercoins for a gpu
Nvidia is bankrupt, amd takes 90% of the market... nvidia gpus will be bought only by little green martian bois who will fall for the nvidia marketing meme
>>54807388
Hey Kyle, still buttblasted about the no invite I see.
>the NDA for information (not even launch) of AMD's new cards is a month away
Holy mother of kek. The "finished & bankrupt" meme is no longer a meme. AMD is truly fucked.
Let's all laugh at how pathetic and incompetent AMD is.
>>54807388
>provide power in for 225W
>only use 150W, all components last for a long time
>provide power in for 150W
>components regularly violate this under load, components last for half the time
One company is doing it right, and it isn't Nvidia.
No idea why anyone expects Poolaris to be any good. Its going to have roughly the same performance as AMD's current gen, just on less power. So hey, it'll have 20% of the 1080's magnificent performance, but it'll sip about 60% of the 1080's power draw.
>>54807791
Completely different price and performance category. When will people learn this? AMD X80 has never been high-end.
>>54807547
>>54807791
Delete these posts. NOW.
>>54807862
Thats AMD's problem, who's going to wait months and months and months for Vegpoor when they can pick up a 1080 right now.
>>54807926
Depends on how much they end up costing. I don't think I've owned a high-end card since the 9800pro. The 1080 is definitely overkill for me.
holy fuck
amd user here, sitting on a r9 fury (non x)
I didnt expect the 1070 to be an upgrade but at $379 I would be fucking STUPID not to buy this card. This in sli would be a very affordable BEASTLY GPU.
anyone hating on this is fucking retarded
>>54807968
>falling for the fury meme
Should have waited anon.
>>54808004
>falling for the polaris meme
Should have waited anon.
>>54808027
Who said I fell for Poolaris meme? I fell for the Vega meme
>>54808004
ive enjoyed the fury for almost a year now so i dont really consider it a waste
>>54805452
If only these benchmarks were real.
swedish site SWECLOCKERS who is very credible has reviewed it too
http://www.sweclockers.com/test/22153-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070
>inb4 i cant read cuck
you can still look at the benchmarks you goof
>>54807315
Still 90% of a 980ti for 250 is better than 379 for 100% of a Titan X (which is basically the same as a 980ti)
>>54807968
>$550+$450 = $1000
>For slightly OC'd 980ti performance
>Thinking this is a good upgrade
Retards who upgrade from one generation to the next should be banned from /g/ for not understanding technology.
>>54807926
> Why waiting when you can get the 980?
Look how it went
>>54808163
haha you sound poor
The GTX 1070 is amazing.
>>54808079
mohammed, pls
>>54808197
>Wasting money is cool
Tiny wiener, heh?
>>54808197
>Objectively bad purchasing decisions make you rich
>>54808004
God I fell for 390x because I couldn't be fucked waiting another fucking year.
The worst part is these Polaris is fucking crashing and burning behind the scenes rumors actually do have me rattled because the last thing I want is to actually have to return to Nvidia after they fucked me around in repairs several years ago. (and the whole Nvidia are pretty much evil, but I'll take good power to price and evil over incompetent and feels)
I want Polaris to be good, but those rumours + this sudden NDA for several months has me fucking worried.
>>54808224
actually im slightly above 6inches
nice try tho
>>54808200
>63% improvement
I think people are too focused on comparing the new cards to the 980ti, which they aren't meant to replace
Since the 1070 is meant to directly replace a 970 that's a hell of a performance gain holy shit
>>54808252
>believing butthurt hardocp rumors
>less than one month is several months
Hey nvidiots convince me to switch/upgrade my 5 year old gpu hd 7770, i could pretty much run all triple a games on high-med
>>54808261
>It's $450
>970, 660Ti, 570 and 470 beat out their previous gen flagships for less than $350
worst GPU launch Nvidia had since forever.
>>54808283
Because AMD doesn't have a history of over-hyping and under performing.
AMD haven't had a good product range for years now. The whole Fury/300 series is a clusterfuck.
