So, audiophiles, tell me. How does spotify's "extreme quality" setting hold up? Would you useless faggots consider it good enough?
Also isn't this a lovely icon pack?
>>54544128
1. long shadow fad is shit and i have no idea how it hasnt died in 2014
2. same shit, download FLAC or ALAC from what.cd or rutracker.org
>Streaming
No thanks i prefer to download my music from soulseek or rutracker.org
>>54544128
Asking for advice from autists probably isn't the best choice anon
there's no hearable difference
>>54545572
>hearable
audible
>>54546453
>audible
Go read a book like a normal person faggot
google's 320k mp3 is earseeable enough for me.
>>54544170
How safe is soulseek? If i'm downloading shit off there am I most likely going to receive a copyright notice?
>>54544128
Songs just sound less muffled especially on lows. But I don't care, it sounds as good as it needs to be. I don't need $100 headphones and $12,000 audiophile rocks wrapped in gold plated tin foil around my cable to enjoy my music.
>>54544128
Most people will use average headphones on their phones or laptops which both have pretty bad dac's.
Most people won't notice the difference.
Most audiophiles on /g/ listen to bleeps and bloops and weeaboo/gaming music.
They won't notice the difference either.
>>54546986
Not at all,majority of the files are shared by others users so i think its pretty safe.
>>54544128
It's horse shit.
I don't need to be an audiophile to tell you that.
Spotify only has shitty mainstream pop garbage.
>>54547535
No they don't you absolute moron
>>54547535
They have loads of music. What do you listen to normally?
>>54547535
I bet you're one of those baby boomers who thinks that the music on the radio is the only music that exists today
>>54544128
It's 320 kb/s so it's good enough if you're not a fag about lossless
>desktop / web player, standard quality: 160 kbps vorbis
>vorbis transparency is generally reached at about 150–170 kbps
web player + adblocker of your choice = most of the music you could ever want at decent quality
