[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
How much does having wifi networks close together cause interference
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
File: Intredasting.jpg (188 KB, 549x563) Image search: [Google]
Intredasting.jpg
188 KB, 549x563
How much does having wifi networks close together cause interference and slow down your wifi? If a house was hypothetically designed so the exterior walls acted like a Faraday cage to block your neighbors wifi so the only wifi in your house was from your own router, would you see significant improvements in network speed? I know that's a retarded idea because you'd also be blocking cell phone signals indoors, I'm just asking a hypothetical.

I'm curious because long story short, we just changed our internet package and for a short while we had the modem from the ISP with wifi built in hooked up in one room because that modem also was for the phone (>inb4 some comment about having a landline in 2016, it's for working from home), and another more capable modem and separate router hooked up in another room. The wifi on the more capable router became slightly better after turning off the wifi on the shitty modem/router the ISP provided. IDK if something else was causing the slowdown and it's just a coincidence or if having two wifi networks so close together really does cause congestion that slows them down.
>>
>>54594008
>I know that's a retarded idea because you'd also be blocking cell phone signals indoors
Just use an extender and run it into the cage.
>>
>>54594024
That would be worthwhile for some people, but I don't think home builders would start building houses to act like Faraday cages because most people would complain about the lack of reception indoors. Maybe there's some material that blocks the frequencies used for wifi but not for cell phones/other important radio frequencies?
>>
>>54594052
>Maybe there's some material that blocks the frequencies used for wifi but not for cell phones/other important radio frequencies?
Not fucking likely.
>>
>>54594008
Why not just have them operate at different channels you fucking moron.
>>
>>54594195
Because there's no need for two wifi networks in the same house. It's a normal sized American house, not a mansion that needs two wifi networks.
>>
>>54594195
>>>54594008 (OP)
>Why not just have them operate at different channels you fucking moron.

This.
Use an wifi's channels analizer to decide which channel to use.
>>
they have multiple channels, dork
Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.