Firefox:
> - Ran by SJW
> - Sluggish
> - Insecure
> + Open Source
Chrome:
> - Botnet
> - Not customisable
> - Burns through your RAM
IE:
> - Dead
> - Not customisable
> + Pretty fast
Edge:
> + Very fast
> + buttery smooth scrolling
> - Not customisable
> - Lack of uBlock
> - Lack of literally everything
> - Shit interface
Everything else:
>Irrelevant or based on one of the above
Is internet dead? Soon we will have to use an app for every website we want to visit.
>>54084962
You should point out how terrible Firefox is twice.
>>54084978
That's what I use at this moment, but that's only because there is no better alternatives at this moment. Maybe once Edge will stop being shit, I will move.
>>54084962
I'm using C2D with 4gb ram and chrome is one laggy piece of shit.
>>54084962
>> + buttery smooth scrolling
I can't stand this
>IE
>Pretty fast
>Edge
>Very Fast
100% Retard
>>54085033
Yes, both are fast. Edge is faster.
Honestly in what year is browser customization such an important factor for anyone who isnt age 16 and below? Just stick with the default, do you really need flame decals, 21 inch rims, and a spoiler on your web browser?
>>54084962
I literally changed from Firefox to Chromium about an hour ago and I'm pretty happy with it.
>>54085210
>points out problem
>"who needs it anyways :P not like anyone's USING IT or anything lol xDD"
>>54085307
Not using palemoon
Nor brave
>mfw
Chromium portable master race
>>54085381
Palemoon was literally depricated by the furry web developer. Also, no MSE.
Brave doesn't feel mature enough.
>>54085381
>palememe
Ill be switching from firecuck to cuckzilla eventually
Everyone has been lamenting this fact for several years now. I predict something will rise to fill the void in the next few years.
>>54085423
Yes governments will announce that using anything other than chrome without government certificates is illegal (already happened in Kazakhstan)
http://thehackernews.com/2015/12/kazakhstan-internet-spying.html
>>54085381
I'd use palemoon if it wasn't for the shit JavaScript performance.
There are a few userscripts that lock up my 4790k on palemoon.
>>54084962
I't will be interesting to see what comes out of recently announced Mozzila lab experiments. I recently switched from Firefox to Chrome Canary because of how slow FF was getting. I desperately want FF to be good again so I can move back
>>54085397
And? Who cares if the dev is a furry? I wouldn't have a problem if the dev was a child rapist and murderer even
It's probably the least sucky Firefox fork out there
>>54085523
Way to miss the point, faglord. The problem is that the dev said it was deprecated. Also, again, not MSE.
Firefox wins by default because its free software. Who would unironically run proprietary software on their own machine?
>Chrome for 40Chins and porn
>Safari for everything else
Safari is the most comfy browser. Prove me wrong.
>>54085625
Chromium
It seems like it is too hard to build a browser from scratch without forking an existing product. And then once you fork you are captive to an extent to the original developer's code choices else your codebase will become too incompatible and become out of date since you are just a small fork you don't have enough manpower/money.
/g/ needs to genetically engineer a team of genius aryan programmers with white nationalist ideals who will work for free to create a browser for them.
>>54085646
By the glorious nature of having source code open to the public, Its obvious chromium maintains a lot of the privacy infringing features of Chrome
>>54084962
>> - Sluggish
>> - Insecure
Works for me. Seems the fastest browser on my pc: 3770k, 780ti, 32GB RAM, Intel 530 SSD, Win7
Chromium and other Chromium based browsers have terryble hardware accelerated video decoding, generally they take all the threads and render my PC useless while loading a few tabs in background, and scrolling on longer pages (VK wall for example) is painfully slow, wheereas Firefox has none of these issues. Even more, e10s seems to make it extremely responsive even under heavy load.
>>54084962
>Running vanilla FF
No joke, I sometimes use IE11, so sleak and fast. Perfect when you only want one quick browser window.
>>54085033
have you tried them? both are lighting fast, and the scroll is the smoothest. Yes, it's botnet and closed source, but give software its merits
>>54085733
I see no problems with FF + Classic Theme Restorer and Adblock Origin. It is only these threads that make me question it.
