[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
I'm ready to escape the botnet
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 70
Thread images: 22
What browser can I put on my Mac that's secure, fast, and doesn't have a shit interface? Preferably battery efficient too, especially since Chrome is shit at that. Bonus: for Android?
>>
>>54761097
Edge
>>
>>54761097
internet explorer in wine
>>
File: KekBotnet.png (86 KB, 600x1200) Image search: [Google]
KekBotnet.png
86 KB, 600x1200
>>54761224
>>54761265
>>
I'd honestly say that Chromium is the best browser for Mac right now. Firefox has a much higher energy impact than Chromium, lacks sandboxing, and the extension eco-system is not as great, with the exception of things like NoScript, Decentraleyes, and a couple others. Other browsers are generally not as desirable due to the fact that they're usually proprietary and lack the kind of security audits that Chromium and Firefox go through. (e.g., Safari or Vivaldi).

If you're really paranoid about Chromium phoning home, install uMatrix by Gorhill and configure the fuck out of it. That, and don't use the "Sign into Chromium" feature. The only thing that sucks is that the UI looks like ass.
>>
File: 1452439626784.png (338 KB, 680x451) Image search: [Google]
1452439626784.png
338 KB, 680x451
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>my Mac
>>
>>54761097
Safari or Chromium.
>>
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>on my Mac
>>
File: 1434103478903.jpg (66 KB, 680x383) Image search: [Google]
1434103478903.jpg
66 KB, 680x383
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>What browser can I put on my Mac
>>
>>54761511

>and the extension eco-system is not as great

Firefox has like 75x the number of extensions that Chrome has - Firefox effectively created the god damned world of addons and extensions for browsers.

>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all
>>
File: white.png (144 B, 310x163) Image search: [Google]
white.png
144 B, 310x163
Stick tin foil around your mac it'll all be fine from there
>>
>>54761097
Safari you dumbass, literally built in
>>
>>54761679
Yeah and 75x the number of useless extensions, most of the extensions I use on Firefox I can also get on chrome, with the exception of the UI ones like DPT and CTR
>>
File: 1435351470776.jpg (13 KB, 283x188) Image search: [Google]
1435351470776.jpg
13 KB, 283x188
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>my Mac
>>
Opera and for android naked browser.
>>
File: ultron.png (79 KB, 512x512) Image search: [Google]
ultron.png
79 KB, 512x512
>>54761097
Google Ultron
>>
I've tried Vivaldi for a while and I need to say:

HOLY SHIT, THIS FUCKING PIECE OF TOXIC GARBAGE SUCKS HORSE DICKS

Use anything, except vivaldi and firefox
>>
Not a really popular choice, but otter browser. Has all of the great things of Opera, but on a better license and better GUI. You have to compile it from source though, there are no pre- compiled packages.
>>
File: 1454967907573.jpg (46 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
1454967907573.jpg
46 KB, 500x500
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>What browser can I put on my Mac
Geez OP, is like you are asking to be bullied.
Get something GNU, like GNU Icecat, a debloated version of Firefox with security enhancements.
>>
SeaMonkey
>>
>>54761806
>Opera
This.

I know people shit on Chromium-based Opera a lot, and for a while it was mostly deserved, but it's really coming into its own now.

>>54761842
>Vivaldi
"Stable" doesn't mean "finished," or even "fully optimized." Give it time.
>>
File: 1433487722160.png (307 KB, 1301x720) Image search: [Google]
1433487722160.png
307 KB, 1301x720
>>54763340
>it's really coming into its own now.
2 years going and still zero fucking features. May as well use Chromium since there's barely any difference.

>"Stable" doesn't mean "finished," or even "fully optimized." Give it time.
Literally out for half a year and it's already got near feature parity for Opera12 while being able to render modern websites and Chrome extensions. The JS based UI crap is cancer and slow as shit though. Luckily you can hide those UI elements.
>>
>>54761816
Underrated post
>>
>>54761816
kek
>>
There are no good browsers for os x.

