>GDDR5X
AMDFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
http://wccftech.com/rumor-nvidia-pascal-gtx-1080-gddr5x-gtx-1070-f-gddr5/
you mean 7.5
>>53990193
>wccftech.com
>rumor
I highly suggest you kill yourself, OP.
Is the RAM bandwidth something you'll notice if you play games at 1440p or above?
Or how does it make a difference.
I'll probably be more likely to get a 1070.
GTX 1080 will probably end up costing $1080.
>>53990288
WCcrtech
and into the water closet it goes
I'm sorry, pajeet, you weren't fast enough today, 46 cents has been deducted from your account
>>53990252
B _ T T H _ R T
Wanna buy a vowel?
>>53990401
I didn't get a 970 so my butt is not hurt
>GDDR5X(not even in volume production yet)
>under 400GB/s bandwidth
>wccftech rumor
Uhh, yeah.
>>53990193
whats gonna be the price tag of the 1070??
>>53990401
No, but I would like to buy a 970 with the specs they advertised.
>>53990252
Kek
>>53990639
Somewhere between $329(GTX 970 launch price) and $399 is the rumors
>>53990639
we dont know
>>53990685
nah more
>>53990193
can AMD fucking die already?
>>53990685
well, thats a bit too much. will 970 prices drop? or should I just buy AMD since I am poorfag and vulcan is already out?
>>53990725
AMD doesn't even support Vulkan 1.0.8
https://developer.nvidia.com/vulkan-driver
>Updated Vulkan API to 1.0.8
>posting curreynigger site
>any year
Both Polaris 10 (midrange) and the pascal 1080 will have a 256-bit memory bus. They will both be using the new GDDR5 modules that run at 8gbits so bandwidth on the new cards will effectively be 256 GB/s which is 15% more than the gtx 980
the pascal cards are a maxwell refresh on 16FF literally the only things being changed are the video engines on the front end for better shadowplay everything else is the same and it will not have Asynchronous-Compute Engines. The 1080 is a 980 with MAOR COARS and possible 4K, 60fps shadowplay capability and thats it. there is no GDDR5X on either AMD or nvidia cards this year so get that out of your heads you retarded faggots
Now onto the Polaris 10: it will have a 256-bit layout with 8gb of same clock VRAM like the gtx1080 but some radical shit has occured in AMD's design. they have redesigned most of the GPU and added a geometry processor and a primitive discard accelerator these two things will allow the polairs card to leverage its bandwidth better than the 1080 AND will give it a huge boost to tessellation performance while the 1080 will have the same tessellation capability of maxwell.
the layout of polaris shaders is similar in that they are structured same way into CU blocks that line up on the memory controllers, however AMD has redesigned the shaders themselves and boosted their efficiency. So even though the polaris 10 is gonna be around 2300-2500 shaders it will drastically outperform the 390 and 390X.
The Overclocking capability on Polaris will actually be much higher than pascal so a heavy OC'ed polaris 10 will actually curb stomp a 1080 and 980ti in applications where it isnt choked on bandwdith for example 1440p 144hz when you get to 1660p and 4K the 980ti will pull ahead
the polaris cards will be significantly more power efficient which will make them the go to GPU's for laptops but the efficiency wont be drastically better than pascal on desktop cards
>>53990749
we'll see
>>53990722
yeah, that would be really good for competition and lowering prices of GPU's. I guess you are Bernie supporter??
>>53990848
B A S E D
A
M
D
>>53990848
NOPE.AVI
Pascal supports compute preemption & 49bit virtual addressing, Maxwell2 does not
It's not Maxwell at all despite how many times you repeat the lies
>>53991071
until people like you wake up and stay woke to nvidia bullshit
>>53990193
will it run under 300w?
>you mean 7.5
Can you people stop with the .5 meme now? It's gotten old. Come up with something new.
>>53991130
Nvidia is superior to your dying, bankrupt worthless company with no drivers
>>53991071
>Pascal supports compute preemption & 49bit virtual addressing
no it does not. it still drops completely before the next switch they just tweaked the drivers to reduce the hang time. With AMD you can run both switches simultaneously
you retarded faggot. in order to run simultaneously Nvidia would have had to completely redesign their front end along similar lines to the ACE's on AMD's cards. the command processor and front end on pascal is identical to maxwell
>>53991175
No doubt it's superior at killing their cards with their superb drivers.
