[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>he fell for the lets pay premium for WD because Seagate is
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 38
Thread images: 6
File: 1463592816151.jpg (79 KB, 720x820) Image search: [Google]
1463592816151.jpg
79 KB, 720x820
>he fell for the lets pay premium for WD because Seagate is unreliable meme

WD cucks literally on suicide watch.
>>
>he fell for the backblaze meme
Let's see their data on only WD Blues and Blac- oh there is none. It's just their Greens and Reds. Seagates mainstream drives performed worse than WD's worst drives for 2 years. There's a reason they got their reputation.

HGST still a best, even after WD bought them.
>>
If I'm reading this chart correctly it seems to imply that WD had lower failure rates than seagate until 2016.

I haven't bought a new harddrive in years so buying WD according to this chart was the better choice between those two.
>>
>>54637433
Only the 1.5 and 3 TB drives caused the problems in the past. Al the other were always fine.
>>
What about the differently branded products? Barracuda/WD Black/NAS drives/etc.

This is all very general and one shitty drive tier from one brand maybe more shitty than the shit drive tier of another brand. The differential volumes and percentages of these shit tier drives are also relevant. Tons of things to consider. This image is useless.
>>
>>54637353
>tfw my barracuda died in 6 months

HGST master race now, wew lads.
>>
>>54637353
You guys realize WD bought out HGST right?
>>
File: 2015-4tb-drive-fails-barchart.jpg (53 KB, 720x820) Image search: [Google]
2015-4tb-drive-fails-barchart.jpg
53 KB, 720x820
Graphs are fun.
>>
>>54640025
They operate with a good deal of independence. They just help WD build shit.
>>
>>54637383
>HGST still a best, even after WD bought them.

For fucks sake, part of the acquisition deal was HGST WOULD STILL OPERATE AS AN INDEPENDENT COMPANY BUT UNDER WD OWNERSHIP
>>
>>54640025
>>54640051

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/10/19/mofcom_says_yes_wd_hgst_merger/

MOFCOM, the Chinese trade regulator which has been holding up the integration of WD and HGST, is relaxing its "hold separate" restriction and integration can start now. But the two brands and sales forces must stay separate for two more years.

Western Digital can "integrate substantial portions of its HGST and WD subsidiaries" while continuing "to offer both HGST and WD product brands in the market and maintain separate sales teams for two years from the date of the decision."

This will enable Western Dig' to start combining operations, sharing technology, such as helium-filled drives, and saving substantial costs, with $400m in annual operating expense savings mentioned.
>>
>>54640100
In addition:
Steve Milligan continues as CEO. Mike Cordano, previously president of the HGST subsidiary, becomes president and COO of Western Digital and "will head a business leadership team with balanced representation of proven leaders from the company’s two former subsidiaries."

Jim Murphy, who was president of the WD subsidiary, will run the Storage Devices business unit, which includes both HDD and SSD products.

A person who was close to the corporate action in Western Digital and HGST said: "All key positions are with HGST people; it's a reverse buyout. First HGST took Coyne's money to buy themselves (probably with a clause that Milligan is becoming CEO) and then they watched WD dismantling itself."

tl;dr: WD bought HGST; HGST execs now run WD
>>
My previous laptop was a WD. Its HDD endured crashes, bumps, heavy transportation, some really intensive I/O stuff, all that.

My current laptop was a Seagate. Started failing after 6 months of light usage.
>>
>>54637353
this graph is useless to form a conclusion from.
>>
>>54640025
You realize that doesn't mean shit right?
>>
File: blog-table-q1-2016-cumulative-2.jpg (661 KB, 720x695) Image search: [Google]
blog-table-q1-2016-cumulative-2.jpg
661 KB, 720x695
>>54640202
But it's much easier to bait retards in to replying with a bar chart rather than this
>>
>>54637353
HGST propaganda
>>
i bought a used seagate. broken sectors, everywhere!
i had a WD now haven't had any problems
>>
>mfw I have a WD blue in my computer
I should probably switch that out soon
>>
>>54640100

Time to buy a HGST now.
>>
>>54640227
>comparing desktop drives to NAS
Can I for ONCE see a pic on this site that isn't complete SHIT?
>>
>>54640924
I miss when the Hitachi Deathstar was a thing. Literally the most reliable drives on the market now.
>>
>I fell for the HGST meme
>fucking love it
>>
File: 1460455129594.png (135 KB, 497x324) Image search: [Google]
1460455129594.png
135 KB, 497x324
>>54637353
>tfw 3 1tb seagates in raid 0

#YOLO
>>
Backblaze's 2014 and 2015 method of testing is unreliable. They brought any random drive regardless if it's new, refurbished or used.

http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/6028/dispelling-backblaze-s-hdd-reliability-myth-the-real-story-covered/index.html

I won't comment on their 2016 test because they did do some improvements, but I won't trust their 2014 and 2015 tests.
>>
>what is bathtub curve
>what is margin of error
>what is backblaze's incosistent methods of obtaining and using the drives
>>
HGST is fucking based, why do people even buy anything else?
>>
>>54640026
Op graph is updated for 2016
>>
>>54640983
That was an IBM thing well before Hitachi.
>>
I have yet to have a Seagate drive fail. Every one of my WD drives have died within 1 to 2 years.
>>
>>54642566
I have yet to have a WD drive fail. Every one of my Seagate drives have died within 1 to 2 years.

Anecdotal evidence doesn't mean shit.
>>
>new toshiba drive arrives
>makes sounds consistent with a dying seagate drive
>also one sound like a drill at the dentist briefly it hasn't repeated
>probably damaged in transit
>gotta fuck around with returns now
>>
>>54639966
>>54640202

Critical thinking is not so common these days. I want to thank you gentlemen for being objective.
>>
>>54637353
what a shitty graph

the sample sizes are nowhere near equal and don't mention usage or time elapsed
>>
I still always go for WD, not one has died on me. I have a HGST that is making grinding noises and shit, wish I could save it.
>>
>>54637353
>WD
>premium
Premium is HGST
WD is $5 extra for the same shit 1 year later
>>
>>54640924
Have this one, then
>>
>>54644723
Complete and utter shit anon
Thread replies: 38
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.