>>54085718
>/g/ needs to genetically engineer a team of genius aryan programmers with white nationalist ideals who will work for free to create a browser for them
And you figure this is going to be easier than building a web browser, huh
I agree.. all browsers suck.
I've been using firefox fora long time and mozilla is killing it slowly for a long time now, the only reason why i still use it is because i cant use chromium for more than some minutes without having this urge to kill myself.
oh boy, another freetard post believing his imaginary world is real. Ok..
>Firefox: Ran by SJW
How this affects normies? How this affects you at all?
>Chrome: botnet.
Still falling to the botnet meme? Do you even know what a fucking botnet is? 90% of Chrome's telemetry can be disabled, and most of the people doesn't care, unlike you. It's pretty fast, enough to satisfy most of the people, and has better add-on support than Firefox by now. There is a reason why it has become an standard.
>IE: Dead
Dying, still heavily used in corporations environments.
>Edge: Lack of literally everything.
It fucking sucks and I agree. It's getting extension support soon [TM] but it's too little, too late.
>Everything else: irrelevant.
UC Browser is the most used browser in india and the most used 3rd party browser for mobiles. Opera is the most used in Africa, and their data saving technology is used in Yandex (most used in Russia) and all Xiaomi phones.
>Is internet dead?
Are you fucking stupid? browsers are still important and valuable, just because none of them fulfills your eccentric expectations doesn't mean the rest of the world is unhappy.
>Soon we will have to use an app for every website we want to visit.
Check the webapp technology that Chrome and Opera are working. They are trying to make webpages work more like apps, actually, Chrome has been working on it since a while, with its store.
Mozilla did the same with Firefox OS, but it was a failure, but not because webapps sucks, having a phone without Android/iOS sucks.
>>54085935
>How this affects normies? How this affects you at all?
Most of their resources goes to SJW fights rather than relevant development.
>>54084962
>Firefox:
>> - Insecure
wut?
>>54086029
It's objectively more insecure than Chromium or Chrome, for example.
>>54084962
Chrome is very fast. Get better shit
-Posted from my x220 Chinkpad
>>54084962
Edge is Open-source and has a dark/light mode. It's more customizable out of the box than any of the other browsers you listed.
>>54086040
Yes but everything is more insecure compared to Chrom%
>>54085935
>How this affects normies? How this affects you at all?
SJWs are synonymous with retarded SF hipsters, and those are self-serving retards and shit programmers more interested in "social" features that nobody fucking wants or uses than making a secure and performant browser. When tab groups disappear and you're told to use an addon in the same update they expand a feature nobody uses, that's SJW development. Browser second, "the modern web" first (except, not actually the modern web, because the modern web has everything in the webpage, not the browser, because that allows for more profit)
SJWs who are also retarded SF hipsters are the entire reason everyone uses chrome despite it being botnet.
>edge
>fast
Fucking microshills.
>>54085935
↑ SheckleMaster ↑
>>54086079
It doesn't support extensions / plugins.
>>54086088
Faster than lagfox at least
>>54086088
Is faster than chrome and Firefox. go ahead and try it
Is still shit, though
>>54086040
can you give some details?
or it's about sandboxing?
>>54085629
Horrible for web dev desu.
>>54086079
>Edge is Open-source
wrong, only the javascript engine is
>tfw still on opera 12.18
>>54086097
It will soon but I wasn't talking about that anyways. Purely out of a fresh install, Edge is better. Dark mode is godly.
That said, if I'm at home Ill still use chrome for 4chanx, material design and ublock.
>>54086079
>Edge is Open-source
>>54086101
>>54086115
>>54086140
>>54084978
Sounds like you're as insecure as your browser
>>54086158
>I will post a dank meme! Now your statement is invalid!
go back to fucking 9gag
>>54086158
Stupid pajeets couldn't afford my Surface :^)
>>54086126
https://it.slashdot.org/story/16/02/12/034206/pwn2own-2016-wont-attack-firefox-because-its-too-easy
>90% of Chrome's telemetry can be disabled
No sauce nor guide.
