Why aren't you developing your own next-generation cellular data transmission standard using software-defined radio?
>>54317836
Doesn't the government "own" certain ranges of frequencies?
I'd rather not get raped in maximum prison
>>54317883
You're not going to get put in prison. You're devices are just going to get DFS'd.
L2tech nerd
>>54317836
Actually I work for a company that does make their own software and hardware for wireless devices using non-licensed radio bands.
I don't know why you think it's profitable. It's really not.
>>54317836
No meaningful l337 homebrew h4xx0rism is going to happen until the Internet becomes heavily regulated, which might be sooner rather than later, the way things are going.
>>54318114
>Actually I work for a company that does make their own software and hardware for wireless devices using non-licensed radio bands.
Also, laws on signal strength.
>>54317836
I am
>>54318114
>you are devices
I built wireless device love it its like explosive vest with wireless trigger so i dont have to worry if people see my ttigger in mah hands before i blow them away
>>54317883
>not owning a completely radio-sealed chamber to do testing on
>SDR
>Can only listen to stuff with minimal investment
>Handheld radio
>Illegal to own and use without a license
>Very useful in emergency scenarios once you know the local repeaters and strengths
I think I know why.