http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/05/03/dead-could-be-brought-back-to-life-in-groundbreaking-project/
it would have to be within moments of death because the cells would all be dead before the body can be reanimated
>>54359797
According to the article it will be used on people who are brain dead and kept "alive" by life support.
What makes them think the same person is going to be back?
>>54359065
>The Torygraph
nothing to see here
it's a slightly less insane version of the daily mail
>>54360269
that's where all the fun comes from
>>54360345
daily mail's top tier
>>54360425
This. Will they be a functional human being even? Or just a living breathing abomination? Will their memories be intact? How much brain damage will they have, if any?
>>54360148
So, the average /g/ user?
>>54359065
so, are you telling me those faggots who pay for cryogenic sleep have a chance?
>>54361026
The neo-Disney era is upon us
>>54360515
Who cares?!
Don't you want to see what rl Frankenstein or zombie Apocalypse would look like?
>>54360295
>>54359083
This is a new technology you autists
>>54361574
Ignore them.
Some people just don't seem to understand that science and technology do overlap, and come here expecting just consumer product threads. Which is understandable considering the majority of the threads.
>>54361026
No, their brains will be mush if they ever get thawed out
>>54360978
Keked
>>54361574
Consumer technology is not a science, just like computer science isn't a science.
>>54359065
Yep, less reasons everyday to believe in some sort of magical sky daddy
