>Fury X beats 980ti in 4k since last year
>980ti beats Fury X in 1080p and sometimes 1440p
>fast forward a few months
>DX12 pushed out
>Fury X blows Nvidia's shit
http://youtu.be/_sAjXKxCW6Y
GeFags on suicide watch
More like
>1080 on the horizon
>Fury X blows nvidias gimped shit
>>54359437
>pascal pushed out
>fast forward polaris pushed out too
>amd blows nvidias shit again
>>54359343
I knew there would be gains for AMD with DX12, but trumping a Titan X by even a few FPS, given the huge price difference, makes choosing which card to buy that much easier.
Also, why buy a Titan X when a 980ti is practically identical in performance.
>Posting from my 4770K w/ 390 crossfire rig
No one uses 4k for videogaymes yet retard.
1000 series will BTFO AMD like always.
>>54359633
And then AMD will release 400 series which will blow up Nvidia as always
>>54359687
And then no one will buy it because the 1000 series will work better with vidyagaymes.
4k isn't going to be adopted as a standard for awhile yet. Saying you have better performance in 4k is irrelevant.
>>54359708
300 series already blew up nvidia's 900 with games.
400 will do the same with 1000.
>>54359734
>300 series already blew up nvidia's 900 with games.
Except it didn't.
Fuckin nVidia vs AMD battle. When will you autistic kids learn that in the end it's all down to personal preference which company's products will one use? This constant shilling between nVidia and AMD is realy getting on my nerves.
Every company had it's up and down products, and they always will have. Getting pissed over a mere 5-6 frames of FPS... you got eyes of the eagle or some shit that you can actually notice the differenece?
Go be productive instead of smelling up moms basement all day long and eating Hot pockets.
JUST WAIT TILL PASCAL BOYS!!!!!WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>54359789
>eating Hot pockets
What do we look like, janitors?
>>54359789
>Getting pissed over a mere 5-6 frames of FPS... you got eyes of the eagle or some shit that you can actually notice the differenece?
If the difference is 5-6 frames in the case of 60 vs 54 then you'd have to be mentally retarded to not notice the game dropping to effective 30fps because of vsync.
If it's 80 vs 74 then no it doesn't matter because you should be using vsync anyway.
On a 144hz monitor it doesn't really matter though as long as it's above 72.
>>54359343
How did Nvidia drop the ball so hard on DX12?
>>54359343
Here we go again
>>54359834
>If it's 80 vs 74 then no it doesn't matter because you should be using vsync anyway.
I was talking in the lines of that. Of course some will notice drop from 60 to 54, but considering high end GPUs can run AAA games (if optimised properly), over 70, with drops to 60ish, then it's really not that important
>>54359734
>stock 290(x) are so shit the get btfo by 970/980 whilst being cheaper at release
>amd has to release a rebranded overclocked card for over $100 more
>b-but look at muh overclocked 290 (aka 390) performance vs your stock 970
>200mhz oc to a stock 970 fucking destroys 390
kek
>>54359875
Try playing at anything more than 900p fucktard so the memory on your cuckcard blows up
>>54359897
I play every modern game at 1080p max settings on my overclocked 970 and it has never blown up or died from muh 3.5. You simply won't use more than 3.5GB at 1080p.
Nice meme though.
>>54359846
By not foreseeing the rise multi computing architectures. But it's not a problem. Good marketing will fix that. You can have the best product but if you don't market it well no one gives a shit.
Oh my fucking god! FPS is a matter of life and death...tards!
>>54359789
i get paid by amd to shill though. i'm only doing my job.
>>54359968
you will say any thing when the tables are turned
>>54359812
>pascal
oh boy, are you in for a surprise
or did you meant volta?
Stand aside fuckers
Its time to make AMD great again
Resistance is futile
>>54359846
> How did Nvidia drop the ball so hard on DX12?
Nvidia already has the majority of the retarded mustard race in their hands. Most of them are nvidia fanboys.