>>53991192
You don't even know fucking SHIT
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-pascal/
>Compute Preemption
>GP100 extends GPU addressing capabilities to enable 49-bit virtual addressing. This is large enough to cover the 48-bit virtual address spaces of modern CPUs, as well as the GPU’s own memory. Therefore, GP100 Unified Memory allows programs to access the full address spaces of all CPUs and GPUs in the system as a single virtual address space, unlimited by the physical memory size of any one processor.
>>53991194
Aww, AMD killed cards with their shitty Crimson killer drivers
>>53991246
It didn't kill them 4 times.
>when AMD is the RAM bandwidth king
nVidiafag: "Its arch is shitty and inefficient as fuck. AMD BTFO!!!"
>when nVidia is the RAM bandwidth king
nVidiafag: "Its arch is shitty and crippled as fuck. AMD BTFO!!!"
>>53990193
>gddr6x
>thinks hell get that in 2016
LOL micron just started shipping a BASIC PROTOTYPE you fuckwit keep on dreaming
>>53991231
>linked to nvidia marketing blog
hahaahhaa oh you pathetic faggot! the GP100 is a professional chip that will NEVER enter the consumer market GP102 which is the 1080 is literally NOTHING like that GPU you fucking retard
second, addressing is not the same as simultenous execution. all better adressing does is allow larger blocks to execute with fewer hangs which was occuring in maxwell BUT THE BLOCK STILL RUN IN SINGLE LINEAR SEQUENCE YOU STUPID FAGGOT THEY DONT RUN PARALLEL!
>>53991260
There was no 4 times
People just love to post lies about drivers
364.47 only had an installer bug that most people didn't experience when doing a Custom Install
364.51 works, 364.72 works
But hey, keep repeating the lies if it makes you feel better, AMDPOORFAG
>>53991307
What about the Fermi cards that literally caught fire?
>>53991300
https://forum.beyond3d.com/posts/1905723/
>GP100 is fully graphics capable. They aren't drawn on the diagrams, but it has display controllers, ROPs, etc.
STAY MAD, AMDPOORFAGS CLUELESS AS FUCKING RETARDS
So it's all going to be overpriced garbage and I should just buy an R9 390?
That's what I'm getting from all this.
>>53991316
That shitty review site overclocked it, it was intentional
>>53991332
Yes, buy the 390. Then wait for based Vega. Polaris is for poorfags like me.
>>53991335
Your distortion field seems quite powerful, I withdraw from this skirmish.
>>53991165
1x8 pin
>>53990193
>GDDR5X
Which doesn't even go into production until "summer", meaning this card would be about 5-6 months out still. That isn't happening.
Into the trash goes Currytech, as usual.
>>53990848
DELETE THIS
>>53990848
Maxwell already record 4K at 60FPS.
What do you think this is it? AMD?
>>53990848
Source: My ass
>>53990293
>if there will even be a 1080 or any gaming GPU this year or next
>>53990848
Wait what, choking at 1440p 144hz? Well, actually I can already do that in cs:go with my 970. Guess I'll just wait until I get a job before investing in my pc. I'm on a gap year and have been fucking around all the time, I don't think I'll be able to study anymore.
>>53990193
>gddr5x
does it mean all current mainboards don't support it or what?
>>53990193
>HBM doesn't make a difference, amdfags, who needs more memory bandwidth? it's not a limiting factor anyway
>nvidia's new GPU is gonna have GDDR5X, which has more bandwidth, it's so much better, suck it amdfags
You people are seriously retarded.
But you guys also consider the GTX 970, the worst disaster in GPU launch history, the GPU that still today comes with defectve memory, to be a good product, so it's no surprise that you're retarded.
>>53992531
no, the 4GB was the issue
>>53992531
>970
>the worst disaster in GPU launch history
You spend too much times on /g/
>>53992726
this, the 970 has literally been the best selling GPU on the market since it came out
>>53991071
>Pascal supports compute preemption
what a joke, I laughed at Jen-Hsun when he said that was a big fucking deal in his presentation.
preemption is still a full context switch, just one that can be externally directed (by a timer or whatever) instead of being spliced into the shader instructions by the driver.
async compute shader scheduling, the real goal, allows the GPU to interleave shaders on a clock-by-clock basic for each compute unit with needlessly flushing state.
Nvidia's GPUs really are stripped down garbage that are made to shine via intense host-side software tweaking.
why do they keep calling the 1080 as the flagship?
why do they act like the ti version doesn't exist?
the 1080 isn't the flagship. the 1080 ti will be. the 1080 might be the fastest for gp104 but it is not the series flagship.
man wccftech is garbage.
