[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA THANK YOU BASED EVGA
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 59
File: SEXY.jpg (208 KB, 946x1925) Image search: [Google]
SEXY.jpg
208 KB, 946x1925
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA

THANK YOU BASED EVGA
>>
>>54751697
those shrouds look like fucking toys.
Where did EVGA's elegant & simple designs go??
>>
>>54751707
EVGA has always been a certified gaymer-grade meme company. Their card is called 'FTW' ffs.

F T W
T
W

How elegant.
>>
File: evga 980.jpg (92 KB, 500x320) Image search: [Google]
evga 980.jpg
92 KB, 500x320
>>54751740
well no fucking shit you troglodyte.
Elegant as in design of the card shroud, not too many angles or vibrant colors. The 10 series shrouds look like Michael bay tier transformers, look at the previous gen's. I mean it looks a lot better than the 1080.
>>
http://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/103610/en-us

http://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/103608/en-us
>>
>>54751740
Why do you even care about GPU name and look? It goes inside of your fucking computer, its not like you are going to sleep with it or have a fucking icecream in public. As long as it cools shit down and stays quiet.
>>
File: q9UYoPU.jpg (361 KB, 980x1197) Image search: [Google]
q9UYoPU.jpg
361 KB, 980x1197
>>54751796
Too elegant for the dumb gaymers who buy Nvidia cards, and especially Nvidia cards with literal memes in their name.

>>54751869
Hello shillo.

[vomits externally]
>>
File: 00002.jpg (71 KB, 1024x706) Image search: [Google]
00002.jpg
71 KB, 1024x706
MSI here I come!
>>
>>54751878
>implying most of /g/ doesn't buy Nvidia cards.
>>
>>54751878
Poor wetback.
>>
>>54751907
>implying 2016 /g/ isn't /v/'s tech support board

wew lad
>>
Pretty ugly really. Shame really because evga is a pretty great company.
>>
>>54751929
Be sure to keep the country nice and tidy for when we inherit it, whiteboi. ;^)
>>
>>54751931
True but irrelevant
>>
>>54751697
waiting for inno3d Hybrid, everything else is irrelevant
>>
>>54751949
Not if famine gets you first. Now fuck off cleaning my pool shitskin so you can buy your new amd.
>>
>>54751949
There won't be much to inherit, it'll all have gone to shit by then.
>>
>>54751707
Am I missing something? In normal PC builds you can't even see the front part of the card- only the backplate and maybe the side.

And anyway it makes far more sense to keep the system on the floor (propped up on a piece of wood, of course, if your floor is carpeted).
>>
>>54752132
well at least in my case you can see part of the GPU (Corsair Air 240), bu that's just me.
>>
If you support a company like nVidia, that gimps old cards with shit drivers, gameworks and all that shit, you're cancer.

Wait for Volta.
>>
after much thought, i recently purchased my second 980ti, how bad did i fuck up /g/ais?
>>
>>54753370
>If you support a company like nVidia, that gimps old cards with shit drivers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvCsT_dk-1E

AMDrones spreading lies and misinformation as usual
>>
>>54753706
That video is completely irrelevant. The argument has never been that Nvidia intentionally gimps their old cards through malicious drivers, but that they gimp them as a byproduct of completely abandoning them and not offering performance updates for new games. That's a fact and not something that Nvidia even deny. 'Game Ready' drivers only affect the current series of cards, and if older ones struggle with a game, tough shit.
>>
>>54751740
haha..I can just picture this elitist, by circumstance, little 14yr old spouting this shit. Kid..thanks for the laugh.
>>
>>54751697
WE HOT WHEELS NOW
>>
I bought a 980 Ti Classified last month for $500. Should I step up to one of these?
>>
>>54751697
>nvidia
gaymer trash by default
>>
>>54753996
nah senpai, you are good for awhile
>>
>>54753706
this has already been proven

not an argument
>>
>>54753996
>buying nvidia
you fucked up the least you can do is not make this mistake again
>>
>>54753370
it's just AMD has shitty as fuck drivers everytime they release new gpus and fix them painfully slow over the years thats why they gain performance after 1 or 2 years after release.
>>
File: 1459185839415.jpg (15 KB, 401x237) Image search: [Google]
1459185839415.jpg
15 KB, 401x237
>>54754078
>shamefur dispray
>>
>>54754063
It was far and away the best card for the price at the time I needed it. I give approximately zero shits about anything else.
>>
>It's another EVGA shill
How long before he starts advertising shitty b-stock?
>>
>>54754078
>a-amd has s-shitty drivers g-guys

>Meanwhile at Nvidia

>killing GPUs
2010: http://betanews.com/2010/03/18/nvidia-admits-geforce-drivers-responsible-for-fan-problems-issues-updates/
2013: http://modcrash.com/nvidia-display-driver-damaging-gpus/
2016: http://wccftech.com/nvidias-latest-game-ready-driver-allegedly-killing-gpus-plagued-issues/
There was even another one that ahppened to some 800M series GPUs as well, but I can't seem to find mentions anymore, but the three listed should suffice.