Which means Nvidia doesn't have to work hard at all to get sales these days. They can drop the ball as hard as they want and their fanboys will still buy their shit. They can fuck their fanboys in the arse with cucked ram and their fanboys will still buy the fuck out of their cucking 3.5 cards.
Nvidia doesn't give a shit. They can cuck all their old cards with shitty drivers and their fanboys will just buy new nvidia cards.
Nvidia doesn't have to compete. They already won regardless of how badly they fuck up. Their fanboys believe in them like a cult.
>>54360056
top
This is not technology, this is little kids gossiping about toys.
Go to >>>/v/
>>54360099
>talking about computer components
>hurr go to /v/
2/10 made me reply
>>54360099
>le real adults don't indulge in hobby i don't like post
[you]
>>54359343
>DX12
go back to /v/ faggot
>>54359846
except they didn't. they've got fully dx12 supported cards with pascal and they've snapped up the first full dx12_3 game in bf5.
>>54359633
i do
>>54359875
>compares 200 series with 900
But again, you're buying nvidia, I expected you to be stupid
>>54360165
I'm talking about stuff that is available right now. I can talk about polaris and how it will BTFO pascal too.
>>54359914
>pays for 4GB and gets ripped off
>Still content because nvidia
>>54360187
>he unironically believes the 970 wasn't brought out to compete with the 290/x at the time of its release
>he unironically believes the 3xx series wasn't brought out to combat the 9xx series after the 2xx series' massive failings
>I expected you to be stupid
you're one to talk.
>>54360280
>>54360231
I paid $230 for my 970 tho
That's cheaper than the AMD equivalent.
>>54360313
I can get AMD equvlent second hand at that price too.
>>54359343
>>54359437
>>54359440
>>54359633
>>54359687
>>54359708
>>54359734
>>54359747
>new things are better than old things, the thread
>>54360323
Mine was first hand.
You're all fighting about which card is better when it comes down to how the games preform on a particular card.
Holy fuck, you double niggers.
All we know about the new Nvidia cards so far is whatever marketing bullshit hype they've fed the press. There has been no demonstration of their new cards. We don't even know when they'll be released.
And we don't have much more information about AMD cards either. AMD have hyped their products to high heaven many times before launch, only to disappoint in the end.
Just wait for the cards to be released and actual real life benchmarks to be posted before you devolve into monkey fanboys throwing poo at each other.
>>54360313
i bought my 980 for the same price as a 390 when it released. my friend bought a 390 (which he now regrets massively) the week it released and i nearly followed him by buying one myself but i found a guy selling a 980 FTW for the same price at £320. great deal and way better than the 390 for gaming and complex software because of cuda and good nvidia drivers.
>>54360313
>I paid $10 to get fucked in the ass tho
>That's cheaper than having sex on top of a hooker
u sure do enjoy bouncing on nfagyas dick
>>54360328
Pascal and Polaris haven't been released yet shit for brains. Also your gay friends brad about how Nvidia's upcoming cards will beat AMD's existing ones. This is some retarded hupocrisy.
>>54360373
Should have used a shit eating or food analogy instead.
>>54360364
i bought my 380x for the same price as a 980 when it released. my friend bought a 980 (which he now regrets massively) the week it released and i nearly followed him by buying one myself but i found a guy selling a 390x STRIX for the same price at £320. great deal and way better than the 980 for gaming and complex software because of stream processors and good amd drivers.
>>54360373
ayymdrone pays less
>nvidiots getting cucked by paying more for le gimped hardware xD
ayymdrone pays more:
>you paid less because its shit
>im soo happy paying more
>stay poor
>keep sucking nvidia dick
and this is why i'd never by amd. everyone who buys amd goes fucking mental because of that buyers remorse. i come to these threads for lols and its all full of >b-b-ut gameworks and >le nvidia gimping amd performance. so much damage control from amd users.