>>53992763
When will your memers learn that async is only useful when your pipelines are idling.
>>53992846
It'll be the flagship until AMD releases something faster, just like with the 680, 780 and 980.
>shipping in Q2 2017
>>53990313
but but how will my family eat this week?
I have an old motherboard (Gigabyte z68-adpd3). and an i7 2600k. Can I even get the 1070 or do I need to upgrade these first...?
Sorry if it's a dumb question.
>>53992982
>i7 2600k
nah, it's alright
>>53993045
Really? I was expecting a no since it's pretty old
What about the MOBO? Or does it not matter?
>>53993087
You will lose like 1-5fps...also your 2600k is a fuking good CPU, probably the best ever made.
>nvidia being relevant when they can't even fix a driver for several months now
t. nvidia user
>>53992906
no, this summer
>>53990193
Nope after their latest driver fuckup and stupid sabotage of older cards they can get fucked.
I am getting a 490 or waiting until everyone offloads their 390x cheap
>>53994622
>sabotage of older cards
stop this meme anon
>>53994633
some games gained performance but alot of them lost it
>>53993341
ill give nvidia until june july and then i am swapping to amd
>>53994622
have you conveinient forgotten that AMD released a card killing driver with crimson's first WHQL release?
lost a 390x to that shit, sold the other one i had and replaced it with a 980ti. fuck AMD.
>>53994642
Your dumb fucking fault for not monitoring temps mate.
Drivers only kill cards if they overheat.
Ive lost plenty of nvidia cards to driver fuckups over the years and only one amd card a 290
>16gb hmb2
Kek AMD btfo
Shame it will cost like $1000usd+
>>53992857
>only usefull on an idling pipeline
*sigh* you dumb faggot the most important feature of async is that if you have the engines to execute in simultaneously in parallel you can dramatically reduce FRAME LATENCY which is a massive deal ESPECIALLY for VR you dingus
>>53992726
>le_cherrypicked_benchmarks.png
>>53994737
>dem amd minimum fps
Isnt ROSTR a fucking amd game?
Dafug?
>>53994639
>improve visual fidelity of games
>give users better options / sliders
>WHY CANT MY CARD MAX OUT THESE NEW SETTINGS AFTER THE UPDATE NVIDIA MUST BE GIMPING MY CARD REEEEEEEEE
The card doesn't start miraculously performing worse just as a function of time alone.
>>53994737
Oh nevermind only the 4gb cards shat themselves due to maxing out vram
>>53990193
Stick it into your rectum, give me the HBM2 card instead.
>>53992982
i7-2XXX + Z77
Best combo ever
Get something like the Maximus V Formula, I got mine for 80 € last year, this thing has more USBs and SATAs than some of the current gen boards
Running a 3770K on it, 10 % worse performance than a 6700K
Won't upgrade until somewhen 2018, when the first 8core 7820K arrives
>>53994714
you mean how nvidia has been doing since forever.
If NVIDIA is so good why are they late to Direct X every single time
First DX10.x then DX11 now DX12 and hardware Async
What the fuck.
Back in the peak DX11 days 2010-2015 they made great cards but they have fallen behind AGAIN
>>53994820
nvidia hasn't fallen behind at all, AMD just caught up and reached parity.
what happens with the 14nm is still up and the air, but if the rumors about polaris being a 232mm2 die that means AMD won't even be releasing a competitor to the 1070/1080 cards and will instead be releasing a 480/480x tier card.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd-nv-glvk&num=2
>>53992440
Computers aren't an investment unless you use them to make money.
>>53994737
>fury x
>19fp
kek, what a overgyped shit card
>>53994762
yes LOL it's where AMD did hair texture that nobody did before etc
>>53994762
RotTR's highest texture setting uses >4GB VRAM at 1080p (and warns you of that when select it). Obviously Nvidia's driver handles that a lot better than AMD's one does, as the cuck card and the 980 have much better minimums.
And no, it's not an AMD game. Quite the opposite in fact, it's a GoyWorks game. The hair technology used is no longer an AMD thing.
>>53995942
Wait wasnt the first one a AMD game?
Fucking hell nvidia baiting games
>>53992969
POO
>>53995964
Yes. The first one used TressFX, which was co-developed by AMD and Crystal Dynamics. RotTR's hair technology isn't credited to anybody, so is presumably something CD did in-house.
