It's that time again.Vim or emacs?
if you want a bloated editor that won't actually make you significantly more productive when actually programming, and may actually hinder you until you have it fully configured, you should use vim.
but if you want a bloated editor that won't actually make you
significantly more productive when actually programming, and may actually hinder you until you have it fully configured, you should use emacs.
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
>>54660096
Also
with vim installed: linux
with emacs installed: the GNU operating system, with linux
suicide
>not both at the same time
small time, kouhai desu
>>54660058
Why not both? Are you a slow learner? If so, you should probably give up programming entirely.
GNU nano
medit
Whatever. Both are good.
Is there really a difference though between them? They both need tinkering for hours for your own need and both have difficult learning curve, I'm using Linux for almost a year now and I still don't remember all the commands in vim or emacs, I have not yet to find a way to remove newline and at this point I use a "shitty" nano or sublime text solutions.
What's vim and emacs? I usually just use Word for text stuff
Spacemacs
Why choose when I can have both?
>>54661231
Get the fuck out rich text fag.
>>54660058
legit vi.
Depends. Am I on a 2016 computer? With 2016 hardware and software?
If so, neither.
Emacs.
>>54661589
>proportional font inside an editor
NEETmacs tries to be everything it isn't
vim or vi, because its going to be on any box I get on in the future by default.
does anyone have a download link for Vim
>using vim
>using emacs
>not using superior nano
>>54660096
Both will make you noticeably more productive.
>>54660058
nano and sublime
While we are at it, I remember being on the website of some new hip editor that had multiple selections like sublime but was CLI based. I can't find it anymore though. Anybody know it?
