Humor thread.
Get shilled >>54610896
I'll save this thread.
>>54613272
just werkz
>>54613272
What the hell I didn't read all the text but I am freaking laughing right now
>>54613288
That is creative.
>>54613858
gonna need all of these
find where?
>>54613272
God damn
>>54614474
>kraut humour
kill yourself
>>54614511
Are you offended?
>>54613858
>// TODO: come up with a better name generating algorithm
topmost kek
>>54614519
No. Fuck off.
>>54614562
OK, Kid.
>>54614568
>capitalizing all nouns
Die, kraut.
>>54614601
OK, Kid.
>>54614576
>>54612510
I don't even understand why we need 5 nvidia threads at the same time
It's just a fucking shitty GPU
>>54614617
Nvidia shills trying to convince themselves that they are going to buy something good, and AMD shills making fun of them.
>>54613272
Timesink shit for turbo cs dropouts to make their hello world more pseudo complicated
>>54614733
>1599$ for a mp3 playero
Hola shit
>>54614733
Meanwhile I bought an iPod touch 5 dirt cheap when the 6 came out. It's about 1/7 the thickness of that shit and gets ok battery life at 1030 mAh.
>60ish hours of audio playback on battery saver
>64GB for $175
>>54614733
So, what's the deal for the price being so high?
There got to be some reason, and not some bullshit reason like with Coconut-audio
>>54613272
Is emacs any better?
>>54613191
possibly the worse generation of humans to ever roam the earth
>>54615489
Remember when they released a noise cancelling microSD?
>>54613272
>>54613298
I suck at Vim but as with all programs, once mastered its way better then anything else, people don't understand that, "just werkz" ain't what its about, its about top most productivity but it has a huge learning curve.
>>54613377
No, thats a Sony TV and camera and a Apple iPad, no Creative products here.
>>54613272
The joke isn't that it requires a huge amount of bullshit to get some basic things to work in Vim (you can paste with ctrl+shift+v without going through .vimrc), it's about the fact that when you ask a simple and straightforward question on stacks, they always reply with whole wall of non-sense.
>>54621968
>(you can paste with ctrl+shift+v without going through .vimrc)
ctrl-shift-v depends on what terminal is used though; middle mouse click also pastes the mouse selection on x systems
>it's about the fact that when you ask a simple and straightforward question on stacks, they always reply with whole wall of non-sense.
it's not just that though, they usually go into every edge-case scenario and always mention the technically proper but practically worse methods of doing things, I'm sure if you ask a question about tar you'll get some answers that only work on ancient deprecated solaris builds of tar
>>54622200
I still struggle to wade through the massive explanations. It seems to be a common thing on Linux forums.
>>54622291
presumably it's because the person answering the question presumes the person who asked the question took the time to use google or read the documentation to rule out the simple explanations and goes with the longer more technical answer
that, or they just flaunt their knowledge by obscuring the answer in a wall of bullshit
>>54613272
literally the only reason I learned how to use vi is because some appliances don't let you install just werkz editors like nano due to space constraints, and some server distro's don't have it by default and I don't want to bother installing a different editor
also visudo is a pain to change to nano
>>54613288
Surprisingly decent looking quality on the TV though