>>53996017
MOUTH
I think /g/ needs a rule against flamewars like /v/ has
>>53996034
>wanting one of the last decent boards to become like /v/ and /tv/
Fuck that
>>53996056
It would improve quality, just look at this thread:
>LE AMDKEK XD XD
Shitposters need to be banned
>>53996064
Doesnt work they just come back under a proxy or different ip
>>53990288
>anime
Kill yourself first weeaboo faggot
>>53990252
DELETE THIS
>>53990252
7.5/8
>>53990848
>it's another adoredtv episode
Tfw I've actually been doing my own research on all of this and you're wrong in every single point.
>>53994737
>le cherry picking benchmarks
>>53994662
There was one Nvidia driver that'd overvolt but only on GTX 590s, not just overheat.
>>53995046
>inb4 Polaris 11 is 232mm2 and Polaris 10 is 369mm2
>>53991052
B A M D
A
S
E
D
Nvidia on DX12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zK2BUeYqLVI
still killing gpus with drivers
http://wccftech.com/nvidias-latest-game-ready-driver-allegedly-killing-gpus-plagued-issues/
>>53998274
DELETE THIS
>>53998274
Quantum break doesn't count because reasons.
(reason being if Nvidia isn't winning the game doesn't count)
>>53998374
neither does ashes or any future dx12 titles, right?
>>53998274
this game is such an unoptimized buggy mess it should be banned till the devs fix it. every midrange card could get atleast 60 fps on high settings at 1080p before this game. to play QB at 60fps at 1080p you need a fucking £550 card. fuck that shit.
>>53998374
>believing anything wwcftech
>x70 buyers are bandwidth cucked
>again
>>53996997
posting this on anime site :^)
>>53998408
I'm glad you understand anon.
>>53998454
>>53990848
t. Pajeet
>>53998637
>async yeilds 30% gains
The future is bright.
>falling for the Pascal/Polaris meme
This is the gimped generation. Literally buying into underpowered, planned obsolescence hardware if you get this shit.
>>53998665
Future is so bright i'm going to need sunglasses.
>>53998653
see>>53998409
ayymdrones will defend shitty optimization and poor performance just to say they finally have a small victory over nvidia
>>53998665
not really. the only 2 games to use async are hitman and ashes of singularity which both happen to be marketed by amd. when the big games start coming at the end of the year 90% of them will be nvidia partnered, as they usually are, and the devs won't be bothered to optimize for async. it's not an easy process as most amd fans think it is anyway.
>>53998702
Wait the Fury X is that much faster than a 980ti??
>>53998796
In ashes of the singularity, yes. Hitman as well.
>>53998733
why is amd doing better in AAA games too??? what the fuck is going on nvidiabros? i thought nvidia drivers were suppose to increase our performance not make it worse, how AMD can run gameworks better?? grrr
>buy AMD
>spend most of the card's lifetime suffering worse performance than Nvidia on the majority of games
>put up with games that dont support AMD hardware properly
Nvidia is still the safer bet
Frametimes is everything
Look at the glorious Fiji card.
>>53998963
Is that pre or post patch?
>>53998861
>its an ayymdrone saying the same things again episode
everyone knows, except ayymdrones who always fail to educate themselves, that the 1.3 patch caused shader problems on nvidia cards but was patched literally 2 days later via a driver update.
you're losing this discussion. try again.
>>53992726
So given that I have a MSI 770 Lightning whatever
do I SLI another or fuck myself in the asshole with a $900 bill for whatever comes out this gen?
I'm not all that impressed with the progress made in 2.5 years
Would it be smart to buy amd this year? Most titles in dx12 seem to perform better on on amd and use async compute more.
>>53999045
>that the 1.3 patch caused shader problems on nvidia cards but was patched literally 2 days later via a driver update.
source or i'm going to have to call bullshit.
>inb4 my dad works at nvidia and told me
>>53998963
>Those unstable frame jumps all over the place from the amd card
>Ncidia staying stable around a certain framerate range
Wew lad.
>>53998861
>>53998963
>>53998807
I might just do it
>>53999095
>Polaris 490x in 2 months
>Buying a Nano
Nano will probably be rebranded to a 480x or something and massively drop in price
>>53999057
i cant find it right now since its buried deep in some beyond3d analysis forum.
the general problem was the update broke the day one driver optimizations on nvidia cards but it was resolved quickly hence why every fallout 4 benchmark conducted now has better performance on nvidia cards.