>chrome crashes
Documented here in march 2014, first mention I could quickly find: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=350547
But if you weren't such a newfag you'd have seen starting early 2015 that every week there would be at least one thread here of people complaining about this.
Fixed only in june 2015, over a year after they first found the issue on chromium: http://techreport.com/news/28551/nvidia-353-38-hotfix-driver-fixes-chrome-crashes-g-sync-lag

>windows 10 support issue
http://techfrag.com/2015/07/25/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti-owners-unable-to-get-windows-10/
>>
File: IMG_2870.jpg (221 KB, 1600x900) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2870.jpg
221 KB, 1600x900
>>54754143
>Not getting a Founder's Editionâ„¢ because you're a Founderâ„¢
>>
>>54754140
>980ti
>best
L O L
O
L
>>
>>54753696
not that bad since NVIDIA will fuck over all the 1080 owners with the Titan launch, and then fuck over Titan owners with the 1080Ti. The real performance gains from AMD and NVIDIA should come with HBM2.0. Right now it's just dick waving the new architectures.
>>
>>54754156
id rather have a card with decent drivers
>>
>>54754182
see >>54754148
>>
>>54753706

Fermi cards run Dark Souls 3 waaaay better with 314.22 drivers from 2013. My 580 went from 20-30FPS to 50-60. Obviously intentional dick move by nVidia. Planned obsolescence.
>>
>>54754182
Kek my Fury X blows your shit up at 4k or at any resolution on dx12. Btw nvidia will ruin your card with drivers in a few months to push you into buying the 1080
>>
>>54751931
>>54751953

Been here for years..you actually think /g/ serves a purpose to others? Really you fucks need to stop thinking your 5 word on avg responses really serve a valuable resource to others.

You faggots couldn't collectively solve the most basic issues put before you. Just who the fuck are you kidding here?
>>
>>54754219
>being this mad about a GPU
>being this mad about someone else's framerate in some shitty video game
go back to /v/ and stay there
>>
I guess I'll just wait for the Gigabyte version with 3 fans.

It'll come, right?
>>
>>54754174
This. 80 Ti's are the only cards worth purchasing. Lower cards (that includes everything AMD makes) are underpowered and Titans are not worth the money. 2017 and possibly even late 2016 games will sure take 1080 Ti to be maxed out at 1080p. Just remember what happened with The Witcher 3 and "futureproof" GTX 970 memecards.
>>
>>54753815
>they gimp them as a byproduct of completely abandoning them and not offering performance updates for new games

My Radeon HD 2900 has been gimped by a lack of support. Conclusive proof AMD gimps cards.
>>
>>54754262
>being so mad because he probably has some shit GPU that can't game for shit
Go back to >>>/b/
>>
>>54754297
Are you retarded? That's the equivlent of nvidia 100 series. They don't even have drivers for those since 2012.
>>
>>54754207
kek

>nvidiots BTFO

Can't fucking wait for based AMD to retake the lead.
>>
>>54754300
>troll
ok
>>
>>54754297
Noone makes mobos with AGP anymore so I can't use my 9800 Pro.

Motherfucking con artist motherboard manufacturers
>>
>>54754343
>anything that's different from my opinion is a troll
I was right, you are technically retarded, please kill yourself.
>>
>>54754372
>>54754297
>Kepler is now considered "legacy"
Defend this, nvidiots.
>>
File: Screenshot 2016-05-26 13.38.03.png (130 KB, 795x704) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot 2016-05-26 13.38.03.png
130 KB, 795x704
>>54754315
No additional driver releases are planned for these products? AMD's official recommendation is to just buy a new card?

AMD gimps cards!
>>
>>54751697
Poor fag here. Bought a evga 960 ssc last week for $220. Works like a dream.
>>
>>54754300
I have a GTX 780, so "some shit GPU that can't game for shit" doesn't really apply. Not the latest and greatest, but still pretty good. It maxes the games I play. "Some GPU that can't game for shit" is a shitty attempt at an insult, go the fuck back to /r/pcmasterrace you 14 year old.
>>
>>54754374
>edgy and a troll
ok
>>
>>54754394
>buying a fucking videocard for $220
>poorfag
You're not a poorfag.
>>
File: It's OK when AMD does it2.png (80 KB, 667x730) Image search: [Google]
It's OK when AMD does it2.png
80 KB, 667x730
>>54754148
>>54754191
>>
>>54754407
Try quantum break at 4k you will probably get 60 frames per minute
>>
File: Screenshot 2016-05-26 13.42.33.png (66 KB, 704x462) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot 2016-05-26 13.42.33.png
66 KB, 704x462
>>54754315
>AMD stopped producing drivers for this card in 2012
>Nvidia is still producing drivers for an equivalent card in 2016

