What torrent client do you use /g/?
Which do you think is the best?
>>54214649
no
>>54214632
Deluge
>>54214711
uTorrent is cancer now tho
utorrent 2.2.1 for personal use
rtorrent for seedbawx
utorrent
a
best
>>54214718
Tiaxti is shit
Deluge only
apparently utorrent is bad now
why
>>54214831
Security issues. It's been bad for a long time.
Still using it though, because I'm a lazy faggot.
>>54214829
What about Transmission?
>>54214632
rtorrent
>>54214632
If you use anything other than utorrent 2.x.x
or deluge then you are retarded.
>>54214678
Fuck off
>>54214831
>trusting the uTorrent devs
qBittorrent
>>54214776
L O L
O
L
utorrent is botnet senpai. go with the OSS fork for utorrent, qbittorrent.
>>54214829
>Tixati is shit
>shilling deluge crap
well memed
Vuze
>>54214909
>closed-source chinese client
>over open-source client
Fuck off /g/.
>What torrent client do you use /g/?
Deluge
>Which do you think is the best?
old uTorrent tbqh. But I'm not going to use it if it since it's ancient and possibly has vulnerabilities that will never get patched without updating to new versions
qbittorrent is OK but not anything special. It does the same functionally as most other clients but the UI feels mediocre for some reason. I can't define it all, just the UI is 'off'. The button and font size don't seem right. The tab selector is below the info so I have to look down then up, compared to other clients that put it between the torrent list and the info. There are some other really tiny things that I can't remember that added up to me preferring Deluge.
>>54214923
>le open sauce
it's a resource hog unstable client, and the icon is ugly af
>>54214963
>the icon
>resource hog
nevermind, you'll fit in well, degenerate.
A client that doesn't stall. So, not qBittorent.
transmission on os x, transmission qt on windows.
did the officual windows version of transmission get released?
>>54215291
yes, very quietly, you'll find it at the very bottom of transmissions downloads page
>>54215306
No?
>>54214632
ABSOLUTELY BASED
A modified version of uTorrent 1.8.5.
Tried transmission and qBittorent multiple times, but have issues with them.
>>54215334
yes
look here, one up from the bottom
https://download.transmissionbt.com/files/
uTorrent 2.2.1
>>54215366
Why didn't they announce it?
>>54215418
I don't know, I only know about it because some anon here mentioned it a while back and I had to google around a bit to find it
>>54214632
>>54214718
>>54214909
>>54214829
tixati is fine...
And has great options...
why it is not good?
>>54214859
Has a shit interface
>>54214632
ktorrent
>>54214678
yes
>>54214772
>utorrent 2.2.1
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-6117/Utorrent.html
>>54214632
rtorrent + rutorrent
Starting a torrent is slightly harder than double-clicking a torrent file, but for all other purposes it's quite good. The fact that it's server based is what wins it for me.
>>54215579
this. why barely anyone ever mentions it? it's like utorrent for linux.
>>54214632
transmission-daemon on literallly everything
>>54215982
its k
>>54215854
All prior to 2.2.1 and I don't use magnet links because I'm not a public tracker shitter. Try again.
uTorrent 2.2.1
>>54216159
crafted URL using the >>(1) bittorrent<<< OR (2) magnet protocol.
>>54214632
uTorrent
Proxy:127.0.0.1
Port:9150
uTorrent 3.1.3
>>54215344
how come mine looks like shit ;c
it wont use the gtk theme i have on
>>54214632
deluge
>>54214632
Deluge, but I'm not overly picky.
uTorrent all the way
>>54216468
>gtj
>it's called qbittorrent
>q
>>54216648
w-what
uTorrent 2.2.1
>>54216737
i think he's trying to say it uses qt themes and not gtk themes?
>>54216864
that makes sense
t-thx
Using qbittorrent. Haven't tested how much I can customize it, but I like it more than Transmission. It's missing a key feature though. It won't let me right click on a torrent and save the .torrent to my HDD. It only gives me the option to save all of them automatically or all of the ones that I complete. No thanks.
I guess I could try Deluge one day, but isn't it really old and mainly for Linuxtards?
>>54216958
Disregard both of them.
I am the one who posted that
I use KDE and qt applications perfectly fits the KDE stock themes
>>54215412
Pretty much a downloadable security vulnerability at this point
lel
>>54217183
Enjoy your malware
i use qbt because it's the only one that has sequential downloading on os x
>>54217193
>Using wangblows
>Complaining about malware
top meme
>>54217230
>projecting
>>54217193
>imblyingg I use OS X
>>54217165
they were right tho
I just fucking fucked myself.