>>53999095
Nah, skip fiji - its scaling like shit over hawaii. The fury x has 45% more shaders and a shitload more bandwith than a 290x but is only 25-30% faster on average.
>>53999181
>Nah, skip AMD
fixed that for you.
>>53999283
A driver gimping a year keeps the goyim in fear.
>>53999283
/thread
I'm still using an AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB from my build I made in 2012. I want to upgrade when the new VR shit hits second gen or maybe when the new gpus come out.
I don't think I could go AMD again, their new crimson drivers are shit tier, I rolled back to catalyst because they were bugging my games out and crashing my system.
I haven't used Nvidia in ages are their drivers as bloated and shitty or are they decent now-a-days?
>>53999339
Nvidia drivers starts givin problems 2years in the hardware release..
but there are many nvidia users that just disable the new drivers updates.
>>53999339
lol
>>53999339
Nvidia drivers are flawless, I had 40 different Nvidia GPUs and never had a driver issue, while I had 9 AMD GPUs, 7 of them died on me and the others got bricked by awful drivers.
>>53999339
generally nvidia drivers are better and have more frequent releases than amd. if you think crimson is shit tier then nvidia will be good tier. im using a 980 right now and haven't had a single driver problem.
When will Nvidia give us this slider?
>>53999374
Damage control incoming
>>53999181
Seriously, why did they even bother to bring out such a card?
>>53999380
>Nvidia drivers are flawless, I had 40 different Nvidia GPUs and never had a driver issue, while I had 9 AMD GPUs, 7 of them died on me and the others got bricked by awful drivers.
>The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
>>53999448
>(You)
>Backpedalling this hard
>>53999448
>ayymd are the best! anyone who has bad experiences is a liar and an nvidia shill!
this damage control lmao
HBM memory is the future get with the times nerds
>>53999468
>>53999453
Lol, I just have trouble believing someone has had 49 different GPUs.
>>53999409
pathetic effort, Rajesh. The latest driver for HD 5000/6000 cards is barely 6 weeks old.
https://support.amd.com/en-us/kb-articles/Pages/AMD-Radeon-Software-Crimson-Edition-16.2.1-for-Non-GCN-Products-Release-Notes.aspx
>>53999448
Amd has been known since the dawn of time to always have shittier drivers and driver support in general than nvidia. Not even shilling, I'm posting this from an amd hd card.
>>53999530
>"AMD’s brand new Crimson Driver update was a much welcomed update for many – but it also spells the end of support for some Radeon owners – namely those with a graphic card older than GCN. These include Radeons built on the VLIW4 and VLIW5 architecture and have been shifted to “Legacy” status following the Crimson update. However, AMD has promised a one-last driver support, given as-is, with its Crimson update. Not a bad way to send off legacy hardware at all, considering that legacy users will still be able to glimpse what Crimson has to offer."
>"However, AMD has promised a one-last driver support, given as-is, with its Crimson update."
pathetic effort, Rajesh.
>>53999560
Do they pay you to be misinformed?
15.11 was the crimson update
16.1 is also compatible with HD5000/6000
16.2.1 is, too
>>53992531
>gtx 970
>that bad
really? what's up this the "gtx 970" sucks thing?
>>53999583
are you a fucking retard? they said themselves in their changelog that they're killing support.
ayymdrones defend amd so much they'll even deny things their beloved company tells them.
>>53998626
>":^)“
Kill yourself
>>53999615
gtx 970 is one of nvidia's biggest successes, it's a fantastic card and it still plays most games at good settings on 4k with with 50+ fps. Since the majority of /g/ are amd shills, they just can't shut up about le 3.5 gb meme, even though most games barely use anything more than 3 vram.
>>53999627
yet they already provided 2 more updates and probably will continue to do so.
Legacy drivers are just less frequent. They didn't abandon the product.
>>53999627
you got rekt you dumb nvidiot shitposter, face the facts
>>53999678
i guarantee you those drivers are just small stability updates for the older cards. i still get those with my old x1950 pro but any game problems i have aren't fixed with the drivers. the same will go for the 5000 and 6000 series. if anyone using those cards is having problems in any game, none of the catalyst drivers will fix those problems for those people.
>>53999727
>he's denying what his own beloved company have said
top kek, ayymdrones everyone.
>>53990193
>8gb vram
>WEW HOW AMAZING!
Cant even fill 4gb except with like one game.