>better add-on support
No NoScript
>not mentioning ram consumption
Fuk it, I'll use Pale Moon
>>54084962
Chrome is just fine
Who doesn't have at least 8gb RAM here
Tons of extensions
>actually caring about Google snooping and "botnet"
If you use the internet at all and worry about someone snooping, then you clearly don't understand what a ISP does on a regular basis. I assume you use a VPN.
And if your so worried get chromium and build it without any connection to Google.
Mentioning botnet means you have severe autism
IceCat master race reporting in.
>>54086178
>HAHAHHA I'LL SEND (YOU) TO 9GAG, EVERYONE LOOK, LOOK AT MEEE!!!!!!!1111
Firefox isn't less secure than chrome
>>54086280
shh, don't tell them that
what a shame, it's so comfy and good
>>54086235
>No sauce nor guide.
it's in the fucking settings
>No NoScript
I said better addon support, not that addons can have more capabilities. There are more addons in Chrome than in Firefox, and these doesn't get incompatible when Chrome updates.
>not mentioning ram consumption
Maybe because I don't have anything to say about it? any modern pc can handle Chrome's memory consumption, Chrome dev team has been working on reducing it, and they implemented tab hibernation a couple of versions ago.
>>54086277
Then why not stop being a child and give me your arguments why Edge is not faster than Firefox or Chrome instead?
>>54086280
Firefox has been the first browser beaten in the pwn2own. Lack of sandboxing and how the extensions work leaves a lot of open windows for directed attacks. Actually, Mozilla will copy some Google measurements with their extensions' permissions, and they will enforce using extensions only from their website.
>>54086235
>NoScript
>>54086392
>willingly being part of the literal, actual botnet
>>54086190
I'm not seeing anywhere that he said that it's too easy. So this summary is almost entirely the fabrication.
>>54085012
I'm using a 7 year old laptop with 3GiBs of ram and chrome is snappy.
Sjwfox is slow as shit and unusable.
>>54086412
my eyes
>>54086412
I pointed NoScript in particular because it's retarded to use it when uMatrix is available.
why does nobody ever mention inox, iridium or ungoogled-chromium, all patchsets for chromium to remove google things and set sane privacy defaults?
>>54086412
>literally tinfoil-hat desktop
>>54086423
Not my screenshot, just an example. That's what it's like out there. If you don't run NoScript or something like it, you're retarded.
>>54086412
Jesus christ, what is that ugly piece of shit? Have you willingly made it that way?
op is a fag
>>54084962
>Having smooth scroll on in browsers
For what purpose?
>>54086384
>default settings
are you fucking kidding me
>>54086392
Ill have you known I use uMatrix combined with NoScript and RequestPolicy.
>>54086384
>more addons
The fuck is this argument - its browsers thread not windows phone.
>Vivaldi
>Pale Moon
>Chromium
So...which one?
>>54086426
>has no idea what XSS is
>>54086473
Opera
>>54084998
>edge
>stop being shit
Choose one
>>54086458
>I use uMatrix combined with NoScript and RequestPolicy
>>54086412
>Windows Classic
>Wireless connection
>le dark edgy theme
>CPU is 50C with just a web browser open
D-desu~
>>54086493
Your reasons?
>>54086493
>Chrome
No thanks.
>>54085762
Firefox currently works (mostly) fine. Unfortunately Mozilla has already announced plans to basically gut the entire browser because their SJW purge got rid of everyone there who can actually make a browser
I shit you not, they said they're going to base the browser on a chromium core.
What about Vivaldi?
>>54085718
Great idea! I'll get started on the logo
>>54086648
dead
>>54086648
It's a web app running on top a browser.
>>54085935
Top tier post, is it copypasta?
I fucking lost it at
>UC Browser is the most used browser in india
followed by
>Opera is the most used in Africa
>>54085935
>india
>Africa
what are you talking about?
>>54086570
In short, is the best Chromium-based browser
>Objectively better interface than Chrome, with a more useful new tab page, a better way to show downloads, tab list so you can move through your tabs even if you have dozens of tabs opened, it looks like a native app in Windows, Ubuntu and OSX, uses native notifications and HTML5 video pop out
>Native adblocking.
