ITT we try to make that falcon tripfag update his furrycucks /g/uide
>Decentraleyes
>A Firefox add-on that emulates Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) locally by intercepting requests, finding the required resource and injecting it into the environment.
>If you're using uMatrix, Edit in and Commit these lines to My rules in the Dashboard:* ajax.aspnetcdn.com script allow
* ajax.googleapis.com script allow
* ajax.microsoft.com script allow
* cdn.jsdelivr.net script allow
* cdnjs.cloudflare.com script allow
* code.jquery.com script allow
* lib.sinaapp.com script allow
* libs.baidu.com script allow
* upcdn.b0.upaiyun.com script allow
* yandex.st script allow
>menu filter
>Keep your menus in check by filtering out items you never use.
Feel free to suggest more.
> using firefox in 2013+3
http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/04/noscript-and-other-popular-firefox-add-ons-open-millions-to-new-attack/
Why even bother
>>53897273
Or what? Chrom[e, ium]? No fucking thank you
>>53897273
Thanks for the reddit link bruh
>>53897401
http://www.ghacks.net/2016/04/06/firefox-cross-extension-vulnerability-discovered/
Just Google the shit. It's all over
>>53897374
Well, they're more secure. I roll with iradium, by far best browser
>>53897472
They also have big privacy problems. Chrome's are well-documented. You may remember a while back Google pushed a blob into Chromium (not just into Chrome, into Chromium) that recorded you and sent the results back to them, supposedly for some voice-control/Google Now kind of project.
Also Chrome looks like Chrome and there's no way to make it look like anything else. Which is a problem because it looks like ass.
>>53897273
>>53897461
>need to install a trojanized extension for this to even apply
FUD for people to push WebExtensions and chromefaggotry further.
>>53897461
I don't need to google this shit. Have you even bothered to read the links you posted? This isn't even a vulnerability by definition and anybody with at least a 2 digit IQ knows things have been like this for a motherfucking decade.
>>53897472
you dropped your tinfoil hat
>>53897569
It's a minor issue but webextensions are a good idea anyway. XUL addons are holding back progress.
>>53897273
>>53897461
This is not actually a flaw it's just the nature of how these addons work. These old addons are not run in a sandbox like chromium addons they have the same limits as firefox itself and can do almost everything that firefox can. This makes them way more powerful than chromium addons but it can also lead to danger. This is why AMO audits all of their addons and it's also why Mozilla wants to strictly enforce addon signing. The eventual plan is to completely disable these kinds of addons and hopefully everyone will move over to webextensions by that time.