>>54360404
>i bought my 380x for the same price as a 980 when it released.
you paid $500 for a 380x? fucking kek
>>54360432
What are you talking about retard any amd card gets more fps than its equivlent in nvidia. You're bragging about your shit to make yourselves feel better.
>>54360476
>What are you talking about retard any amd card gets more fps than its equivlent in nvidia
lets look at relative performance at the most popular resolution right now, shall we:
>970 higher relative performance than a 390
>980 higher relative performance than a 390x
>980 ti higher relative performance than a fury x
you were saying?
>>54360564
Come back with some real world performance.
>>54360618
ok. i'll post a game that isn't broken, uses propriety software or runs at 50 fps at low settings on a furyx/980ti/titan.
:^)
>>54360653
>using FPS cap because his double priced card can't come close to Fury
Topkek
>>54360700
>980ti beating furyx
>980 beating 390x
>970 beating 390
>$100 cheaper 290 matching a 390
>$130 cheaper 290x mathcing a 390x
toppest of keks
>>54359343
Too bad DX12 is irrelevant to me since I'm never going to use windows 10
>>54360811
V U L K A N
U
L
K
A
N
>>54360779
>dx11
Kek
>>54360884
>i like paying for amd hardware and getting worse performance to end up pojecting my buyers remorse on a japanese image board
kek
>>54360962
paying more for*
>>54360884
>clutching at straws
>dx11 still most popular api
>hundreds more games than muh dx12 or muh mantle
Assassinate introspectively.
>>54360962
>>54360884
ke ke keekekekekekekek
>>54360962
>shitvidia fanboy so stupid he can't spell
Kek
>>54359633
I use it for shit games that don't have proper AA
>>54359834
Wait should I be playing at 72 fps cap instead of 60?
>>54361286
Do you have a 144Hz monitor?
>>54361339
Yea
>>54361394
Yes retard. Cap at 48, 72, or 144 because those are the framerates you can use with vsync.
If you have adaptive sync (G or Freesync) then it doesn't matter.
>>54360997
Maybe it's more popular because it's been out longer you shill fuck
Enjoy getting BTFO'd by AMD every time a new game comes out
>>54359343
>fury X blows nvidia's shit
dude, the 290x blows nvidias shit
what do you expect from a devices which are manufactured at the same exact factory. only nvidia decides to charge over twice the amount for no apparent reason
literally, people pay more money for inferior hardware. its hilarious
>inb4 b- but you're just a m-mad AMD poorfag!!!
t. memes
>>54360653
This is a bullshit benchmark. I was getting better fps than this on a shitty amd processor before the latest patch, and now I get a smooth 55-60 in most places.
>>54360328
980ti came out the same time as fury X
>>54360779
>290X beating 970. Anon I.....
>>54361930
literally, i payed $204 for my 290x on ebay in late 2014 (amazing deal i know. found a late night auction nobody was interested in, and my only competition didn't even place any high bids)
my 290x smokes the living shit out of the 980ti
somebody should probably sue nvidia for this
this is outright consumer fraud
It was never a secret that AMD would benefit more than Nvidia from DX12
Their DX11 drivers were such shit they couldn't fully harness the power of their cards. Plus they have dedicated async compute engines, although granted they only give around a 5-10% improvement in DX12
But DX12 on games like the new Hitman is flat out broken, so there's that
>>54359343
>completely ignoring the fact that Fury X cannot overclock at all while most 980 ti's can overclock like crazy
>ignoring the fact that even a factory oced 980ti mops the floor with the fury x at 4k
>>54360779
the 290x actually does better than the 980ti in dark souls 3 too
the charts only reflect the "overall" average FPS. but the 290x actually does a better job, specifically rendering all the areas that cause lag.
....and this is a dx11 game
>>54362037
shhhh....
>it's yet another "it gets better in the future" amd thread
>this time based on a thing that will take years to become a standard
This amd shit is literally a cult. Holy shit.
>>54362037
Except it doesn't.