>safari/webkit
lolnoaddons

>FF/chomium
Battery will be dead in 2 hours. Also complete lagfest
>>
Safari is best browser on OSX.

Chrome is basically 4chan browser
>>
File: 1451347971323.png (10 KB, 300x100) Image search: [Google]
1451347971323.png
10 KB, 300x100
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>mac
>>
>>54761097
Opera Developer Edition.
Opera Mini for Android.
>>
>>54763488
>Chrome extensions
But ChrOpera has this as well.
>>
>>54761511
>I'd honestly say that Chromium is the best browser for Mac right now. Firefox has a much higher energy impact than Chromium
That's an outright lie.
Just recently I compared Chrome with Firefox, same addons (Umatrix, UBlock Origin, HTTPS Everywhere, some Tab-related addons for Firefox) with roughly ~60 tabs and Firefox's energy impact was way, way lower.
That's the sole reason I'm still using Firefox.
>>
>>54761097
>>54761224
>>54761286
>>54761631
>>54761651
>>54761657
>>54762658
>>54763614
I dont know why people are so paranoia about their privacy like sombody gives a rats ass bout what they re doing, all data is mostly used for publicity and advertising and to improve aspects of the OS. There is no such thing as "privacy" once you are connected to internet, no matter what OS u are using. If you want privacy stop doing the following: dont use smartphone or computers, if you use, dont use the internet (lol), if you use internet, dont create accounts on any sites, dont use search engines, dont play online games...u see where im going with this?
>>
>>54763678
Then you're going to love ChrOpera. They added in a battery saver mode and in my experience it usually uses around 1/3 of what Firefox was using.
>>
>>54763700
>u
>u
>u
>>
>>54763678
Firefox can't handle HTML5 video. I watch one shitty youtube video on Firefox and my laptop fans go apeshit. Nothing similar on Chrome.
>>
>>54763715
I have pretty much the same usage when playing HTML5 video and even worse usage when Chrome is using Flash. What system do you have? (i5 5287U with Iris 6100 here)
>>
File: 1433642347414.png (268 KB, 614x622) Image search: [Google]
1433642347414.png
268 KB, 614x622
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>iBotnetOS
>applel literally scans and analyzes everything on your drive and deletes what they don't like

lmao
>>
>>54761097
>escape the botnet
>mac
Pick one
>>
File: Screenshot 2016-05-27 02.46.19.jpg (60 KB, 600x318) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot 2016-05-27 02.46.19.jpg
60 KB, 600x318
>>54763785
Not that poster, but checked on my early 2014 MBA, with both browsers running the same extensions.
>>
>>54761097
>escape the botnet
>mac
Pick one
>>
File: 1444298950218.png (433 KB, 577x1018) Image search: [Google]
1444298950218.png
433 KB, 577x1018
>>54761097
>escape the botnet
>mac
lmao
>>
>>54763843
>>54763939
>apple didn't give out info to the FBI
>androshits on suicide watch
>>
File: 1435459715194.gif (4 MB, 273x200) Image search: [Google]
1435459715194.gif
4 MB, 273x200
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>my Mac
>>
>>54761511
>extension eco-system is not as great