AMD gimps cards.
>>
>>54754418
I sold an xbox one that I bought with an eleven month layaway two years ago on Craigslist for 250.
>>
>>54754441
When I do play video games, I play at 1080p on a 144hz monitor. I also tend to avoid AAA console ports since most of the time they're not very good.
Try harder.
>>
>>54754297
the difference is that card is old as fuck and was shit on launch and the 780 ti wasnt
>>
>>54754447
You mean those drivers still actively improve performance on the 100 series ?
>>
>>54754448
Why didn't you buy a 380? Better card than the 960 right now and most certainly will be supported longer.
>>
>>54754438
>1 vs like 5
tell me when it happens 5 more times nvidiot cuck
>>
>>54754447
>Implying that actually does anything
>Implying old drivers don't work the same
>Implying you can run any modern games on ancient relic GPUs
>>
>>54754480
>that card is old as fuck
Define old as fuck

>>54754482
>those drivers still actively improve performance on the 100 series ?
Infinitely more than AMD has improved my 2900 card in the past 5 years.
>>
File: Doom.png (1 MB, 1276x710) Image search: [Google]
Doom.png
1 MB, 1276x710
>>54754509
>It...It doesn't count!

How are those game ready drivers working out for you?
>>
File: 1457968757628.jpg (1 MB, 1140x1128) Image search: [Google]
1457968757628.jpg
1 MB, 1140x1128
>>54754447
>>54754388
>being this autistic
>>
>>54754523
>ancient

Define ancient
>>
>>54754527
>infinitely more than AMD has improved my 2900 card in the past 5 years

Do you have any reliable sources to back that up ?
>>
>>54754532
>loses argument
>just call them names instead
>>
>>54754527
>define old as fuck
like 7 generations older than the 700 series

>>54754531
>opengl
>2016
lol

besides that was in the 12 hours before the hotfix but nice cherrypicking
>>
File: image.jpg (144 KB, 1136x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
144 KB, 1136x640
>>54754531
Nice try faggot. They fixed the driver 10 minutes later.
>>
>>54754574
>besides that was in the 12 hours before the hotfix

Try 5 days
>>
>>54754561
Cry about it when AMD does it five more times sperg.
>>
>>54754531
The best example you could find was something immediately hotfixed the day after?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvWaE-3Aseg

Nvidiots are bad at this.
>>
>>54754470
You play on a 144hz monitor but most fps you get is around 60 on shitty games
>>
>>54754586
It was 12 hours you asperger and
>2016
>opengl

Im sure you also think directX 9 games coming out in 2016 is a acceptable practice as well.
>>
>>54754556
I've already taken screenshots of Nvidia supporting their older cards where AMD has abandoned them, directly addressing your original argument of
>they (Nvidia) gimp them as a byproduct of completely abandoning them

AMD is the one that abandons cards, you are wrong.

Whether or not the new Nvidia drivers provide meaningful performance increases to these legacy cards is a matter of performing some benchmarks I am not willing or capable of doing, as I do not own a Geforce 140, I own a Radeon 2900 which AMD has not supported for nearly five years.
>>
>>54754615
[citation needed]
>>
>>54754615
You have autism now stop white knighting nvidia you brandcuck
>>
File: img123390_0233bf0373feaa8f.jpg (98 KB, 500x500) Image search: [Google]
img123390_0233bf0373feaa8f.jpg
98 KB, 500x500
>>54754624
>>
>>54754470
Btw 290 and 290x blow your 780ti's shit in any game whilst they cost less
>>
File: It's OK when AMD does it.jpg (779 KB, 1667x3879) Image search: [Google]
It's OK when AMD does it.jpg
779 KB, 1667x3879
>>54754614
>2016
>opengl
>It...It doesn't count!
>>
>>54754615
>I own a Radeon 2900 which AMD has not supported for nearly five years.
That card was 4 years old (read: ancient) when GCN was introduced. Why are you so salty? That card enjoyed plenty of support while it was useful. It is now useless.
>>
>>54751707
In the bin when they realised that the 1080's terrible thermal performance forced them to privilege cooling over everything else.
>>
>>54754388
>>54754438
>>54754447
Captain, Damage Control!
>>
>>54754659
>WHQL
>stable
ebin
simply ebin
>>
>>54754586
Same day driver release