>>54362075
Oh right I forgot this was an AMD fanboy thread
>>54362092
What are you talking about retard? Watch the video, AMD BTFO'd all Nvidia's cards including the $1000 one. The thread is literally >MUH PASCAL while completely ignoring the fact that Polaris is on the way too.
>>54362092
>AMD fanboys talk about how great DX12 is going to be for them
>First proper DX12 titles start shipping
>They were actually right, AMD is getting a good size performance boost from it
You're obviously going to call me an AMD shill, but consider this
>Current GPU is a GTX 970
>Haven't had a rig with an AMD/ATi GPU since my Pentium 4 rig with a Radeon 9800 Pro that I got in 2004
>>54362152
As an Nvidia/Intel owner I fully hope Polaris wrecks Pascal's shit so they can gain back some market share
And Zen has cheap 8 core cpus that wreck mainstream i7s
Give me back the glory days of AMD!
>>54362186
>same butthurt faggot using his no real world performance benchmarks
>>54362167
>9800 pro
>not just buying a 9500 and using the pencil trick for a free 9700
>>54362037
>needs to overclock $900 gpu to compete with $205 GPU
>still doesn't win
>>54362243
>It...It doesn't count!
>>54362254
>980ti
>$900
>Fury X
>$205
>>54362249
Obviously would have been somewhat cheaper, but also lower performance as the 9800 was the successor to the 9700.
God the 9700 was a long lived chip... IIRC they still sold a variant of it as a low end GPU with the Radeon HD 2000-series.
>>54361988
I seriously doubt that it smokes the 980Ti, but I use a 290X to play games on Ultra at 1080p with no problem and I paid less than 300$ for the damned thing two years ago.
>>54362186
you do know the msi 980ti lightning is a factory overclocked card right? he's right.
>>54362186
>>54362508
oh shit nvm i misread
>>54362065
this is honestly the most stupid comment i've read on /g/ this week
>>54362298
the 290x is already benching higher than the 980ti in dx12
please consider this before posting, sir
>>54362508
Yea thats what I was saying. Factory overclocked 980 tis mop the floor with the fury x since fury x cannot overclock
My 980 ti gigabyte g1 runs comfortably at 1450 mhz all day and no fury x can touch it.
>>54362570
Consider the fact that DX12 benchmarks aren't real life where next to no games use DX12
>>54362620
And the ones that do offer marginal performance increases if it works at all
>>54362570
the real dx12 battle will be with the new cards. no current gpu fully supports dx12 feature level 3.
also all the 4 or so dx12 games are massively broken in one way or another. devs still havn't got their head around it all yet. by q4 2017 dx12 games will be the standard, but for the remainder of this year and most of next year every game will be made in dx11 with maybe added on dx12 features since no game engine fully supports dx12. game engines have to actually be built for dx12 from the ground up otherwise you get shitfests like gears of war or quantum break.
ERADICATION OF NVIDIA'S FAGGOTS LOVES POLARUUUHHHSS
>$500 Fury X
>destroys €1200 Titan X
Can't make this shit up.
Amd cards are shit, and always will be shit
Stop being so butthurt about your dying company
>>54362570
this is true
>>54362685
>Just wait. Nividia will show you!!!
Yeah, nah.
In most actual games that are currently released DX12 offers no benefit over DX11 so most arguments are actually that AMD cards are slightly less gimped by DX12 than NVidia. Hardly anything uses DX12 so DX12 comparison is largely meaningless for this generation.
>>54360334
>zotac garbage
I'd sooner buy used.
>>54360165
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-trouble-asynchronous-compute/
Ayyy
>>54364627
All new cards will have full dx12 support with the latest feature levels. Don't delude yourself with your fanboy mindset that Nvidia won't have it. It's a given that both companies will be able to utilize dx12 to its full potential.
>>54364470
Not him but my buddy bought a brand new msi 970 for cheaper than a sapphire 390.
