>A study by Stanford University has shown that human volunteers demonstrated "physiological arousal" when a robot instructed them to touch it up.
>The research found humans instructed to touch a two-foot tall robot on the buttocks
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/05/human_arousal_touching_robot_private_areas/
Literally nothing wrong with this
You're on a website that has like half a dozen boards devoted to jacking it to cartoons and you think this is news?
>>53892590
Wew lad
AI robo sex dolls when?
>>53892637
Soon but aren't you frightened that a cold dead humanoid robot is capable of causing arousal in humans?
>>53892759
My vibrator causes me Arousal. Why can't a robot?
>>53892908
fagit
>>53892590
Fucking Top Kek
>>53892637
>>53892590
would be a pretty convenient fetish
>>53892482
>>53892759
I've fapped to similar
>>53892590
>>53892590
>>53892590
>>53892759
It's not about the robot arousing humans, you nematode, it's primarily the association of the act combined with the descriptions given.
I doubt they could replicate the exact results with instructions like
>place your hand along panel 8
>>53892759
Donno.I only get aroused by Cartoon porn these days.
>>53892393
>touch a two-foot tall robot on the buttocks
everyone is a pedo
Isn't arousal just as much our mental connection to "doing something sexy or forbidden" as it is actually doing that thing?
I mean a lot of people train themselves to get aroused in certain situations, even if it isn't necessarily sexual in the beginning.
Getting aroused by touching a robot if it asks inappropriately is not that different than getting aroused by watching porn.
