Which one should I use /g/?
HI HAPPY TO HELP OUT LET ME KNOW IF YOU NEED ME TO CLICK ON ANY OF THESE LINKS
It depends. Are you a pedophile or a terrorist?
>>54715148
damn son def getting your money worth out of that stupid sideways ass monitor lol...
>>54715215
it's a normal monitor, just rotated to portrait orientation. it makes it easier to scan a list of search results for stupid questions that an OP should be able to google himself.
>>54715228
>>54715148
>being this butthurt
Kill yourself.
>>54715173
I just wanna hide my gay porno
>>54715246
lol, where are you reading butthurt in all this? are you sure you're not projecting your own baggage?
>>54715289
>being this retarded
Are you sure you don't have down syndrome.
>>54715173
Why not both?
>>54715135
For encryption use DES or 160-bit ECDSA. For Hash use MD5 or SHA1
AES should be fine. The other options are slower but more secure.
>>54715328
>The other options are slower but more secure.
Proof on more secure part?
>>54715303
Source?
>>54717058
AES is approved by the NSA. Serpent and Twofish are not.
>>54715307
>using MD5
>2016
Please, kill yourself
what sort of CP are you trying to hide OP?
>>54715328
Unless you have hardware acceleration for AES then serpent is fastest
>>54715135
>AES(Twofish(Serpent))
Is that what I think it is?
>>54719738
>taking that comment seriously
>>54715135
Need Hardware acceleration? Use AES.
Don't want to use a NSA crypto system (only)?
Use Twofish or AES(Twofish).
>>54719738
>calling out the use of MD5 but not DES, 160-bit ECDSA or SHA1
This is how I can tell you don't actually know anything about cryptography and are just parroting memes you heard online.
>>54719771
Depends what you think it is.
I use AES for my on-line disk crypto (since it's the fastest by an order of magnitude on systems with AES-NI), and Serpent for my off-line disk crypto (since it's designed to be “paranoid” and include extra rounds and security margins beyond the calculated minimum)
I'm waiting for the next SHAppening :^)
>>54719771
A bad idea?
Yes.
LUKS vs Veracrypt?
>>54719962
LUKS if you're on Linux
VeraCrypt if you're trying to polish a turd
>>54719771
More importantly, why don't they write it as AES∘Twofish∘Serpent?
Calling it AES(Twofish(Serpent)) is just misleading abuse of notation.
>>54720011
>More importantly, why don't they write it as AES∘Twofish∘Serpent?
Wanted to avoid non-ASCII?
>>54720065
It's 2016
Why three-cipher encryption is considered bad?
>>54715148
/Thread.