Damn you're so mad
>>
File: vcvvlUe.png (17 KB, 506x292) Image search: [Google]
vcvvlUe.png
17 KB, 506x292
>>54754615
>Nvidia doesn't gimp cards trust me
sure buddy
>>
>>54754602
not true, but ok
>>54754655
bought before the 780Ti came out when the R9 series was overpriced because of mining

Why are you so mad? Upset that people have a different graphics card than you? Why do you give a shit?
>>
>>54754659
>wanting macroshit to insure your drivers
>>>/v/
>>
>>54754662
>2900
>4 years old
its 10 years old
>>
>>54754688
>why are you mad
>he replied to all of my posts
That's some irony
>>
>>54754691
Hey come on now

Nvidia owners overpay a lot of money so they can get their card killing driver updates WHQL certified by Microsoft. It's expensive but it's worth it to known I have the best Game Ready driver possible.
>>
>>54754710
Read the sentence again.
>>
File: 1459451052548.gif (1 MB, 200x195) Image search: [Google]
1459451052548.gif
1 MB, 200x195
>mfw people buy video cards based on looks
>>
>>54754720
here's your (you)
>>
>>54754498
I actually wanted a 280x, since there didn't seem to be much difference in performance vs the 380, but the local parts store discontinued selling them. The 960 also has a sweet cooler on it, and evga lets you even replace that without losing the warrenty. I've never seen in go above 75 degrees, which is pretty cool.
>>
>>54754809
380 gets 10 fps more in battlefield 1440p
>>
>8GB
There it is. They said it again.
>>
will there be a version with 2 dvis?
>>
>>54754447
You're a moron, i own the mobile version of nvidia gt 360m amd 460m the driver is only made so it will compatible with windows 10, it's a basically a generic microsoft driver.
>>
>>54754777
Pretty much this.
When I buy a card I look at 2 things - cheapness and sound levels. I don't care about 2fps gains or what the plastic looks like.
>>
>>54754976
>10fps
>2
Are you stupid?
>>
>>54754878
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-380-vs-Radeon-R9-280X This is how I made the decision. >>54754905
>>
>>54755031
>implying any "factory" oc can give 10 extra fps in a modern game in a meaningful resolution

It's not 2008. Get your ass out of your asshole.
>>
>>54755096
You were speaking of a card over another.
Idiot.
>>
>>54755130
Feel free to point out where I was speaking about different cards, you dyslexic retard.
>>
>>54755048
You are literally retarded if you made any sort of purchasing decision based on the meaningless, arbitrary bar graphs based on synthetic benchmarks from that site.
>>
>>54755218
The sources there indicate that those are indeed not arbitrary. What made you so hostile?
>>
>>54754274
>not worth the money
>mid tier cards are way more value for buck than everything else

ok
>>
>>54751697

Only competitor to evga is msi lightning series.

Only classified is worth it but this is just a midrange card.

Anything SC is good but only on flagships titan series

Hydrocopper would the best bet

This 1080 release is just to weed out all frustrated retards that waited on their christmas savings
>>
File: 1448705572008.jpg (73 KB, 500x333) Image search: [Google]
1448705572008.jpg
73 KB, 500x333
>>54753815
>The argument has never been that Nvidia intentionally gimps their old cards through malicious drivers

That has always been the argument, you are just moving the goalpost
>>
File: 1464023077967.jpg (30 KB, 480x490) Image search: [Google]
1464023077967.jpg
30 KB, 480x490
Will the 1080 be the best card for 1440p?
>>
File: 1260343366427.jpg (37 KB, 370x300) Image search: [Google]
1260343366427.jpg
37 KB, 370x300
>>54754680
Theres a simple explanation for that.

'New' AMD cards are all basicaly rebrands and rehashes of old cards, the same GCN architecture. So optimizations for their newer line up still benefit the old cards.

Nvidia actualy released a new architecture with Maxwell, so optimizations it now makes are for that architecture because it doesn't sell Keppler cards anymore.

So the gap closes over time between older architecture Nvidia cards and older AMD cards.

Feel free to prove I'm wrong by showing me benchmarks of Nvidia cards having significantly lower fps in games now than they did in the past

Protip: you can't
>>
>>54755348

Nvidia does gimp their cards. I was skeptical at first but it's true. Nobody dares calling them out or doing an independent review because they would sue them to oblivion, the difference is noticeable and many reactions attest to this, the simple proof is the sheer number of users who rollback

Technically the card will always belong to nvidia and they do whatever they want, some end user licensing agreement voodoo hocus pocus
>>
>>54755404
>I was skeptical at first but it's true
There's literally no evidence of gimping, it's all speculation with no proof
>>
>>54755404
>Nvidia does gimp their cards.
See
>>54755399
>>
>>54752132
>Carpeted floors
Absolutely disgusting. Are you from Britain or Ireland? I'll never understand you bloody islanders.
>>
I only buy cards based on their warranty. Shit could be bright purple for all I care. Finally paid off when my gtx 580 died a month ago and evga replaced it without hassle.

