Why aren't you using madvr?
>>54747468
b/c i don't know what it is
Because I'm not autistic.
>>54747468
Because mpv is much better and fully opensource.
I'm using it ....
>>54747468
Because it's a windows only crapware.
Seriously why did/do you use this?
>>54747468
I don't want to run a delphi botnet again.
>>54747468
already am, apparently - it's ok but a shitty source is a shit source.
>>54747468
Because I can't see any differences between madvr and kodi HQ scalers.
I use it. It's superior to anything I tried before
>>54747468
Because that shit in your picture only improves illustrations and I don't watch chinese cartoons
madvr/LAV/mpc-hc/icaros MASTERRACE!!!!!!!!!
>>54749888
All these directshits malware...
Why?
>>54749911
because it's the superior option...
>>54747468
It's placebo junk and I don't use mpc anymore
>>54749925
I don't think so... mpv is developed by pro and ethical developers.
Madshi is just a crying baby.
>>54749955
how is that relevant? Who the heck cares if composer was chronic alcoholic?
>>54750007
Bah I prefer a software powered by talented people than a selfish delphi/directshow programmer who cried because mpv is better.
>>54747468
>closed-source botnet
>trusting the A/V jew
>>54750043
how is mpv actually any better though
>>54749840
>those artifacts
jesus fucking christ just nuke it from orbit with fire
>>54750052
- better color management
- better scalers
- better shader system for complex filters (super-res, cross-bilateral)
- amazing lua scripting system to create addons
- ...
>>54750110
it's not actually better though
>>54750043
how is it better? it uses same algorithms as mpv but in a user friendly form
Also, 65% of the music you listen is made by degenerates, and at least 45% of software. So good luck with finding any talented people without a sin.
>>54750122
much better so...
>>54750123
similar algorithms but much saner backend
MPV is to madVR is what gimp is to photoshop
>>54750147
not really
>>54750161
Damn do you think madvr is a paid/subscription crapware?
>>54750122
That's because you've been eating shit for so long you've grown fond of the taste of shit, now anything that isn't shit doesn't taste right to you.
>>54750250
hmm, if that were true then id have no trouble using mpv though
>>54750122
>>54750161
>>54750250
Again and again a silly madvr vs mpv thread.
>>54750273
No, it's true anon. You're also using Chrome and Windows. The world of technology has put a heaping pile of shit on your plate and you've gobbled it up and asked for more.
>>54750324
>chrome
lol fuck that IE masterrace. sounds like you're just easily swayed by memes
>>54750324
Topical winfag with no brain and fat belly.
>>54747468
But I use it... Why?
Only because I can run smoothmotion smoothly but not the mpv's interpolation with my netbook. Even with angle backend and bilinear scalers.
don't forget madVR also has:
>smooth motion playback without 3:2 pulldown judder even at 60Hz
so whats MPV's equivalent?
>>54750430
https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/wiki/Interpolation#smoothmotion
>>54750122
madVR:
doesn't have crossbilateral (better than Reconstruction)
broken SuperRes
broken and slow adaptive-sharpen
>>54750857
Oh I just make a win10 install to check and you're right.
The madVR's Bilateral scaler is not based on CrossBilateral and AdaptiveSharpen is incredibly slow.
I can't use SuperRes so what's the problem with madVR one?
>>54751972
>what's the problem with madVR one?
produces ringing artifacts
>>54747468
>32 bit only
>>54752164
it's not though
>>54747468
I use it, because it´s the best program to improve the quality.
proof that I am wrong /g
(would be happy to know if there is something better)
>>54752070
youre just repeating things doom9 says in the madvr thread. all these functions from both programs pull from the same sources. there just isnt an mpv thread for you to pull crap from, so you think its better.
>>54747468
>5 year old image of mostly deprecated renderers
Funny thing is EVR comes with MPC-HC and I don't need to install anything extra.
MadVR only made sense before that was the case.
>>54753287
doom9 says it doesn't ring, show me where they say that SuperRes fails with ringing artifacts.
mpv's SuperRes was fixed, it's much better
>>54753333
mpv doesn't have SuperRes
>>54753333
>thinking any sane person would trust your personal opinions over the doom9 collectives opinion
>>54747468
Because I download 4K shit for my 1080p display anyway.
As soon as nips move to 8K fully, I'll get a 4K screen and download 8K rips.
>some other idiot in this thread posting huh why download 4K for 1080p
Kill yourself poster who probably isn't OP.
>>54753350
yeah, seems like you don't know what you are talking about
>>54753368
whatever, you can compare them, but you are probably too retarded for that
>>54749840
>he bought jewrises again
kill yourself
>>54753388
>yeah, seems like you don't know what you are talking about
I'm on the mpv contributor list, are you?
>>54753496
>on a contributor list and doesn't know about user shaders
what are you contributing, some lua shit?
>>54753530
>what are you contributing, some lua shit?
I maintain vo_opengl
>>54753767
so, what else mpv doesn't have?
>>54753857
(Cross)Bilateral, FineSharp, AdaptiveSharpen or LumaSharpen
>>54753877
and good antiringing, why btw?
>>54753891
Unnecessary bloat
>>54753906
you sound like a useless contributor
Honestly, people who use anything beyond bicubic filtering are retarded.
>>54753857
DirectShow.
>>54747468
Because I'm not watching 240x352 resolution videos that would benefit from such extremely slow upscaling.
>>54753877
when will it have those or something better?
>>54754060
Never. I added the user hook system so people would shut about their stupid meme filters
>>54754186
wrong thread pal
>>54747468
but i am using it...
>>54753295
That's 7 years old nowadays
>>54747468
because its buggy at best, sometimes subs will not work, sometimes they do... this shit has ruined installs of the programs i use for no real tangible benefit. when im a comfortable distance away.
>>54747468
My shitty laptop can't handle it
>>54747468
>>54747493
>the most obvious samefagging OP move
>>54749781
I also prefer mpv. Not because it's FOSS, I don't actually give a shit about that- but because it works fantastically and I don't need to fuck around with installing 426 different "filters" and other antique bullshit.
>>54747468
Because it's obsolete and because its author has no time for it anymore.
He thought he could make money with it but he was wrong so he gave up.
>>54747468
All its filters are messing all my videos, even its jinc implementation is broken. Sometimes antiring works and mess a little bit but sometimes it mess everything and produces ringing...
>>54747468
because i don't watch my vids at 5000% crop
>>54747468
Because it's a directshow video renderer, it's maybe the most useless thing of the world. It's like a calculator or a notepad coded in COBOL.