LOOOOOOOL WHAT?
YOU CAN FUCKING DO EVERYTHING IN FIREFOX ADDONS, CAN'T DO SHIT IN CHRO* ONES
>>
File: 1436595919590.gif (1010 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
1436595919590.gif
1010 KB, 400x400
>>54763983
>damage controlling this hard
>>
File: Screenshot 2016-05-27 03.07.36.png (170 KB, 1157x332) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot 2016-05-27 03.07.36.png
170 KB, 1157x332
>>54763917
Then there was this.
>>
File: 1459768266770.jpg (331 KB, 517x768) Image search: [Google]
1459768266770.jpg
331 KB, 517x768
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>my Mac
>>
File: Screenshot_2016-05-27-09-10-00.png (245 KB, 1080x1920) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-05-27-09-10-00.png
245 KB, 1080x1920
>>54763983
>>
File: 1434896104426.jpg (34 KB, 552x800) Image search: [Google]
1434896104426.jpg
34 KB, 552x800
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>Mac
>>
>>54763785
Had to get to work to check, was still on my commute.
The System I base that on is a MacBook Pro 2013. 2.4GHz i5 + 8Gig RAM.
>>
>>54763917
>Not that poster, but checked on my early 2014 MBA, with both browsers running the same extensions.
Just google something like "mac firefox chrome energy impact". A lot of people did a lot of comparable tests and the result is always the same (you also can usually download their scripts and do it on your own computer).
Both browsers have a background energy impact of less than ~4 for me so this case is irrelevant and in your screenshot Chromium has way higher average impact, so I assume one of the browsers was just recently started or whatever.
>>
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
Good man

>on my Mac
...
>>
File: 1434982302254.jpg (26 KB, 414x419) Image search: [Google]
1434982302254.jpg
26 KB, 414x419
>>54761097
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>Mac
>>
>>54763700
There are privacy respecting search engines. Searx.me
mass data collection and mass harvesting and analysis are a thing, the problem is not being targeted individually, it is collecting data without a warrant and doing this on everybody.
>>54761097
Gnu icecat
>>
File: 1437870808695.png (297 KB, 640x640) Image search: [Google]
1437870808695.png
297 KB, 640x640
>I'm ready to escape the botnet
>Mac
>>
>>54761097
When connected to a power source: Firefox
When out and about: Safari (more power efficient)
>>
File: 1434411858805.jpg (44 KB, 750x501) Image search: [Google]
1434411858805.jpg
44 KB, 750x501
>>54761097
>ready to escape the botnet
>on my Mac
>>
chromium
>>
>>54764007
get the fuck out you curry piece of shit
>>
>>54765231
>sjwfox
Just use a fork
>>
>>54765910
>hating on firefox because of some bullshit a few of the people in the development say and do
>not because of the drm in it or the webrct or the nonfree aspects about it
Back to /pol/ if this is more important to you than technology.
>>
>>54761097

>mac

you are the botnet
>>
>>54761511
I switched to Chromium from Firefox, really liked the sleekness and the responsiveness, but I switched back to Firefox because I need to research at the moment and I really like TreeStyleTabs for that.

This much in regards to addons.

As for energy efficiency: when I use Chromium on my Thinkpad, it heats up a lot more as compared to using Firefox and battery life drops a lot faster.

If I wanna go all-out on battery savings, for those times when I wanna work on the go for long periods of time, I use Midori, as it consumes almost no energy and displays most websites decently enough (with fex exceptions).
>>
>>54766055
Alternatively, just use Safari. It comes preinstalled and I've heard here that you can achieve really good battery life with it. Probably better than Midori if you use OSX. Midori is a good choice for Linux users though (and possibly for Windows users, but I've never used Midori on Windows, so I can't comment on that).
>>
>>54766000
>>hating on firefox because of some bullshit a few of the people in the development say and do
>>not because of the drm in it or the webrct or the nonfree aspects about it
>implying these are not related
>>
>>54761097
The only battery efficient browser on Mac is Safari because it's optimized for the hardware. You could look at some of the Mac exclusive browsers too though. Might want to qualify what you mean by a non-shit interface.
>>
>>54763641
>Chinese botnet

so
>Chinese botnet > Google botnet
or
>Chinese botnet < Google botnet
>>
>>54763700
Elliot saw that his shrink liked anal sex. That's not cool mang.
>>
>>54767959
>>Chinese botnet
Devs are Norwegian, so it's a Viking botnet.
>>
>>54767959
foreign botnet > homeland botnet
Thread replies: 70
Thread images: 22

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.