Did notice they no longer sell cards with lifetime warranties. Is it because of poverty niggers like me?
>>
>>54755399
>So optimizations for their newer line up still benefit the old cards.

If they are not gimped. then why AMD old cards beat Nvidia old cards from same gen and sometime on par with last gen Nvidia cards?
Are you suggesting that AMD old card actually better than Nvidia instead of Nvidia gimping their own card?

/CHECKMATE
>>
>>54754691
>>54754730
That's the problem, Microsoft DOESN'T certify all WHQL software, certain manufacturers self certify. Care to guess which of the two categories nvidia falls under?
>>
>>54754207
>driver meme

why are you lying on the internet ? I know that not true because I removed all current drivers and installed old ones and my shit performed worse. So your gain of +30 fps with old drivers straight up pathetic underage behaviour.
>>
>>54755491
>If they are not gimped. then why AMD old cards beat Nvidia old cards from same gen and sometime on par with last gen Nvidia cards?

Did you read what I said? Or did you just go into full AMD meme mode after the first line? I suggest you read it again.

Also I will repeat:

Feel free to prove me wrong with benchmarks of older generation Nvidia cards now getting much worse fps in the same games they got higher fps in the past.

Again, you can't, because it's just a meme
>>
>>54755420
>it's all speculation with no proof

Of course you won't hear any proof from people in /g/, because they know their old Nvidia card is shit so they keep cucking them self with upgrading to a new Nvidia cards

Mark my words, you wont hear anything from this place about 970/980 downgrade because people already use 1070/1080 in the next couple months.
>>
>>54755421

What's the root cause of the issues from driver 364 until now, is it the transition to windows 10 and Vulkan support?

The dedication to drivers seem to be shifting as well because it's a clear marketing over technical tool, those monthly rollouts and pdf files are really well done

With AMD you just update catalyst and that's it, but with nvidia you get a spinning all seeing eye and telemetry from evga precision x (?)
>>
>>54755594
Lol OK, thanks for proving my point
>>
>>54755598
What kind of tinfoil hat bullshit are you on about
>>
>people actualy believe the gimp meme
>but can provide no evidence

Literally brainwashed
>>
>1080 SLI 121 frames in 4K

defend this AMDrones
>>
>>54754232
True, let's be honest, /g/ is just a troll board at this point
>>
Why the FUCK do people care so much about a fucking company holy shit neither nvidia or amd give a flying fuck about you personally why do people find a need to defend what ANY company does. Just fucking buy what YOU want and get on with it.
>>
>>54755629

On factors that make a customer a hardcore cultish fanboy

precision x is afterburner reskinned but with some communication buffer.. Really needs internet access. Kboost is good but yeah its heavy
>>
File: 9-18-10-intel600.jpg (73 KB, 600x392) Image search: [Google]
9-18-10-intel600.jpg
73 KB, 600x392
>>54755671
Anon you have a moral obligation to buy AMD so that you don't support Nvidia's and Intel's corrupt business practices, not to mention supporting Israel (Intel)
>>
>HAHA U USE LE WRONG GRAPHICS CARD
do you have any idea what unbelievable faggots you all are
>>
File: 2560_VeryHigh.png (74 KB, 1299x1739) Image search: [Google]
2560_VeryHigh.png
74 KB, 1299x1739
>>54755613

You said?
Also where are the proud GTX TITAN owner here, never heard any shit from you guys since years ago.

how its filled to get cucked by your beloved company?
>>
>>54755649
Proofs?
>>
>>54755706
It's common knowledge the Titan is a bad buy

And I don't see the problem with your picture
>>
>>54755706
I have a Titan Black. Shit's a fucking bargain, no wonder they hold their value so well.
>>
File: GTX-1080-SLI.jpg (44 KB, 623x581) Image search: [Google]
GTX-1080-SLI.jpg
44 KB, 623x581
>>54755725
>>
File: Ashes_02.png (59 KB, 1302x1593) Image search: [Google]
Ashes_02.png
59 KB, 1302x1593
>>54755752
>dx11
>>
File: 1080p.png (144 KB, 1299x3103) Image search: [Google]
1080p.png
144 KB, 1299x3103
>>54755730
>And I don't see the problem with your picture

