https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium
What do you guys think of this? I'm honestly surprised by the amount of effort behind blocking all these communications only to be still uncertain that there isn't a call that was missed. I'm also surprised that you have to recompile the browser to fucking change anything at all with it even to fucking remove the profile management button.
Oh sweet. I fucking hate that button. The rest I couldn't give a rip, but this.
This is good.
>>53905250
There's actually a better patch that keeps the incognito man in incognito mode if you want that. https://github.com/Akujin/chromium-disable-profile-button-patch I guess this can be a chromium patch general.
>>53905313
Now, say I'm a lazy man. How could I set this patch up once so it automagically updates when synaptic decides i need a new version of Chromium?
>>53905354
Well I'm not to sure how apt works as I'm on Gentoo, but I'm pretty sure you have manually compile updates yourself and make debs. You'd need something like portage to automatically update a program and apply a patch.
>>53904547
bumping because you posted a really good girl (not the best girl but still really good)
GOOGLEBOTS BTFO ONCE AGAIN
>>53905623
>not optimizing the PNG before uploading
>>53905670
>Butchering the quality
I can see your pngquant, asshole.
>>53905519
As usual, gentoo shows itself to be superior to every other distro in every single way.
>>53905725
>As usual, gentoo shows itself to be superior to every other distro in every single way.
Yup, it's quite easy to patch an ebuild too, using epatch. I have just submitted a feature request to the gentoo team to add some of those patches.
>>53905670
I see artifacts, see me after class and tell your parents to meet me next week.
The issue with "ungoogling" Chromium has always been a balance between privacy and features.
For example, the omnibar's autocomplete functionality simply cannot work without sending what you type to a web server for analysis, the same reason you can't get autocomplete results on Google's page without them reading what you're typing in.
So to correct this "privacy concern", the only answer is to either send the data through another web service (which only passes the privacy concern onto another party) or remove the feature entirely. And at that point, you're just making a worse version of Chromium.
>>53905623
>>53904547
>>53905670
>Posting Sakurako
M-more like Sluturako, hmph!!
>>53906058
You stop it right now, Sakurako is qt
tfw so many cute pics in my cute pics folder I can't find a pic of her ;-;
>>53906159
>Not keeping intricately sorted folders between seasons, shows and girls
O I'm laffin
>>53905313
No, /g/ has enough generals. Don't call it a general just call it a patch thread holy crap.
>>53906379
Ok General /g/ I will not call this a general.
>>53905670
I just have to say thank you so fucking much for being autistic about optimising anime .pngs.
My internet is really fucking shit and they already take long enough to load in the first place.
>>53906235
I need to accomplish this
>>53905914
Other browsers have autocompletion feature without the botnet because the algorithm is a client-side part of the browser. It doesn't look through google without you telling it to, which is an option in many cases, and otherwise an actual search bar is provided alongside the url bar, as it fucking should be.
>posting basic ass bitches
Y'all niggas ain't shit, cuz.
Also, that's pretty cool OP. What about Windows builds?
>>53907070
>wanting to debotnet the browser on botnet os
Anon I think ms is going to do just as much harm as google will.
>>53907070
>Wants a de-botnetted browser
>Uses a botnet OS
J U S T
>>53907094
>use WinXP
>no adware and very little spyware, if at all
Not that it matters, I've gone full GNU+Linux
The fact that this guy could have snuck in a backdoor, just a few lines of code, anywhere in those thousands of class files
its more unsettling than the fact that chromium might send some scant data to google servers
>>53907190
You compile from source.
The patches are only a few lines long.
If you actually read what some of the scripts do, it's very clear he's for the safety of the user.
Also:
>Not compiling from source
>>53907244
>implying that simply because you have the ability to compile from source it means there isn't anything malicious in the source code
Shit needs to be reviewed, senpai-tachi.
>Disabled searching in Omnibox
>Disabled automatic formatting of URL in Omnibox
>Disabled persistent per-site settings in Preferences file
Why the fuck?
>>53906026
Kek
>>53907274
You don't have to use all the patches you mong.
>>53907273
Did you even read what I typed
>>53907322
>>53907322
o-oh
i'm sorry
i'm blind
>>53904547
finally, fuck
now i can use the browser with the BLAZING FAST JS ENGINE again without google tracking me
>>53907244
>>Not compiling from source
>The build process takes about 3 hours on a i5-3550 CPU @ 3.90GHz and 16GB ram. (without ccache)
Yeah, fuck that.
>>53908416
Learn some patience you fucking millennial faggot. Do something else during those 3 hours. Or do it overnight
>>53908416
>single-threaded compile
>2016
>>53908544
>lol just have some patience and wait 3 hours before using the internet!
>>53908566
Found the inbred everybody!
>>53908594
This was the first time you've seen a mirror?
>>53908544
>>53908594
Anon you're not making any sense.
>>53907273
People will independently review this particular patchset coming simply from a curiosity/general intel/ perspective. Unusual situation tbqh