>>53999656
gonna need some citation on that buddy
>>53999742
Had problems launching EA Battlefront in fullscreen mode on a 6970. Installed 16.2.1 and it fixed the problem. Now the game runs just fine with no issues.
>x1950
>driver updates
what the fuck are you smoking? That's a 10 year old card.
>>53999773
not him but very very few games use more than 3/4 gb vram at 1080p or even 1440p. vram is almost never the limiting factor in a gpu. you'll run out of juice before you hit vram problems. nvidia and intel (igpu) also have very good texture compression. amd less so hence why they always require more vram. its funny, because the guy who made the texture compression used in intel igpu and nvidia gpu was an amd employee, and they still don't use it.
>>53999770
>buy 8gb vram meme card for "future proofing"
>future time comes
>vram is enough but gpu is too weak
top kek
>>53999742
do you think nvidia or amd are adding substantial improvements to old cards with the new drivers?
its just for enabling support for something like windows 10 etc.
>mfw nvitards think just because the release notes on new drivers say they support some old card it's actually an improvement over something
the installer detects your shitty old card and probably just adds newer released games in the drop drown list in the manage 3d settings menu, nothing more
>>53999817
>nvidia card on the other hand is already deprecated at launch
tip kuck
>>53999809
I wasn't looking for citation on the vram issue, but rather the 50fps at 4k
what settings? low as dick?
>>53990252
Bahahahhahahahhahahha it sounds impossible but hay it's happened before!
>>53999817
>"future proofing"
> In the future, i might need this even tho its not an issue now, QUICK! Must buy this overly expensive piece of hardware while its still overly expensive because i may need it someday and will certainly not be able to buy it later!
Straight up autism
>>53999802
>Had problems launching EA Battlefront in fullscreen mode on a 6970. Installed 16.2.1 and it fixed the problem. Now the game runs just fine with no issues.
stablility updates, like i said.
>what the fuck are you smoking? That's a 10 year old card.
some drivers are compatible. downloaded one like 2 months back which stopped on screen artifacting in some applications.
>>53999825
>mfw ayymdrones think just because the release notes on new drivers say they support some old card it's actually an improvement over something
kek, just like
>>53999678
>>53999727
>>53999530
>>53999583
>>53999809
> nvidia and intel (igpu) also have very good texture compression.
>amd less so hence why they always require more vram
Skipping highscool today huh
>>53999844
>new drivers fix problems
>b... but it's not real driver support
what do you want? a blowjob with every update?
>>53999890
>amd less so, hence..
>basic english
>>53999894
yeah when you get gimped by goyworks lets see those crimson drivers fix the performance on your ancient card :^)
>>53999890
>highscool
>>53999952
I wasnt replying for your third grade writing ability but for your retarded comment
Weren't vidya cards supposed to be announced this month?
>>53999964
see >>53999915
its basic fucking English, what are you like 12?
>>53999773
>>53999832
Here you go. Playing one of the most demanding pc games at 4k with good enough settings https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUnO0c1GEc8
>>53999829
I was talking about nvidia, retard
>>53999842
well with nvidia you can pay 1000$ now and hope it'll last for a few years or pay 1000$ every year lel
>>54000011
>pay $1000 every year
Why the fuck would anyone upgrade their gpu every year? Neither nvidia nor amd even release new architectures that fast, it takes years for them to develop them. You're also thinking about the titan x, which is regarded as the worst price per performance card on the market. Everybody goes for the ti model, this isn't anything new. The shilling in this thread just keeps getting dumber and dumber.
>>54000027
>implying we don't do this just to get emotionally sensitive autist who get attached to physical objects
and it seems to be working, thanks for feeding me anon xd
>>53999986
go back to r/dyslexia you autist
>>53999987
thanks. I figured not ultra or very high all around, so this is in line with my thoughts
thanks for not sucking huge hair horse cock like most of the shitposting sperglords that lurk these threads
>>54000065
>>53999930
>limit tessellation
>runs just fine
:^)
>>54000046
>i was le trolleing all along! you feell in my trap anone, thats why im smarter than u
fuck off.
>>53999837
Check pic and link for 7.5
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-geforce-gtx-1080-gp104-gpu/
>>54000095
>implying that has ever fully solved the problem
enjoy that significantly worse performance :^)
>>54000113
enjoy being butthurt :^)
![snapshot_07.03_[2015.07.28_02.25.17].png](https://i.imgur.com/DjfTFFd.jpg "snapshot_07.03_[2015.07.28_02.25.17].png")
>>53990722
how about you to kill yourself?