I barrack for AMD because I believe in open source, but that doesn't stop AMDs bizarre incompetence while Nvidia are moving in for the kill.
So is the 1080 a good idea or a bad idea?
>>54808376
It's $380 for the decent versions if you don't have the patience of a child
Only a $50 price bump for a die shrink that took years and billions of dollars of R&D and engineering
Another review. 1070 is a very good overclocker.
http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/2453-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070-founders-edition-review
>>54807968
>bought a Fury
>considering spending $379 for a 10% performance bump
>calling others retarded
>>54808197
Anybody considering is a 1070 is poor. The 1080 is 25% faster. If you weren't poor, you'd buy the best.
>>54808435
>very good overclocker
>1986MHz
>still nowhere near stock 1080
>1080 reaches 2164MHz
>very good overclocker
Retard.
>>54806655
Go to /x/ and fix your shit, anon.
>>54808422
>20% more performance for 50% more money
flagship cards are always bad ideas
>>54808440
>If you weren't poor, you'd buy the best.
Most people who have rent, have to buy food, fuel etc don't have $600+ on disposable income, especially for something you have to spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars more to see the potential of.
There are numerous more useful things than high end graphics cards worth purchasing or having.
>>54806190
For the ceo on the left, yes
>>54807265
no need the 480x will beat it at $250
>>54808252
I fell for the 380 meme. Yours is at least decent.
>>54808517
480x performs like a 980..................................................................................................................
>>54808529
>shilling this hard
>>>/v/
the 480x will match the 1070
>>54808529
>.................................................................................................................
Source
>>54808553
c4 = 480
c7 = 480x
you might wanna back up your statement you fucking retarded assfaced moron
http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>>54805452
>implying AMD gives any fucks about Pascwell
>implying new architecture and an even smaller node shrink wont provide the better value for any consumer who isn't dumb enough to get jewed
>>54808579
C7 has been used as a code for the LOCKED 380 in the past as well, that C7 also has only about 2300 cores and full polaris 10 will have 2500 cores so put two and two together retard shill.
>>54808587
Listen, autismotron.
AMD peaked in 2000, and unless they do some groundbreaking shit, they're not going to peak ever again. The proof is in the picture.
It's finished.
Nvidia is clearly the superior one here.
>my unreleased card can do this!!!!
>no look at my released card, it's the best!!!!
>no fuck you my company is better
>no my company is the best
>waaaaaah
Is it fun anons? I never have had fun shitposting, but there are people that are genuinely behind these brands because of their identity. The facts are here, the 1070 is an amazing card and it'll probably sell more than the 970 with how it performs. There are idiots out there that are buying it for 1080p, but that's marketing I guess. Polaris better be a killer at a lower price, at least having a better price to performance if it is even possible, or AMD is in trouble.
>>54808638
I can't tell whose side you're on.
>>54808579
That bench shows a 480 (non x) and possibly a 470x or unlocked polaris 11, you must be new here.
>>54808630
>I could have made almost $30000 if I pulled the trigger on 10000 shares
Why am I such a pussy? Fuck, I knew it would rise, but being a poor student is suffering.
>>54808579
That puts it within 8% of the Fury X and those benchmarks are made with early driver versions.
Release version will offer Fury X performance for $300 or less.
>>54808579
>http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>amd-radeon-r9-480
>r9-480
mong
>>54807547
NDA for Polaris is up in less than 24 hours you autist. That NDA is for Vega.
>>54808638
I agree with you.
As I said before, I prefer AMD because of open source, but I'm not going to waste my own money due to brand loyalty, I'll always buy best power/price ratio.
I don't understand people who form self-identification around giant corporations. It's even more pathetic than base nationalism.
>>54808710
>implying nationalism is bad
>>>/r/cuckolding
>>54808652
If anything, I'm more into AMD with their current actions. They have a more open mindset with their platforms with their GPUopen shenanigans and fressync while Nvidia is the classic closed source guys. The fact is that Nvidia released good cards, albeit disappointing with the higher end performance, and AMD is probably going to not have a good time with Polaris unless they price it low. Nvidia has the PC gaymer industry by the balls and their marketing is amazing, they're basically Apple for the gaymers.