>Opera Turbo
>Can sync your data with Opera for mobiles (which is also a good browser)
>Better communication with the development team.
>>54086412
So this is what the browser of an autist looks like...
>>54086699
>>54086776
OP claimed that the rest of the browsers are irrelevant, this is false.
>>54086493
>using Chropera
>not using (outdated as fuck)Opera 12
>>54086129
any browser but chrome is horrible for web dev
>>54085307
Whats the difference between Chromium and Chrome?
>>54084962
imma lurk here, i need a new internet browser. recommendations?
>>54086493
>opera 12 still runs better than new one or chrome
it might lag while rendering shitty pages, but oh well
>>54087805
get. the. fuck. out
>>54084962
>le chrome eats your ram
I will never understand this meme
>>54086822
soo, opera is the way to go?
>>54088078
Pretty much yeah
>>54085381
>brave
>let's replace their ads with ours! :^)
>>54086849
>India
>Africa
>relevant
>>54087813
Icecat
>>54084962
>Is internet dead? Soon we will have to use an app for every website we want to visit.
Internet is a great thing, and people that made it were awesome
What you're talking about is the web, and it's trash.
>>54085036
>>54085751
no wonder why it's fast. they just removed every functionality that should be on a modern web browser
>>54086412
This screenshot is painful to watch.
I'm using Chromium and I'm satisfied. I'll switch to Brave once it's UI stops being retarded. There's no real reason to use anything else than Chromium currently.
>>54084962
Opera:
> + used to be good
> - turned into a chrome clone
> - no good extesions
> + turbo mode is fast
>>54084962
>+
>Open source
cant wait for servo to be able to open most webpages
What you're referring to as Open Source is actually Free Software. So called Open Source proponents are evil BSD license using cucks.
>>54085935
FOUND THE GOOD GOY
>>54091318
Is still good.
>turned into a chrome clone
Presto was shit, and Opera's marketshare was even lower than what it's now. The only thing that the new Opera misses is disabling selected skins and moving the tabs to the left.
>no good extesions
Now is compatible with all the Chrome Extensions, that's another advantage of leaving presto.
>>54091989
*disabled selected scripts, stupid Android
>>54091318
It is god tier when youre on a slow connection. I could open websites in 1-2 minutes with a 56k connection instead of the usual 5 minutes.
chrome and firefox are both a pain in the ass for me, I've been having fuckin display driver crashes and constant freeze times
>>54093413
maybe its not the browsers but your computer thats shit
>>54093490
my computer is a ASUS Gl552vw
>>54085381
Brave is based on Chromium but has a wayyy shittier interface.
>>54086624
Even in the article posted here on /g/ it said the opposite. They were experimenting with using Blink but not planning to actually use it.
>not using links
>>54095591
124th post best post
Why can't /g/ make their own web browser that respects their freedoms?
>>54096332
Ill start on the logo
>>54096352
I'll get the installer ready.
>>54096360
I'll be the ideas man
What About Vivaldi?
>>54084962
Well meme'd!
>>54090820
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>ran from firefox cause SJW crap
>installed Palemoon
>discovered it was made by furries
Are all browsers made ran by weird motherfuckers?
>>54086624
I thought they are moving the core to Rust based shit. I hope it won't become just another Opera
dooble
testing brave
Safari:
+Faster than chrome
+Better font rendering
+Not giant ass toolbar, it's also customizable
-No webbum support, have to use extension to watch them on a different tab
-Chokes really hard on streams
>>54092276
>I could open websites in 1-2 minutes with a 56k connection instead of the usual 5 minutes.
I remember when I had a 56k connection that was 28k in real like speed. Websites didn't take a fucking minute to load. What happened /g/? Hold me.
>2016
>not writing your own browser
>>54098010
This. I'm still designing the logo tho.
>>54097938
pajeets took over web development
you now need 800kb javascript to have a hover effect on the button
GNU Icecat
>>54087805
one is explicitly sending shit to google, the other is implicitly doing the same.
>>54084962
Soo... I was thinking about using Chrome after all the shit Firefox is coming through (always used FF) but Chrome on android is shit, doesn't support addons nor background audio streaming like FF.