>>53990193
Rumors are that Polaris10 is also using GDDR5X.
I don't believe either of the rumours, it's still too early for GDDR5X, unless the 1080/Polaris10 are both pushed back to ~august/september
>>54000157
gddr5x wont be in cards till atleast mid 2017. even the amd fanboys on youtube admit it wont be on any amd card this year. they still havent even send out the gddr5x test samples to amd and nvidia yet
>>53990193
>had an FX5200
>had a gtx 590
>had a gtx 670
>bought a 970
Leaning AMD this time around....
unreliable source and it's a rumor
why do you continue to breathe
>>53999409
>m-muh placebo drivers on old GPUs
>>54000157
HBM1 is still a possibility for Polaris 10.
>>53996997
>>53990288
Speaking of rumors and predictions - what are chances that Nvidia would release 1060 along with 1070 and 1080? And if so, should I get 960 now or wait?
>>54000560
If you get a card now at least get a 970 so you can do VR. Everything lower is deprecated at this point.
>>54000568
But 960 would cost me 900 PLN while 970 cost 1500 PLN.
>>54000341
No it's not, AMD drivers are defining it as an 8GB card.
HBM is off the table.
>>54000267
>FX5200
My first Fermi was a GT530, it was an amazing gaming experience for me. Maxed out CoD4 on 1280x800.
Unfortunately I boght a Gsync screen so AMD would be a waste unless I want to loose the money for the screen, its worth only half of the original price used.
>>53999809
Every game from last year I play uses over 4gb on occasion at 1440p. I always check my maxes after i get off a game.
>>54000823
if you have a 4gb card it won't. if you have a card with more ram the game will just cache more.
when its said that the game wont use more than 4gb it means the game doesn't need more than 4gb to run effectively. hell, most games still run well on 2gb 750 ti and 960.
>>53990193
>GDDR5X
>not HBM
Preorder cancelled. I'll sit out the Pascal meme and feel content with my SLI 980Tis, thank you.
>>53990193
The 1080 stands for 1080p because you won't be able to play the latest games in 4K or even 2K with just one of them. Don't fall for the Pascal meme, kiddos.
Also don't fall for the AMD meme either. They're not some kind of underdog, they're the prime supplier for console peasants and doing just fine right now.
>>54000581
>>54000560
Please respond.
I was planning on upgrading whole machine around June.
>>54001006
get whichever you can afford. if you can afford the 970 then get it since it would last longer than the 960
>>53990749
Then how come the last three Crimson drivers had specific Vulkan support?
Fucking stop lying.
>>53990401
I buy an "a"
>>53991246
How so?
>>54001244
When you overclocked with Msi afterburner, it conflicted with the drivers fan control and locked it at low speeds.
>>54000788
lol everyone, this faggot got literally cuck-locked into vendor specific trash trap
thats hilarious
>>54001333
I have had no problem overclocking my R9 390, the fan had no trouble keeping the card cool.
However, my case has a very good airflow, can you cite your source?
>>54001634
that afterburneer software has always been trash, its literally vlc popular for reasons even though I have read how awful it is for almost a decade now
>>53999095
Nah don't do it. Cards like that will be entry level next year because of the movement to mass adoption VR.
>>54001634
There was no evidence of the fan bug actually killing cards beyond a random twitter post. For a long time gpu's have had thermal protection baked into the silicon to prevent non working fans killing cards (fun fact: the overwhelming majority of gpus don't even car if a fan is plugged in or not, whereas if a cpu doesn't detect fan it will refuse to boot).
I actually tested this on ym 290x due to my ow nstupidity - I had removed and cleaned my tri-x cooler but didn't screw it down enough so theh eatsink wasn't making contact with the gpu core. It would thermally shutdown basically after booting into windows.
Kinda fucking stupid how you guys make this same thread every day of the week and it's usually the same bullshit being posted over and over. Just cause you can't wait for 2 fucking months.
I swear to FUCKING GOD DAMN if they call it the 1080 someone at nvidia is goong to lose their balls
>>54001703
Fine. We'll call it the nVidia X80
>>54001701
make that 8 months
nobody in their right mind will buy into the polaris/1080 ruse
>>54001687
I remember after one of nvidia's driver updates geforce cards would go for max fps on the main menu and something about 2d clocks/fan not activating would cause the cards to fry and not shut off, I think it was starcraft 2, a popular game at the time, not far from launch so it was a big deal
>he's gonna buy the nvidia fermi 2.0
>>54001776
The nvidya GTX80
>>54001776
>>54001840
>>54001862
No, they will go oldschool and called it the Nvidia TNT series.