>>54808710
To expand upon what you just mentioned -
If you choose one company over their competitor, the only thing you're hurting is yourself. You don't HAVE to be an "AMD person", nor do you HAVE to be a "Nvidia person". A smart person would buy the best performance per dollar, and at this point in time, it's Nvidia with their GTX 1070.
>>54808703
C7 is 480X in crossfire you stupid degenerate
>>54808704
It's June 29th for Polaris.
>>54808460
+300MHz chip and 600MHz ramclock on FE
>not a good overclock
Are you fucking dense?
>>54808750
>taking pride in achievements of people who have nothing to do with you except being born in the same landmass.
Nationalism is retarded and even more retarded in an era of instant internet communication and global capitalism.
It's just a spook designed for political control over certain population centers to keep people divided, the fact you are on 4chan, hanging out with people most likely not even in the same country as you shows that deep down even you know nationalism is full of shit.
You have more in common with rajeb in bangaldesh who works in McDonalds there than you have probably with most political and business leaders in your own country.
>not waiting 2 years and buying a graphics card with HBM2
>>54809017
you might be dead tomorrow
no point in waiting
So is nvidia trying to scam people into 1070 reference by ending embargo before even 1080 partners launch?
>>54809153
Reviews are already out
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/GeForce-GTX-1070-8GB-Founders-Edition-Review
>>54809153
they ended the embargo because AMD is showing Polaris at Computex. Computex starts tomorrow.
>>54805452
>AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
If it is to be like that then see pic related, 25W, both modern graphics and decent CPU.
How can NVIDIA compete?
>>54805452
>>54805452
>next gen gpu that just hit the market vs old gen that has been rebranded the past 4 years
no shit sherlock
>>54808822
its only a 480 you mong not a 480x
>>54808822
>http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>amd-radeon-r9-480
>r9-480
doesn't even surprise me that nvidia panjeet shills cant read
>>54809311
>>54809311
>AMD readeon r9 480 / 480 X performance
on top of the fucking benchmark
C4, C7, C7 CF
limited AMDrone go hang yourself
Good 1080p Gsync monitor to accompany?
>>54809381
>http://videocardz.com/60253/amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>amd-radeon-r9-480-3dmark11-benchmarks
>amd-radeon-r9-480
>r9-480
LEARN TO READ PANJEET
also full polaris has about 2500 cores the one in the benchmark only has 2300 core
>>54807186
Nvidia has what can only be assumed to be exclusive access to Doom's Vulkan dev builds, as they've been demoing it on the 10xx's, so more or less the OGL 4.3/4.5 situation
>>54809387
>1070
>for 1080fuckingp
>>54809415
you are literally fucking retarded
this moron refers to a url which they named after 480
the benchmarks shows 480 / 480X
C4 is 480 , C7 is 480X
C4 is 67DF:C4 = 480
C7 is 67DF:C7 = 480X
fucking subhuman end your life
>>54809435
1080p 144hz would be ok
>>54809457
C7 was a codename for the 380, stop being so fucking new and go back to /v/
>>>/v/
>>54809457
>"One more thing, according to Sisoft database, C7 has 2304 cores, there is a possibility that there's another P10 chip with 2560 cores (full silicon), even faster than those. Just wanted to make it clear."
Keep being new you aspie
>>54809457
C7 is a codename for the gimped rx x80
you must be new around here or something
>>54805452
The 1070 is actually slower than a 980ti
in this one specific test, but holy fuck the difference in clock rate is massive, the GPU on the 1070 must be a giant hunk of shit
>>54809499
>>54809517
>>54809532
DELET THIS
>>54809457
67DF is the cut down chip.
67C0 is the full chip.
