In this thread we imagen life without X
>what distro would you use and why ?
>how long would you survive, estimated ?
>what programs would you use ?
Fedora cuz wayland support.
>>54722853
Debian with screen. irssi, links2, nano/vim. all you need.
>>54724500
>still not using tmux
>>54724580
Is there any real benefit?
>>54724500
sigh..
tmux, weechat, lynx, emacs
there, happy now, fanboys?
>>54724593
yea, there is a bunch
>>54724483
This-ellidoodely
I actually use arch in tty1 w/out X in order to rice every aspect
>>54722853
>wayland
/thread
>>54724651
>being overweight
regarding wayland... How much of X does it replace?
Things like xinput, xmodmap xev... Will those keep working on wayland or do we need to reinvent the wheel to get those essential things to work?
>imagen
>>54724598
I raise you Screen, Weechat, Lynx, Spacemacs (and Vim for just quick edits (it loads much faster)).
And mustn't forget Ncmpcpp.
>>54722853
>he uses a gui
>>54724483
Wayland does not replace X server retard. But you are just a fedora babby
>>54722853
Gentoo with a fraimbuffer
>>54722853
slackware
weechat, bitlbee, vim, zsh, mutt, raggle, midnight commander, w3m-img or links2... that's pretty much it, yeah.
>>54724593
ctrl+b t
>>54724593
At the contrary, Screen has more functions than tmux, doesn't matter what memelords say.
>>54724831
Reinvent the wheel.
But hell like I'm switching, that thing has a systemd dependency https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Systemd-230-FBDEV-Woe
>>54722853
OpenSUSE
Yast works fantastic without X
