Connection technology capable of it is expensive and rare. Thunderbolt 3 can, not sure what else.

>>54761126
DisplayPort 1.4 finally has GPU support, so new monitors should follow

Acer XB270HU is 27in 1440p 144hz

ASUS MG279Q is as well

>>54761126
>>54761154
>using anything other than S-Video, VGA, or DVI

>>54761096
>24 in
>4k

yuge waste of money

>>54761207

Why? I want high pixel density.

>>54761096
good question

best you can do is 27in 144hz 1440p currently

otherwise you're doing 24in 144hz or 24in 1440p.

>>54761222
your eyes can't see past 1080p

>>54761301

You're going to need to try harder.

>>54761154

The real news is that DP 1.4 supports 4k @ 120hz

But it also has adaptivesync aka native freesync

Gsync in the trash

>>54761222
well high pixel density is good right? but if you sit just far enough away 4k & 1080p will look way too similar, but if you get say a 27" monitor at least, sure the pixel density will go down by about 12.5/13%, which is marginal at 4k. But i'd rather sacrifice from 8-17% pixel density in a higher screen size than essentially it looking the same as 1080p if my eyes are off.

>>54761327

I think that's why I want the compromise of 144hz 1440p 24in, but that doesn't exist.

There are 24' 4K monitors but none with 144hz.

>>54761396

I know, have to choose one or the other. It's a bummer. Like I said though, I wish there was at least 1440p.

>>54761096
Because 24" is only for poor people.

>>54761586
I have space constraints. I'd have to go down to 1 monitor if I was going to go bigger than 24in.

>>54761603
Space constraints for a 27"? are you in your fucking bathtub? gtfo.

>>54761666

For a 27in and a vertical 24in. It's doable but it would be cramped.

>>54761586
>tfw perfectly happy with 21.5"
then again I'm using 1080.

>>54761572
wait until 2017

>>54761301
the human eye cant see above 3.5gb anyway