So these are probably 470, 470X
>>54809584
>>54809532
>>54809517
>>54809499
NVIDIOTS
B T F O
T
F
O
>>54809499
>>54809517
>>54809532
subhuman degenerates don't know wtf they are talking about
C7 = 480X
And you can't do shit about it
>>54809536
Don't worry, Nvidia will finds a way to fuck around with 980ti likes any old cards
>>54809620
>being so new that you dont even remeber the 380 leaks about a year or so ago
you have to be 18 or older to post here
>>54807315
I think that same website had synths putting the fury x at around 10-15% ahead of the Titan x before release based on "relative performance" of the 290x
>>54809620
>"One more thing, according to Sisoft database, C7 has 2304 cores, there is a possibility that there's another P10 chip with 2560 cores (full silicon), even faster than those. Just wanted to make it clear."
Panjeet learn to read
>>54809639
>polaris benchmarks equal 380 leaks
subhuman
>>54809667
>AMD decides to change C7 meaning rx x80 to rx x80x
WEW LAD do you enjoy being wrong or something
>>54809667
>"One more thing, according to Sisoft database, C7 has 2304 cores, there is a possibility that there's another P10 chip with 2560 cores (full silicon), even faster than those. Just wanted to make it clear."
kek panjeet cant read
>>54809536
The 980ti wont be better for much longer.
>>54809667
>>54809620
>Nvidia shill at it finest
>>54809723
>possibility, might, rumor
whom are you calling panjeet you shitstain
Enjoy being irrelevant on the gpu market
>polaris 125w non OCable
>better than Nvidia ever
40 keks
>>54809017
I have a gtx 670 and I've waited for a node shrink for years already, waiting time is over especially because current flagships struggle to get 60fps at 4K
>>54809536
>>54809517
A 2048 shader variant was confirmed in some leak. There is no confirmation of a 2560 shader variant.
Whichever the C7 version is, it's awfully close to a Fury X or 980ti in that synthetic benchmark. Only takes another driver update or some slightly higher clocks to be equal with them.
![3070339-6.+unigine+valley[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/8kwGTtr.png "3070339-6.+unigine+valley[1].png")
>>54809746
>"One more thing, according to Sisoft database, C7 has 2304 cores, there is a possibility that there's another P10 chip with 2560 cores (full silicon), even faster than those. Just wanted to make it clear."
kek panjeet STILL cant read
>>54809788
>amd
>not OCable
pic related
>>54805452
Yea they are finished
>>54805964
Their best bet is most likely just going into cell phone graphics chips.
>>54809888
TRIPS OF TRUTH CONFIRM AMD CAN OVERCLOCK
NVIDIOTS BTFO AGAIN
>>54809816
Overclocked 980 ti vs overclocked 1070 the 980 ti wins
Im waiting for Polaris/vega or even further before upgrading my 980, no games even push it at 1080p yet
>>54809926
can you go back to /v/ newfriend
>>>/v/
>>54809972
can you go to >>>/toy/ newfriend ?
>>54809959
>Overclocked 980 ti vs overclocked 1070 the 980 ti wins
Says who?
>>54809953
>polaris
delusional thoughts and probably suicidal irl
>>54809987
>being this mad about a /v/ redirect
wew
>>54809994
NVIDIOT KEKOLDS BTFO EVEN MORE
>>54809988
Says me.
>>54809995
>gets shown his real place
wew indeed
>>54809988
Frig off Randy.
>>54806190
they both look pretty real to me chief
it was on Nvidia's official twitter I doubt it'd be a fake tattoo
>>54810005
>lost every review and benchmark
>btfo
thats not how it works kid
>>54810058
NVIDIOTS DENYING FACTS BTFO HARD
>>54806461
You know how some games say "Nvidia, the way it's meant to be played" in the beginning? Well, DiRT Rally has that for /a/md. Fuck off.
>>54809856
What is up with all the ugly as hell graphs lately?
