>>54574666
nice thread and wasted trips

i have no idea but i would like to hear about

>I remember people went apeshit when they first heard Tampermonkey is cuming to firefox that's why I'm asking

because i didn't see this at all

>>54574678
it was a few month ago with another quality OP like "it's over greasemonkey is finished" in all caps
but it had some decent discussion but I can't find it in archive
anyway I installed it and the only "bad" thing about it is that I can't auto install scripts on click. You need to save them from the page then import into tampermonkey

>>54574666
Violent monkey

if tampermonkey somehow implemented "unsafeWindow" in chrome, why the hell can't we do that natively

i literally can not understand this

Tampermonkey's GUI is shit

>>54574666
greasemonkey apparently have some issues with certain scripts unlike tampermonkey.
Have you embraced GNU, Satan?

Greasemonkey; first monkey is best monkey