Of course you don't see it.
You already got brainwashed by buying the latest card each time they released it.
>>
>>54755786
>AMD fags clinging to a single game because it's the only thing they have

lel
>>
>>54755752

>That min framerate

Whats that source for 120hz 4k.ready, curious
>>
File: sf.png (45 KB, 634x392) Image search: [Google]
sf.png
45 KB, 634x392
>>54755786
>>
>>54755798
Are you seriously mad because new cards perform better than old ones?
>>
>>54755697
No, my moral obligation to keep my fucking opinions about trivial nonsense such as what GFX card I use to myself.
>>
>>54755819
>benching amd in dx12 and nvidia in dx11

nice shill site senpai, nvidia stillt cant into dx12
>>
>>54751869
Was just about to say this, why would anyone care about how a gpu looks, I pick which one that fits my budget and then counts how many fans it has
>>
Sorry AMDrones - Nvidia won even more with non reference models because they allow extra wattage with either 8x8pin or 8x6pin
Superclocked and AMP versions literally rape everything
>>
So would it be worth it to buy a fury X or 980ti still? Is the 1080 even fast enough to justify its price?
>>
>>54755837
>Make new card.
>beat their own old card
>"b-but gimp is meme, its normal for old card to run bad."
>New card literally on par with competitor old card just with a driver update
>"didn't hear lol"

Your goalpost is moving.
>>
>>54755856

Well that's a self fulfilling prophecy fallacy, one thing between having individuality and another from taking your ostrich head out of the ground.. Those are facts and you can ignore them and stay blue pilled

Youre the type of basic low reasoning and just short circuiting by saying fuck off and slamming the door
>>
>>54755904
Fury X actually beats both a 980ti and 1080, but the shill review sites won't say that
>>
>>54755904
the 480x is going to match those cards so no
>>
>>54755899
>still implying pascal can overclock
do you enjoy being retarded
>>
>>54755904
fury x is actually fastest card currently available at our tech level and should last you until the singularity.
>>
File: dx11,12,async.png (103 KB, 1628x847) Image search: [Google]
dx11,12,async.png
103 KB, 1628x847
>>54755859

don't embarass yourself now
>>
>>54755961
CF 480x can't even keep up with the 1080
>>
When the 1000 series drops the 900 series will move down the charts, and shadowplay and other features will stop working.
>>
>>54755957
>literally no proof
SIMPLY
E
P
I
C
>>
>>54756007
>1000 series perform better than 900 series

Holy shit do others know about this?
>>
>>54756010
>simply sepic
Ok
>>
>>54756010
Kinda hard to find proof when Nvidia suppresses it all
>>
>>54751740

Honestly the only reason I stick with EVGA is because they have great customer service. I've RMA'd two cards the entire time I've used them and never got hassled or anything.
>>
>>54751707
They're have better fans on them because the reference card will have shit airflow

Although, I do agree reference cards look nicer
>>
>Still own a 390
>don't give a fuck

I'm not retarded enough to buy another DDR5 bullshit.
>>
>>54756021
Old AMD will stay high on the charts
>>
File: 1445351485255.jpg (14 KB, 480x640) Image search: [Google]
1445351485255.jpg
14 KB, 480x640
>>54755985
>16nm with super high clocks vs 28nm
>only 7fps faster
>gets hot as fuck (104 Celsius)

pascal = pentium 4
>>
File: 1455064122420.jpg (417 KB, 2000x2000) Image search: [Google]
1455064122420.jpg
417 KB, 2000x2000
>>54756041
>it's nvidia's fault I don't have proof
Come on, man
>>
>>54756083
I've done my own testing with mine and a friends card, you won't find any published proof
>>
>>54755980

>still ducking and dodging from the facts

AMDkeks on suicide watch as usual
>>
File: obama_snob.gif (25 KB, 500x759) Image search: [Google]
obama_snob.gif
25 KB, 500x759
>>54751697

Enjoy your 700$ midrange card

Save up for a new 1440p monitor for christmas
>>
>>54755985

>4k
>1080 card drop the average FPS
>literally almost no gain with Async on in all range.

What hell happen there? literally almost less than 3% performance gain with async on.
What the fuck?
>>
>>54756068

pure entertainment AMDrones will literally never learn
>>
File: goodgoy.jpg (3 MB, 900x5916) Image search: [Google]
goodgoy.jpg
3 MB, 900x5916
>>54756154
>(You)
>>
ITT: children fighting over brands
>>
>>54755985

>Almost literally no differences between DX11 and DX12 for both 980Ti and 1080


So 1080 is just a boosted 980 Ti?
>>
>>54756175
>all speculation
>literally no proof

Arkham Knight running like crap had nothing to do with gameworks, and even Witcher runs fine on both AMD and Nvidia with gameworks turned off
>>
>>54751697
EVGA will never make 'em like this anymore, or like the 600...
>>
>>54756175

>/r/pcmasterrace

hang yourself you illeterate. Soak up some knowledge from tumbrl and post again.
>>
File: 1400985439735.jpg (202 KB, 717x880) Image search: [Google]
1400985439735.jpg
202 KB, 717x880
>>54756175
jesus christ I can't believe /r/pcmasterrace cancer posts here
>>
>>54756260

>Poorfag design.