>>54808435
>Lisa's face when
>>54805452woodscrews
>>54808435
Thats pathetic, not even 10% gains
POOLOORIS CAN'T COMPETE
NVIDIA WINS YET AGAIN
>>54811349
you have autism
>>>/v/
wew lad this board sucks
assblasted AMDcucks
>>54811411
congrats you have autism
>>>/v/
>>54811399
This board is pure shit, but I like technology so it can't be helped. No mods, generals everywhere, identity politics, shitposting galore, etc, it really is shit.
>>54811438
its the nvidiots and the other cancer coming from /v/ asking for tech support and shilling their garbage
>>54811456
someone linked this thread in a /v/ thread
>>54811516
well that explains a lot
980 ti is 8-12% faster when both are overclocked.
still a good card for the money.
Polaris and Zen better be good
>>54811593
Polaris 10 will prob match furyx/980ti performace the thing that needs to be good is vega
>>54806698
>/g/ always say this bullshit about amd gpus
>they come out
>literally the exact same price or even more expensive than nvidia's shit every single time
>>54811683
Are you people just fucking stupid or what? AMD has already shown on the presentation that polaris is low-mid end crap.
>>54812056
true story
especially for europe
>>54812056
not our fault you are from a 3rd world country
>>54812158
>literally true for every country on the planet
>le 3rd world xD
fuck off amd drone
>>54812168
panjeet pls
>>54812168
POO IN THE LOO
Am I the only one who thinks it's kind of weird that we have almost no information regarding Polaris? That AMD keep incredibly tight lipped about it?
I can't help but think that we're all going to be surprised once Polaris is revealed. Don't know whether it'll be a pleasant surprise or not though. Knowing AMD, we'll most likely end up disappointed.
>>54805452
>AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
kek
>>54813081
Computex hasn't even started yet dipshit
>>54813081
Pretty sure they're announcing stuff june 1st
>>54813122
I was considering buying AMD stock about 2 years ago. I regret not doing it now.
>>54813081
>we have almost no information regarding Polaris
>Polaris 10 is for mainstream desktops and 11 is for notebooks.
That's more than enough info to confirm that Vega late this fall is what I'll be interested in.
I'm sure Polaris 10 will be interesting, but it'll still fall well below the flagship Nvidia parts. AMD has been very clear on this. Based on those leaked benchmark scores we've probably all seen, I would guess that it'll fall just below the Fury X.
>>54813122
ayy I bought 2000€ worth of stock 2 years ago myself, best investment so far.
And I still feel bad, could had easily invested 10000€ or even 50000€, I knew it was going up.
>>54805452
500 euro here so meh
>>54814451
>being poor
>>54806300
ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>54809816
Oh shit
AMDRONES BTFO
$380 vs $650 980 ti, and it's faster on average.
Gigabyte 1080 VR edition.
Please 1070 edition
>>54806300
Sorry to hear that anon.
Have a meme to cheer up.
>>54806300
sry to hear that anon
>>54805484
no you
A new nvidia card is faster and cheaper than an older nvidia card, big news anon what does this have to do with AMD?
>>54806342
It always was. But Goyworks used to gimp any other card that wasnt the series 9xx. Now you are watching the actual performance of it.
>>54809959
>>54809988
>>54806300
Good riddance. Cats are vermin.
Get yourself a dog.
>>54818907
The difference between the 980 ti and 1070/1080 is minimal despite the much higher clocks.
>>54808553
>the 480x will match the 1070
>>54820540
Which is pretty fucking impressive when you realize the 1070 is the cut down version of the chip that is supposed to replace the 980, not even the 980ti
>>54820572
So it's nothing more than a rebrand.
>>54820816
You are tech illiterate aren't you?
The two chips couldn't be more different
>>54820944
And yet they perform nearly the same.
I was expecting a bit more from the 10xx series.
>>54820540
>>54821000
This.
Performance is weak as fuck in actual games.
>>54811191
Haha I haven't heard woodscrews in years. Well meme'd, friend.
>>54820476
I'd rather have cats, thanks. At least they don't stink like dogs and their owners.