>>53992749
The only reason that's the case is because it was cheaper with the similar/slight+ performance to the most performing and expensive card of the time(first $1000 titan remember?) and people saw it as a deal but in reality it wasn't as planned since Nvidia sets the prices and AMD wouldn't come to play for another year. Nvidia picks the right time/price that benefits them the most to sell GPUs unlike AMD, then fuck every early adopter like they did with the titan z and 980 ti,it's all marketing tactics anon and people keep eating that shit up.
>>54001840
>le nvidia fermi
This meme is outdated as fuck by now. Both amd and nvidia cards overclock equally as well and run at good temps. Both companies had some disasters before, true, but it's better now.
>>54001912
if not the Z than one of the other titian,there too many damn titans
>>54001964
>too many damn titans
There are only 2. Once again, AMD shills blowing things out of proportion. This is why I don't take advice from this site, it's just constant shilling.
>>54001989
>titan
>titan black
>titan z
>titan x
>>54001989
titan,titan black,titan x and titan z
>>54002011
>let me list all titans in the past 10 years
It's the same shit, just rebranded to fit with the card arch it's from. Every year they play around with the name a bit, but the card itself never changes. The only two different titans from each other are the titan z and x.
>>54001989
titan, titan black, titan z, titan x
with no distinguishable naming scheme to know which is newer, better etc.
>shills
its clear you are both retarded and butthurt
everywhere on the internet there will be more people claiming nvidia is better since there are currently more people using them than the other competitor and they have a more worthy "brand"
go back to gpuboss
you don't know shit
>>54001931
>he doesn't know
>>54002011
>mfw titan y
>>53990193
They haven't even started mass production of GDDR5X
>>54000780
You can stack HBM1 to 2GB per stack.
>>54003182
No, you can't - that the whoel reason Fiji is limited to 4GB, even on FirePro models which are usually 16GB.
No HBM, No GDDR5X, just regular old GDDR5.
Well it's good GDDR5 for AMD, since they haven't shipped a GDDR5 product with 7000+ MT/s yet.
http://videocardz.com/59013/nvidia-already-sending-invitations-for-pascal-launch-to-the-press
IT'S OVER, AMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
"Wait for next GEN cards, don't buy the rebranded 290!!!!!!!!!!"
>3.5 years later.
>14/16mm cards released.
>overheat, due to less heat spread.
>performance increased as much as Intel's jump to a smaller fab on the CPU side.
>memory is just a hair faster than what the 390 already puts out.
>>54003529
maximum paperlaunch
>/g/
>every product release
>it's over, x release y, z is finished
>literally nothing happens
>minor improvements on previous model
>much bigger price
>nothing changes
>/g/ still gobble it all up
>why.
>>54003710
Marketing is a very powerful tool and /g/ is full of consumer whores.
>>54003727
I used to work for a UK computer components retailer and one of the three guys in marketing always had a couple forums and stuff open and would constantly shill the retailer we worked for. I would have told him about /g/ but it's already full of manufacturers doing it and it's not primarily British people on here.
They're not announcing anything because it would make people stop buying cards/become waitfags, and for good reason. Prices will drop on old cards and we'll get higher performance cards for cheap (i.e. ~350 midrange Polaris 11).
Waiting has officially become worth it.
>>53999890
>> nvidia and intel (igpu) also have very good texture compression.
>>amd less so hence why they always require more vram
Except AMD's texture compression works in-memory too, unlike Nvidia's. (don't know about intel, they're a fucking joke in the GPU space)
>>53990193
>>GDDR5X
NVIDIAFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>53999046
Polaris 11 desu
>>54004050
>overclockers.co.uk
We're onto you.
>>53990722
>can the only competitor nVidia has die already?
>that will definitely inspire nVidia to make better products
I hope you're not actually this retarded
>>54004050
>chillblast
i fucking knew it
>>53998861
>>53999057
>>53999148
Holy fuck anon you are a huge retard. The patch 1.3 added the Nvidia Flex debris effect which runs on Physx and only available on Nvidia cards
What AdoredTV shill forgot to mention to you in that retarded video is that he has that enabled for Nvidia cards.