Should I use Chrome on both desktop and android?
How is the privacy and security?
>>54098414
You should use Chromium on desktop, not Chrome.
>>54098473
Why Chromium and not Chrome?
and which browser on mobile?
>>54098491
Because Chromium has no botnet. Use the nosync no webrtc build: http://chromium.woolyss.com/
I don't know on mobile. I sue Samsung's default with content blocker. It's GOAT.
>Chrome on Windows PC
>Chromium on Linux laptops and PCs
Best sync, supports the few addons I actually use, just werks.
I don't even care about the botnet since I live in the UK so the government can spy on me all they want either way.
>>54098520
Thanks m8, I was thinking about using Google products like sync shit and that, but I'm not entirely sure.
>>54098543
A friend of mine asked me to check his computer because his GPU wasn't working very well, so he leave it on my house for a few days. After the first day I opened Chrome on his computer to check for something and I could see all the porn he was watching with his cellphone at his house because of Sync.
I'm not saying Sync is inherently bad, but be careful if you use it.
>>54098566
kek.
I really want to keep my "shady things" appart from the Sync thing, I mean use it for Google Now, and work/uni, don't plan to do any porn/bizarre searches.
>>54085210
Https-everywhere, random agent spoofer, 4chanx and ublock origin are a thing. And for people that hate mozplugger, open with is a thing as well.
A few of these work system wide but are not updated as often that way.
>>54085521
Try to enable hardware acceleration and multi process.
>>54086822
Too bad it's proprietary software. I liked opera 12 when I had shit internet speeds.
>>54095591
Lynx is great but for some things it just doesn't work properly. I would love to use it for youtube and 4chan like i would for everything else if it was possible to properly stream with mpv/youtube-dl from it. For good websites lynx is one of the best browsers, for mediocre websites with good content like the ones i mentioned it is almost unusable.
Anyone got some neat hacks for it? Or for w3m?
>>54098536
In which way is chromes sync the best? FF is really good in that regard.
Maybe if you'd stop using Windows you'd have access to some better web browsers like luakit or xombrero or surf.
>>54101173
this faggot
>>54084962
>irrelevant
that's not an argument
>>54098520
I'm currently running this version:
>ChromiumPortable.paf.exe • 50.0.2657.0
and I'm loving it. Am I safe from the botnet though?
>>54084962
Safari you cunt.
Who cares about desktop browsers anyway?
Chrome is good on mobile.
>>54101629
Everybody that is actually old enough to browse this site.
Is Opera the new meme Browser?
>>54103752
No, that's Vivaldi
>>54084962
>XD bad political beliefs = bad software!
Firefox a besto
>>54090900
as much as I hate curry niggers, back to /pol/ faggot.
>recently download Chromium to patch apng support into it cause it's pissing me off that it doesn't have such a basic thing
>look up the patch
>find this
I mean, I'll be the first one to admit I'm no computer wizard whatsoever but I'm fairly competent at handling one. Even then I cannot understand any of these things. Not a single one.
What am I supposed to do with all this shit?
Does it have to be on Chromium exclusively and not Chrome?
>>54084962
>Firefox
>sluggish
No. Install a version with e10s, and disable SSL Observatory in your https everywhere addon. Firefox is plenty fast.
>>54084962
Edge doesn't play webm
about chrome anyway, did anyone else update to v50? now I'm getting some kind of barebone 4chan page for a split second or whole second when I f5 any catalog in 4chan
thought it was my pc, but I updated to v50 on another device and it does the same shit
annoying as fuck, anybody has a solution for that?
>>54107780
I'm using Chromium v50 and that happens too.
>>54107859
>>54107780
The new update is just utter shit. They also decided to reset all user settings and enable garbage like smooth scrolling again.
Not to mention that the autofilling box now has a font in BOLD which cannot be disabled.
Fuck Chrome.
>>54084998
You know what? Edge really isn't that bad.
The extension support is weak, but once that picks up it will be very viable.
I sometimes even use it now when I'm on my Windows machine.
>>54084962
>IE:
>+Pretty fast
At least you made it clear your post is b8
If you have to use Firefox, at least use a fork like Cyberfox.