>>54364898
http://techfrag.com/2016/03/25/rumour-nvidia-pascal-facing-problems-with-asynchronous-compute/
>he thinks 16nm Maxwell will be able to do async
>>54359343
Aren't all console ports optimized for AMD because of the AMD hardware in the XB1 and PS4?
>>54362685
>game engines have to actually be built for dx12 from the ground up
That explains why the Dolphin wii emulator saw a massive fps gain when they took in dx12.
>>54362685
The REAL DX12 battle will be getting people to actually use the OS that supports DX12, "Windows 10 exclusive" might as well be the engraving on a headstone
I keep seeing DX12 brought up as a reason why AMD is going to have an advantage over Nvidia in the next generation of cards. That obviously might play some role but it's being overblown. DX11 is still going to be relevant for at least another year, maybe more.
The real reason AMD will have the upper hand is because Polaris as a GPU looks like it's going to be more efficient and cheaper to fab relative to Pascal. It's also bound to be a more modern arch as the rumors seem to indicate that Pascal is basically a die shrink of Maxwell. Granted, Maxwell is a pretty damn good arch considering the performance Nvidia squeezes out of it, but it's already showing its age. (No async compute, questionable DX12 performance thus far.)
>>54365537
Should clarify that I obviously meant async compute that is native to the hardware.
>DX12
Literally who cares. Vulkan is the future.
>>54365009
Async compute wouldn't even benefit nvidia cards beyond a percent or two anyway. They already do something similar to that but on the hardware level, it's what their streaming multiprocessor architecture is built around.
>>54365612
Maxwell's handling of async compute is just a workaround for not having the capability to handle it natively like AMD's GPUs do. Async hurts Nvidia when games try to use it for shader calculations (relative to AMD). Their current architecture clearly was not "built around" handling async compute.
>>54365667
But async compute only provides a performance advantage when the GPU is being underutilized, which is not a problem Nvidia cards have ever had, and has been an issue with AMD cards for years. Theres no reason for Nvidia to support async compute.
>>54359343
I don't think games like Quantum Break should be used for benchmarking.
What was your last nvidia card? 9600GT here.
>>54365691
lel who told you that's how async compute works? Async compute is going to be used if the game engine calls for it. See: shader effects in Ashes of the Singularity. Yeah, you either have to turn Async on or off, but if it's set to on, it's going to use that part of the GPU (whether its on-die or through software the game doesn't care) to make those calculations.
Async compute sucks for Nvidia. The only thing they can do is hope game devs don't utilize it much (they might not) or if they do use it, they're able to squeeze enough performance out of their cards that it won't matter much anyway. This most likely also ties in with Nvidia pushing a lot of their Gameworks SDK to github so the workarounds can be made in advance of games getting released by studios.
>>54365590
>Vulkan is the future.
Vulkan is undoubtedly better on AMD.
Also GPU + Integrated GPU feature on AMD and lots of cores will blow Nvidia out of the water with Vulkan.
>>54360099
What a waste of double dubs
>>54365751
async compute isn't some magical hardware component that makes things fast, its using compute at the same time as shaders. This only provides a performance benefit when SM's aren't being fully utilized, but nvidia cards are very efficient at utilizing their SM's, so async compute would be fighting shaders for computation time and thus there would be no performance benefit. AMD cards aren't very efficient at using their stream processors (which is a well known phenomena) and as such get a disproportionately large benefit from async compute because shaders and compute aren't going to be fighting for computation time.
>>54362854
Underrated. My next PC build will be called Rust in Peace
>>54359343
>BENCHMARKING A WINDOWS 10 EXCLUSIVE GAME
LOL
>implying anyone on /g/ uses win10
>>54359834
>vsync
no.
>>54359633
>like always
Only thing nVidia got working for them is the end card for 700 and 900 series. 780ti and 980ti. All others were AMD's turf.
>>54359834
>frames of FPS
>AMD
>beating nvidia anytime for the past 4 years
>muh thermi
>muh housefire