Just finished downloading a torrent that was stuck on 90% for weeks. Then I installed Deluge and ran the same torrent too what options Deluge had. The result? Deluge erased my completed file. Stupid program didn't even fucking check. Now I have to spend another month trying to redownload this shit.
>>54214632
rtorrent
>>54217292
>he fell for the deluge meme
>>54216434
>Proxy:127.0.0.1
Why ?
Using qBittorrent but uTorrent 2.2.1 still blows everything up
μTorrent 2.2.1, been using it for 5 years without any problems whatsoever and it still blasts any other client.
>>54218070
>hahah i posted the ebin cve mémé again
Your autism aside, it's actually the best client
uTorrent 2.2.1 by default, qBittorrent when I need sequential download (e.g. for previewing movies and checking for quality).
>>54217292
Was it really Deluge's fault? I've never used it, but I can't believe it's such a POS.
>>54217259
install qt4-qtconfig and set theme to gtk+, qt supports gtk themes perfectly, but it will only work if it's compiled with the QGTKSTYLE flag. I think it's that way in Ubuntu, Debian and Arch so maybe you won't have to worry about that.
Utorrent 2.2.1
>>54214632
uTorrent portable
I use qBittorrent
I think rtorrent is the best
>>54214632
Flud :^)
>>54218162
>using more than one torrent client
Autist.
>>54219224
>using the smiley with a carat nose
Bittorrent pro 7.9 cracked
rtorrent + rutorrent is king
>>54217292
If you have to spend a month to download something might as well buy it because you got caught by the opportunity cost of dicking around
I used Limewire to get Limewire Pro
Aria2 is decent and even have a few gui.
>>54214632
I use Vuze. I think Vuze is the best, or at least have the best search tools for torrents.
>>54215982
I loved Ktorrent when I used it a long time ago, but isn't it not really up to date? It went ages without an update, though KTorrent 5.0 just released like literally a few days ago, though the homepage doesn't show it (again part of the problem).
How does KTorrent compare to Deluge and Transmission when it comes to protocols and features? Does it respect the private torrent flag? Last I recalled, it didn't have some of the newer features like the arforementioned, but I really hope it has been updated.
>>54221256
I thought I was so smart to do that.
>>54221492
go with qBittorrent
Also has search, none of the bloated slugginess of Vuze
>>54221492
>pic related
>>54214632
I use qbittorrent, but it's RSS feed isn't the best around compared to other client.
I hear a lot about rtorrent but I never got the WebGUI working.
I used uTorrent for a long time on a xp vm, now I use transmission on a raspberry
qBittorrent is promising and has a nice little UI, though it lacks a couple of features that Transmision and especially Deluge have, most notably a comprehensive IP Blocklist. I cannot understand why the blocklist support is so utterly shitty when other FOSS clients do just fine.
qBT only supports LOCAL, UNCOMPRESSED, MANUALLY UPDATED EVERY SINGLE FUCKING TIME blocklists. Deluge, Transmission, and many others have sane options by comparison - they can use zipped/gzipped lists as well as uncompressed, update both manually as well as auto-scheduled with multiple settings (ie X days, at load etc), and most importantly update from a fucking URL. For fuck's sake qBT is an application for downloading things in a rather complex, distributed way and it can't even download blocklists from a static URL? Fuck.
And no, its foolish to set up PeerBlock or firewall rules as these kind of whole system blocking tools are asinine as I don't want all of those addresses filtered on all applications, just bittorrent Most other clients can offer these features, so its annoying that qBT doesn't seem to. When they change, I'll give them a try again.
Deluge
>>54214632
Transmission. I mainly us Linux as my go-to OS and only boot into Windows to play games (which is once a week or so).
>>54214632
>Unupdated utorrent
How fucked am I /g/?
>>54214864
It's the only way
Tixati is best
It has fancy graphs and rarest first distribution
>>54221859
NTFS compression is a thing if you are on Windows. As for the missing auto-update functionality, it shouldn't be hard to set up a scheduled job to take care of it.
>>54214632
Deluge
>>54222881
NTFS compression is different than simply being able to load/read a zipped/gzipped file from a url somewhere. I'm not sure how to set up a job like that in windows as I'm more familiar with cron in linux, but really now users should not have to go to those lengths to essentially automate a manual update using scripting or whatnot.
Most other FOSS BitTorrent clients going all the way back to Azureus have a simple, full featured blocklist updater, so qBT should have it also. Hell, it isn't like the code in those other clients is obfuscated or locked away, it should be relatively easy for someone with the knowledge to develop qBT to bring it over.
>>54214632
rtorrent
>>54214718
>>54222816
tixati stronk
>>54221629
In those days I didn't even understand that getting songs for free was illegal