Thanks god for that.
>>
File: lol evga.jpg (351 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
lol evga.jpg
351 KB, 1920x1080
>>54756260
Don't forget the 970 cooler
>>
>>54756175

literally no arguments left whatsoever so post images from leddit

shit on by every possible angle
>>
File: b1450.jpg (49 KB, 500x320) Image search: [Google]
b1450.jpg
49 KB, 500x320
>>54756260
and here's the 600 I had in mind.

>>54756271
Okay MSI Dragon Gamer
>>
>>54756280

Why bother buying a Prosumer card when you want to looks like a fucking poorfag?

Fucking end yourself.
>>
>>54755904

599$ non reference is the way to go

Fury X is still 640€ around here way to fucking expensive
>>
>>54756041
I could see 1080 suppression but you can't suppress 980ti info at this point. People can test them themselves if they want to and throw results on YouTube and no one can tell them no.
>>
>>54756408
If it were actually 599 I'd buy it, I have a feeling we won't actually see cards that cheap though.
>>
>>54756175
hahahaha I've had a 550ti since 2011 and I can still play all of the games I want to play (csgo, gta, overwatch mostly) nvidia haven't crippled old card performance whatsoever.
>>
File: Recycl_eBin.png (97 KB, 256x384) Image search: [Google]
Recycl_eBin.png
97 KB, 256x384
>>54751697
>FTW
>SUPERCLOCKED
>>
>>54756475
$0.02 has been deposited into your account
>>
>>54756525

>fury X
>polaris X

down the toilet with the shit
>>
>>54756580
Not saying that Nvidia is bad (I use a ref 780ti), but those names are just meme worthy
>>
File: yodawg.jpg (10 KB, 279x180) Image search: [Google]
yodawg.jpg
10 KB, 279x180
>>54756614
>>
What is the news here? That EVGA is releasing 1080 cards?
>>
>>54756278
tested and the card only runs max 1-2 celsius hotter WOW TOTAL TRASH NOW I GUESS. Just fucking kill yourself already.
>>
>>54756666

Yeah and faggots critiquing the design and the ubiquituous cooler controversy

And evga product naming (ftw/sc) for a midrange card
>>
>>54756718
>I am OK with lazy and incomplete design

Spot the fanboy
>>
>>54756724
>Yeah and faggots critiquing the design and the ubiquituous cooler controversy
What a horrible thread.
>And evga product naming (ftw/sc) for a midrange card
They have been doing this for nearly a decade now.
>>
>>54755466

Did they step you up? My 280x's died recently and they were replaced with brand new 380x's.
>>
File: 1231245214.jpg (82 KB, 900x571) Image search: [Google]
1231245214.jpg
82 KB, 900x571
Any other posted cooler designs for Pascal? I like zotacs, granted its real. Ricer all the way to the tron world.
>>
File: R9-390X-8DF_1.jpg (51 KB, 843x491) Image search: [Google]
R9-390X-8DF_1.jpg
51 KB, 843x491
>>54751697
Why do so few GPU manufacturers make cards that don't look like dogshit? EVGA used to make nice simple designs(albeit with retarded names), now they're the same shit as Asus.
>>
>>54756666

news is that gigabyte, zotac, msi, inno3d, evga, asus are ready to ship their version of the gtx 1080 on 27th

AMDcucks on vitamins that prevent anus pain

while those retailers put in extra wattage with 8x8,8x6 pins which increases performance and cards stays below 80C during benching
allows comfy 2.1ghz+ and silky smooth gameplay
>>
>>54756824
this
>>
File: .gif (216 KB, 320x240) Image search: [Google]
.gif
216 KB, 320x240
>>54756804
I want off this wild ride.
>>
>>54756827
That's also not news, those you can order on the 27th are the Founders Editionâ„¢ overpriced reference cards.
>>
File: 1416258571974[1].gif (12 KB, 501x585) Image search: [Google]
1416258571974[1].gif
12 KB, 501x585
>caring about a card that is only marginally faster than a 980ti at $200 more.
>>
>>54756880

not interested in reference, never was. Blower fans are insane loud. I had one AMD card with blower design with coil noise. Never fucking ever again.
>>
>>54756824
>design

I hope you're talking about design when it comes to efficiency, cooling and size.
>>
Here are the other 1080 designs revealed so far. Somehow Asus comes off the least gaudy to me.
>>
File: untitled-15.png (53 KB, 682x967) Image search: [Google]
untitled-15.png
53 KB, 682x967
>>54756899
>marginally faster
>>
>>54756899
What if I don't have a 980ti fampi
>>
>>54756929
>>
>>54756938
>>
>>54756930
>stock 980 Ti

Literally nobody cares. Once you overclock both cards, the difference between them is 10-15% at best. The 980 Ti rapidly gains ground as you clock both up, since it has more CUDA cores and Pascal is literally a Maxwell die shrink at higher clocks.
>>
>>54756899
Depends if you think 10fps is worth $200 extra fampai
>>
When will the 980 drop in price?

When are the non-founders 1080s shipping?
>>
>>54757067
>When will the 980 drop in price?
~2 months.
>When are the non-founders 1080s shipping?
~2 months.
>>
>Fury X only has 4 gigs of ram

What a fucking meme
>>
File: celsius.jpg (9 KB, 259x194) Image search: [Google]
celsius.jpg
9 KB, 259x194
>>54756916

>engineers are designers
>approved by marketing dpt
>form follows function
>>
>>54757107
>1080 only has GDDR5X

What a fucking meme.
>>
>>54757092

Ugh. I don't know what I want now.

I see all the preoders for the 1080 founders are saturated, is anyone going to have them for sale tomorrow?
>>
>>54757159
The crystal ball is hazy. Nvidia's site looks like it might.
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1080
>>
>>54757220

Cool, thank you.
>>
>>54757092

>2 months

try may 27th idiot
>>
>>54757306
>non-founders
>>
>>54757340

Yes bitch non founders.
>>
>>54757383
Nvidia explicitly stated that nobody would be selling anything other than the founder's edition tomorrow. Fucking retard learn how to read.
>>
>>54757395
I would like both of you to cite your posts. I've read that 1080 aftermarket cards ship when the 1070 does on like June 10.
>>
>>54757395

So ? Still doesnt hold be back to preoder my non founder edition and get it on the same day as founders.
>>
Remind me of the difference between founders and non-reference designs? Just clockrate on some if the manufacturers crank them up?
>>
>>54757440
Either post a pic of your preorder or shut the fuck up
>>
File: 1462587848718.jpg (92 KB, 1200x1200) Image search: [Google]
1462587848718.jpg
92 KB, 1200x1200
>>54757437
Gigabyte released this a few weeks ago

>>54757443
Founders=Reference

That's literally it
>>
>>54757457
>inb4 490 Xtreme
>>
>>54757457

Thanks boss.
>>
>>54757450

>demanding pics
Eat shit you faggot. Source on 2 months waiting time for non founders edition then I might reply with a preoder.
>>
>>54757533
Literally "no u"
>>
Is there enough of a performance upgrade over 980ti to justify waiting another month or 2?

I can get 980ti right now at a decent price
>>
>>54757559

Who are you again ? Oh right the faggot who was spreading misinformation about 2 months waiting for a non reference. Chew good on it.
>>
>>54757533
It should be pretty simple for you to post a preorder image, you don't actually have one though you fucking fag.
>>
>>54757533
>I have a unicorn!
>Pretty sure you have a horse, show us your unicorn.
>FUCK YOU MY UNICORN IS THE BEST SHOW ME PROOF THAT THERE ARE ONLY HORSES.
Eat shit and die.
>>
>>54757575

How decent? The benchmarks make the reference cards look like 15 to 25 fps better but I'm sure the non-ref will likely be even higher.
>>
File: JFxPPvI.gif (1 MB, 352x264) Image search: [Google]
JFxPPvI.gif
1 MB, 352x264
>>54756929

>3 slot card
>probably more expensive than reference edition
>>
>>54757601

>being this buttblasted than Ive got a preoder going

beyond autism and retardation
>>
>>54757663
You have nothing. Succumb to your mental illness and end your life.
>>
>>54757663
>still hasn't shown any proof
And I already have a 1080ti, bet you're super jealous now.
>>
>Nvidia cards are so broken on launch that vendors have to jerryrig power connectors to make them work.

Amazing. I'll stick with AMD.
>>
File: Jen-Hsun-Huang-Tesla-Model-X.jpg (148 KB, 1500x750) Image search: [Google]
Jen-Hsun-Huang-Tesla-Model-X.jpg
148 KB, 1500x750
>>54757440
>>54757533

>non-founders

I found my founders edition cooler wasn't cool enough so I bought a non founders with a modded founder cooler to blow founder quality air on my second official founders edition in nvlink sli founders physx mode
>>
>>54757673

Ill be running SLI while you still spread misinformation.
Thread replies: 255
Thread images: 59

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.